Plane Contact and Partial Slip Behaviors of Elastic Layers With Randomly Rough Surfaces

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Jin ◽  
Qiang Wan ◽  
Xu Guo
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Layer ◽  
Partial Slip ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Rigid Base ◽  
Slip Model ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Plane Contact

A plane contact and partial slip model of an elastic layer with randomly rough surface were established by combining the Greenwood–Williamson (GW) rough contact model and the Cattaneo–Mindlin partial slip model. The rough surface of the elastic layer bonded to a rigid base is modeled as an ensemble of noninteracting asperities with identical radius of curvature and Gaussian-distributed heights. By employing the Hertzian solution and the Cattaneo–Mindlin solution to each individual asperity of the rough surface, we derive the total normal force, the real contact area, and the total tangential force for the rough surface, respectively, and then examine the normal contact and partial slip behaviors of the layer. An effective Coulomb coefficient is defined to account for interfacial friction properties. Furthermore, a typical stick–slip transition for the rough surface was also captured by distinguishing the stick and slip contacting asperities according to their respective indentation depths. Our analysis results show that an increasing layer thickness may result in a larger real contact area, a lower mean contact pressure, and a higher effective Coulomb coefficient.

Influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the normal contact of periodically rough surfaces

2016 ◽  
Vol 230 (9) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391
Author(s):  
K Houanoh ◽  
H-P Yin ◽  
J Cesbron ◽  
Q-C He
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulations ◽  
Half Space ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Elastic Half Space ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Full Contact ◽  
Rigid Surfaces

The present work aims to analyze the influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the contact between periodically rough surfaces. Square pattern and hexagonal pattern rigid surfaces are considered. Their contact with an elastic half-space is analyzed by numerical simulations. Three surfaces are generated with identical asperities periodically distributed in a plan according to different patterns. It follows from numerical results that when the load and the real contact area are small, the asperities act almost independently. However, the interaction between close asperities increases with the load becomes intensified and has a significant effect on the contact area when the situation is close to full contact.

Deterministic Contact Model of a Rough Surface Against a Flat-Layered Surface

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Pasaribu ◽  
D. J. Schipper
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Indentation Depth ◽  
Normal Load ◽  
Contact Model ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Single Asperity ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Effective Mechanical Properties

The effective mechanical properties of a layered surface vary as a function of indentation depth and the values of these properties range between the value of the layer itself and of the substrate. In this paper, a layered surface is modelled like a solid that has effective mechanical properties as a function of indentation depth by assuming that the layer is perfectly bounded to the substrate. The normal load as a function of indentation depth of sphere pressed against a flat layered surface is calculated using this model and is in agreement with the experimental results published by El-Sherbiney (1975), El-Shafei et al. (1983), Tang & Arnell (1999) and Michler & Blank (2001). A deterministic contact model of a rough surface against a flat layered surface is developed by representing a rough surface as an array of spherically shaped asperities with different radii and heights (not necessarily Gaussian distributed). Once the data of radius and height of every single asperity is obtained, one can calculate the number of asperities in contact, the real contact area and the load carried by the asperities as a function of the separation.

Strongly Anisotropic Rough Surfaces

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Bush ◽  
R. D. Gibson ◽  
G. P. Keogh
Keyword(s):  
Random Process ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Plasticity Index ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Contact ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Real Contact

The statistics of a strongly anisotropic rough surface are briefly described. The elastic contact of rough surfaces is treated by approximating the summits of a random process model by parabolic ellipsoids and applying the Hertzian solution for their deformation. Load and real contact area are derived as functions of the separation and for all separations the load is found to be approximately proportional to the contact area. The limits of elastic/plastic contact are discussed in terms of the plasticity index.

Finite Element Analysis on Real Contact Area Based on Fractal Characterization

2013 ◽  
Vol 579-580 ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Chun Wang ◽  
Bo Qiang Xing ◽  
Teng Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Smooth Surface ◽  
Thermal Conductance ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Real Contact

No surface in engineering is absolutely smooth. It is important to analyze and calculate the real contact area for a better understanding of friction, wear, lubrication and thermal conductance. To obtain the accurate real contact area between rough surface and smooth surface, a rough-non-rigid-smooth surface contact finite element model is proposed in which the rough surface is characterized by fracture theory. In finite element modeling and analyzing process, MATLABEXCEL and AutoCAD are used to process data, and the smooth surface is considered to be non-rigid body. Compared with the traditional modeling, this method can obtain data quickly and is closer to the actual situation.

Unloading Process in Elastic-Plastic Contact of a Rough Surface With a Flat

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sepehri ◽  
K. Farhang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Integral Form ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Approximate Equations

Three dimensional elastic-plastic contact of a nominally flat rough surface and a flat is considered. The asperity level Finite Element based constitutive equations relating contact force and real contact area to the interference is used. The statistical summation of asperity interaction during unloading phase is derived in integral form. Approximate equations are found that describe in closed form contact load as a function of mean plane separation during unloading. The approximate equations provide accuracy to within 6 percent for the unload phase of the contact force.

scholarly journals Elastic Rough Surface Contact and the Root Mean Square Slope of Measured Surfaces over Multiple Scales

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Robert Jackson ◽  
Yang Xu ◽  
Swarna Saha ◽  
Kyle Schulze
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surface ◽  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Surface Contact ◽  
Rough Surface Contact

This study investigates the predictions of the real contact area for perfectly elastic rough surfaces using a boundary element method (BEM). Sample surface measurements were used in the BEM to predict the real contact area as a function of load. The surfaces were normalized by the root-mean-square (RMS) slope to evaluate if contact area measurements would collapse onto one master curve. If so, this would confirm that the contact areas of manufactured, real measured surfaces are directly proportional to the root mean square slope and the applied load, which is predicted by fractal diffusion-based rough surface contact theory. The data predicts a complex response that deviates from this behavior. The variation in the RMS slope and the spectrum of the system related to the features in contact are further evaluated to illuminate why this property is seen in some types of surfaces and not others.

scholarly journals Precise Correlation of Contact Area and Forces in the Unstable Friction between a Rough Fluoroelastomer Surface and Borosilicate Glass

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4615
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Shabnam Z. Bonyadi ◽  
Florian Grün ◽  
Gerald Pinter ◽  
Andreas Hausberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Dynamic Contact ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Partial Slip ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Stick Slip ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Contact

Stick-slip friction of elastomers arises due to adhesion, high local strains, surface features, and viscous dissipation. In situ techniques connecting the real contact area to interfacial forces can reveal the contact evolution of a rough elastomer surface leading up to gross slip, as well as provide high-resolution dynamic contact areas for improving current slip models. Samples with rough surfaces were produced by the same manufacturing processes as machined seals. In this work, a machined fluoroelastomer (FKM) hemisphere was slid against glass, and the stick-slip behavior was captured optically in situ. The influence of sliding velocity on sliding behavior was studied over a range of speeds from 1 µm/s to 100 µm/s. The real contact area was measured from image sequences thresholded using Otsu’s method. The motion of the pinned region was delineated with a machine learning scheme. The first result is that, within the macroscale sticking, or pinned phase, local pinned and partial slip regions were observed and modeled as a combined contact with contributions to friction by both regions. As a second result, we identified a critical velocity below which the stick-slip motion converted from high frequency with low amplitude to low frequency with high amplitude. This study on the sliding behavior of a viscoelastic machined elastomer demonstrates a multi-technique approach which reveals precise changes in contact area before and during pinning and slip.

A Contact Mechanics Model for Rough Surfaces Based on a New Fractal Characterization Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (06) ◽  
pp. 1850069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjun Sun ◽  
Zhengbo Ji ◽  
Yuyan Zhang ◽  
Qiuping Yu ◽  
Chenbo Ma
Keyword(s):  
Contact Mechanics ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Pressure ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Contact Stiffness ◽  
Measurement Scale ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Sample Length ◽  
Normal Contact

There are mainly two kinds of contact mechanics models for rough surfaces. One is based on the statistical characteristic parameters and depends on the measurement scale of rough surface topography. The other is based on the fractal parameters, which is independent of the measurement scale. However, most of the contact models for rough surfaces based on fractal theory use the size that is corresponding to the contact area of an asperity or the sample length as the base diameter of an asperity to describe the initial profile of asperities. As a result, the obtained deformation mechanism of asperities is not correct. To solve this problem, a new fractal characterization method for rough surfaces based on the fractal dimension [Formula: see text], fractal roughness [Formula: see text] and the highest asperity height is proposed, and then a fractal contact model independent of the measurement scale is established. The contact mechanism of asperities and variation trends of the real contact area and contact stiffness are discussed. When the contact pressure of the rough surface is less than its yield strength, its normal contact stiffness can be expressed as the first derivative of the contact pressure versus the normal compression, regardless of the deformation forms of asperities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document