scholarly journals Speciation dynamics and extent of parallel evolution along a lake-stream environmental contrast in African cichlid fishes

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (45) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra A.-T. Weber ◽  
Jelena Rajkov ◽  
Kolja Smailus ◽  
Bernd Egger ◽  
Walter Salzburger
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2839-2854 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. O'Quin ◽  
C. M. Hofmann ◽  
H. A. Hofmann ◽  
K. L. Carleton

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tereza Manousaki ◽  
Pincelli M. Hull ◽  
Henrik Kusche ◽  
Gonzalo Machado-Schiaffino ◽  
Paolo Franchini ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
pp. 333-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Sturmbauer ◽  
Martin Husemann ◽  
Patrick D. Danley

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroly A. Shumway

Abstract In this review, I explore the effects of both social organization and the physical environment, specifically habitat complexity, on the brains and behavior of highly visual African cichlid fishes, drawing on examples from primates and birds where appropriate. In closely related fishes from the monophyletic Ectodinii clade of Lake Tanganyika, both forces influence cichlid brains and behavior. Considering social influences first, visual acuity differs with respect to social organization (monogamy versus polygyny). Both the telencephalon and amygdalar homologue, area Dm, are larger in monogamous species. Monogamous species are found to have more vasotocin-immunoreactive cells in the preoptic area of the brain. Habitat complexity also influences brain and behavior in these fishes. Total brain size, telencephalic and cerebellar size are positively correlated with habitat complexity. Visual acuity and spatial memory are enhanced in cichlids living in more complex environments. However habitat complexity and social forces affect cichlid brains differently. Taken together, our field data and plasticity data suggest that some of the species-specific neural effects of habitat complexity could be the consequence of the corresponding social correlates. Environmental forces, however, exert a broader effect on brain structures than social ones do, suggesting allometric expansion of the brain structures in concert with brain size and/or co-evolution of these structures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 2297-2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Schulte ◽  
Conor S. O’Brien ◽  
Matthew A. Conte ◽  
Kelly E. O’Quin ◽  
Karen L. Carleton

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 755 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorunn Dieleman ◽  
Bert Van Bocxlaer ◽  
Claudia Manntschke ◽  
Dorothy Wanja Nyingi ◽  
Dominique Adriaens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document