scholarly journals Temperature and sea ice hindcast skill of the MiKlip decadal prediction system in the Arctic

Author(s):  
Daniel Senftleben ◽  
Veronika Eyring ◽  
Axel Lauer ◽  
Mattia Righi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Palerme ◽  
Malte Müller

<p>There is a growing demand for accurate sea-ice forecasts in the Arctic due to increasing maritime traffic. Although the capabilities of numerical models steadily improve, sea-ice forecasts produced by numerical prediction systems are affected by biases. In order to reduce forecast errors, statistical methods can be used for calibration.</p><p>In this study, two calibration methods have been developed for calibrating sea-ice drift forecasts from an operational prediction system (TOPAZ4) in the Arctic. These methods are based on random forest algorithms, a machine learning technique suitable for assessing non-linear relationships between a set of predictors and a target variable. While all the algorithms developed in this study use the same set of predictors, two set of algorithms have been developed using either buoy or synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) observations for the target variable. Furthermore, different algorithms have been developed for predicting the direction and the speed of sea-ice drift, as well as for different lead times. The random forest algorithms use predictor variables from sea-ice concentration observations during the initialization of the forecasts, sea-ice forecasts from the TOPAZ4 prediction system, wind forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, and some geographical information.</p><p>The performances of the calibrated forecasts have been evaluated and compared to those from the TOPAZ4 forecasts using buoy observations from the International Arctic Buoy Programme. Depending on the calibration method, the mean absolute error is reduced, on average, between 5.9 % and 8.1 % for the direction, and between 7.1 % and 9.6 % for the speed of sea-ice drift. However, there is a large spatial variability in the performances of these algorithms, and the random forest algorithms have particularly poor performances in the Canadian Archipelago, an area characterized by narrow channels and the presence of landfast ice.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Andersson ◽  
Fruzsina Agocs ◽  
Scott Hosking ◽  
María Pérez-Ortiz ◽  
Brooks Paige ◽  
...  

<p>Over recent decades, the Arctic has warmed faster than any region on Earth. The rapid decline in Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) is often highlighted as a key indicator of anthropogenic climate change. Changes in sea ice disrupt Arctic wildlife and indigenous communities, and influence weather patterns as far as the mid-latitudes. Furthermore, melting sea ice attenuates the albedo effect by replacing the white, reflective ice with dark, heat-absorbing melt ponds and open sea, increasing the Sun’s radiative heat input to the Arctic and amplifying global warming through a positive feedback loop. Thus, the reliable prediction of sea ice under a changing climate is of both regional and global importance. However, Arctic sea ice presents severe modelling challenges due to its complex coupled interactions with the ocean and atmosphere, leading to high levels of uncertainty in numerical sea ice forecasts.</p><p>Deep learning (a subset of machine learning) is a family of algorithms that use multiple nonlinear processing layers to extract increasingly high-level features from raw input data. Recent advances in deep learning techniques have enabled widespread success in diverse areas where significant volumes of data are available, such as image recognition, genetics, and online recommendation systems. Despite this success, and the presence of large climate datasets, applications of deep learning in climate science have been scarce until recent years. For example, few studies have posed the prediction of Arctic sea ice in a deep learning framework. We investigate the potential of a fully data-driven, neural network sea ice prediction system based on satellite observations of the Arctic. In particular, we use inputs of monthly-averaged sea ice concentration (SIC) maps since 1979 from the National Snow and Ice Data Centre, as well as climatological variables (such as surface pressure and temperature) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA5) dataset. Past deep learning-based Arctic sea ice prediction systems tend to overestimate sea ice in recent years - we investigate the potential to learn the non-stationarity induced by climate change with the inclusion of multi-decade global warming indicators (such as average Arctic air temperature). We train the networks to predict SIC maps one month into the future, evaluating network prediction uncertainty by ensembling independent networks with different random weight initialisations. Our model accounts for seasonal variations in the drivers of sea ice by controlling for the month of the year being predicted. We benchmark our prediction system against persistence, linear extrapolation and autoregressive models, as well as September minimum SIE predictions from submissions to the Sea Ice Prediction Network's Sea Ice Outlook. Performance is evaluated quantitatively using the root mean square error and qualitatively by analysing maps of prediction error and uncertainty.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Tian ◽  
Shuting Yang ◽  
Pasha Karami ◽  
François Massonnet ◽  
Tim Kruschke ◽  
...  

<p>The Arctic has lost more than 50% multiyear sea ice (MYI) area during 1999-2017. Observation analysis suggests that if the decline of the MYI coverage continues, changes in the Arctic ice cover (i.e. area and volume) will be more controlled by seasonal ice than the effect of global warming. To investigate how large and where the source of Arctic prediction skill is given a large losses of thick MYI during the last two decades, we explore the decadal prediction skills and sensitivity to sea ice thickness (SIT) initialization from the EC-Earth3 Climate Prediction System with Anomaly Initialization (EC-Earth3-CPSAI). Three sets of ensemble hind-cast experiments following the protocol for the CMIP6 Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) are carried out in which the predictions start from: 1) a baseline system with ocean only initialization; 2) with ocean and sea ice concentration (SIC) initialization; 3) with ocean, SIC and SIT initialization. The hind-cast experiments are initialized and validated based on the ERA-Interim-reanalysis for the atmosphere and ORAS5 for ocean and sea-ice, with a focus period 1997-2016. All initialized experiments show better agreement with ORAS5 than the CMIP6 historical run (i.e. the Free run) for the first winter sea ice forecast. The SIT initialized experiments show the best skill in predicting SIT (or volume) and the added value by greatly reducing errors of near surface air temperature over the Greenland and its surrounding waters. In the Central Arctic, the Beaufort and East Siberian Seas, there are only minor differences in prediction skills on seasonal to decadal time scales between the ocean-only initialized and the SIT initialized experiments, indicating that the source of predictability in these regions are mainly from the ocean; while the ocean-only initialization degrades skill with larger RMSE than the Free run, e.g. during the ice-freezing season in the GIN and Barents Seas, or at  the summer minimum in the Kara Sea, the added value from the SIT initialized experiment is present, and it may have long-term effect (>4 years) probably associated with sea-ice recirculation. In all cases, the improvement from the ocean-only initialization to also including SIC initialization is found negligible, even somehow degrading the skills. This highlights the important use of SIT in predicting changes in the Arctic sea ice cover at various time scales during the study period. Therefore, the sea-ice initialization with constraint on SIT is recommended as the most effective initialization strategy in our EC-Earth3-CPSAI for present climate prediction from seasonal to decadal time scales.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Liang ◽  
Fu Zhao ◽  
Chunhua Li ◽  
Lin Zhang

<p>NMEFC provides sea ice services for the CHINARE since 2010, the products in the early stage (before 2017) include satellite-retrieved and numerical forecasts of sea ice concentration. Based on MITgcm and ensemble Kalman Filter data assimilation scheme,  the Arctic Ice-Ocean Prediction System (ArcIOPS v1.0), was established in 2017. ArcIOPS v1.0 assimilates available satellite-retrieved sea ice concentration and thickness data. Sea ice thickness forecasting products from ArcIOPS v1.0 are provided to the CHINARE8, and are believed to have played an important role in the successful passage of R/V XUELONG through the Central Arctic for the first time during the summer of 2017. In 2019, ArcIOPS v1.0 was upgraded to the latest version (ArcIOPS v1.1), which assimilates satellite-retrieved sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness, as well as sea surface temperature (SST) data in ice free areas. Comparison between outputs of the latest version of ArcIOPS and that of its previous version shows that the latest version has a substantial improvement on sea ice concentration forecasts. In the future, with more and more kinds of observations to be assimilated, the high-resolution version of ArcIOPS will be put into operational running and benefit Chinese scientific and commercial activities in the Arctic Ocean.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longjiang Mu ◽  
Lars Nerger ◽  
Qi Tang ◽  
Svetlana N. Losa ◽  
Dmitry Sidorenko ◽  
...  

<p>We implement multivariate data assimilation in a seamless sea ice prediction system based on the fully-coupled AWI Climate Model (AWI-CM, v1.1). AWI-CM has an ocean/ice component with unstructured-mesh discretization and smoothly varying spatial resolution, which aims for seamless sea ice prediction across a wide range of space and time scales. The assimilation uses a Local Error Subspace Transform Kalman Filter coded in the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework. To test the robustness of the assimilation system, a perfect-model experiment is configured to assimilate synthetic observations. Real observations from sea ice concentration, thickness, drift, and sea surface temperature are further assimilated in the system. The analysis results are evaluated against independent in-situ observations and reanalysis data. Further experiments that assimilate different combinations of variables are conducted to understand their individual impacts on the analysis step. Particularly we find that assimilating sea ice drift improves the sea ice thickness estimate in the Antarctic, and assimilating sea surface temperature is able to avert a circulation bias of the free-running model in the Arctic Ocean at mid-depth. We also test the performance of an extended experiment where the atmosphere is constrained by nudging toward reanalysis data. The second version of the system assimilating more observations also with a new atmospheric model is currently under development.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Cruz-García ◽  
Pablo Ortega ◽  
Virginie Guemas ◽  
Juan C. Acosta Navarro ◽  
François Massonnet ◽  
...  

AbstractThe quality of initial conditions (ICs) in climate predictions controls the level of skill. Both the use of the latest high-quality observations and of the most efficient assimilation method are of paramount importance. Technical challenges make it frequent to assimilate observational information independently in the various model components. Inconsistencies between the ICs obtained for the different model components can cause initialization shocks. In this study, we identify and quantify the contribution of the ICs inconsistency relative to the model inherent bias (in which the Arctic is generally too warm) to the development of sea ice concentration forecast biases in a seasonal prediction system with the EC-Earth general circulation model. We estimate that the ICs inconsistency dominates the development of forecast biases for as long as the first 24 (19) days of the forecasts initialized in May (November), while the development of model inherent bias dominates afterwards. The effect of ICs inconsistency is stronger in the Greenland Sea, in particular in November, and mostly associated to a mismatch between the sea ice and ocean ICs. In both May and November, the ICs inconsistency between the ocean and sea ice leads to sea ice melting, but it happens in November (May) in a context of sea ice expansion (shrinking). The ICs inconsistency tend to postpone (accelerate) the November (May) sea ice freezing (melting). Our findings suggest that the ICs inconsistency might have a larger impact than previously suspected. Detecting and filtering out this signal requires the use of high frequency data.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Vázquez ◽  
Raquel Nieto ◽  
Anita Drumond ◽  
Luis Gimeno

1969 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Nørgaard-Pedersen ◽  
Sofia Ribeiro ◽  
Naja Mikkelsen ◽  
Audrey Limoges ◽  
Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz

The marine record of the Independence–Danmark fjord system extending out to the Wandel Hav in eastern North Greenland (Fig. 1A) is little known due to the almost perennial sea-ice cover, which makes the region inaccessible for research vessels (Nørgaard-Pedersen et al. 2008), and only a few depth measurements have been conducted in the area. In 2015, the Villum Research Station, a new logistic base for scientific investigations, was opened at Station Nord. In contrast to the early exploration of the region, it is now possible to observe and track the seasonal character and changes of ice in the fjord system and the Arctic Ocean through remote sensing by satellite radar systems. Satellite data going back to the early 1980s show that the outer part of the Independence–Danmark fjord system is characterised by perennial sea ice whereas both the southern part of the fjord system and an area 20–30 km west of Station Nord are partly ice free during late summer (Fig. 1B). Hence, marine-orientated field work can be conducted from the sea ice using snow mobiles, and by drilling through the ice to reach the underlying water and sea bottom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document