A Simple 2D Wheelchair Positioning: Correcting IMU’s Data Using One Encoder and Applying Kalman Filtering

Author(s):  
Zohreh Salimi ◽  
Martin W. Ferguson-Pell

Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) are widely used for spatial positioning. They are well known, however, for signal drift. A common way of overcoming the drift is to use Kalman Filtering. In this study, we have undertaken some experiments during wheelchair propulsion, recording data with an IMU, an Encoder (tachometer) and an Optotrak (motion analysis system). We then applied Kalman filtering (with two approaches) to IMU’s data. Eventually, in order to verify Kalman’s results, they were compared to Optotrak’s data. As result of this study, 2D wheelchair tracking can be done with acceptable precision, using one IMU and one Encoder and applying Kalman filtering. Kalman filtering with approach B was a better predictor of subject’s spatial position than approach A. Kalman and even IMU’s results for rotation were of good accuracy; therefore IMU’s data can be used to find all angular characteristics of subject’s position, even without applying Kalman filtering, if the offsets are precisely found through a stationary test.

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuengfa Khobkhun ◽  
Mark A. Hollands ◽  
Jim Richards ◽  
Amornpan Ajjimaporn

Camera-based 3D motion analysis systems are considered to be the gold standard for movement analysis. However, using such equipment in a clinical setting is prohibitive due to the expense and time-consuming nature of data collection and analysis. Therefore, Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been suggested as an alternative to measure movement in clinical settings. One area which is both important and challenging is the assessment of turning kinematics in individuals with movement disorders. This study aimed to validate the use of IMUs in the measurement of turning kinematics in healthy adults compared to a camera-based 3D motion analysis system. Data were collected from twelve participants using a Vicon motion analysis system which were compared with data from four IMUs placed on the forehead, middle thorax, and feet in order to determine accuracy and reliability. The results demonstrated that the IMU sensors produced reliable kinematic measures and showed excellent reliability (ICCs 0.80–0.98) and no significant differences were seen in paired t-tests in all parameters when comparing the two systems. This suggests that the IMU sensors provide a viable alternative to camera-based motion capture that could be used in isolation to gather data from individuals with movement disorders in clinical settings and real-life situations.


Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Carey ◽  
Kevin Hufford ◽  
Amanda Martori ◽  
Mario Simoes ◽  
Francy Sinatra ◽  
...  

Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) stem from a number of causes such as illnesses, strokes, accidents or battlefield traumas. These injuries can cause issues with everyday tasks, such as gait, and are linked with vestibular dysfunction [1]. Current technology that measures gait parameters often requires time consuming set up and post processing and is limited to the laboratory setting. The purpose of this study was to develop a wearable motion analysis system (WMAS) using five commercially available inertial measurement units (IMU) working in unison to record and output four gait parameters in a clinically relevant way. The WMAS has the potential to be used to 1) help diagnose mTBI or other neurocognitive disorders; 2) provide feedback to a clinician during a training session; 3) collect gait parameter data outside of the laboratory setting to determine rehabilitation progress; 4) provide quantitative outcome measures for rehabilitation efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi D’Alfonso ◽  
Emanuele Garone ◽  
Pietro Muraca ◽  
Paolo Pugliese

AbstractIn this work, we face the problem of estimating the relative position and orientation of a camera and an object, when they are both equipped with inertial measurement units (IMUs), and the object exhibits a set of n landmark points with known coordinates (the so-called Pose estimation or PnP Problem). We present two algorithms that, fusing the information provided by the camera and the IMUs, solve the PnP problem with good accuracy. These algorithms only use the measurements given by IMUs’ inclinometers, as the magnetometers usually give inaccurate estimates of the Earth magnetic vector. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is assessed by numerical simulations and experimental tests. The results of the tests are compared with the most recent methods proposed in the literature.


Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Amy R. Lewis ◽  
Elissa J. Phillips ◽  
William S. P. Robertson ◽  
Paul N. Grimshaw ◽  
Marc Portus

Author(s):  
Pratima Saravanan ◽  
Jiyun Yao ◽  
Jessica Menold

Clinical gait analysis is used for diagnosing, assessing, and for monitoring a patient by analyzing their kinetics, kinematics and electromyography while walking. Traditionally, gait analysis is performed in a formal laboratory environment making use of several high-resolution cameras, either video or infrared. The subject is asked to walk on a force platform or a treadmill with several markers attached to their body, allowing cameras to capture the joint coordinates across time. The space required for such a laboratory is non-trivial and often the associated costs of such an experimental setup is prohibitively expensive. The current work aims to investigate the coupled use of a Microsoft Kinect and Inertial Measurement Units as a portable and cost-efficient gait analysis system. Past studies on assessing gait using either Kinect or Inertial Measurement Units concluded that they achieve medium reliability individually due to some drawbacks related to each sensor. In this study, we propose that a combined system is efficient in detecting different phases of human gait, and the combination of sensors complement each other by overcoming the individual sensor drawbacks. Preliminary findings indicate that the IMU sensors are efficient in providing gait kinematics such as step length, stride length, velocity, cadence, etc., whereas the Kinect sensor helps in studying the gait asymmetries by comparing the right and left joint, such as hips, knees, and ankle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document