Dismantling Method of Fuel Cycle Facilities Obtained by Dismantling of the JRTF

Author(s):  
Fumihiko Kanayama

The Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Reprocessing Test Facility (JRTF) was the first reprocessing facility which was constructed by applying only Japanese technology to establish basic technology on wet reprocessing. JRTF had been operated since 1968 to 1969 using spent fuels (uranium metal/aluminum clad, about 600kg as uranium metal and 600MWD/T) from the Japan Research Reactor No.3 (JRR-3). Reprocessing testings on PUREX process were implemented at 3 runs, so that, 200g of plutonium dioxide were extracted. After JRTF was shut down at 1970, it had been used for research and development of reprocessing since 1971. The more mature research and development of nuclear are, the more opportunity of dismantling of old nuclear facilities would be. Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) has an experience of full scale of dismantling through decommissioning of Japan Power Demonstration Reactor (JPDR)1). On the other hand, we didn’t have that of fuel cycle facility. Moreover, it is considered that dismantling methods of nuclear reactor and fuel cycle facility are different for following reason, components contaminated TRU nuclide including Pu, and components installed inside narrow cells. Dismantling methods are important factor to decide manpower and time for dismantling. So, it is indispensable to optimize dismantling method in order to minimize manpower and time for dismantling. Considering the background mentioned above, the decommissioning project of JRTF was started in 1990. The decommissioning project of JRTF is carried out phase by phase. Phase 1; Investigation for dismantling of the JRTF2)3)4). Phase 2; R&D of decommissioning technologies for dismantling of the JRTF5)6)7)8). Phase 3; Actual dismantling of the JRTF9)10). There were several components used for reprocessing and a system for liquid radwaste storage, and those were installed inside of each of several thick concrete cells. The inner surfaces of each cell were contaminated by TRU nuclides including Pu. In phase 3, components used in reprocessing and a system for liquid radwaste storage were dismantled. Moreover, opening was made in concrete walls (including ceiling) for this work. Effective practices for dismantling fuel cycle facilities were obtained through these works. On this report, effective dismantle methods obtained by actual dismantling activities in JRTF are introduced.


Author(s):  
Kenji Kudo ◽  
Shinji Kawatsuma ◽  
Hiroshi Rindo ◽  
Kozo Watabe ◽  
Hiroyuki Tomii ◽  
...  

Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) played a leading role in basic research in the field of atomic energy research and development, while Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC) did a major role in FBR cycle development and high level waste disposal. According to Japanese government’s decision in December 2001, JAERI and JNC was merged as of October 1st. 2005. The new organization, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) is an institute for comprehensive R&D for atomic energy, and which is the largest research and development institute among Japanese Governmental organization. Its missions are basic research on atomic, R&D for nuclear fuel cycle, decommissioning and disposal for own facilities and waste, contribution to safety and non-proliferation, etc. The JAEA owns a number of nuclear facilities: research reactors such as JRR-2 and Joyo, prototype reactors such as ATR “Fugen” and FBR “Monju”, fuel cycle plants such as Uranium Enrichment Demonstration Plant at ningyo-toge, MOX fuel plants at Tokai, Reprocessing Plant at Tokai, and Hot Laboratories such as JRTF and FMF. As a part of preparation of the mergence, JNC and JAERI have jointly developed a comprehensive cost estimation method for decommissioning, based on decommissioning and upgrading experiences of JAERI and JNC. This method has adopted more estimation formulae for typical decommissioning activities than ever, so as to be more reliable. JAERI and JNC had estimated by using the comprehensive estimation method for decommissioning, and concluded the total cost for decommissioning would be 600 billion yen (approx. 5 billion USD).



1975 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pendley ◽  
Lawrence Scheinman ◽  
Richard W. Butler

“International safeguards” refer to a set of international agreements establishing control over the production, use, and final disposition of fissionable materials. Before the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) went into effect, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards had been applied to 75 reactors and ten other nuclear facilities under 51 different agreements. The design of the first regime was largely a function of political, strategic, and economic rather than technical considerations. After 1971, safeguards were made an integral part of the NPT, and became obligatory with respect to all peaceful nuclear activities in signatory states. Negotiations on the NPT safeguards regime focused on efforts to minimize the major asymmetrical costs that this implied, and particularly to meet the objections of major nonnuclear weapons states. The focus of controversy centered less on resistance to incursions on sovereignty than on demands for equity in incursion. In these negotiations, technological factors facilitated the construction of a politically acceptable regime.



Author(s):  
S. F. Challinor

In 1999 the UK government announced a step change in the strategy for the delivery of the UK civil nuclear clean-up programme. BNFL has responded to the Governments announcement by changing the strategic direction and increasing the priority on remediation activities across the Company. BNFL has extensive experience in decommissioning nuclear facilities having undertaken remediation and decommissioning operations on BNFL sites for many years, encompassing a wide range of projects including reactors, fuel cycle plants and Research and Development facilities. This paper describes the challenges posed by, and the progress made, on some of the range of decommissioning projects undertaken on the Sellafield site as part of its decommissioning and remediation portfolio. These decommissioning operations cover a variety of redundant fuel cycle facilities ranging in size and complexity in both beta gamma and alpha contamination environments utilising manual and remote decommissioning techniques to systematically and progressively reduce the hazard on the site.



1978 ◽  
Vol 8 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 106-107

The Energy Research and Development Administration’s (ERDA) primary involvement in Africa has been with Egypt and the Republic of South Africa. ERDA is also concerned to a lesser extent with several black African nations and has provided equipment grants to eight African countries in conjunction with AID and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).



Author(s):  
A.V. Kuryndin ◽  
◽  
A.S. Shapovalov ◽  
N.B. Timofeev ◽  
A.L. Vernik ◽  
...  

In accordance with the legislative framework of the system for regulating liquid and airborne discharges of radioactive substances into the environment in force in the Russian Federation, this system is equally designed to regulate discharges of the radionuclides of both artificial and natural origin. The mechanisms of radiological impact of the discharges of natural origin radionuclides on the environment and population do not have any specificity in comparison with the ones of artificial origin radionuclides. Nevertheless, to date, the law enforcement of the Russian system for regulating discharges of the radioactive substances is applied only in relation to the discharges of the radionuclides of artificial origin carried out by nuclear facilities. At the same time, regulation of the discharges of natural origin radionuclides, in accordance with the safety standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is the best practice in the field of environmental protection, and the levels of radiation exposure, which characterize such discharges, are not low enough to be neglected. Regulation of the discharges of natural origin radionuclides is provided for in the norms of the European Union and is practically applied in the number of countries of the European Union, where the legislation provides for the regulation of activities, in which the raw materials containing radionuclides of natural origin are used, and the types of economic and other activities subject to this regulation are determined. The Russian system of regulation of discharges of the radioactive substances into the environment is built on the same basic principles and criteria that underlie foreign regulation systems, and which are recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The regulatory and methodological base formed to date in the Russian Federation contains all the required legal mechanisms for the regulation of discharges of the radioactive substances from nuclear facilities, is based on the best international practices and fully complies with the standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency.



Politeja ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 14 (5 (50)) ◽  
pp. 149-165
Author(s):  
Tomasz MŁYNARSKI

THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY IN MAINTAINING NUCLEAR PEACE AND NON-PROLIFERATION REGIME IN THE 21ST CENTURY The article is an attempt to explain the IAEA’s critical role in ensuring global nuclear safety and on the global nuclear governance system. The objective of the Agency’s operation is promotion of the peaceful use of nuclear energy, including the use of energy to produce electricity, along with establishment of a system of safeguards to ensure that the countries do not use the peaceful assistance for military purposes.The aim of the article is to present the principles of the internationalsystem of nuclear safeguards and the role of the IAEA in maintaining nuclear peace and nuclear challenges of non-proliferation regime reform. The duality of nuclear technology (dual use) causes the need of strengthening the competence-control and institutional resources of the IAEA. It is necessary to oblige the Member States to cooperate with the Agency’s inspectors. The Agency should also develop a procedure to standardize the rules, structure, and legal restrictions. In addition the UN Security Council should react faster in the case of non-compliance detection. A separate issue is the internationalization of the fuel cycle.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document