Effect of Surface Roughness on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Water on a Superhydrophilic Aluminum Surface

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsub Kim ◽  
Seongchul Jun ◽  
Jungho Lee ◽  
Juan Godinez ◽  
Seung M. You
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Aluminum Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Copper Surfaces ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Superhydrophilic Surface ◽  
Aluminum Surfaces ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The effect of surface roughness on the pool boiling heat transfer of water was investigated on superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces. The formation of nanoscale protrusions on the aluminum surface was confirmed after immersing it in boiling water, which modified surface wettability to form a superhydrophilic surface. The effect of surface roughness was examined at different average roughness (Ra) values ranging from 0.11 to 2.93 μm. The boiling heat transfer coefficients increased with an increase in roughness owing to the increased number of cavities. However, the superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces exhibited degradation of the heat transfer coefficients when compared with copper surfaces owing to the flooding of promising cavities. The superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces exhibited a higher critical heat flux (CHF) than the copper surfaces. The CHF was 1650 kW/m2 for Ra = 0.11 μm, and it increased to 2150 kW/m2 for Ra = 0.35 μm. Surface roughness is considered to affect CHF as it improves the capillary wicking on the superhydrophilic surface. However, further increase in surface roughness above 0.35 μm did not augment the CHF, even at Ra = 2.93 μm. This upper limit of the CHF appears to result from the hydrodynamic limit on the superhydrophilic surface, because the roughest surface with Ra = 2.93 μm still showed a faster liquid spreading speed.

Effect of Surface Roughness on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Water on a Superhydrophilic Aluminum Surface

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsub Kim ◽  
Seongchul Jun ◽  
Jungho Lee ◽  
Seung M. You
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Aluminum Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Copper Surfaces ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Superhydrophilic Surface ◽  
Aluminum Surfaces ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The effect of surface roughness on the pool boiling heat transfer of water was investigated on superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces. The formation of nanoscale protrusions on the aluminum surface was confirmed after immersing it in boiling water, which modified surface wettability to form a superhydrophilic surface. The effect of surface roughness was examined at different average roughness (Ra) values ranging from 0.11–2.93 μm. The boiling heat transfer coefficients increased with an increase in roughness owing to the increased number of cavities. However, the superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces exhibited degradation of the heat transfer coefficients when compared with copper surfaces owing to the flooding of promising cavities. The superhydrophilic aluminum surfaces exhibited a higher critical heat flux (CHF) than the copper surfaces. The CHF was 1,650 kW/m2 for Ra = 0.11 μm, and it increased to 2,150 kW/m2 for Ra = 0.35 μm. Surface roughness is considered to affect CHF as it improves the capillary wicking on the superhydrophilic surface. However, further increase in surface roughness above 0.35 μm did not augment the CHF, even at Ra = 2.93 μm. This upper limit of the CHF appears to result from the hydrodynamic limit on the superhydrophilic surface, because the roughest surface with Ra = 2.93 μm still showed a faster liquid spreading speed.

Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Enhancement from Carbon Nanotube-Enhanced Surfaces

2014 ◽  
Vol 348 ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
I. Pranoto ◽  
C. Yang ◽  
L.X. Zheng ◽  
K.C. Leong ◽  
P.K. Chan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Carbon Nanotube ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Aluminum Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer

This paper presents an experimental study of flow boiling heat transfer from carbon nanotube (CNT) structures in a two-phase cooling facility. Multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) structures of dimensions 80 mm × 60 mm were applied to a horizontal flow boiling channel. Two CNT structures with different properties viz. NC-3100 and MERCSD were tested with a dielectric liquid FC-72. The height of the CNT structures was fixed at 37.5 μm and tests were conducted at coolant mass fluxes of 35, 50, and 65 kg/m2·s under saturated flow boiling conditions. The experimental results show that the CNT structures enhance the boiling heat transfer coefficients by up to 1.6 times compared to the smooth aluminum surface. The results also show that the CNT structures increase significantly the Critical Heat Flux (CHF) of the smooth aluminum surface from 66.7 W/cm2 to 100 W/cm2.

Surface Roughness Effects on Flow Boiling in Microchannels

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Jones ◽  
Suresh V. Garimella
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Cut Surface

The influence of surface roughness on flow boiling heat transfer and pressure drop in microchannels is experimentally explored. The microchannel heat sink employed in the study consists of ten parallel, 25.4 mm long channels with nominal dimensions of 500×500 μm2. The channels were produced by saw-cutting. Two of the test piece surfaces were roughened to varying degrees with electrical discharge machining (EDM). The roughness average Ra varied from 1.4 μm for the as-fabricated, saw-cut surface to 3.9 μm and 6.7 μm for the two roughened EDM surfaces. Deionized water was used as the working fluid. The experiments indicate that the surface roughness has little influence on boiling incipience and only a minor impact on saturated boiling heat transfer coefficients at lower heat fluxes. For wall heat fluxes above 1500 kW/m2, the two EDM surfaces (3.9 μm and 6.7 μm) have similar heat transfer coefficients that were 20–35% higher than those measured for the saw-cut surface (1.4 μm). A modified Bertsch et al. [2009, “A Composite Heat Transfer Correlation for Saturated Flow Boiling in Small Channels,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 2110–2118] correlation was found to provide acceptable predictions of the flow boiling heat transfer coefficient over the range of conditions tested. Analysis of the pressure drop measurements indicates that only the roughest surface (6.7 μm) has an adverse effect on the two-phase pressure drop.

scholarly journals The Influence of Surface Roughness on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Jones ◽  
John P. McHale ◽  
Suresh V. Garimella
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Polished Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Two Fluids ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

The effect of surface roughness on pool boiling heat transfer is experimentally explored over a wide range of roughness values in water and Fluorinert™ FC-77, two fluids with different thermal properties and wetting characteristics. The test surfaces ranged from a polished surface (Ra between 0.027 μm and 0.038 μm) to electrical discharge machined (EDM) surfaces with a roughness (Ra) ranging from 1.08 μm to 10.0 μm. Different trends were observed in the heat transfer coefficient with respect to the surface roughness between the two fluids on the same set of surfaces. For FC-77, the heat transfer coefficient was found to continually increase with increasing roughness. For water, on the other hand, EDM surfaces of intermediate roughness displayed similar heat transfer coefficients that were higher than for the polished surface, while the roughest surface showed the highest heat transfer coefficients. The heat transfer coefficients were more strongly influenced by surface roughness with FC-77 than with water. For FC-77, the roughest surface produced 210% higher heat transfer coefficients than the polished surface while for water, a more modest 100% enhancement was measured between the same set of surfaces. Although the results highlight the inadequacy of characterizing nucleate pool boiling data using Ra, the observed effect of roughness was correlated using h∝Ram as has been done in several prior studies. The experimental results were compared with predictions from several widely used correlations in the literature.

Surface Roughness Effects on Flow Boiling in Microchannels

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Jones ◽  
Suresh V. Garimella
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Cut Surface

The influence of surface roughness on flow boiling heat transfer and pressure drop in microchannels is experimentally explored. The microchannel heat sink employed in the study consists of 10 parallel, 25.4 mm long channels with nominal dimensions of 500 μm × 500 μm. The channels were produced by saw-cutting. Two of the test piece surfaces were roughened to varying degrees with electrical discharge machining (EDM). The roughness average, Ra, varied from 1.4 μm for the as-fabricated, saw-cut surface to 3.9 and 6.7 μm for the two roughened EDM surfaces. Deionized water was used as the working fluid. Experiments indicate that the surface roughness has little influence on boiling incipience and only a minor impact on saturated boiling heat transfer coefficients at lower heat fluxes. For wall heat fluxes above 1500 kW/m2, the two EDM surfaces (3.9 and 6.7 μm) have similar heat transfer coefficients that were 20 to 35% higher than those measured for the saw cut surface (1.4 μm). Analysis of the pressure drop measurements indicates that only the roughest surface (6.7 μm) has an adverse effect on the two-phase pressure drop.

Numerical and Experimental Investigation Into the Effects of Nanoparticle Mass Fraction and Bubble Size on Boiling Heat Transfer of TiO2–Water Nanofluid

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Qi ◽  
Yongliang Wan ◽  
Lin Liang ◽  
Zhonghao Rao ◽  
Yimin Li
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Bubble Size ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Experimental Methods ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Mass Fractions ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Bubble Sizes

Considering mass transfer and energy transfer between liquid phase and vapor phase, a mixture model for boiling heat transfer of nanofluid is established. In addition, an experimental installation of boiling heat transfer is built. The boiling heat transfer of TiO2–water nanofluid is investigated by numerical and experimental methods, respectively. Thermal conductivity, viscosity, and boiling bubble size of TiO2–water nanofluid are experimentally investigated, and the effects of different nanoparticle mass fractions, bubble sizes and superheat on boiling heat transfer are also discussed. It is found that the boiling bubble size in TiO2–water nanofluid is only one-third of that in de-ionized water. It is also found that there is a critical nanoparticle mass fraction (wt.% = 2%) between enhancement and degradation for TiO2–water nanofluid. Compared with water, nanofluid enhances the boiling heat transfer coefficient by 77.7% when the nanoparticle mass fraction is lower than 2%, while it reduces the boiling heat transfer by 30.3% when the nanoparticle mass fraction is higher than 2%. The boiling heat transfer coefficients increase with the superheat for water and nanofluid. A mathematic correlation between heat flux and superheat is obtained in this paper.

High Heat Flux Boiling Heat Transfer for Laser Diode Arrays

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Bandhauer ◽  
Taylor A. Bevis
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Thermal Management ◽  
Laser Diode ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Laser Diodes ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Laser Diode Arrays

The principle limit for achieving higher brightness of laser diode arrays is thermal management. State of the art laser diodes generate heat at fluxes in excess of 1 kW cm−2 on a plane parallel to the light emitting edge. As the laser diode bars are packed closer together, it becomes increasingly difficult to remove large amounts of heat in the diminishing space between neighboring diode bars. Thermal management of these diode arrays using conduction and natural convection is practically impossible, and, therefore, some form of forced convective cooling must be utilized. Cooling large arrays of laser diodes using single-phase convection heat transfer has been investigated for more than two decades by multiple investigators. Unfortunately, either large fluid temperature increases or very high flow velocities must be utilized to reject heat to a single phase fluid, and the practical threshold for single phase convective cooling of laser diodes appears to have been reached. In contrast, liquid-vapor phase change heat transport can occur with a negligible increase in temperature and, due to a high enthalpy of vaporization, at comparatively low mass flow rates. However, there have been no prior investigations at the conditions required for high brightness edge emitting laser diode arrays: >1 kW cm−2 and >10 kW cm−3. In the current investigation, flow boiling heat transfer at heat fluxes up to 1.1 kW cm−2 was studied in a microchannel heat sink with plurality of very small channels (45 × 200 microns) using R134a as the phase change fluid. The high aspect ratio channels (4.4:1) were manufactured using MEMS fabrication techniques, which yielded a large heat transfer surface area to volume ratio in the vicinity of the laser diode. To characterize the heat transfer performance, a test facility was constructed that enabled testing over a range of fluid saturation temperatures (15°C to 25°C). Due to the very small geometric features, significant heat spreading was observed, necessitating numerical methods to determine the average heat transfer coefficient from test data. This technique is crucial to accurately calculate the heat transfer coefficients for the current investigation, and it is shown that the analytical approach used by many previous investigations requires assumptions that are inadequate for the very small dimensions and heat fluxes observed in the present study. During the tests, the calculated outlet vapor quality exceeded 0.6 and the base heat flux reached a maximum of 1.1 kW cm−2. The resulting experimental heat transfer coefficients are found to be as large a 58.1 kW m−2 K−1 with an average uncertainty of ±11.1%, which includes uncertainty from all measured and calculated values, required assumptions, and geometric discretization error from meshing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document