Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment for Coal-Fired Power Industry

Author(s):  
Behrang Pakzadeh ◽  
Jay Wos ◽  
Jay Renew

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)’s announcement that it will revise the effluent limitation guidelines for steam electric power generating units could affect not only how power plants use water, but also how they discharge it. The revised guidelines may lower discharge limits for various contaminants in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater including mercury, selenium, arsenic, and nitrate/nitrite. Although the specific details of the guidelines are unknown at present, the power industry is evaluating various technologies that may address the new effluent limitation guidelines and promote water conservation. Moreover, the power industry is looking for avenues to increase water usage efficiency, reuse and recycle throughout its plant processes. Final rule approval is expected by the middle of 2014 and new regulations are expected to be implemented between 2017 and 2022 through 5-year NPDES permit cycles. discharge limits for various contaminants including arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite [1]. These pollutant limits may be below the levels achievable today with conventional treatment [2]. A growing interest exists in zero liquid discharge (ZLD) facilities and processes in power plant operations. Potentially stringent discharge limits along with water conservation and reuse efforts are two of the major drivers to achieve ZLD. Potential pollutant levels are so low that ZLD may be the best option, if not an outright requirement [1]. Thermal ZLD systems have been the subject of increased interest and discussion lately. They employ evaporating processes such as ponds, evaporators and crystallizers, or spray dryers to produce a reusable water stream and a solid residue (i.e. waste). Evaporators and crystallizers have been employed in the power industry for a number of years. However, typical A growing interest exists in zero liquid discharge (ZLD) facilities and processes in power plant operations. Potentially stringent discharge limits along with water conservation and reuse efforts are two of the major drivers to achieve ZLD. Potential pollutant levels are so low that ZLD may be the best option, if not an outright requirement. A key disadvantage of thermal ZLD is its high capital cost. One way to reduce this cost is to pre-treat the liquid stream using innovative membrane technologies and reverse osmosis (RO).

2013 ◽  
Vol 316-317 ◽  
pp. 354-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li Wu ◽  
Yan Cao ◽  
Han Xu Li ◽  
Wei Ping Pan

The full-scale of PC/Cyclone Boilers with common wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) with limestone forced oxidation (LSFO) was studied. Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) was used to determine mercury emission and speciation at these two full-scale WFGD systems, and OHM quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) was followed during the field testing. WFGD re-emission problems were repeatedly observed at this unit. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) had significant effects on mercury removal and Hg0 re-emission rates across WFGD. Effects of injection of continuous chemicals additive containing HS-, S2- or I- on mercury re-emission control were also conducted at this unit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 651-653 ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Hai Zhi Xu

With installed capacity increase of China's coal-fired power plants year by year, the emissions of in flue gas increase year by year, sulfur dioxide pollution of the atmosphere has increased year by year at the same, so strengthen the control of coal-fired power plant emissions of is imperative. Based on the experience of typical coal-fired power plant desulfurization technology and desulfurization, limestone/gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization equipment simulation system has been established. The influence factors of limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization are once studied.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3 Part B) ◽  
pp. 2047-2057
Author(s):  
Sergey Shevyrev ◽  
Aleksandr Bogomolov ◽  
Ksenia Vershinina ◽  
Timur Valiullin ◽  
Geniy Kuznetsov ◽  
...  

The study regards the issues of increasing the thermodynamic efficiency of a typical condensing thermal power plant using coal-water and organic coal-water fuels as the main source. The attention is paid to the use of the phase transition heat of the water vapor of the flue gas. We have shown that it is possible to increase the power plant efficiency by about 3.7% (gross) relative to the base value (in the case of using pulverized coal). We propose to use the flue-gas desulfurization technology for creating fuel slurries in which a liquid incombustible base will be replaced, for example, with aqueous solutions of Ca(OH)2. This will create a closed water cycle, improve the efficiency of Sox flue gas purification and improve the performance of scrubbers.


Author(s):  
Arthur G. Killinger ◽  
Mark J. O’Connell

Diesel generator sets are installed at nuclear power plants to provide emergency power to ensure safe shut down of the reactor in the event of an accident. In the United States, all nuclear power plants belong to one of six different Diesel Generator Owner’s Groups. Some groups have been in existence for over 17 years and the members have all benefited from their participation. In the past three years, the Diesel Generator Owner’s Group concept has spread and two new groups have been formed among a number of independent diesel generator power plant owners and operators in Latin America and the Caribbean area. This paper describes: (1) how electric power plants, large and small, have formed Diesel Generator Owner’s Groups, (2) how better working relationships between the power plants and the engine manufacturer have been established, and (3) how involvement in a strong owner’s group provides significant benefits to the members. The primary goal of the groups is to increase reliability and improve performance of the diesel engines at the respective power plants. Typical objectives of effective Diesel Generator Owner’s Groups include: • Provide a mechanism for rapid resolution of specific problems with the diesel engine, generator and auxiliary systems, • Provide improved communications among the owners and the diesel generator manufacturer, • Develop a group of “technical experts” and expand that knowledge base to other plant personnel, and • Identify methods to improve diesel engine generator and overall power plant performance, reliability, availability and safety. Active participation in Diesel Generator Owner’s Group has resulted in real payback for the owners and manufacturers alike. To illustrate this fact, several unique diesel engine problems are described along with the approach the Diesel Generator Owner’s Groups used to resolve the problems. Finally, overall diesel generator reliability and availability have improved. These groups have worked to develop the best possible technical environment to continue improving diesel generator power plant performance, operation and maintenance.


Author(s):  
Shane E. Powers ◽  
William C. Wood

With the renewed interest in the construction of coal-fired power plants in the United States, there has also been an increased interest in the methodology used to calculate/determine the overall performance of a coal fired power plant. This methodology is detailed in the ASME PTC 46 (1996) Code, which provides an excellent framework for determining the power output and heat rate of coal fired power plants. Unfortunately, the power industry has been slow to adopt this methodology, in part because of the lack of some details in the Code regarding the planning needed to design a performance test program for the determination of coal fired power plant performance. This paper will expand on the ASME PTC 46 (1996) Code by discussing key concepts that need to be addressed when planning an overall plant performance test of a coal fired power plant. The most difficult aspect of calculating coal fired power plant performance is integrating the calculation of boiler performance with the calculation of turbine cycle performance and other balance of plant aspects. If proper planning of the performance test is not performed, the integration of boiler and turbine data will result in a test result that does not accurately reflect the true performance of the overall plant. This planning must start very early in the development of the test program, and be implemented in all stages of the test program design. This paper will address the necessary planning of the test program, including: • Determination of Actual Plant Performance. • Selection of a Test Goal. • Development of the Basic Correction Algorithm. • Designing a Plant Model. • Development of Correction Curves. • Operation of the Power Plant during the Test. All nomenclature in this paper utilizes the ASME PTC 46 definitions for the calculation and correction of plant performance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 04005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding Yang ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
XingLian Ye ◽  
WeiXiang Chen ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
...  

SO3 is one of the main precursors of atmospheric PM2.5, and its emission has attracted more and more attention in the industry. This paper briefly analyzes the harm of SO3 and the method of controlled condensation to test SO3. The effect of cooperative removal of SO3 by ultra-low emission technology in some coal-fired power plants has been tested by using the method of controlled condensation. The results show that the cooperative removal of SO3 by ultra-low emission technology in coal-fired power plants is effective. The removal rate of SO3 by low-low temperature electrostatic precipitators and electrostatic-fabric integrated precipitators can be exceeded 80%, while the removal rate of SO3 by wet flue gas desulfurization equipment displays lower than the above two facilities, and the wet electrostatic precipitator shows a better removal effect on SO3. With the use of ultra-low emission technology in coal-fired power plants, the SO3 emission concentration of the tail chimney reaches less than 1 mg / Nm3.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document