scholarly journals European Law as a terminological issue

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Poremská ◽  
Bohumil Vítek
Keyword(s):  
International Organizations ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Law ◽  
Multiple Value ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Functional Concept

The European Law is a multiple-value term which is used in several branches of law and other sciences and its understanding is not clear. There are four basic branches of law explaining the concept of the “European law.“ One of them is the European law as the law of the EU. Second meaning is the law of international organizations. Then the law of Europe as the continent and the last meaning is connected with functional concept of law. The function is the regulation of competition or public procurement etc. The aim of the article is to contribute to better understanding of different meanings of the European law. Not only for the purpose of legal science but for other sciences as well because the EU law is binding for all the Member states and their activities.

scholarly journals The effect of the establishment and application of European law in Poland – selected theoretical issues

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (56) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
Jacek Zaleśny
Keyword(s):  
Legal Order ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Polish Law ◽  
The Eu

The article is focused on the effect of the establishment and application the European Union law in Poland immediately after 2004. By becoming the law binding in Poland (and other member states of the EU), the EU law effected significant changes in the sphere of law creation and application. Traditionally, in the national legal order, the law of the highest force is the constitution, while in accordance with the EU legal order, the regulations of the European law are superior in their application in the territory of the member states, including the regulations of the constitution. The present analysis explains how the dilemma of the simultaneous superiority of the regulations of the constitution and the regulations of the EU law was solved in Poland and what importance is attributed to the concept of favourable interpretation of the national law and the EU law. The present paper poses the hypothesis that the model of reconciling the regulations of the Polish law and the regulations of the European law developed in Poland immediately after 2004 was correctly established. It contributes well to Poland meeting international obligations, at the same time respecting the superior position of the constitution.

scholarly journals The Diversity of the EU Approach to Law Enforcement—Towards a Coherent Model Inspired by a Law and Economics Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Faure ◽  
Franziska Weber
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Insider Trading ◽  
Law And Economics ◽  
Economic Approach ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
European Level ◽  
Member States ◽  
Economic Reasoning ◽  
The Eu

Traditionally in the division of labor between the European level and the Member States it was, roughly, the European legislature that set the norms and the Member States that took care of enforcing these norms. In various policy areas, an implementation deficit has been observed, which is said to be partly due to the Member States facing difficulties with the choice of procedural options. For that reason, among others, the European legislature increasingly prescribes the enforcement approach to the Member States to back up national legislation that implements European law. This Article examines the incoherence of the EU's approach to law enforcement in the areas of consumer, competition, environmental, and insider trading laws. After setting out the EU's legal competences with a view to law enforcement, the rather diverse picture—mixes—of private, administrative, and criminal law enforcement in the four areas will be illustrated. The authors then ask the question of whether this divergence can be explained by an economic reasoning with respect to law enforcement. The analysis, however, identifies substantial differences between an ideal enforcement mix and the current enforcement approaches used in EU law. Moreover, it is suggested that the economic approach could be employed to provide more consistency to the use of enforcement tools in EU law.

Disclosure rules in eu public procurement: Balancing between competition and transparency

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsi-Maria Halonen
Keyword(s):  
Public Procurement ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
Competitive Effects ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Disclosure Of Information ◽  
Disclosure Rules ◽  
Procurement Procedure ◽  
The Eu

The paper examines the disclosure of information within public contract awards under EU law. EU Public Procurement rules have several objectives that may at some times be conflicting with each other. A certain level of transparency of public procurement procedure is necessary in order to fight corruption, enhance trade opportunities and ensure effective legal remedies. On the other hand, too much transparency may have certain anti-competitive effects. The national laws regarding disclosure of information vary in different EU member states. In Finland the EU law principle of effective remedies has been interpreted as requiring full transparency among the bidders. The transparency rules under EU law and certain Member States' national laws are analysed. As a conclusion, it is suggested that the rules on disclosure should not be left solely to the discretion of member states as the over-transparent approach taken by certain member states may negatively affect the markets both on a national and EU level.

4. Freedom of movement for EU nationals

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Clayton ◽  
Georgina Firth ◽  
Caroline Sawyer ◽  
Rowena Moffatt ◽  
Helena Wray
Keyword(s):  
Free Movement ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Freedom Of Movement ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Third Country Nationals

Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. This chapter discusses the law which governs the free movement of people within the EU. As such, it is principally about the movement of EU nationals. The movement of non-EU nationals, known in European law as third-country nationals, may come within the ambit of EU law due to their connection with EU nationals; for instance, as a spouse or employee. The chapter concentrates on the rights of EU nationals and their families to move within the EU, and covers the powers to deport or remove EU nationals. It also considers the possible impacts of Brexit on free movement rights.

The Relationship between the EU and Member States in Constitutional Case Law: A Comparison between Western and Eastern Europe

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 189-198
Author(s):  
Constance Grewe
Keyword(s):  
Turning Point ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
Member States ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Constitutional Identity ◽  
The Eu

It is indeed a crucial moment now that Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries have begun to join the EU. The Maastricht Treaty was itself, in several respects, a turning point in European construction; Member States then became aware of the increasing influence of EU law and started to defend their autonomy against the ‘attacks’ stemming from it. With the accession of the CEE states, the ‘Solange story: a story about national constitutional courts resisting a straightforward surrender of national legal sovereignties, and insisting on their own role as guardians of any further transfer of powers from the national to the European level’, can now enter into ‘its chapter 3’. National or constitutional identity is the main arm of resistance, and these national reactions require a rethinking of the relationship between national and European law.

The Application of European Law in the New Member States: Several (Early) Predictions

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zdeněk Kühn
Keyword(s):  
Eu Enlargement ◽  
Future Application ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
New Member States ◽  
Probable Outcome ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
The Eu

After the EU Enlargement of 2004, the law courts of the new Member States now fulfill a twofold role of applying both national and European law. The application of European law also entails the duty of judges to construe their own domestic law as close as possible with EU law, and, if that is not possible, the duty arises to set aside the domestic law found to be incompatible with European law. In consequence, developments in the next decade will test judges’ capacity for properly applying European law and this process will inevitably present a serious challenge to the Central European judicial systems. While evaluations can first be made no sooner than a few years after the EU Enlargement, there are important indications that can suggest the probable outcome of that challenge. This article briefly outlines the application of European law in those countries prior to EU Enlargement and then deals with the important factors which are likely to influence its future application in the new Member States.

Incorporation

2020 ◽  
pp. 80-107
Author(s):  
Pavlos Eleftheriadis
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
National Courts ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
Structural Principles ◽  
The Law ◽  
Political Communities ◽  
The Eu

This chapter shows how national courts receive European Union (EU) law by way of dualism in the same way they receive international law. From the member states’ point of view EU law is not the law of a new jurisdiction but the law of an international legal order. Incorporation is not a simple transfer. Member state courts incorporate EU law through three structural principles: ‘conditional primacy’, ‘institutional tolerance’, and ‘integrity’. These principles are uniquely relevant to the transnational nature of EU law. The member states remain independent political communities. Integrity, thus, applies to EU law on the basis that the EU is a community of communities of principle. The ideals of a community of principle apply to the EU only when it is seen as a union of peoples that come together on the basis of the law of nations. The practical or deliberative understanding of law provides an account of the relationship between domestic and EU law without paradox.

4. Freedom of movement for EU nationals

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-144
Author(s):  
Gina Clayton ◽  
Georgina Firth ◽  
Caroline Sawyer ◽  
Rowena Moffatt
Keyword(s):  
Family Member ◽  
Free Movement ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Freedom Of Movement ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Third Country Nationals

This chapter discusses the law which governs the free movement of people within the EU. As such, it is principally about the movement of EU nationals. The movement of non-EU nationals, known in European law as third-country nationals, may come within the ambit of EU law due to their connection with EU nationals, for instance as a spouse, family member, or employee. The chapter concentrates on the rights of EU nationals and their families to move within the EU, and covers the powers to deport or remove EU nationals. It also considers the possible impacts of Brexit on free movement rights.

scholarly journals Dyskusja nad modelem wykładni prounijnej w polskiej nauce prawa

2018 ◽  
pp. 9-22
Author(s):  
Wojciech Rowiński
Keyword(s):  
European Court Of Justice ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Consistent Model ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Normative Models ◽  
The Eu

The aim of this paper is to present the discussion on normative models of the pro-EU interpretation of national law in Polish jurisprudence. The European Court of Justice drew only general assumptions concerning the pro-EU interpretation, and left the Member States free to choose the methods of its implementation. The author analyses the proposals of the models described in the science of European law as well as in the theory of law, and on that basis comes to the conclusion that a universal and consistent model that would ensure full realisation of the EU law objectives regarding the pro-EU interpretation has not yet been developed.

The Distribution of Asylum Responsibilities in the EU: Dublin, Partnerships with Third Countries and the Question of Solidarity

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-358
Author(s):  
Eleni Karageorgiou
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Immigration Policy ◽  
European Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Allocation Mechanism ◽  
Member States ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Eu

Because of the scale of global displacement, in particular from Syria, the European Union (EU) has stressed the need to work on an effective asylum and immigration policy through more robust forms of cooperation internally, between Member States, and externally, with third countries. This contribution investigates the extent to which the EU rules for distributing asylum responsibilities genuinely address the requirement of solidarity set out in EU law. It focuses on the Dublin system, which forms the main intra-EU responsibility allocation mechanism, and on the EU–Turkey partnership as an external mechanism. It suggests that instead of relieving countries that have disproportionate protection responsibilities and guaranteeing protection for every individual in need, such practices achieve the opposite. They ensure that overburdened countries remain the main protection providers and that the movement of refugees is strictly managed. This leads to the debasement of the right to asylum contrary to international and European law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document