Student nurses' strategies when speaking up for patient safety: A qualitative study

Author(s):  
Anthea Fagan ◽  
Jackie Lea ◽  
Vicki Parker
2017 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne ten Hoeve ◽  
Stynke Castelein ◽  
Gerard Jansen ◽  
Petrie Roodbol

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. e33-e33 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Entwistle ◽  
D. McCaughan ◽  
I. S. Watt ◽  
Y. Birks ◽  
J. Hall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 101052
Author(s):  
Carla Pena Dias ◽  
Marina Aparecida Chrispim Silva ◽  
Moema Souza Santos ◽  
Flávio Lopes Ferreira ◽  
Vânia de Paula Carvalho ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 448
Author(s):  
Nery José de Oliveira Junior ◽  
Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães

Aim: analyze the application of the safe surgery checklist, seeking to describe the main factors that can affect its completion and follow-up, according to the perception of nursing technicians. Method: this is a qualitative study performed with nursing technicians from an outpatient surgical center in southern Brazil. The data were collected through focus groups and photographic methods, from the perspective of ecological and restorative thinking. Results: three categories emerged from the information grouping: Checklist for patient safety – still a challenge; difficulty of adherence to the safe surgery checklist; and Checklist Steps. Discussion: the data indicate that some stages of this process are still not met and there is difficulty of adherence by the teams. Conclusions: among the main failures is the low adherence of the medical team to perform the time out and to the confirmation of the place and the procedure. The restorative ecological approach made it possible to engage professionals.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marketa Gross

Patient safety in health care remains a serious concern in Canada. Adverse events can lead to physiological and psychological complications and pose a significant economic burden on the health care system. The purpose of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore the team processes, roles and factors that underpin effective communication between team members during an OR-PACU handover. Content analysis revealed four major categories: Ownership, Distractions and Interruptions, Transfer of Information and Workflow. The results of this study, informed by the Theory of Collective Competence enhance our understanding of the OR-PACU handover and support the need for the development of a structured OR-PACU team handover process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (42) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
Christine Urum
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham P Martin ◽  
Emma-Louise Aveling ◽  
Anne Campbell ◽  
Carolyn Tarrant ◽  
Peter J Pronovost ◽  
...  

BackgroundHealthcare organisations often fail to harvest and make use of the ‘soft intelligence’ about safety and quality concerns held by their own personnel. We aimed to examine the role of formal channels in encouraging or inhibiting employee voice about concerns.MethodsQualitative study involving personnel from three academic hospitals in two countries. Interviews were conducted with 165 participants from a wide range of occupational and professional backgrounds, including senior leaders and those from the sharp end of care. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method.ResultsLeaders reported that they valued employee voice; they identified formal organisational channels as a key route for the expression of concerns by employees. Formal channels and processes were designed to ensure fairness, account for all available evidence and achieve appropriate resolution. When processed through these formal systems, concerns were destined to become evidenced, formal and tractable to organisational intervention. But the way these systems operated meant that some concerns were never voiced. Participants were anxious about having to process their suspicions and concerns into hard evidentiary facts, and they feared being drawn into official procedures designed to allocate consequence. Anxiety about evidence and process was particularly relevant when the intelligence was especially ‘soft’—feelings or intuitions that were difficult to resolve into a coherent, compelling reconstruction of an incident or concern. Efforts to make soft intelligence hard thus risked creating ‘forbidden knowledge’: dangerous to know or share.ConclusionsThe legal and bureaucratic considerations that govern formal channels for the voicing of concerns may, perversely, inhibit staff from speaking up. Leaders responsible for quality and safety should consider complementing formal mechanisms with alternative, informal opportunities for listening to concerns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document