scholarly journals Elastic-Plastic Analysis of the PVRC Burst Disk Tests With Comparison to the ASME Code Primary Stress Limits

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Jones ◽  
J. E. Holliday
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
High Strength ◽  
High Ductility ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Primary Stress ◽  
Asme Code

This paper provides a comparison between finite element analysis results and test data from the Pressure Vessel Research Council (PVRC) burst disk program. Testing sponsored by the PVRC over 20 yr ago was done by pressurizing circular flat disks made from three different materials until failure by bursting. The purpose of this reanalysis is to investigate the use of finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the primary stress limits of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (hereafter the Code), and to qualify the use of elastic-plastic (EP-FEA) for limit-load calculations. The three materials tested represent the range of strength and ductility found in modern pressure vessel construction and include a low-strength, high-ductility material, a medium-strength, medium-ductility material, and a high-strength, low-ductility, low-alloy material. Results of elastic and EP-FEA are compared to test data. Stresses from the elastic analyses are linearized for comparison of Code primary stress limits to test results. Elastic-plastic analyses are done using both best-estimate and elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) stress-strain curves. Both large strain-large displacement (LSLD) and small strain-small displacement (SSSD) assumptions are used with the EP-FEA. Analysis results are compared to test results to evaluate the various analysis methods, models, and assumptions as applied to the bursting of thin disks. The test results show that low-strength, high-ductility materials have a higher burst capacity than do high-strength, low-ductility materials. Linearized elastic FEA stresses and ASME Code primary stress limits provide excessive margins to failure for the burst disks for all three materials. The results of these studies show that LSLD EP-FEA can provide a best-estimate analysis of the disks, but the accuracy depends on the material stress-strain curve. This work concludes that SSSD EPP analysis methods provide a robust and viable alternative to the current elastic linearization method of satisfying the primary stress limits of the Code. [S0094-9930(00)01602-4]

Separation of Primary Stress in Finite Element Analysis of Pressure Vessel with the Principle of Superposition

2007 ◽  
Vol 353-358 ◽  
pp. 373-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Jun Gao ◽  
Xiao Ping Shi ◽  
Hong Yan Liu ◽  
Jin Hong Li
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Engineering Application ◽  
Total Stress ◽  
Principle Of Superposition ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Primary Stress ◽  
The Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Allowable Load

A key problem in engineering application of “design by analysis” approach is how to decompose a total stress field obtained by the finite element analysis into different stress categories defined in the ASME Code III and VIII-2. In this paper, we suggested an approach to separate primary stress with the principle of superposition, in which the structure does not need to be cut into primary structure but analyzed as a whole only with decomposed load. Taking pressurized cylindrical vessel with plate head as example, the approach is demonstrated and discussed in detail. The allowable load determined by the supposed method is a little conservative than that determined by limited load analysis.

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Steel-Encased Composite Continuous Beams with High Strength Materials

2013 ◽  
Vol 648 ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Qi Yin Shi ◽  
Yi Tao Ge ◽  
Li Lin Cao ◽  
Zhao Chang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Error Control ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Continuous Beams ◽  
The Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Good Agreement

In this study, based on the test of the high strength materials of steel-encased concrete composite continuous beam, the ultimate flexural capacity of 8 composite continuous beams are analyzed by using the finite element analysis software ABAQUS. Numerical results show that it is a very good agreement for the load-deflection curves which obtained by finite element method (FEM) and those by the test results, and the error control is less than 8.5%. When selecting and utilizing appropriate cyclic constitutive model, element model and failure criterion of high strength steel and high strength concrete, the accuracy of the calculation can be improved better.

Alternative Approaches for ASME Code Simplified Elastic-Plastic Analysis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sampath Ranganath ◽  
Nathan A. Palm
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Correction Factor ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Plastic Analysis ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Alternative Approaches ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Technical Basis

Subsection NB, Section III of the ASME Code provides rules for the fatigue evaluation of nuclear pressure vessel and piping components. The stress analysis in ASME code evaluation is generally based on linear elastic analysis. Simplified rules using an elastic-plastic strain correction factor, Ke, are provided in Section III to account for plastic yielding when the primary plus secondary stress intensity range exceeds the 3Sm limit. While the simplified elastic-plastic analysis rules are easy to apply and do not require nonlinear analysis, the application of the Ke correction factor can produce extremely conservative results. This paper investigates different analytical methods that are available for simplified elastic-plastic analysis and proposes an alternative method that is not overly conservative (compared to the Code Ke) and offers a more realistic approach to simplified elastic-plastic analysis. The proposed methodology is applicable for both vessel (NB-3200), core support structures (NG-3200) and piping components (NB-3600) and does not require new finite element analysis. Information in existing ASME Code stress reports should be sufficient to determine the new Ke factor. The proposed methodology is applicable to structural materials including austenitic stainless steel and nickel based alloys, carbon steel and low alloy steel. Comparison of the proposed methodology with detailed elastic-plastic finite element analysis shows that the new Ke factors are conservative but offer relief from the excessive conservatism in the Code Ke values. This paper provides the technical basis for an ASME draft Code Case for Alternative Approaches for ASME Code Simplified Elastic-plastic Analysis being pursued through the Section III ASME Code Committees.

Elastic-Shakedown Analysis of Axisymmetric Nozzles

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muscat ◽  
Donald Mackenzie
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Shakedown Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Division 2

An investigation of the shakedown behavior of axisymmetric nozzles under internal pressure is presented. The analysis is based on elastic-plastic finite element analysis and Melan’s lower bound shakedown theorem. Calculated shakedown pressures are compared with values from the literature and with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 2 primary plus secondary stress limits. Results obtained by the lower bound method are also verified by cyclic elastic-plastic finite element analysis.

Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Exterior FRP Shell

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 1461-1465
Author(s):  
Chuan Min Zhang ◽  
Chao He Chen ◽  
Ye Fan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beams ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Contact Interface ◽  
Accurate Calculation ◽  
Element Analysis

The paper makes an analysis of the reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP Shell in Finite Element, and compares it with the test results. The results show that, by means of this model, mechanical properties of reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP shell can be predicted better. However, the larger the load, the larger deviation between calculated values and test values. Hence, if more accurate calculation is required, issues of contact interface between the reinforced concrete beams and the FRP shell should be taken into consideration.

Stress Analysis and Structure Optimization for the Opening Flat Cover of Pressure Vessels

2012 ◽  
Vol 538-541 ◽  
pp. 3253-3258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Jian Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Structure Optimization ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Secondary Stress ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Primary Stress ◽  
Flat Cover

According to the results of finite element analysis (FEA), when the diameter of opening of the flat cover is no more than 0.5D (d≤0.5D), there is obvious stress concentration at the edge of opening, but only existed within the region of 2d. Increasing the thickness of flat covers could not relieve the stress concentration at the edge of opening. It is recommended that reinforcing element being installed within the region of 2d should be used. When the diameter of openings is larger than 0.5D (d>0.5D), conical or round angle transitions could be employed at connecting location, with which the edge stress decreased remarkably. However, the primary stress plus the secondary stress would be valued by 3[σ].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document