scholarly journals Oil droplet breakup during pressure swirl atomization of food emulsions: Influence of atomization pressure and initial oil droplet size

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Taboada ◽  
Ann‐Christin Schäfer ◽  
Heike P. Karbstein ◽  
Volker Gaukel
Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Martha L. Taboada ◽  
Esteban Zapata ◽  
Heike P. Karbstein ◽  
Volker Gaukel

The goal of this study was to investigate oil droplet breakup in food emulsions during atomization with pressure swirl (PS), internal mixing (IM), and external mixing (EM) twin-fluid atomizers. By this, new knowledge is provided that facilitates the design of atomization processes, taking into account atomization performance as well as product characteristics (oil droplet size). Atomization experiments were performed in pilot plant scale at liquid volume flow rates of 21.8, 28.0, and 33.3 L/h. Corresponding liquid pressures in the range of 50–200 bar and air-to-liquid ratios in the range of 0.03–0.5 were applied. Two approaches were followed: oil droplet breakup was initially compared for conditions by which the same spray droplet sizes were achieved at constant liquid throughput. For all volume flow rates, the strongest oil droplet breakup was obtained with the PS nozzle, followed by the IM and the EM twin-fluid atomizer. In a second approach, the concept of energy density EV was used to characterize the sizes of resulting spray droplets and of the dispersed oil droplets in the spray. For all nozzles, Sauter mean diameters of spray and oil droplets showed a power-law dependency on EV. PS nozzles achieved the smallest spray droplet sizes and the strongest oil droplet breakup for a constant EV. In twin-fluid atomizers, the nozzle type (IM or EM) has a significant influence on the resulting oil droplet size, even when the resulting spray droplet size is independent of this nozzle type. Overall, it was shown that the proposed concept of EV allows formulating process functions that simplify the design of atomization processes regarding both spray and oil droplet sizes.


Author(s):  
Martha L. Taboada ◽  
Doll Chutani ◽  
Heike P. Karbstein ◽  
Volker Gaukel

AbstractThe goal of this study was to investigate the changes in oil droplet size in whey protein–stabilized emulsions during the atomization and the subsequent drying step of a spray drying process. For this purpose, experiments were performed in an atomization rig and a pilot spray dryer with two commercial pressure swirl atomizers. By comparing the oil droplet size before atomization, after atomization, and after spray drying, the changes in oil droplet size during each process step were quantified. The effect of oil droplet breakup during atomization was isolated by atomizing emulsions with 1 wt.% oil content and a protein to oil concentration ratio of 0.1. At 100 bar, the Sauter mean diameter of oil droplet size was reduced from 3.13 to 0.61 μm. Directly after breakup, coalescence of the oil droplets was observed for emulsions with a high oil content of 30 wt.%, leading to a droplet size after atomization of 1.15 μm. Increasing the protein to oil concentration ratio to 0.2 reduced coalescence during atomization and oil droplets with a mean diameter of 0.92 μm were obtained. Further coalescence was observed during the drying step: for an oil content of 30 wt.% and a protein to oil concentration ratio of 0.1 the mean droplet size increased to 1.77 μm. Powders produced at high oil contents showed a strong tendency to clump. Comparable effects were observed for a spray drying process with a different nozzle at 250 bar. The results confirm that droplet breakup and coalescence during atomization and coalescence during drying have to be taken into consideration when targeting specific oil droplet sizes in the product. This is relevant for product design in spray drying applications, in which the oil droplet size in the powder or after its redispersion determines product quality and stability.


Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e05788
Author(s):  
George Katsaros ◽  
Magdalini Tsoukala ◽  
Marianna Giannoglou ◽  
Petros Taoukis

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yayoi MIYAGAWA ◽  
Kohshi KIKUCHI ◽  
Hirokazu SHIGA ◽  
Shuji ADACHI

Soft Matter ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (47) ◽  
pp. 9762-9775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Patel ◽  
Athira Mohanan ◽  
Supratim Ghosh

Sodium caseinate (SC)-stabilized 40% oil-in-water nanoemulsions (NEs) could be transformed into elastic gels below a critical droplet size due to increase in ϕeff by a thicker steric barrier of SC, while whey protein (WPI)-stabilized NEs remained liquid due to thinner steric barrier of WPI.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Koji KAWAKAMI ◽  
Akiko FUJITA ◽  
Vita PARAMITA ◽  
Tze Loon NEOH ◽  
Hidefumi YOSHII

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document