scholarly journals Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens with Acetate in Syntrophic Cooperation with Hydrogen-Oxidizing Anaerobic Partners

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 2232-2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Cord-Ruwisch ◽  
Derek R. Lovley ◽  
Bernhard Schink
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Hydrogen Transfer ◽  
Dry Mass ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Acetate Oxidation ◽  
Yield Data ◽  
Partial Pressures ◽  
Production Of Hydrogen ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

ABSTRACT Pure cultures of Geobacter sulfurreducens and other Fe(III)-reducing bacteria accumulated hydrogen to partial pressures of 5 to 70 Pa with acetate, butyrate, benzoate, ethanol, lactate, or glucose as the electron donor if electron release to an acceptor was limiting. G. sulfurreducens coupled acetate oxidation with electron transfer to an anaerobic partner bacterium in the absence of ferric iron or other electron acceptors. Cocultures of G. sulfurreducens and Wolinella succinogenes with nitrate as the electron acceptor degraded acetate efficiently and grew with doubling times of 6 to 8 h. The hydrogen partial pressures in these acetate-degrading cocultures were considerably lower, in the range of 0.02 to 0.04 Pa. From these values and the concentrations of the other reactants, it was calculated that in this cooperation the free energy change available to G. sulfurreducens should be about −53 kJ per mol of acetate oxidized, assuming complete conversion of acetate to CO2 and H2. However, growth yields (18.5 g of dry mass per mol of acetate for the coculture, about 14 g for G. sulfurreducens) indicated considerably higher energy gains. These yield data, measurement of hydrogen production rates, and calculation of the diffusive hydrogen flux indicated that electron transfer in these cocultures may not proceed exclusively via interspecies hydrogen transfer but may also proceed through an alternative carrier system with higher redox potential, e.g., a c-type cytochrome that was found to be excreted byG. sulfurreducens into the culture fluid. Syntrophic acetate degradation was also possible with G. sulfurreducens and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans CSN but only with nitrate as electron acceptor. These cultures produced cell yields of 4.5 g of dry mass per mol of acetate, to which both partners contributed at about equal rates. These results demonstrate that some Fe(III)-reducing bacteria can oxidize organic compounds under Fe(III) limitation with the production of hydrogen, and they provide the first example of rapid acetate oxidation via interspecies electron transfer at moderate temperature.

scholarly journals Identification of different putative outer membrane electron conduits necessary for Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III) oxide, Mn(IV) oxide, or electrode reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Jiménez Otero ◽  
Chi Ho Chan ◽  
Daniel R. Bond
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Transcriptional Analysis ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Redox Potentials ◽  
Wild Type

AbstractAt least five gene clusters in the Geobacter sulfurreducens genome encode putative ‘electron conduits’ implicated in electron transfer across the outer membrane, each containing a periplasmic multiheme c-type cytochrome, integral outer membrane anchor, and outer membrane redox lipoprotein(s). Markerless single gene cluster deletions and all possible multiple deletion combinations were constructed and grown with soluble Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-oxides, and graphite electrodes poised at +0.24 V and −0.1 V vs. SHE. Different gene clusters were necessary for reduction of each electron acceptor. During metal oxide reduction, deletion of the previously described omcBC cluster caused defects, but deletion of additional components in an ΔomcBC background, such as extEFG, were needed to produce defects greater than 50% compared to wild type. Deletion of all five gene clusters abolished all metal reduction. During electrode reduction, only the ΔextABCD mutant had a severe growth defect at both redox potentials, while this mutation did not affect Fe(III)-oxide, Mn(IV)-oxide, or Fe(III) citrate reduction. Some mutants containing only one cluster were able to reduce particular terminal electron acceptors better than wild type, suggesting routes for improvement by targeting specific electron transfer pathways. Transcriptomic comparisons between fumarate and electrode-based growth showed all of these ext clusters to be constitutive, and transcriptional analysis of the triple-deletion strain containing only extABCD detected no significant changes in expression of known redox proteins or pili components. These genetic experiments reveal new outer membrane conduit complexes necessary for growth of G. sulfurreducens, depending on the available extracellular electron acceptor.

scholarly journals Identification of different putative outer membrane electron conduits necessary for Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III)-oxide, Mn(IV)-oxide, or electrode reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens .

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Jiménez Otero ◽  
Chi Ho Chan ◽  
Daniel R Bond
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Transcriptional Analysis ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Redox Potentials ◽  
Wild Type

At least five gene clusters in the Geobacter sulfurreducens genome encode putative ‘electron conduits’ implicated in electron transfer across the outer membrane, each containing a periplasmic multiheme c -type cytochrome, integral outer membrane anchor, and outer membrane redox lipoprotein(s). Markerless single gene cluster deletions and all possible multiple deletion combinations were constructed and grown with soluble Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-oxides, and graphite electrodes poised at +0.24 V and -0.1 V vs. SHE. Different gene clusters were necessary for reduction of each electron acceptor. During metal oxide reduction, deletion of the previously described omcBC cluster caused defects, but deletion of additional components in an Δ omcBC background, such as extEFG , were needed to produce defects greater than 50% compared to wild type. Deletion of all five gene clusters abolished all metal reduction. During electrode reduction, only the Δ extABCD mutant had a severe growth defect at both redox potentials, while this mutation did not affect Fe(III)-oxide, Mn(IV)-oxide, or Fe(III) citrate reduction. Some mutants containing only one cluster were able to reduce particular terminal electron acceptors better than wild type, suggesting routes for improvement by targeting specific electron transfer pathways. Transcriptomic comparisons between fumarate and electrode-based growth showed all of these ext clusters to be constitutive, and transcriptional analysis of the triple-deletion strain containing only extABCD detected no significant changes in expression of known redox proteins or pili components. These genetic experiments reveal new outer membrane conduit complexes necessary for growth of G. sulfurreducens , depending on the available extracellular electron acceptor.

Recovery of Humic-Reducing Bacteria from a Diversity of Environments

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1504-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Coates ◽  
Debra J. Ellis ◽  
Elizabeth L. Blunt-Harris ◽  
Catherine V. Gaw ◽  
Eric E. Roden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Humic Substance ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Microbial Reduction ◽  
Acetate Oxidation ◽  
Liquid Media ◽  
Sedimentary Environments ◽  
Sediment Types ◽  
Solid Media ◽  
The Family ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

ABSTRACT To evaluate which microorganisms might be responsible for microbial reduction of humic substances in sedimentary environments, humic-reducing bacteria were isolated from a variety of sediment types. These included lake sediments, pristine and contaminated wetland sediments, and marine sediments. In each of the sediment types, all of the humic reducers recovered with acetate as the electron donor and the humic substance analog, 2,6-anthraquinone disulfonate (AQDS), as the electron acceptor were members of the familyGeobacteraceae. This was true whether the AQDS-reducing bacteria were enriched prior to isolation on solid media or were recovered from the highest positive dilutions of sediments in liquid media. All of the isolates tested not only conserved energy to support growth from acetate oxidation coupled to AQDS reduction but also could oxidize acetate with highly purified soil humic acids as the sole electron acceptor. All of the isolates tested were also able to grow with Fe(III) serving as the sole electron acceptor. This is consistent with previous studies that have suggested that the capacity for Fe(III) reduction is a common feature of all members of theGeobacteraceae. These studies demonstrate that the potential for microbial humic substance reduction can be found in a wide variety of sediment types and suggest thatGeobacteraceae species might be important humic-reducing organisms in sediments.

scholarly journals Identification of Different Putative Outer Membrane Electron Conduits Necessary for Fe(III) Citrate, Fe(III) Oxide, Mn(IV) Oxide, or Electrode Reduction byGeobacter sulfurreducens

2018 ◽  
Vol 200 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Jiménez Otero ◽  
Chi Ho Chan ◽  
Daniel R. Bond
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Transcriptional Analysis ◽  
Metal Reduction ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Redox Proteins ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTAt least five gene clusters in theGeobacter sulfurreducensgenome encode putative “electron conduits” implicated in electron transfer across the outer membrane, each containing a periplasmic multihemec-type cytochrome, integral outer membrane anchor, and outer membrane redox lipoprotein(s). Markerless single-gene-cluster deletions and all possible multiple-deletion combinations were constructed and grown with soluble Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides, and graphite electrodes poised at +0.24 V and −0.1 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). Different gene clusters were necessary for reduction of each electron acceptor. During metal oxide reduction, deletion of the previously describedomcBCcluster caused defects, but deletion of additional components in an ΔomcBCbackground, such asextEFG, were needed to produce defects greater than 50% compared to findings with the wild type. Deletion of all five gene clusters abolished all metal reduction. During electrode reduction, only the ΔextABCDmutant had a severe growth defect at both redox potentials, while this mutation did not affect Fe(III) oxide, Mn(IV) oxide, or Fe(III) citrate reduction. Some mutants containing only one cluster were able to reduce particular terminal electron acceptors better than the wild type, suggesting routes for improvement by targeting specific electron transfer pathways. Transcriptomic comparisons between fumarate and electrode-based growth conditions showed all of theseextclusters to be constitutive, and transcriptional analysis of the triple-deletion strain containing onlyextABCDdetected no significant changes in expression of genes encoding known redox proteins or pilus components. These genetic experiments reveal new outer membrane conduit complexes necessary for growth ofG. sulfurreducens, depending on the available extracellular electron acceptor.IMPORTANCEGram-negative metal-reducing bacteria utilize electron conduits, chains of redox proteins spanning the outer membrane, to transfer electrons to the extracellular surface. Only one pathway for electron transfer across the outer membrane ofGeobacter sulfurreducenshas been linked to Fe(III) reduction. However,G. sulfurreducensis able to respire a wide array of extracellular substrates. Here we present the first combinatorial genetic analysis of five different electron conduits via creation of new markerless deletion strains and complementation vectors. Multiple conduit gene clusters appear to have overlapping roles, including two that have never been linked to metal reduction. Another recently described cluster (ExtABCD) was the only electron conduit essential during electrode reduction, a substrate of special importance to biotechnological applications of this organism.

scholarly journals Geobacter sulfurreducens inner membrane cytochrome CbcBA controls electron transfer and growth yield near the energetic limit of respiration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Joshi ◽  
Chi Ho Chan ◽  
Daniel R. Bond
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Redox Potential ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Growth Efficiency ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Redox Potentials ◽  
Hydrogen Electrode ◽  
Highly Expressed Genes ◽  
Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Transfer Chain

AbstractGeobacter sulfurreducens utilizes extracellular electron acceptors such as Mn(IV), Fe(III), syntrophic partners, and electrodes that vary from +0.4 to −0.3 V vs. Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE), representing a potential energy span that should require a highly branched electron transfer chain. Here we describe CbcBA, a bc-type cytochrome essential near the thermodynamic limit of respiration when acetate is the electron donor. Mutants lacking cbcBA ceased Fe(III) reduction at −0.21 V vs. SHE, could not transfer electrons to electrodes between −0.21 and −0.28 V, and could not reduce the final 10% – 35% of Fe(III) minerals. As redox potential decreased during Fe(III) reduction, cbcBA was induced with the aid of the regulator BccR to become one of the most highly expressed genes in G. sulfurreducens. Growth yield (CFU/mM Fe(II)) was 112% of WT in ΔcbcBA, and deletion of cbcL (a different bc-cytochrome essential near −0.15 V) in ΔcbcBA increased yield to 220%. Together with ImcH, which is required at high redox potentials, CbcBA represents a third cytoplasmic membrane oxidoreductase in G. sulfurreducens. This expanding list shows how these important metal-reducing bacteria may constantly sense redox potential to adjust growth efficiency in changing environments.

scholarly journals MacA, a Diheme c-Type Cytochrome Involved in Fe(III) Reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (12) ◽  
pp. 4042-4045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Butler ◽  
Franz Kaufmann ◽  
Maddalena V. Coppi ◽  
Cinthia Núñez ◽  
Derek R. Lovley
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Peroxidase Activity ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens

ABSTRACT A 36-kDa diheme c-type cytochrome abundant in Fe(III)-respiring Geobacter sulfurreducens, designated MacA, was more highly expressed during growth with Fe(III) as the electron acceptor than with fumarate. Although MacA has homology to proteins with in vitro peroxidase activity, deletion of macA had no impact on response to oxidative stress. However, the capacity for Fe(III) reduction was greatly diminished, indicating that MacA, which is predicted to be localized in the periplasm, is a key intermediate in electron transfer to Fe(III).

Potential role of the Fe(III)-reducing bacteriaGeobacterandGeothrixin controlling arsenic solubility in Bengal delta sediments

2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 865-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Islam ◽  
C. Boothman ◽  
A. G. Gault ◽  
D. A. Polya ◽  
J. R. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Enrichment Culture ◽  
Anaerobic Bacteria ◽  
Defined Medium ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Close Relative ◽  
Bengal Delta ◽  
Delta Sediments ◽  
Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Geothrix Fermentans

AbstractPrevious studies from our laboratory have suggested a role for indigenous metal-reducing bacteria in the reduction of sediment-bound As(V), and have also shown that a stable enrichment culture of Fe(III)-reducing bacteria was able to mobilize arsenic (as As(III)) from sediments collected from West Bengal (Islamet al., 2004). To identify the Fe(III)-reducing bacteria that may play a role in the reduction of As(V) and mobilization of As(III), we made a detailed molecular analysis of this enrichment culture. It was dominated by a close relative ofGeothrix fermentans, but the type strain of this organism was unable to conserve energy for growth via the dissimilatory reduction of As(V), or reduce As(V) present in a defined medium containing fumarate as the electron acceptor. Furthermore, when the cells were grown using soluble Fe(III)-citrate as an electron acceptor in the presence of As(V), bacterial Fe(III) reduction resulted in the precipitation of the Fe(II)-bearing mineral vivianite in 2 weeks. This was accompanied by the efficient removal of As from solution. These results demonstrate thatGeothrix fermentans, in common with other key Fe(III)-reducing bacteria such asGeobacter sulfurreducens, does not reduce As(V) enzymatically, but can capture arsenic in Fe(II) minerals formed during respiration using Fe(III) as an electron acceptor. Thus, the reduction of arsenic-bearing Fe(III) oxide minerals is not sufficient to mobilize arsenic, but may result in the formation of Fe(II) biominerals that could potentially act as sinks for arsenic in sediments. Additional mechanisms, including dissimilatory As(V) reduction by other specialist anaerobic bacteria, are implicated in the mobilization of arsenic from sediments.

scholarly journals An Inner Membrane Cytochrome Required Only for Reduction of High Redox Potential Extracellular Electron Acceptors

mBio ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb E. Levar ◽  
Chi Ho Chan ◽  
Misha G. Mehta-Kolte ◽  
Daniel R. Bond
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Electron Acceptors ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Extracellular Electron Transfer ◽  
Redox Potentials ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Transfer Strategies ◽  
Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Metal Reducing Bacteria

ABSTRACTDissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria, such asGeobacter sulfurreducens, transfer electrons beyond their outer membranes to Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides, heavy metals, and electrodes in electrochemical devices. In the environment, metal acceptors exist in multiple chelated and insoluble forms that span a range of redox potentials and offer different amounts of available energy. Despite this, metal-reducing bacteria have not been shown to alter their electron transfer strategies to take advantage of these energy differences. Disruption ofimcH, encoding an inner membranec-type cytochrome, eliminated the ability ofG. sulfurreducensto reduce Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III)-EDTA, and insoluble Mn(IV) oxides, electron acceptors with potentials greater than 0.1 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), but theimcHmutant retained the ability to reduce Fe(III) oxides with potentials of ≤−0.1 V versus SHE. TheimcHmutant failed to grow on electrodes poised at +0.24 V versus SHE, but switching electrodes to −0.1 V versus SHE triggered exponential growth. At potentials of ≤−0.1 V versus SHE, both the wild type and theimcHmutant doubled 60% slower than at higher potentials. Electrodes poised even 100 mV higher (0.0 V versus SHE) could not triggerimcHmutant growth. These results demonstrate thatG. sulfurreducenspossesses multiple respiratory pathways, that some of these pathways are in operation only after exposure to low redox potentials, and that electron flow can be coupled to generation of different amounts of energy for growth. The redox potentials that trigger these behaviors mirror those of metal acceptors common in subsurface environments whereGeobacteris found.IMPORTANCEInsoluble metal oxides in the environment represent a common and vast reservoir of energy for respiratory microbes capable of transferring electrons across their insulating membranes to external acceptors, a process termed extracellular electron transfer. Despite the global biogeochemical importance of metal cycling and the ability of such organisms to produce electricity at electrodes, fundamental gaps in the understanding of extracellular electron transfer biochemistry exist. Here, we describe a conserved inner membrane redox protein inGeobacter sulfurreducenswhich is required only for electron transfer to high-potential compounds, and we show thatG. sulfurreducenshas the ability to utilize different electron transfer pathways in response to the amount of energy available in a metal or electrode distant from the cell.

scholarly journals Electricity Production by Geobacter sulfurreducens Attached to Electrodes

2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 1548-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Bond ◽  
Derek R. Lovley
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transfer ◽  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Electron Donor ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Microbial Fuel Cells ◽  
Electrical Current ◽  
Geobacter Sulfurreducens ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Organic Substrates ◽  
Current Production

ABSTRACT Previous studies have suggested that members of the Geobacteraceae can use electrodes as electron acceptors for anaerobic respiration. In order to better understand this electron transfer process for energy production, Geobacter sulfurreducens was inoculated into chambers in which a graphite electrode served as the sole electron acceptor and acetate or hydrogen was the electron donor. The electron-accepting electrodes were maintained at oxidizing potentials by connecting them to similar electrodes in oxygenated medium (fuel cells) or to potentiostats that poised electrodes at +0.2 V versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (poised potential). When a small inoculum of G. sulfurreducens was introduced into electrode-containing chambers, electrical current production was dependent upon oxidation of acetate to carbon dioxide and increased exponentially, indicating for the first time that electrode reduction supported the growth of this organism. When the medium was replaced with an anaerobic buffer lacking nutrients required for growth, acetate-dependent electrical current production was unaffected and cells attached to these electrodes continued to generate electrical current for weeks. This represents the first report of microbial electricity production solely by cells attached to an electrode. Electrode-attached cells completely oxidized acetate to levels below detection (<10 μM), and hydrogen was metabolized to a threshold of 3 Pa. The rates of electron transfer to electrodes (0.21 to 1.2 μmol of electrons/mg of protein/min) were similar to those observed for respiration with Fe(III) citrate as the electron acceptor (Eo′ =+0.37 V). The production of current in microbial fuel cell (65 mA/m2 of electrode surface) or poised-potential (163 to 1,143 mA/m2) mode was greater than what has been reported for other microbial systems, even those that employed higher cell densities and electron-shuttling compounds. Since acetate was completely oxidized, the efficiency of conversion of organic electron donor to electricity was significantly higher than in previously described microbial fuel cells. These results suggest that the effectiveness of microbial fuel cells can be increased with organisms such as G. sulfurreducens that can attach to electrodes and remain viable for long periods of time while completely oxidizing organic substrates with quantitative transfer of electrons to an electrode.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document