Supplemental Stress and Fracture Mechanics Analyses of Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzles

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Walter ◽  
Shengjun Yin ◽  
Gary L. Stevens ◽  
Daniel Sommerville ◽  
Nathan Palm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Additional Stress ◽  
Corner Crack ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
The Core ◽  
Water Reactors ◽  
Reactor Pressure

In past years, the authors have undertaken various studies of nozzles in both boiling water reactors (BWRs) and pressurized water reactors (PWRs) located in the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) adjacent to the core beltline region. Those studies described stress and fracture mechanics analyses performed to assess various RPV nozzle geometries, which were selected based on their proximity to the core beltline region, i.e., those nozzle configurations that are located close enough to the core region such that they may receive sufficient fluence prior to end-of-life (EOL) to require evaluation of embrittlement as part of the RPV analyses associated with pressure-temperature (P-T) limits. In this paper, additional stress and fracture analyses are summarized that were performed for additional PWR nozzles with the following objectives: • To expand the population of PWR nozzle configurations evaluated, which was limited in the previous work to just two nozzles (one inlet and one outlet nozzle). • To model and understand differences in stress results obtained for an internal pressure load case using a two-dimensional (2-D) axi-symmetric finite element model (FEM) vs. a three-dimensional (3-D) FEM for these PWR nozzles. In particular, the ovalization (stress concentration) effect of two intersecting cylinders, which is typical of RPV nozzle configurations, was investigated. • To investigate the applicability of previously recommended linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) hand solutions for calculating the Mode I stress intensity factor for a postulated nozzle corner crack for pressure loading for these PWR nozzles. These analyses were performed to further expand earlier work completed to support potential revision and refinement of Title 10 to the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix G, “Fracture Toughness Requirements,” and are intended to supplement similar evaluation of nozzles presented at the 2008, 2009, and 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping (PVP) Conferences. This work is also relevant to the ongoing efforts of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, Section XI, Working Group on Operating Plant Criteria (WGOPC) efforts to incorporate nozzle fracture mechanics solutions into a revision to ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix G.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Technological Evolution of Materials Requirements Included in Reactor Pressure Vessel Manufacturing Codes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5498
Author(s):  
Alvaro Rodríguez-Prieto ◽  
Mariaenrica Frigione ◽  
John Kickhofel ◽  
Ana M. Camacho
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Green Energy ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Technical Literature ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Water Reactors ◽  
Regulatory Commission ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The growth of green energy technologies within the frame of the 7th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) along with the concern about climatic changes make nuclear energy an attractive choice for many countries to ensure energy security and sustainable development as well as to actively address environmental issues. Unlike nuclear equipment (immovable goods), which are often well-catalogued and analyzed, the design and manufacturing codes and their standardized materials specifications can be considered movable and intangible goods that have not been thoroughly studied based on a detailed evaluation of the scientific and technical literature on the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) materials behavior. The aim of this work is the analysis of historical advances in materials properties research and associated standardized design codes requirements. The analysis, based on the consolidated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.99 Rev.2 model, enables determination of the best materials options, corresponding to some of the most widely used material specifications such as WWER 15Kh2MFAA (used from the 1970s and 1980s; already in operation), ASME SA-533 Grade B Cl.1 (used in pressurized water reactor-PWR 2nd–4th; already in operation), DIN 20MnMoNi55 and DIN 22NiMoCr37 (used in PWR 2nd–4th) as well as ASTM A-336 Grade F22V (current designs). Consequently, in view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that the best options correspond to recently developed or well-established specifications used in the design of pressurized water reactors. These assessments endorse the fact that nuclear technology is continually improving, with safety being its fundamental pillar. In the future, further research related to the technical heritage from the evolution of materials requirements for other clean and sustainable power generation technologies will be performed.

Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment: French Simplified Analysis Method Applied to Underclad Postulated Defect in Nozzle

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Arrieta-Ruiz ◽  
Eric Meister ◽  
Stéphane Vidard
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Core Area ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
The Core ◽  
Simplified Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Structural integrity of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is one of the main concerns regarding safety and lifetime of Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) since this component is considered as not reasonably replaceable. Fast fracture risk is the main potential damage considered in the integrity assessment of RPV. In France, deterministic integrity assessment for RPV vis-à-vis the brittle fracture risk is based on the crack initiation stage. As regards the core area in particular, the stability of an under-clad postulated flaw is currently evaluated under a Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) through a dedicated fracture mechanics simplified method called “beta method”. However, flaw stability analyses are also carried-out in several other areas of the RPV. Thence-forward performing uniform simplified inservice analyses of flaw stability is a major concern for EDF. In this context, 3D finite element elastic-plastic calculations with flaw modelling in the nozzle have been carried out recently and the corresponding results have been compared to those provided by the beta method, codified in the French RSE-M code for under-clad defects in the core area, in the most severe events. The purpose of this work is to validate the employment of the core area fracture mechanics simplified method as a conservative approach for the under-clad postulated flaw stability assessment in the complex geometry of the nozzle. This paper presents both simplified and 3D modelling flaw stability evaluation methods and the corresponding results obtained by running a PTS event. It shows that the employment of the “beta method” provides conservative results in comparison to those produced by elastic-plastic calculations for the cases here studied.

MAI Benchmark Campaign of International Software for Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Dautreme ◽  
Emmanuel Remy ◽  
Roman Sueur ◽  
Jean-Philippe Fontes ◽  
Karine Aubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Software Tool ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Benchmark Study ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) integrity is a major issue concerning plant safety and this component is one of the few within a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) whose replacement is not considered as feasible. To ensure that adequate margins against failure are maintained throughout the vessel service life, research engineers have developed and applied computational tools to study and assess the probability of pressure vessel failure during operating and postulated loads. The Materials Ageing Institute (MAI) sponsored a benchmark study to compare the results from software developed in France, Japan and the United States to compute the probability of flaw initiation in reactor pressure vessels. This benchmark study was performed to assess the similarities and differences in the software and to identify the sources of any differences that were found. Participants in this work included researchers from EDF in France, CRIEPI in Japan and EPRI in the United States, with each organization using the probabilistic software tool that had been developed in their country. An incremental approach, beginning with deterministic comparisons and ending by assessing Conditional Probability of crack Initiation (CPI), provided confirmation of the good agreement between the results obtained from the software used in this benchmark study. This conclusion strengthens the confidence in these probabilistic fracture mechanics tools and improves understanding of the fundamental computational procedures and algorithms.

The Development of Radiation Embrittlement Models for U.S. Power Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Wang ◽  
N. S. V. Rao ◽  
S. Konduri
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Irradiation Temperature ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Boiling Water ◽  
Radiation Embrittlement ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Water Reactor ◽  
Water Reactors ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The information fusion technique is used to develop radiation embrittlement prediction models for reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels from U.S. power reactors, including boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors. The Charpy transition temperature-shift data is used as the primary index of RPV radiation embrittlement in this study. Six parameters—Cu, Ni, P, neutron fluence, irradiation time, and irradiation temperature—are used in the embrittlement prediction models. The results indicate that this new embrittlement predictor achieved reductions of about 49.5% and 52% in the uncertainties for plate and weld data, respectively, for pressurized water reactor and boiling water reactor data, compared with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.99, Rev. 2. The implications of dose-rate effect and irradiation temperature effects for the development of radiation embrittlement models are also discussed.

Buoyancy Driven Coolant Mixing Studies of Natural Circulation Flows at the ROCOM Test Facility Using ANSYS CFX

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ho¨hne ◽  
So¨ren Kliem ◽  
Ulrich Rohde ◽  
Frank-Peter Weiß
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Natural Circulation ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Density Difference ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
The Core ◽  
Ansys Cfx ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Coolant mixing in the cold leg, downcomer and the lower plenum of pressurized water reactors is an important phenomenon mitigating the reactivity insertion into the core. Therefore, mixing of the de-borated slugs with the ambient coolant in the reactor pressure vessel was investigated at the four loop 1:5 scaled ROCOM mixing test facility. Thermal hydraulics analyses showed, that weakly borated condensate can accumulate in particular in the pump loop seal of those loops, which do not receive safety injection. After refilling of the primary circuit, natural circulation in the stagnant loops can re-establish simultaneously and the de-borated slugs are shifted towards the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). In the ROCOM experiments, the length of the flow ramp and the initial density difference between the slugs and the ambient coolant was varied. From the test matrix experiments with 0 resp. 2% density difference between the de-borated slugs and the ambient coolant were used to validate the CFD software ANSYS CFX. To model the effects of turbulence on the mean flow a higher order Reynolds stress turbulence model was employed and a mesh consisting of 6.4 million hybrid elements was utilized. Only the experiments and CFD calculations with modeled density differences show a stratification in the downcomer. Depending on the degree of density differences the less dense slugs flow around the core barrel at the top of the downcomer. At the opposite side the lower borated coolant is entrained by the colder safety injection water and transported to the core. The validation proves that ANSYS CFX is able to simulate appropriately the flow field and mixing effects of coolant with different densities.

Analysis of a Concept for the Diagnosis of the Core State During Severe Accidents in Pressurized Water Reactors

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Schmidt ◽  
Daniel Fiß ◽  
Alexander Kratzsch
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Core State ◽  
Process Technology ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
The Core ◽  
Gamma Radiations ◽  
State Diagnosis ◽  
Reactor Pressure

In line with the cooperative project “Non-invasive Condition Monitoring of Nuclear Reactors for the Detection of Level Change and Deformation of the Core” between the Technical University Dresden and the Institute of Process Technology, Process Automation and Measuring Technology (IPM) of Zittau/Goerlitz University of Applied Sciences, a measuring system for the core state diagnosis during a core melt accident in the reactor pressure vessel of a pressurized water reactor is going to be developed. The operational principle of this system is based on the non-invasive measurement of continuously changing gamma radiations (caused by the shifting of melted materials and fission products) outside of the reactor pressure vessel by means of several gamma radiation sensors. The sensors are arranged over the height of the core and the lower head. By using computer based and real-time capable methods for evaluation of the measured gamma radiations conclusions about the core state can subsequently be drawn. This paper includes a description of a concept as well as several methods for the core state diagnosis during a core melt accident. The main part is the analysis of the methods for the core state diagnosis based on different evaluation criteria.

Stress and Fracture Mechanics Analyses of Boiling Water Reactor and Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzles

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengjun Sean Yin ◽  
Gary L. Stevens ◽  
B. Richard Bass ◽  
Mark T. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressurized Water Reactor ◽  
Outlet Nozzle ◽  
Corner Crack ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Water Reactor ◽  
The Core ◽  
Reactor Pressure

This paper describes stress analysis and fracture mechanics work performed to assess boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR) nozzles located in the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) adjacent to the core beltline region. Various RPV nozzle geometries were investigated: 1. BWR recirculation outlet nozzle; 2. BWR core spray nozzle; 3. PWR inlet nozzle; 4. PWR outlet nozzle; and 5. BWR partial penetration instrument nozzle. The above nozzle designs were selected based on their proximity to the core beltline region, i.e., those nozzle configurations that are located close enough to the core region such that they may receive sufficient fluence prior to end-of-license (EOL) to require evaluation as part of establishing the allowed limits on heatup, cooldown, and hydrotest (leak test) conditions. These nozzles analyzed represent one each of the nozzle types potentially requiring evaluation. The purpose of the analyses performed on these nozzle designs was as follows: • To model and understand differences in pressure and thermal stress results using a two-dimensional (2-D) axi-symmetric finite element model (FEM) versus a three-dimensional (3-D) FEM for all nozzle types. In particular, the ovalization (stress concentration) effect of two intersecting cylinders, which is typical of RPV nozzle configurations, was investigated; • To verify the accuracy of a selected linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) hand solution for stress intensity factor for a postulated nozzle corner crack for both thermal and pressure loading for all nozzle types; • To assess the significance of attached piping loads on the stresses in the nozzle corner region; and • To assess the significance of applying pressure on the crack face with respect to the stress intensity factor for a postulated nozzle corner crack.

Comparison of PTS Guides for Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan Brumovsky
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Vessel Integrity ◽  
Degradation Of Materials ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Integrity of reactor pressure vessels (RPV) are of the most importance for safety of the whole NPP. From all potential regimes, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) regimes during emergency cooling conditions are the most severe and most important. Several nuclear codes are based in similar approaches but their procedures differ and are based on national knowledge and approach to fracture mechanics as well as non-destructive methods of reactor pressure vessel testing. The paper will compare requirements and procedures for PTS evaluation in accordance with RCC-M code in France [2], KTA in Germany [3], Russian original code PNAEG from 1989 [5] and new procedure from 2004 for WWER vessels [4], as well as VERLIFE procedure and IAEA-NULIFE VERLIFE [6] procedure for WWER RPVs and finally ASME Code requirements [1] including US NRC RG approach. Detailed comparison of individual parameters in calculations are compared — material properties, degradation of materials, calculated defects size and form, fracture mechanics approach, warm pre-stressing possibility etc.

Comparison of PTS Guides for Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan Brumovsky
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Vessel Integrity ◽  
Degradation Of Materials ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Integrity of reactor pressure vessels (RPV) are of the most importance for safety of the whole NPP. From all potential regimes, Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) regimes during emergency cooling conditions are the most severe and most important. Several nuclear codes are based in similar approaches but their procedures differ and are based on national knowledge and approach to fracture mechanics as well as non-destructive methods of reactor pressure vessel testing. The paper will compare requirements and procedures for PTS evaluation in accordance with RCC-M code in France [2], KTA in Germany [3], Russian original code PNAEG from 1989 [5] and new procedure from 2004 for WWER vessels [4], as well as VERLIFE procedure and IAEA-NULIFE VERLIFE [6] procedure for WWER RPVs and finally ASME Code requirements [1] including US NRC RG approach. Detailed comparison of individual parameters in calculations are compared — material properties, degradation of materials, calculated defects size and form, fracture mechanics approach, warm pre-stressing possibility etc.

Impact of Using ASME Section XI Code Case N-830 on Plant Heatup and Cooldown Pressure-Temperature Limit Curves for Pressurized Water Reactors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandria Carolan ◽  
Benjamin Mays ◽  
Anees Udyawar ◽  
J. Brian Hall
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressurized Water Reactors ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Water Reactors ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Abstract Nuclear plant reactor pressure vessel heat-up and cool-down pressure temperature (P-T) limit curves are determined using ASME Section XI, Appendix G. ASME has adopted into ASME Section XI Appendix G the allowable use of the ASTM E1921 master curve fracture toughness based reference temperature (T0) to index the KIc curve. ASME Section XI Code Case N-830 allows the use of the KJc 95% lower bound master curve indexed using T0 directly. In ASME Section XI Appendix G, the equation RTT0 = T0 + 19.4°C, as an alternate RTNDT, shifts the KIc curve to approximate the KJc 95% lower bound master curve, however, the KIc exponential curve parameters are different. Thus, this paper evaluates the impact on plant heatup and cooldown pressure-temperature limit curves between the two ASME approved methods for typical pressurized water reactors (PWR). Different degrees of embrittlement are assessed to determine differences in the two approaches on reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline operating curves. Furthermore, in the proposed Revision 19 of Regulatory Guide 1.147, the US NRC has included a condition on the use of Code Case N-830 that prohibits the use of the current KIc equation in ASME Section XI Appendix G when these values are above the KJc lower bound 95% curve at temperatures below T0 − 64°C. This paper briefly discusses this NRC condition on the P-T limit curves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document