Relationships of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with the previous and subsequent nights’ sleep in children and youth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Yajun Huang ◽  
Robin Sze‐Tak Ho ◽  
Mark S. Tremblay ◽  
Stephen Heung‐Sang Wong
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Children And Youth

scholarly journals Impact of physical activity and sedentary behaviour on fall risks in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Thibaud ◽  
Frédéric Bloch ◽  
Caroline Tournoux-Facon ◽  
Cyril Brèque ◽  
Anne Sophie Rigaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older People ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fall Risks

scholarly journals Smartphone applications for physical activity and sedentary behaviour change in people with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258460
Author(s):  
Kacie Patterson ◽  
Rachel Davey ◽  
Richard Keegan ◽  
Nicole Freene
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Smartphone Applications ◽  
Activity Tracker ◽  
Target Behaviour ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

Background Smartphone applications provide new opportunities for secondary prevention healthcare. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine if smartphone applications are effective at changing physical activity and sedentary behaviour in people with cardiovascular disease. Methods Six electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Sports Discus and EMBASE) were searched from 2007 to October 2020. Cardiovascular disease secondary prevention physical activity or sedentary behaviour interventions were included where the primary element was a smartphone or tablet computer application (excluding SMS-only text-messaging). Study quality was assessed using validated tools appropriate for each study design. Random effects model was used and the pooled mean difference between post scores were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine differences based on diagnosis, sample size, age, intervention duration, activity tracker use, target behaviour, and self-report versus device-measured outcome. Results Nineteen studies with a total of 1,543 participants were included (coronary heart disease, n = 10; hypertension, n = 4; stroke, n = 3; heart failure, n = 1; peripheral artery disease, n = 1). Risk of bias was rated as high. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Only two controlled studies reported on sedentary behaviour. Smartphone applications produced a significant increase of 40.35 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity per week (7 studies; p = 0.04; 95% CI 1.03 to 79.67) and 2,390 steps per day (3 studies; p = 0.0007; 95% CI 1,006.9 to 3,791.2). Subgroup analyses found no difference when comparing diagnoses, sample size, activity tracker use, target behaviour and self-report versus device-measured outcome. Larger improvements in physical activity were noted in intervention durations of ≤3-months and participants ≥60yrs (95.35 mins.week-1; p = 0.05). Conclusions Smartphone applications were effective in increasing physical activity in people with cardiovascular disease. Caution is warranted for the low-quality evidence, small sample and larger coronary heart disease representation. More rigorous research is needed to investigate the effect of smartphone applications across diagnoses and in sedentary behaviour.

Are Birth Weight, Early Growth, and Motor Development Determinants of Physical Activity in Children and Youth? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guro Pauck Øglund ◽  
Maria Hildebrand ◽  
Ulf Ekelund
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Objectively Measured ◽  
Objectively Measured Physical Activity

The purpose of this systematic review was to explore whether birth weight, early growth and motor development act as determinants of physical activity in children and youth.Methods:We performed a systematic literature search on the possible early life determinants. A meta-analysis was performed on the association between birthweight and objectively measured physical activity.Results:We identified 9 studies examining birth weight, in which none of the studies with objectively measured physical activity observed an association between birth weight and physical activity. The meta-analysis confirmed this result (b=-3.08, 95% CI -10.20, 4.04). The 3 studies examining early growth and physical activity in youth differ in methodology and the results are inconsistent. Two studies suggest an association between earlier motor development and physical activity and sport participation in youth. This was not confirmed in a third study.Conclusion:Our meta-analysis suggests that birth weight is not an important determinant of physical activity in youth. Available data does not allow firm conclusions whether early growth and motor development act as determinants of physical activity in youth.

scholarly journals Are people in the bush really physically active? A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in rural Australians populations

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Ivan Mesa Castrillon ◽  
Paula R Beckenkamp ◽  
Manuela L Ferreira ◽  
Jose A Michell ◽  
Vania Alice de Aguiar Mendes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Physically Active

scholarly journals Changes in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Due to Enforced COVID-19-Related Lockdown and Movement Restrictions: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5251
Author(s):  
Chris Kite ◽  
Lukasz Lagojda ◽  
Cain C. T. Clark ◽  
Olalekan Uthman ◽  
Francesca Denton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Sedentary Behaviours ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
The Impact

Prolonged lockdown/restriction measures due to the COVID-19 pandemic have reportedly impacted opportunities to be physically active for a large proportion of the population in affected countries globally. The exact changes to physical activity and sedentary behaviours due to these measures have not been fully studied. Accordingly, the objective of this PROSPERO-registered systematic review is to evaluate the available evidence on physical activity and sedentary behaviours in the general population during COVID-19-related lockdown/restriction measures, compared to prior to restrictions being in place. Defined searches to identify eligible studies published in English, from November 2019 up to the date of submission, will be conducted using the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PSYCinfo, Coronavirus Research Database, Public Health Database, Publicly Available Content Database, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. The applied inclusion criteria were selected to identify observational studies with no restrictions placed on participants, with outcomes regarding physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour during lockdown/restriction measures, and with comparisons for these outcomes to a time when no such measures were in place. Where appropriate, results from included studies will be pooled and effect estimates will be presented in random effects meta-analyses. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review to evaluate one complete year of published data on the impact of COVID-19-related lockdown/restriction measures on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis will constitute the most up-to-date synthesis of published evidence on any such documented changes, and so will comprehensively inform clinical practitioners, public health agencies, researchers, policymakers and the general public regarding the effects of lockdown/restriction measures on both physical activity and sedentary behaviour.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document