scholarly journals Mapping the Core of the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock Defines the Network Structure of the Oscillator

Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 336 (6077) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Huang ◽  
P. Pérez-García ◽  
A. Pokhilko ◽  
A. J. Millar ◽  
I. Antoshechkin ◽  
...  

In many organisms, the circadian clock is composed of functionally coupled morning and evening oscillators. In Arabidopsis, oscillator coupling relies on a core loop in which the evening oscillator component TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1) was proposed to activate a subset of morning-expressed oscillator genes. Here, we show that TOC1 does not function as an activator but rather as a general repressor of oscillator gene expression. Repression occurs through TOC1 rhythmic association to the promoters of the oscillator genes. Hormone-dependent induction of TOC1 and analysis of RNA interference plants show that TOC1 prevents the activation of morning-expressed genes at night. Our study overturns the prevailing model of the Arabidopsis circadian clock, showing that the morning and evening oscillator loops are connected through the repressing activity of TOC1.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh G. Nimmo ◽  
Janet Laird

The core of the plant circadian clock involves multiple interlocking gene expression loops and post-translational controls along with inputs from light and metabolism. The complexity of the interactions is such that few specific functions can be ascribed to single components. In previous work, we reported differences in the operation of the clocks in Arabidopsis shoots and roots, including the effects of mutations of key clock components. Here, we have used luciferase imaging to study prr7 mutants expressing CCA1::LUC and GI::LUC markers. In mature shoots expressing CCA1::LUC, loss of PRR7 radically altered behaviour in light:dark cycles and caused loss of rhythmicity in constant light but had little effect on roots. In contrast, in mature plants expressing GI::LUC, loss of PRR7 had little effect in light:dark cycles but in constant light increased the circadian period in shoots and reduced it in roots. We conclude that most or all of the circadian input to the CCA1 promoter in shoots is mediated by PRR7 and that loss of PRR7 has organ-specific effects. The results emphasise the differences in operation of the shoot and root clocks, and the importance of studying clock mutants in both light:dark cycles and constant light.


Author(s):  
Mario Luis Small

This chapter examines the “core discussion networks” of graduate students in three departments and shows that, contrary to traditional expectations, many of the ties appear to be weak rather than strong. It considers how the students relate to those they have considered their confidants after six months, and more specifically whether they would as a whole report the same confidants. Three perspectives on the relative importance of network structure versus social interaction are discussed based on the students’ different experiences: the students will keep most confidants, they will drop many of their confidants, or they will drop many confidants but quickly replace them. In general, the students replaced their confidants often.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlei Yue ◽  
Ze Jiang ◽  
Enoch Sapey ◽  
Tingting Wu ◽  
Shi Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In soybean, some circadian clock genes have been identified as loci for maturity traits. However, the effects of these genes on soybean circadian rhythmicity and their impacts on maturity are unclear. Results We used two geographically, phenotypically and genetically distinct cultivars, conventional juvenile Zhonghuang 24 (with functional J/GmELF3a, a homolog of the circadian clock indispensable component EARLY FLOWERING 3) and long juvenile Huaxia 3 (with dysfunctional j/Gmelf3a) to dissect the soybean circadian clock with time-series transcriptomal RNA-Seq analysis of unifoliate leaves on a day scale. The results showed that several known circadian clock components, including RVE1, GI, LUX and TOC1, phase differently in soybean than in Arabidopsis, demonstrating that the soybean circadian clock is obviously different from the canonical model in Arabidopsis. In contrast to the observation that ELF3 dysfunction results in clock arrhythmia in Arabidopsis, the circadian clock is conserved in soybean regardless of the functional status of J/GmELF3a. Soybean exhibits a circadian rhythmicity in both gene expression and alternative splicing. Genes can be grouped into six clusters, C1-C6, with different expression profiles. Many more genes are grouped into the night clusters (C4-C6) than in the day cluster (C2), showing that night is essential for gene expression and regulation. Moreover, soybean chromosomes are activated with a circadian rhythmicity, indicating that high-order chromosome structure might impact circadian rhythmicity. Interestingly, night time points were clustered in one group, while day time points were separated into two groups, morning and afternoon, demonstrating that morning and afternoon are representative of different environments for soybean growth and development. However, no genes were consistently differentially expressed over different time-points, indicating that it is necessary to perform a circadian rhythmicity analysis to more thoroughly dissect the function of a gene. Moreover, the analysis of the circadian rhythmicity of the GmFT family showed that GmELF3a might phase- and amplitude-modulate the GmFT family to regulate the juvenility and maturity traits of soybean. Conclusions These results and the resultant RNA-seq data should be helpful in understanding the soybean circadian clock and elucidating the connection between the circadian clock and soybean maturity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document