Methodology to Support Environmentally Aware Product Design Using Axiomatic Design: eAD+

Author(s):  
Mijeong Shin ◽  
James R. Morrison ◽  
Hyo Won Suh

With the increasing environmental sophistication of consumers, there is a need to consider environmental factors and sustainability in the design process. This paper proposes a design methodology intended for software implementation called eAD+ to address the following four issues: 1) there are inherent couplings between eco-factors and product design parameters, 2) eco-factors are seldom structured for ready use within all phases of the design process, 3) there is a need for a formal feedback mechanism from the results of eco-analysis to the design process, and 4) it can be difficult to identify which design choice causes the most egregious environmental issue or functional coupling. eAD+ is based primarily on the Axiomatic Design (AD) methodology and addresses these issues as follows. First, AD directly identifies couplings between the functional requirements (FRs) in a design so that efforts, such as TRIZ, can be applied to address them. Second, as common eco-factors do not provide sufficient structure for inclusion in the AD framework, we develop structured eco-FRs and constraints. These are included alongside the product FRs throughout the design process. Third, the subset of the design matrix (DM) relating the eco-FRs to the design parameters explicitly incorporates feedback from eco-analysis into the design process. Here a database containing environmental (or sustainability) information is employed to evaluate the design. Fourth, we employ an augmented DM (drawing inspiration from the House of Quality of QFD) that provides weights highlighting which design parameter has the greatest influence on eco-factors and functional couplings.

2018 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 01009
Author(s):  
Auðunn Herjólfsson ◽  
Haraldur Helgason ◽  
Sindri S. Ingvason ◽  
þráinn þórarinsson ◽  
Joseph Timothy Foley

With the explosion of smart devices, tablets can currently be found everywhere. From schools to kiosks to watching movies in bed, these devices are prevalent everywhere in modern life. The problem with watching movies in bed using tablets is the necessity of hand usage. The market currently holds a few products that attempt to solve this, but none truly frees the user, allowing them hands-free usage with an easy exit of the bed. In this paper, we will describe a design which, utilizing axiomatic design, will out-perform anything currently existing in the same field, by giving a stable viewing experience while fitting to nearly any bed or sofa. Axiomatic Design ensured a comprehensive design process by ensuring customer needs were transformed into carefully thought out functional requirements and design parameters while maintaining modularity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 00011
Author(s):  
Chu-Yi Wang ◽  
Ang Liu ◽  
Stephen Lu

Because parametric values are unknown during initial concept generation, the Axiomatic Design Theory uses the binary design matrix (DM) to represent the coupling relationship between functional requirements and design parameters. However, given an existing product, it would be possible to employ the numerical DM that has more detailed information than the binary DM to help improve the design concept. This paper proposed a two-phase method to create a numerical DM in phase I and manage the functional couplings in phase II for concept improvement of existing product. A decomposition-definition-levelling framework and the Puritan-Bennett’s 0-1-3-9 level rating are employed to evaluate the system impact of each functional coupling to create the numerical DM of an existing design concept. The Design Coupling Sequence (DCS) approach was extended to use the numerical DM to improve this design concept. Compared with other numerical matrices for product development and the structured approach by Su et al., our method is more generic and faster, providing useful details yet still able to maintain the dominance of the high-level couplings.


Author(s):  
Chu-Yi Wang ◽  
Stephen C.-Y. Lu ◽  
Ang Liu

A large part of design complexity is originated during the concept generation phase when coupling relationships are established between functional requirements and design parameters. Therefore, one of the important tasks in concept improvement is to properly manage the sequence of these functional couplings to minimize the design complexity. This paper introduces a new method, called Design Coupling Sequence (DCS), which, given a design matrix generated during conceptual design, can symmetrically guide the designer through this sequencing task to reduce the design complexity. DCS is developed with sound foundations from logics and mathematics, and useful in engineering practice as real-world design tasks become increasingly complex.


Author(s):  
Hongqian Yu ◽  
Lily H. Shu ◽  
Ron Venter

Abstract This paper describes an Axiomatic Design process enhanced by the House of Quality that combines the advantages of these two methods: 1) the House of Quality is used to translate customer needs into engineering specifications; 2) decomposition by theme is used to determine the Basic Functional Requirements; 3) engineering specifications are categorized into strategies, constraints, Quality Functional Requirements and possible Basic Functional Requirements; 4) Quality Functional Requirements are assigned to different Basic Functional Requirements; 5) Basic Design Matrix, Single Quality Design Matrix and Cross Quality Design Matrix are generated to study and evaluate design concepts from different aspects. By using this approach, it is possible that an improved understanding and higher efficiency of the design process may be achieved.


2011 ◽  
Vol 328-330 ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Jia Qi Wang ◽  
Run Hua Tan

In the mapping from functional requirements to design parameters in Axiomatic Design, a relation model about design parameters will be discussed. According to this model, use trimming which is redefined with Axiomatic Design and Evolution Mode of TRIZ to reduce coupling. At last, a JYS - Z electric brush type filter is described to prove the process.


Author(s):  
Prakash C. R. J. Naidu ◽  
Kshirsagar C. J. Naidu

This paper introduces a new approach named Design for Patentability (DFP) and presents the preliminary formulation of a formal methodology to attempt consideration of patentability aspects during the early stages of design including conceptual design and initial implementation of detailed design and manufacturing. Design for Automation (DFAM) approach formulated earlier by the first author based on Axiomatic Design Theory originated by Suh et. al. at MIT is adapted, suitably modified and customized for inclusion of patentability aspects such as anticipation, functionality, utility, and obviousness. Highlighting the complexity in incorporation of legal aspects in an engineering methodology, the paper presents the possibilities of improving the patentability of a design by a systematic and considered approach. The proposed methodology introduces a Patentability Evaluation phase in-between the Product Design, Process Design and Automation System Design phases of DFAM. The paper reviews mapping of parameters between different domains, namely, Functional Requirements Domain, Design Parameters Domain, Process Requirements Domain, and Design Automation Parameters Domain encompassed in the DFAM methodology and includes Patentability Parameters Domain in parallel to the last three domains to enable possible consideration of patentability aspects during Product Design, Process Design, and Automation System Design. Further, the paper briefly discusses the relevance of the Information Axiom of the Axiomatic Design Theory in the context of preparation of preliminary drafts of invention disclosure and potential claims for perusal by patent agents or attorneys. The approach reported in the paper is expected to have broad applications in the growing field of innovation based entrepreneurship in which design for patentability is an essential requirement for success of a business venture.


Author(s):  
Zhuochen Shi ◽  
Gregory Mocko

Axiomatic Design has been applied and developed as a tool, offering a scientific basis for design and improving design activities. Axiomatic Design has been used in various fields such as software system design, structure design, and product design. However, several challenges and limitations exist in Axiomatic Design including: the inconsistency in identifying design parameters, existence of coupled design, and multiple groups of functional requirements and design parameters. Aimed at using Axiomatic Design to generate conceptual solutions in engineering design while overcoming its limitations, a formal ontology is developed. The ontology defines functional requirements, design parameters, concepts, components and variables and their relationships. Axioms and rules of Axiomatic Design for the ontology are summarized. The Axiomatic Design ontology is applied to the design of a car seat as an example generating several concepts, and then compared and analyzed multiple groups of the concepts with the help of Axiomatic Design rules. More design ideas can be generated by combining detailed concepts as the higher level possible solutions.


Author(s):  
K. N. Song ◽  
B. S. Kang ◽  
K. H. Yoon ◽  
S. K. Choi ◽  
G. J. Park

Recently, much attention has been focused on the design of the fuel assemblies in the Pressurized Light Water Reactor (PLWR). The spacer grid is one of the main structural components in a fuel assembly. It supports fuel rods, guides cooling water, and maintains geometry from the external impact loads. In this research, a new shape of the spacer grid is designed by the axiomatic approach. The Independence Axiom is utilized for the design. For the conceptual design, functional requirements (FRs) are defined and corresponding design parameters (DPs) are found to satisfy FRs in sequence. Overall configuration and shapes are determined in this process. Detailed design is carried out based on the result of the axiomatic design. For the detailed design, the system performances are evaluated by using linear and nonlinear finite element analysis. The dimensions are determined by optimization. Some commercial codes are utilized for the analysis and design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 00015
Author(s):  
Wenguang Lin ◽  
Renbin Xiao ◽  
Rongshen Lai ◽  
Xiaozhen Guo

Axiomatic design theory is widely used in new product development by providing design solutions through mapping between functional requirements and design parameters. However, the theory does not provide a method to help designer obtain and select design parameters. To this end, this paper introduces patent analysis to overcome the deficiency. Firstly, functional requirements are transformed into patent search terms, and design parameters are obtained from patents. Secondly, morphological matrix is used to represent the relationships between target function and multiple design parameters. Thirdly, design parameters with higher patent frequency are chose and combined into a new scheme. Finally, the scheme is evaluated by the independent axiom of Axiomatic Design theory. The methodology is demonstrated and validated with a case study of spa shower.


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
José E. Lugo ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Stephen M. Batill ◽  
Laura Carlson

Gestalt principles have previously served as qualitative guidelines for good visual design in art, architecture, and product design. This paper introduces a formal method to quantify classical Gestalt principles (proximity, continuity, closure, symmetry, parallelism, and similarity) for two-dimensional product representations. With the approach, designers use their judgment to divide a 2D representation of a new concept or existing design into its key atomistic elements, identify the most appropriate Gestalt principles that apply to the grouping of those elements, and then can objectively quantify the design’s adherence to those principles using mathematical functions of the design parameters. This quantification provides a tool to augment a design team’s own subjective interpretations in evaluating and communicating a product’s visual appearance at any stage of or throughout the design process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document