Prediction of Contact Area and Frictional Behaviour of Rubber on Rigid Rough Surfaces

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen Lind ◽  
Matthias Wangenheim
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Surface Texture ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Contact Friction ◽  
Sliding Velocity ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Frictional Behaviour

In the tire-road contact friction depends on several influencing variables (e.g. surface texture, real contact area, sliding velocity, normal contact pressure, temperature, tread block geometry, compound and on the existence of a lubrication film). A multi-scale model for prediction of contact area and frictional behaviour of rubber on rigid rough surfaces at different length scales is presented. Within this publication the multi-scale approach is checked regarding convergence. By means of the model influencing parameters like sliding velocity, compound and surface texture on friction and contact area will be investigated.

Influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the normal contact of periodically rough surfaces

2016 ◽  
Vol 230 (9) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391
Author(s):  
K Houanoh ◽  
H-P Yin ◽  
J Cesbron ◽  
Q-C He
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulations ◽  
Half Space ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Elastic Half Space ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Full Contact ◽  
Rigid Surfaces

The present work aims to analyze the influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the contact between periodically rough surfaces. Square pattern and hexagonal pattern rigid surfaces are considered. Their contact with an elastic half-space is analyzed by numerical simulations. Three surfaces are generated with identical asperities periodically distributed in a plan according to different patterns. It follows from numerical results that when the load and the real contact area are small, the asperities act almost independently. However, the interaction between close asperities increases with the load becomes intensified and has a significant effect on the contact area when the situation is close to full contact.

A Multi-Scale Model for Contact Between Rough Surfaces

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Jackson ◽  
Jeffrey L. Streator
Keyword(s):  
Scale Effects ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Surface Profile ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Real Surface ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Fractal Analyses ◽  
Deformation Mechanics

This work describes a non-statistical multi-scale model of the normal contact between rough surfaces. The model produces predictions for contact area as a function of contact load, and is compared to the traditional Greenwood and Williamson (GW) and Majumdar and Bhushan (MB) rough surface contact models, which represent single-scale and fractal analyses, respectively. The current model incorporates the effect of asperity deformations at multiple scales into a simple framework for modeling the contact between nominally flat rough surfaces. Similar to the “protuberance upon protuberance” theory proposed by Archard, the model considers the effect of having smaller asperities located on top of larger asperities in repeated fashion with increasing detail down to the limits of current measurement techniques. The parameters describing the surface topography (areal asperity density and asperity radius) are calculated from an FFT performed of the surface profile. Thus, the model considers multi-scale effects, which fractal methods have addressed, while attempting to more accurately incorporate the deformation mechanics into the solution. After the FFT of a real surface is calculated, the computational resources needed for the method are very small. Perhaps surprisingly, the trends produced by this non-statistical multi-scale model are quite similar to those arising from the GW and MB models.

A Contact Mechanics Model for Rough Surfaces Based on a New Fractal Characterization Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (06) ◽  
pp. 1850069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjun Sun ◽  
Zhengbo Ji ◽  
Yuyan Zhang ◽  
Qiuping Yu ◽  
Chenbo Ma
Keyword(s):  
Contact Mechanics ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Pressure ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Contact Stiffness ◽  
Measurement Scale ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Sample Length ◽  
Normal Contact

There are mainly two kinds of contact mechanics models for rough surfaces. One is based on the statistical characteristic parameters and depends on the measurement scale of rough surface topography. The other is based on the fractal parameters, which is independent of the measurement scale. However, most of the contact models for rough surfaces based on fractal theory use the size that is corresponding to the contact area of an asperity or the sample length as the base diameter of an asperity to describe the initial profile of asperities. As a result, the obtained deformation mechanism of asperities is not correct. To solve this problem, a new fractal characterization method for rough surfaces based on the fractal dimension [Formula: see text], fractal roughness [Formula: see text] and the highest asperity height is proposed, and then a fractal contact model independent of the measurement scale is established. The contact mechanism of asperities and variation trends of the real contact area and contact stiffness are discussed. When the contact pressure of the rough surface is less than its yield strength, its normal contact stiffness can be expressed as the first derivative of the contact pressure versus the normal compression, regardless of the deformation forms of asperities.

A multi-scale model of real contact area for linear guideway based on the fractal theory

2021 ◽  
pp. 095440622098336
Author(s):  
Xinxin Li ◽  
Zhimin Li ◽  
Sun Jin ◽  
Jichang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Fractal Theory ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
The Real ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Proposed Model

High precision, efficiency and reliability are the unremitting pursuits of machinery manufacturing industry. As one of the pivotal function parts of high-end NC machine tool, precise linear guideway determines the machining precision and operation performance. Accurate evaluation and prediction of surface topography are the crucial effects on the matching performance of linear guideway. In this paper, the real contact area is regarded as a key parameter, a multi-scale method with the fractal theory is proposed. First, the contact area of a single asperity was obtained with Hertz contact theory. Afterwards, the contact area between rough surfaces was deduced by the fractal theory. Finally, using the proposed multi-scale contact mechanics model, the real contact area between rough plane and cylinder was obtained by integral solution. Compared with the former fractal model and GW model, the proposed model on the real contact area calculation of linear guideway is more accurate and comprehensive. The effect factors of load, fractal parameter and friction were discussed, the increasing rate of real contact area of smoother surface is greater as load increases. The proposed model may provide practical guidance for assembly accuracy and surface quality requirements at design stage.

scholarly journals Measurement of Real Contact Area for Rough Metal Surfaces and the Distinction of Contribution From Elasticity and Plasticity

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei-Tao Li ◽  
Xuan-Ming Liang ◽  
Yu-Zhe Xing ◽  
Duo Yan ◽  
Gang-Feng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Normal Load ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
The Real ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Frustrated Total Internal Reflection ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
New Apparatus ◽  
Elastic And Plastic Deformation

Abstract The measurement of the real contact area between rough surfaces is one of the most challenging problems in contact mechanics and is of importance to understand some physical mechanisms in tribology. Based on the frustrated total internal reflection, a new apparatus is designed to measure the real contact area. For metallic samples with various surface topographies, the relation between normal load and the real contact area is measured. The unloading process is first considered to distinguish the contribution of elasticity and plasticity in contact with rough surfaces. It is found that both elasticity and plasticity are involved throughout the continuous loading process, different from some present understanding and assumptions that they play at different loading stages. A quantitative parameter is proposed to indicate the contribution of plasticity. The present work not only provides an experimental method to measure the real contact area but figures out how elastic and plastic deformation works in contact with rough surfaces.

scholarly journals A semi-analytical approach to the elastic loading behaviour of rough surfaces

Friction ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-981
Author(s):  
Xiaogang Zhang ◽  
Yali Zhang ◽  
Zhongmin Jin
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Exponential Relationship ◽  
Load Range ◽  
Contact Behaviour ◽  
Elastic Loading ◽  
Moderate Load ◽  
Convergence Problems ◽  
Linear Decay

AbstractThe elastic loading behaviour of rough surfaces is derived based on the physical understanding of the contact phenomena, where the pressure distribution is analytically obtained without any negative values or convergence problems, thus the evolution of the contact behaviour is obtained in a semi-analytical manner. Numerical results obtained by the proposed approach facilitate the understanding of the contact behaviour in the following aspects: 1) the ratio of contact area to load decreases with an increase in real contact area; 2) normal approach-load relationship is approximated by an exponential decay under relatively small loads and a linear decay under relatively large loads; and 3) average gap shows an exponential relationship with load only in moderate load range.

Strongly Anisotropic Rough Surfaces

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Bush ◽  
R. D. Gibson ◽  
G. P. Keogh
Keyword(s):  
Random Process ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Plasticity Index ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Contact ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Real Contact

The statistics of a strongly anisotropic rough surface are briefly described. The elastic contact of rough surfaces is treated by approximating the summits of a random process model by parabolic ellipsoids and applying the Hertzian solution for their deformation. Load and real contact area are derived as functions of the separation and for all separations the load is found to be approximately proportional to the contact area. The limits of elastic/plastic contact are discussed in terms of the plasticity index.

Plane Contact and Partial Slip Behaviors of Elastic Layers With Randomly Rough Surfaces

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Jin ◽  
Qiang Wan ◽  
Xu Guo
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Layer ◽  
Partial Slip ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Rigid Base ◽  
Slip Model ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Plane Contact

A plane contact and partial slip model of an elastic layer with randomly rough surface were established by combining the Greenwood–Williamson (GW) rough contact model and the Cattaneo–Mindlin partial slip model. The rough surface of the elastic layer bonded to a rigid base is modeled as an ensemble of noninteracting asperities with identical radius of curvature and Gaussian-distributed heights. By employing the Hertzian solution and the Cattaneo–Mindlin solution to each individual asperity of the rough surface, we derive the total normal force, the real contact area, and the total tangential force for the rough surface, respectively, and then examine the normal contact and partial slip behaviors of the layer. An effective Coulomb coefficient is defined to account for interfacial friction properties. Furthermore, a typical stick–slip transition for the rough surface was also captured by distinguishing the stick and slip contacting asperities according to their respective indentation depths. Our analysis results show that an increasing layer thickness may result in a larger real contact area, a lower mean contact pressure, and a higher effective Coulomb coefficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document