scholarly journals The Determinants of Capital Structure: New Evidence from Listed Companies in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1587-1595
Author(s):  
Phuong Dung Thi Nguyen ◽  
Thanh Nhan Thi Do ◽  
Michael Joseph Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
High Growth ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
High Profit ◽  
Tangible Assets ◽  
New Evidence

This study examines the factors which affect the capital structure of 608 non-financial firms in Vietnam during the period 2009–2017. Our findings indicate that companies with more tangible assets prefer longer term to shorter term debts while larger companies tend to borrow more to finance their activities. Furthermore, companies with high profit and high growth in Vietnam are able to opt for alternative options for raising capital in addition to borrowing. Overall, we recommend that capital structures in Vietnamese firms can be understood within a framework of the pecking order theory. Interestingly, audit reputation is the single considered determinant that does not appear to impact on the firms’ capital structure.

scholarly journals Determinants of Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from Turkey

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merve Gizem Cevheroglu-Acar
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Tax Shield ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Debt Tax Shield ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Capital Structure

The primary aim of this study is to identify the firm-specific determinants of the capital structure of non-financial firms in Turkey and to test whether the determinants offered by financial theory are able to provide convincing explanations for non-financial firms in Turkey. Because the relationship between liquidity and capital structure is not well examined for Turkish market in the context of capital structure theories, we include liquidity as independent variable in our models in addition to profitability, growth, non-debt tax shields, size, tangibility, and risk. We use panel regression as econometric model and cover the period from 2009 to 2016. Our results show that profitability, non-debt tax shield, size, tangibility, and liquidity are significant determinants of the capital structure, size being the most robust one. On the other hand, growth and volatility are not significantly related with the leverage. Moreover, we conclude that capital structure decisions of non-financial firms in Turkey are mostly consistent with the hypothesis of pecking order theory rather than trade-off theory.

scholarly journals Firm Level Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence From Egypt

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sakr ◽  
Amina Bedeir
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Agency Cost ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Time Period

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the firm level determinants of capital structure of Egyptian publicly traded non-financial firms. The study investigates the firm level determinants of capital structure of Egyptian companies utilising data from the financial statements of 62 listed companies over the time period from 2003 to 2016. The study investigates whether the capital structure decisions in Egypt are closer to the assumptions of Trade-Off Theory, of Pecking Order Theory or of the Agency Cost Theory. The empirical evidence obtained allows us to conclude that Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories are the most theories to describe the financial behaviour of the Egyptian companies' choice of capital structure whereas there was little evidence to support the agency cost theory.

scholarly journals Debt Capacity and Tests of Capital Structure Theories

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1161-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Lemmon ◽  
Jaime F. Zender
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Good Description ◽  
High Growth ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Growth Firms ◽  
Debt Capacity ◽  
Financing Behavior ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWe examine the impact of explicitly incorporating a measure of debt capacity in recent tests of competing theories of capital structure. Our main results are that if external funds are required, in the absence of debt capacity concerns, debt appears to be preferred to equity. Concerns over debt capacity largely explain the use of new external equity financing by publicly traded firms. Finally, we present evidence that reconciles the frequent equity issues by small, high-growth firms with the pecking order. After accounting for debt capacity, the pecking order theory appears to give a good description of financing behavior for a large sample of firms examined over an extended time period.

scholarly journals The Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from Selected Listed Companies in Sri Lanka

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tharmalingam Pratheepan ◽  
Y. K. Weerakon Banda
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Positive Sign ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
The Capital Structure

This research examines the determinants of capital structure of selected listed companies in Sri Lanka. The capital structure of 55 companies listed in Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) is empirically examined using the fixed effects model. Based on the findings of the panel data analysis during the period of 2003-2012, Profitability exhibits statistically significant of inverse relationship with leverage while firm size and growth shows statistically significant of positive relationship with leverage for selected listed companies in Sri Lanka. Non–debt tax shields and tangibility indicate insignificant impacts on leverage. The results of this empirical study shows that there is robust evidence to support the pecking order theory by manufacturing based companies on the capital structure determinant of profitability variable, and growth variable also strongly supports to the association of the pecking order theory. Though, trade–off theory also can not be rejected because of the correct estimate of the positive sign of size variable of manufacturing based companies. Thus, implication of pecking order theory is more appropriate in Sri Lankan perspective.

Capital Structure and Debt Maturity in Nonprofit Organizations

2021 ◽  
pp. 089976402110655
Author(s):  
Inigo Garcia-Rodriguez ◽  
M. Elena Romero-Merino ◽  
Marcos Santamaria-Mariscal
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Nonprofit Organizations ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Debt Maturity ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Financing Decisions ◽  
Tangible Assets ◽  
The Capital Structure

This article examines the capital structure and debt maturity in nonprofit organizations (NPOs). In particular, we analyze whether these financing decisions are made as expected according to the two main theories used to explain the capital structure, that is, the trade-off and pecking order theories. To do so, we study the associations between NPOs’ indebtedness and their size, age, tangibility, liquidity, profitability, risk, and growth. We use fixed effects, probit, and Heckman selection models with unbalanced panel data containing 8,721 charities in the United Kingdom for the period 2011–2018 (60,222 year-obs). Our results show that the financing patterns of NPOs are consistent with the arguments of the pecking order theory. We also find that less than half of our sample uses long-term debt. Moreover, debt maturity is longer in larger NPOs, those with more tangible assets, or those with higher liquidity.

scholarly journals Pecking Order Theory and Trade-Off Theory of Capital Structure: Evidence from Indonesian Stock Exchange

The Winners ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Priska Ralna Eunike Culata ◽  
Tri Gunarsih
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Optimal Capital Structure ◽  
Optimal Capital

Numerous empirical studies in the finance field have tested many theories for firms’ capital structure. The pecking order theory and the trade-off theory of capital structure is among the most influential theories of firms’ capital structure. The trade-off theory predicts optimal capital structure, while the pecking order theory does not predict an optimal capital structure. According to pecking order theory,  the order of financial sources used is the source of internal funds from profits, short-term securities, debt, preferred stock and common stock last. The main objective of this study is to econometrically test whether the listed companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange follow the pecking order theory or the trade-off theory. Samples in this study are public companies listed during 2009-2010. The research questions are tested by running regression models.  The empirical result of this study shows that the pecking order theory is not supported, while the trade-off theory is supported. This suggests that the capital structure of listed companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange is financed based on optimal capital structure, not by the order financial resources.

Qualitative Research on Critical Issues In Halal Logistics

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Syazwan Ab Talib ◽  
Lim Rubin ◽  
Vincent Khor Zhengyi
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Specific Factor ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Corporate Financing ◽  
Financing Decision

This is a preliminary study developed to explore the determinants of capital structure of Shariah-compliant firms listed in Bursa Malaysia. This study is primarily motivated by the issue of the determinants still being inconclusive in the area of capital structure. The study is performed using the static models namely Pool Ordinary Least Square, Fixed Effect and Random Effect Model. Empirical analysis on the determinants reveals that country specific factor which is GDP and sector specific factor which is industry concentration are also significant in influencing the corporate financing decisions in this country along with firm specific factors such as efficiency, bankruptcy risk, profitability, tangibility, liquidity and size of the firm. The findings revealed that results are sensitive to models employed in the study. Nevertheless, the applicability of capital structure theories such as the trade-off theory, agency theory and pecking order theory diverge across sectors in Malaysia. The pecking order theory and agency theory are found to be the dominant theories governing the corporate financing decision in the country as well. It indicates strong evidence of hierarchy practised in firms’ financing decision. The finding on agency theory being dominant justifies the function of short-term debt as a controlling mechanism to mitigate the agency problem arises within firms across sectors. 

scholarly journals Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure: the case of Islamic financing modes

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moncef Guizani
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Equity Financing ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Corporate Financing ◽  
Financing Decisions ◽  
Executive Managers ◽  
The Capital Structure

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not the basic premises according to the pecking order theory provide an explanation for the capital structure mix of firms operating under Islamic principles. Pooled OLS and random effect regressions were performed to test the pecking order theory applying data from a sample of 66 Islamic firms listed on Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stock market over the period 2006–2016. The results show that sale-based instruments (Murabahah, Ijara) track the financial deficit quite closely followed by equity financing and as the last alternative to finance deficit, Islamic firms issue Sukuk. In the crisis period, these firms seem more reliant on equity, then on sale-based instrument and on Sukuk as last option. The study findings also indicate that the cumulative financing deficit does not wipe out the effects of conventional variables, although it is empirically significant. This provides no support for the pecking order theory attempted by Saudi Islamic firms. This research highlights the capital structure choice of firms operating under Islamic principles. It explores the implication of the relevant Islamic principles on corporate financing preferences. It can serve firm executive managers in their financing decisions to add value to the companies.

scholarly journals Determinants of the Capital Structure of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchanges of Argentina, Brazil and Chile: An Empirical Analysis of the Period from 2007 to 2016

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Marcelo Rabelo Henrique ◽  
Sandro Braz Silva ◽  
Antônio Saporito ◽  
Sérgio Roberto da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Speed Of Adjustment ◽  
Asset Growth ◽  
The Capital Structure

The present investigation refers to the determinants of the capital structure, using the technique of multiple regression through Panel Data of open capital companies in the stock exchanges of Argentina, Brazil and Chile, in order to know the behavior of determinants of the capital structure in relation to Trade-Off Theory (TOT) and Pecking Order Theory (POT). The POT offers the existence of a hierarchy in the use of sources of resources, while the TOT considers the existence of a target capital structure that would be pursued by the company. Sixteen accounting variables were used, in which five are dependent (related to indebtedness) and eleven are independent variables (explaining the determinants of the capital structure). It is observed that, with the use of the Panel Data, the determinants that seem to influence in a more accentuated way the levels of debt of the companies are: current liquidity, tangibility, return to shareholders, return of assets, sales growth, asset growth, market-to-book and business risk measured by the volatility of benefits. Suggestions for future research include the use of Panel Data to analyze other factors that may influence indebtedness, mainly taxes and dividends, as well as a deeper analysis of factors that may influence the speed of adjustment towards the supposed objective level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document