Type I interferon suppresses virus-specific B cell responses by modulating CD8 + T cell differentiation

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Ashley Moseman ◽  
Tuoqi Wu ◽  
Juan Carlos de la Torre ◽  
Pamela L. Schwartzberg ◽  
Dorian B. McGavern
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Neumann ◽  
Boris Kubuschok ◽  
Kubilay Ertan ◽  
Claudia Schormann ◽  
Stefan Stevanovic ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Green ◽  
Thomas R. Wittenborn ◽  
Cecilia Fahlquist-Hagert ◽  
Ewa Terczynska-Dyla ◽  
Nina van Campen ◽  
...  

Germinal centers (GCs) are induced microanatomical structures wherein B cells undergo affinity maturation to improve the quality of the antibody response. Although GCs are crucial to appropriate humoral responses to infectious challenges and vaccines, many questions remain about the molecular signals driving B cell participation in GC responses. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is an important mediator of type I interferon and proinflammatory cytokine responses during infection and cellular stress. Recent studies have reported important roles for STING in B cell responses, including an impact on GC B cells and downstream antibody responses, which could have great consequences for vaccine design and understanding STING-associated interferonopathies. GCs are also involved in untoward reactions to autoantigens in a plethora of autoimmune disorders, and it is generally thought that these responses coopt the mechanisms used in foreign antigen-directed GCs. Here, we set out to investigate the importance of the cGAS-STING pathway in autoreactive B cell responses. In a direct competition scenario in a murine mixed bone marrow chimera model of autoreactive GCs, we find that B cell intrinsic deficiency of cGAS, STING, or the type I interferon receptor IFNAR, does not impair GC participation, whereas Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 deficiency mediates a near-complete block. Our findings suggest that physiological B cell responses are strictly sustained by signals linked to BCR-mediated endocytosis. This wiring of B cell signals may enable appropriate antibody responses, while at the same time restricting aberrant antibody responses during infections and in autoimmune or autoinflammatory settings.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Ida ◽  
Akihiko Kurata ◽  
Katsumi Eguchi ◽  
Atsushi Kawakami ◽  
Kiyoshi Migita ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1423-1423
Author(s):  
Shannon A. Carty ◽  
Mercy Gohil ◽  
Gary A Koretzky ◽  
Martha S Jordan

Abstract Regulation of DNA methylation is critical for proper T cell differentiation and function. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells undergo global remodeling of DNA methylation following viral infection, suggesting that DNA methylation may direct antigen-specific T cell responses. TET2 is a member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family, which converts 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and subsequent intermediates ultimately leading to DNA demethylation. How TET2 regulates T cell differentiation and function is unknown. Here we demonstrate that TET2 expression is regulated by TCR signaling in primary murine T cells. Furthermore, using a novel flow cytometric assay to measure 5hmC levels on a single cell basis, we find that TCR signaling also regulates TET activity as evidenced by a rapid increase in global 5hmC levels after TCR stimulation that is blunted in TET2-deficient T cells. To determine the role of TET2 in T cell responses, we generated mice deficient in TET2 in the T cell compartment (TET2fl/flCD4Cre+) mice. These mice develop grossly normal thymic and peripheral T cell subsets. Given the regulation of TET2’s expression and activity by TCR stimulation, we used a murine model of acute viral infection, specifically LCMV-Armstrong, to test if TET2 regulates antigen-specific T cell responses in vivo. Following viral challenge, TET2fl/flCD4Cre+ mice have similar antigen-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and effector responses but exhibit significantly enhanced memory CD8+ T cell differentiation compared to control mice. These data demonstrate that TET2 plays a critical role in directing CD8+ T cell differentiation and function. Studies are ongoing to identify specific TET2 regulated genes important in the development of CD8+ T cell memory. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Maria A Cardenas ◽  
Nataliya Prokhnevska ◽  
Haydn T Kissick

Abstract Tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells are associated with improved patient survival and response to immunotherapy in various cancers. Persistent antigen leads to CD8 T-cell exhaustion, where proliferation/self-renewal and killing are divided within distinct subsets of CD8 T cells in the tumor. CD8 T-cell responses in chronic antigen settings must be maintained for long periods of time, suggesting that mechanisms that regulate chronic CD8 T-cell responses may differ from those in acute settings. Currently, factors that regulate the maintenance of stem-like CD8 T cells in the tumor or their differentiation into terminally differentiated cells are unknown. In this review, we discuss the role of dendritic cells in the activation and differentiation of CD8 T-cell subsets within secondary lymphoid tissue and tumors. In addition, we examine changes in CD4 T-cell differentiation in response to chronic antigens and consider how subset-specific mechanisms could assist the stem-like and terminally differentiated CD8 T-cell subsets. Finally, we highlight how tumor-infiltrating CD4 T cells and dendritic cells interact with CD8 T cells within organized lymphoid-like areas in the tumor and propose a CD8 T-cell differentiation model that requires the collaboration of CD4 T cells and dendritic cells. These organized interactions coordinate the anti-tumor response and control disease progression by mechanisms that regulate CD8 T-cell differentiation, which permit the maintenance of an effective balance of stem-like and terminally differentiated CD8 T cells.


2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Bauer ◽  
Alexander Sterzik ◽  
Franz Bauernfeind ◽  
Peter Duewell ◽  
Claudius Conrad ◽  
...  

Immunity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1038.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetna Soni ◽  
Oriana A. Perez ◽  
William N. Voss ◽  
Joseph N. Pucella ◽  
Lee Serpas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document