Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients for Two Labyrinth Gas Seals: Teeth-on-Stator and Interlocking Teeth Configurations. A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Their Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingcheng Wu ◽  
Luis San Andrés
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Inlet Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Supply Pressure ◽  
Gas Seals

Labyrinth gas seals (LSs) commonly used in turbomachines reduce secondary flow leakage. Conventional see-through labyrinth seal designs include either all teeth-on-stator (TOS) or all teeth-on-rotor (TOR). Experience shows that an interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), with teeth on both stator and rotor, reduces gas leakage by up to 30% compared to the conventional see-through designs. However, field data for ILS rotordynamic characteristics are still vague and scarce in the literature. This work presents flow predictions for an ILS and a TOS LS, both seals share identical design features, namely radial clearance Cr = 0.2 mm, rotor diameter D = 150 mm, tooth pitch Li = 3.75 mm, and tooth height B = 3 mm. Air enters the seal at supply pressure Pin = 3.8, 6.9 bar (absolute) and temperature of 25 °C. The ratio of gas exit pressure to supply pressure ranges from 0.5 to 0.8, and the rotor speed is fixed at 10 krpm (surface speed of 79 m/s). The analysis implements a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method with a multi-frequency-orbit rotor whirl model. The CFD predicted mass flow rate for the ILS is ∼ 21% lower than that of the TOS LS, thus making the ILS a more efficient choice. Integration of the dynamic pressure fields in the seal cavities, obtained for excitation frequency (ω) ranging from 12% to 168% of rotor speed (sub and super synchronous whirl), allows an accurate estimation of the seal dynamic force coefficients. For all the considered operating conditions, at low frequency range, the TOS LS shows a negative direct stiffness (K < 0), frequency independent; whereas the ILS has K > 0 that increases with both frequency and supply pressure. For both seals, the magnitude of K decreases when the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio increases. On the other hand, the cross-coupled stiffness (k) from both seals is frequency dependent, its magnitude increases with gas supply pressure, and k for the ILS is more sensitive to a change in the exit/inlet pressure ratio. Notably, k turns negative for subsynchronous frequencies below rotor speed (Ω) for both the TOS LS and the ILS. The direct damping (C) for the TOS LS remains constant for ω > ½ Ω and has a larger magnitude than the damping for the ILS over the frequency range up to 1.5 Ω. An increase in exit/inlet pressure ratio decreases the direct damping for both seals. The effective damping coefficient, Ceff = (C-k/ω), whenever positive aids to damp vibrations, whereas Ceff < 0 is a potential source for an instability. For frequencies ω/Ω < 1.3, Ceff for the TOS LS is higher in magnitude than that for the ILS. From a rotordynamics point of view, the ILS is not a sound selection albeit it reduces leakage. Comparison of the CFD predicted force coefficients against those from a bulk flow model demonstrates that the later simple model delivers poor results, often contradictory and largely indifferent to the type of seal, ILS or TOS LS. In addition, CFD model predictions are benchmarked against experimental dynamic force coefficients for two TOS LSs published by Ertas et al. (2012, “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Preswirl and High Differential Pressure Ratio,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(4), pp. 04250301–04250312) and Vannini et al. (2014, “Labyrinth Seal and Pocket Damper Seal High Pressure Rotordynamic Test Data,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(2), pp. 022501–022509.)

Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients for Two Labyrinth Gas Seals: Teeth-on-Stator and Interlocking Teeth Configurations — A CFD Approach to Their Performance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Tingcheng Wu
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Inlet Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Supply Pressure ◽  
Exit Pressure ◽  
Gas Seals

Labyrinth gas seals (LS) commonly used in turbomachines reduce secondary flow leakage. Conventional see-through labyrinth seal designs include either all Teeth-On-Stator (TOS) or all Teeth-On-Rotor (TOR). Experience shows that an interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), with teeth on both stator and rotor, reduces gas leakage by up to 30% compared to the conventional see-through designs. However, field data for ILS rotordynamic characteristics is still vague and scarce in the literature. This work presents flow predictions for an ILS and a TOS LS, both seals share identical design features, namely radial clearance Cr = 0.2 mm, rotor diameter D = 150 mm, tooth pitch Li = 3.75 mm, and tooth height B = 3 mm. Air enters the seal at supply pressure Pin = 3.8, 6.9 bar (absolute) and temperature of 25 °C. The ratio of gas exit pressure to supply pressure ranges from 0.5 to 0.8, and the rotor speed is fixed at 10 krpm (surface speed of 79 m/s). The analysis implements a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method with a multi-frequency-orbit rotor whirl model. The CFD predicted mass flow rate for the ILS is ∼21% lower than that of the TOS LS, thus making the ILS a more efficient choice. Integration of the dynamic pressure fields in the seal cavities, obtained for excitation frequency (ω) ranging from 12% to 168% of rotor speed (sub and super synchronous whirl), allows an accurate estimation of the seal dynamic force coefficients. For all the considered operating conditions, at low frequency range the TOS LS shows a negative direct stiffness (K < 0), frequency independent; whereas the ILS has K > 0 that increases with both frequency and supply pressure. For both seals, the magnitude of K decreases when the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio increases. On the other hand, the cross-coupled stiffness (k) from both seals is frequency dependent, its magnitude increases with gas supply pressure, and the k for the ILS is more sensitive to a change in the exit/inlet pressure ratio. Notably, k turns negative for subsynchronous frequencies below rotor speed (Ω) for both the TOS LS and ILS. The direct damping (C) for the TOS LS remains constant for ω > ½ Ω and has a larger magnitude than the damping for the ILS over the frequency range up to 1.5Ω. An increase in exit/inlet pressure ratio decreases the direct damping for both seals. The effective damping coefficient, Ceff = (C-k/ω) whenever positive aids to damp vibrations, whereas Ceff < 0 is a potential source for an instability. For frequencies ω /Ω < 1.3, Ceff for the TOS LS is higher in magnitude than that for the ILS. From a rotordynamics point of view, the ILS is not a sound selection albeit it reduces leakage. Comparison of the CFD predicted force coefficients against those from a bulk flow model demonstrate the later simple model delivers poor results, often contradictory and largely indifferent to the type of seal, ILS or TOS LS. In addition, CFD model predictions are benchmarked against experimental dynamic force coefficients for two TOS LSs published by Ertas et al. (2012) and Vannini et al. (2014).

Leakage and Cavity Pressures in an Interlocking Labyrinth Gas Seal: Measurements vs. Predictions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Tingcheng Wu ◽  
Jose Barajas-Rivera ◽  
Jiaxin Zhang ◽  
Rimpei Kawashita
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flow ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Inlet Pressure ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Labyrinth Seals ◽  
Gas Seals

Abstract Gas labyrinth seals (LS) restrict secondary flows (leakage) in turbomachinery and their impact on the efficiency and rotordynamic stability of high-pressure compressors and steam turbines can hardly be overstated. Amongst seal types, the interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), having teeth on both the rotor and on the stator, is able to reduce leakage up to 30% compared to other LSs with either all teeth on the rotor or all teeth on the stator. This paper introduces a revamped facility to test gas seals for their rotordynamic performance and presents measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures in a five teeth ILS. The seal with overall length/diameter L/D = 0.3 and small tip clearance Cr/D = 0.00133 is supplied with air at T = 298 K and increasing inlet pressure Pin = 0.3 MPa ∼ 1.3 MPa, while the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio PR = Pout/Pin is set to range from 0.3 to 0.8. The rotor speed varies from null to 10 krpm (79 m/s max. surface speed). During the tests, instrumentation records the seal mass flow (ṁ) and static pressure in each cavity. In parallel, a bulk-flow model (BFM) and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis predict the flow field and deliver the same performance characteristics, namely leakage and cavity pressures. Both measurements and predictions agree closely (within 5%) and demonstrate the seal mass flow rate is independent of rotor speed. A modified flow factor Φ¯=m.T/PinD1-PR2 characterizes best the seal mass flow with a unique magnitude for all pressure conditions, Pin and PR.

Leakage and Cavity Pressures in an Interlocking Labyrinth Gas Seal: Measurements Versus Predictions

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Tingcheng Wu ◽  
Jose Barajas-Rivera ◽  
Jiaxin Zhang ◽  
Rimpei Kawashita
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flow ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Inlet Pressure ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Labyrinth Seals ◽  
Gas Seals

Gas labyrinth seals (LS) restrict secondary flows (leakage) in turbomachinery and their impact on the efficiency and rotordynamic stability of high-pressure compressors and steam turbines can hardly be overstated. Among seal types, the interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), having teeth on both the rotor and the stator, is able to reduce leakage up to 30% compared to other LSs with either all teeth on the rotor (TOR) or all teeth on the stator. This paper introduces a revamped facility to test gas seals for their rotordynamic performance and presents measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures in a five teeth ILS. The seal with overall length/diameter L/D = 0.3 and small tip clearance Cr/D = 0.00133 is supplied with air at T = 298 K and increasing inlet pressure Pin = 0.3–1.3 MPa, while the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio PR = Pout/Pin is set to range from 0.3 to 0.8. The rotor speed varies from null to 10 krpm (79 m/s max. surface speed). During the tests, instrumentation records the seal mass flow (m˙) and static pressure in each cavity. In parallel, a bulk-flow model (BFM) and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis predict the flow field and deliver the same performance characteristics, namely leakage and cavity pressures. Both measurements and predictions agree closely (within 5%) and demonstrate that the seal mass flow rate is independent of rotor speed. A modified flow factor Φ¯=m˙T/(PinD1−PR2) characterizes best the seal mass flow with a unique magnitude for all pressure conditions, Pin and PR.

Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Pocket Damper Seal Operating Under a Wet Gas Condition: Tests Versus Predictions

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Xueliang Lu
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Mass Flow ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Supply Pressure ◽  
Liquid Mass ◽  
Wet Gas

AbstractHigh-performance centrifugal compressors presently favor pocket damper seals (PDSs) as a choice of secondary flow control element offering a large effective damping coefficient to mitigate rotor subsynchronous whirl motions. Current and upcoming multiple-phase compression systems in subsea production facilities must demonstrate long-term operation and continuous availability, free of harmful rotor instabilities. Plain annular seals and labyrinth (LABY) seals are notoriously bad choices, whereas a PDS, by stopping the circulation of trapped liquid, operates stably. This paper presents experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results for the leakage and dynamic force coefficients obtained in a dedicated test facility hosting a fully partitioned PDS (FPPDS), four ribbed and with eight pockets per cavity. The test PDS, operating at a rotor speed 5250 rpm (surface speed 35 m/s) and under a supply pressure/discharge pressure ratio up to 3.2, is supplied with a mixture of air and ISO VG 10 oil whose maximum liquid volume fraction (LVF) is 2.2%, equivalent to a liquid mass fraction of 84%. When supplied with just air (dry condition), the measured leakage increases nonlinearly with supply pressure. Under a wet gas condition, the recorded mass flow increases on account of the large difference in density between the liquid and the gas. CFD-derived mass flow rates for both dry and wet gas conditions agree with the measured ones. The test dry gas PDS produces a direct dynamic stiffness (HR) increasing with frequency, whereas the direct damping (C) and cross-coupled dynamic stiffness (hR) coefficients remain relatively constant. The CFD-predicted damping agrees best with the test C albeit overpredicting HR at low excitation frequencies and hR at all frequencies (<175 Hz ∼ twice rotor speed). Under a wet gas condition with LVF  =  0.4%, the test force coefficients show great variability over the excitation frequency range; in particular, HR < 0, though growing with frequency due to the large liquid mass fraction. The CFD predictions, on the other hand, produce a dynamic direct stiffness HR > 0 for all frequencies. Both experimental hR and C for the wet gas PDS are larger than their counterparts for the dry gas seal. The CFD-predicted C and hR, wet versus dry, show a modest growth, yet remaining lower than the test data. The CFD-derived flow field for a wet gas condition shows that the seal radial partition walls (ridges) reduce the circumferential flow velocity and liquid accumulation within a pocket. Both the test data and the CFD prediction show that the magnitude of the flexibility function for the PDS test system reduces when the two-component mixture flows through the seal, hence revealing the additional effective damping, more pronounced for the test data rather than that from the predictions. Further work, experimental and CFD based, will continue to advance the technology of wet gas seals while bridging the gap between test data and computational physics model simulations.

Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Pocket Damper Seal Operating Under a Wet Gas Condition: Tests vs. Predictions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Xueliang Lu
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Mass Flow ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Rotor Speed ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Supply Pressure ◽  
Liquid Mass ◽  
Wet Gas

Abstract High performance centrifugal compressors presently favor pocket damper seals (PDSs) as a choice of secondary flow control element offering a large effective damping coefficient to mitigate rotor sub synchronous whirl motions. Current and upcoming multiple-phase compression systems in subsea production facilities must demonstrate long term operation and continuous availability, free of harmful rotor instabilities. Plain annular seals and labyrinth seals are notoriously bad choices, whereas a PDS, by stopping the circulation of trapped liquid, operates stably. This paper presents experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results for the leakage and dynamic force coefficients obtained in a dedicated test facility hosting a fully partitioned PDS, four ribbed and with eight pockets per cavity. The test PDS, operating at a rotor speed 5,250 rpm (surface speed 35 m/s) and under a supply pressure/discharge pressure ratio up to 3.2, is supplied with a mixture of air and ISO VG 10 oil whose maximum liquid volume fraction (LVF) is 2.2%, equivalent to a liquid mass fraction of 84%. When supplied with just air (dry condition), the measured leakage increases nonlinearly with supply pressure. Under a wet gas condition, the recorded mass flow increases on account of the large difference in density between the liquid and the gas. CFD derived mass flow rates for both dry and wet gas conditions agree with the measured ones. The test dry gas PDS produces a direct dynamic stiffness (HR) increasing with frequency whereas the direct damping (C) and cross-coupled dynamic stiffness (hR) coefficients remain relatively constant. The CFD predicted damping agrees best with the test C albeit over predicting HR at low excitation frequencies and hR at all frequencies (< 175 Hz ∼ twice rotor speed). Under a wet gas condition with LVF = 0.4%, the test force coefficients show great variability over the excitation frequency range; in particular HR < 0, though growing with frequency due to the large liquid mass fraction. The CFD predictions, on the other hand, produce a dynamic direct stiffness HR > 0 for all frequencies. Both experimental hR and C for the wet gas PDS are larger than their counterparts for the dry gas seal. The CFD predicted C and hR, wet vs. dry, show a modest growth, yet remaining lower than the test data. The CFD derived flow field for a wet gas condition shows the seal radial partition walls (ridges) reduce the circumferential flow velocity and liquid accumulation within a pocket. Both the test data and CFD prediction show that the magnitude of the flexibility function for the PDS test system reduces when the two component mixture flows through the seal, hence revealing the additional effective damping, more pronounced for the test data rather than that from the predictions. Further work, experimental and CFD based, will continue to advance the technology of wet gas seals while bridging the gap between test data and computational physics model simulations.

A Bulk Flow Model for Off-Centered Honeycomb Gas Seals

2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Soulas ◽  
Luis San Andres
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Control Volume ◽  
Bulk Flow ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Honeycomb Seal ◽  
Rotor Eccentricity ◽  
Honeycomb Seals ◽  
Gas Seals

A computational analysis for prediction of the static and dynamic forced performance of gas honeycomb seals at off-centered rotor conditions follows. The bulk-flow analysis, similar to the two-control volume flow model of Kleynhans and Childs (1997, “The Acoustic Influence of Cell Depth on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Smooth-Rotor/Honeycomb-Stator Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 119, pp. 949–957), is brought without loss of generality into a single-control volume model, thus simplifying the computational process. The formulation accommodates the honeycomb effective cell depth, and existing software for annular pressure seals and is easily upgraded for damper seal analysis. An analytical perturbation method for derivation of zeroth- and first-order flow fields renders the seal equilibrium response and frequency-dependent dynamic force impedances, respectively. Numerical predictions for a centered straight-bore honeycomb gas seal shows good agreement with experimentally identified impedances, hence validating the model and confirming the paramount influence of excitation frequency on the rotordynamic force coefficients of honeycomb seals. The effect of rotor eccentricity on the static and dynamic forced response of a smooth annular seal and a honeycomb seal is evaluated for characteristic pressure differentials and rotor speeds. Leakage for the two seal types increases slightly as the rotor eccentricity increases. Rotor off-centering has a pronounced nonlinear effect on the predicted (and experimentally verified) dynamic force coefficients for smooth seals. However, in honeycomb gas seals, even large rotor center excursions do not sensibly affect the effective local film thickness, maintaining the flow azimuthal symmetry. The current model and predictions thus increase confidence in honeycomb seal design, operating performance, and reliability in actual applications.

Experimental Identification of Dynamic Force Coefficients for a 110 mm Compliantly Damped Hybrid Gas Bearing

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Load Capacity ◽  
Excitation Frequency ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Inlet Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Metal Mesh ◽  
Gas Bearings ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Test Parameters ◽  
Gas Bearing

Compliant hybrid gas bearings combine key enabling features from both fixed geometry externally pressurized gas bearings and compliant foil bearings. The compliant hybrid bearing relies on both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic film pressures to generate load capacity and stiffness to the rotor system, while providing damping through integrally mounted metal mesh bearing support dampers. This paper presents experimentally identified force coefficients for a 110 mm compliantly damped gas bearing using a controlled-motion test rig. Test parameters include hydrostatic inlet pressure, excitation frequency, and rotor speed. The experiments were structured to evaluate the feasibility of implementing these bearings in large size turbomachinery. Dynamic test results indicate weak dependency of equivalent direct stiffness coefficients to most test parameters except for frequency and speed, where higher speeds and excitation frequency decreased equivalent bearing stiffness values. The bearing system equivalent direct damping was negatively impacted by increased inlet pressure and excitation frequency, while the cross-coupled force coefficients showed values an order of magnitude lower than the direct coefficients. The experiments also include orbital excitations to simulate unbalance response representative of a target machine while synchronously traversing a critical speed. The results indicate that the gas bearing can accommodate vibration levels larger than the set bore clearance while maintaining satisfactory damping levels.

Leakage and Force Coefficients of a Grooved Wet (Bubbly Liquid) Seal for Multiphase Pumps and Comparisons With Prior Test Results for a Three Wave Seal

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueliang Lu ◽  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Tingcheng Wu
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Excitation Frequency ◽  
Gas Content ◽  
Bubbly Liquid ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Ring Seal

Abstract In the subsea oil and gas industry, multiphase pumps and wet gas compressors are engineered choices saving transportation and separation facility costs. In these machines, seals handling multiple phase components must be able to operate without affecting the system efficiency and its dynamic stability. This paper, extending prior work conducted with uniform clearance and wavy surface annular seals, presents measurements of leakage and dynamic force coefficients in a grooved seal whose dimensions are scaled from an impeller wear ring seal in a boiler feed pump. The 14-grooves seal has diameter D = 127 mm, length L = 0.34 D, and clearance c = 0.211 mm; each groove has shallow depth dg ∼2.6 c and length Lg ∼ 3.4% L. At a shaft speed of 3.5 krpm (surface speed = 23.3 m/s), a mixture of air in ISO VG 10 oil with inlet gas volume fraction (GVF) ranging from 0 (just oil) to 0.7 (mostly air) lubricates the seal. The pressure ratio (inlet/exit) is 2.9. The flow is laminar since the liquid is viscous and the pressure drop is low. The measured mixture mass flow decreases continuously with an increase in inlet GVF. The seal stiffnesses (direct K and cross coupled k), added mass (M), and direct damping (C) coefficients are constant when the supplied mixture is low in gas content, GVF ≤ 0.1. As the gas content increases, 0.2 ≤  GVF ≤ 0.5, the seal direct dynamic stiffness becomes nil with an increase in excitation frequency, whereas k and C reduce steadily with GVF. In general, for GVF ≤ 0.5, the direct damping is invariant with frequency; variations appearing for GVF = 0.7. Compared against a three wave annular seal, the grooved seal offers much lower force coefficients, in particular the viscous damping. Thus, for laminar flow operation (heavy oil) with a low pressure drop as in a wear ring seal, a three wave seal is recommended as it also offers a significant centering stiffness.

Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Multiple-Blade, Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seal: Test Results and Predictions

1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiming Li ◽  
Ramon Aguilar ◽  
Luis San Andre´s ◽  
John M. Vance
Keyword(s):  
Control Volume ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Flexible Structure ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Exit Pressure ◽  
Identification Technique ◽  
Gas Damper ◽  
Stiffness And Damping

Experimental rotordynamic force coefficients and leakage for a four-blade, two-four pocket gas damper seal are presented and compared to predictions based on a one control volume bulk-flow model. The test rig comprises a vertical shaft and a test seal housing and flexible structure suspended from a rigid centering frame. The experiments were conducted at increasing rotor speeds to 6000 rpm and inlet/exit pressure ratios from 1.0 to 3.0. The seal force coefficients are obtained from impact response measurements of the seal and flexible structure using a frequency domain parameter identification technique. Both measurements and predictions show the seal direct stiffness and damping coefficients are proportional to the inlet/exit pressure ratio and insensitive to rotor speed. The agreement between experimental results and analytical predictions is acceptable. Predicted cross-coupled stiffness coefficients are of small amplitude. However, the test results evidence cross-coupled stiffnesses without journal rotation due to a structural asymmetry induced by the external pressurization into the seal. [S0742-4787(00)04201-6]

Leakage and Force Coefficients of a Grooved Wet (Bubbly Liquid) Seal for Multiphase Pumps and Comparisons With Prior Test Results for a Three Wave Seal

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueliang Lu ◽  
Luis San Andrés ◽  
Tingcheng Wu
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Excitation Frequency ◽  
Gas Content ◽  
Bubbly Liquid ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Force Coefficients ◽  
Ring Seal

Abstract In the subsea oil and gas industry, multiphase pumps and wet gas compressors are engineered choices saving transportation and separation facility costs. In these machines, seals handling multiple phase components must be able to operate without affecting the system efficiency and its dynamic stability. This paper, extending prior work conducted with uniform clearance and wavy surface annular seals, presents measurements of leakage and dynamic force coefficients in a grooved seal whose dimensions are scaled from an impeller wear ring seal in a boiler feed pump. The 14-grooves seal has diameter D = 127 mm, length L = 0.34 D, and clearance c = 0.211 mm; each groove has shallow depth dg ∼2.6 c and length Lg ∼ 3.4% L. At a shaft speed of 3.5 krpm (surface speed = 23.3 m/s), a mixture of air in ISO VG 10 oil with inlet gas volume fraction (GVF) ranging from 0 (just oil) to 0.7 (mostly air) lubricates the seal. The pressure ratio (inlet/exit) is 2.9. The flow is laminar since the liquid is viscous and the pressure drop is low. The measured mixture mass flow decreases continuously with an increase in inlet GVF. The seal stiffnesses (direct K and cross coupled k), added mass (M), and direct damping (C) coefficients are constant when the supplied mixture is low in gas content, GVF ≤ 0.1. As the gas content increases, 0.2 ≤ GVF ≤ 0.5, the seal direct dynamic stiffness becomes nil with an increase in excitation frequency, whereas k and C reduce steadily with GVF. In general, for GVF ≤ 0.5 the direct damping is invariant with frequency; variations appearing for GVF = 0.7. Compared against a three wave annular seal, the grooved seal offers much lower force coefficients, in particular the viscous damping. Thus, for laminar flow operation (heavy oil) with a low pressure drop as in a wear ring seal, a three wave seal is recommended as it also offers a significant centering stiffness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document