scholarly journals Additional Determinants within Escherichia coli FNR Activating Region 1 and RNA Polymerase α Subunit Required for Transcription Activation

2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (5) ◽  
pp. 1724-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Derek Weber ◽  
Owen D. Vincent ◽  
Patricia J. Kiley
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Class I ◽  
Side Chains ◽  
Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis ◽  
Α Subunit

ABSTRACT The global anaerobic regulator FNR is a DNA binding protein that activates transcription of genes required for anaerobic metabolism in Escherichia coli through interactions with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of FNR amino acid residues 181 to 193 of FNR was utilized to determine which amino acid side chains are required for transcription of both class II and class I promoters. In vivo assays of FNR function demonstrated that a core of residues (F181, R184, S187, and R189) was required for efficient activation of class II promoters, while at a class I promoter, FF(−61.5), only S187 and R189 were critical for FNR activation. Site-directed mutagenesis of positions 184, 187, and 189 revealed that the positive charge contributes to the function of the side chain at positions 184 and 189 while the serine hydroxyl is critical for the function of position 187. Subsequent analysis of the carboxy-terminal domain of the α subunit (αCTD) of RNAP, using an alanine library in single copy, revealed that in addition to previously characterized side chains (D305, R317, and L318), E286 and E288 contributed to FNR activation of both class II and class I promoters, suggesting that αCTD region 285 to 288 also participates in activation by FNR. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that multiple side chains within region 181 to 192 are required for FNR activation and the surface of αCTD required for FNR activation is more extensive than previously observed.

scholarly journals Determinants of the C-Terminal Domain of the Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase α Subunit Important for Transcription at Class I Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein-Dependent Promoters

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (8) ◽  
pp. 2273-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel J. Savery ◽  
Georgina S. Lloyd ◽  
Stephen J. W. Busby ◽  
Mark S. Thomas ◽  
Richard H. Ebright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Cyclic Amp Receptor Protein ◽  
Terminal Domain

ABSTRACT Alanine scanning of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit C-terminal domain (αCTD) was used to identify amino acid side chains important for class I cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)-dependent transcription. Key residues were investigated further in vivo and in vitro. Substitutions in three regions of αCTD affected class I CRP-dependent transcription from the CC(−61.5) promoter and/or the lacP1 promoter. These regions are (i) the 287 determinant, previously shown to contact CRP during class II CRP-dependent transcription; (ii) the 265 determinant, previously shown to be important for αCTD-DNA interactions, including those required for class II CRP-dependent transcription; and (iii) the 261 determinant. We conclude that CRP contacts the same target in αCTD, the 287 determinant, at class I and class II CRP-dependent promoters. We also conclude that the relative contributions of individual residues within the 265 determinant depend on promoter sequence, and we discuss explanations for effects of substitutions in the 261 determinant.

scholarly journals Interactions between the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase at Class I promoters

1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Up Elements ◽  
Camp Receptor

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.

scholarly journals Exploring the Amino Acid Residue Requirements of the RNA Polymerase (RNAP) α Subunit C-Terminal Domain for Productive Interaction between Spx and RNAP of Bacillus subtilis

2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cierra A. Birch ◽  
Madison J. Davis ◽  
Lea Mbengi ◽  
Peter Zuber
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Stress Induction ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Codon Substitution

ABSTRACT Bacillus subtilis Spx is a global transcriptional regulator that is conserved among Gram-positive bacteria, in which Spx is required for preventing oxidatively induced proteotoxicity. Upon stress induction, Spx engages RNA polymerase (RNAP) through interaction with the C-terminal domain of the rpoA-encoded RNAP α subunit (αCTD). Previous mutational analysis of rpoA revealed that substitutions of Y263 in αCTD severely impaired Spx-activated transcription. Attempts to substitute alanine for αCTD R261, R268, R289, E255, E298, and K294 were unsuccessful, suggesting that these residues are essential. To determine whether these RpoA residues were required for productive Spx-RNAP interaction, we ectopically expressed the putatively lethal rpoA mutant alleles in the rpoAY263C mutant, where “Y263C” indicates the amino acid change that results from mutation of the allele. By complementation analysis, we show that Spx-bound αCTD amino acid residues are not essential for Spx-activated transcription in vivo but that R261A, E298A, and E255A mutants confer a partial defect in NaCl-stress induction of Spx-controlled genes. In addition, strains expressing rpoAE255A are defective in disulfide stress resistance and produce RNAP having a reduced affinity for Spx. The E255 residue corresponds to Escherichia coli αD259, which has been implicated in αCTD-σ70 interaction (σ70 R603, corresponding to R362 of B. subtilis σA). However, the combined rpoAE255A and sigAR362A mutations have an additive negative effect on Spx-dependent expression, suggesting the residues' differing roles in Spx-activated transcription. Our findings suggest that, while αCTD is essential for Spx-activated transcription, Spx is the primary DNA-binding determinant of the Spx-αCTD complex. IMPORTANCE Though extensively studied in Escherichia coli, the role of αCTD in activator-stimulated transcription is largely uncharacterized in Bacillus subtilis. Here, we conduct phenotypic analyses of putatively lethal αCTD alanine codon substitution mutants to determine whether these residues function in specific DNA binding at the Spx-αCTD-DNA interface. Our findings suggest that multisubunit RNAP contact to Spx is optimal for activation while Spx fulfills the most stringent requirement of upstream promoter binding. Furthermore, several αCTD residues targeted for mutagenesis in this study are conserved among many bacterial species and thus insights on their function in other regulatory systems may be suggested herein.

scholarly journals Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein-Dependent Activation of the Escherichia coli acsP2 Promoter by a Synergistic Class III Mechanism

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (17) ◽  
pp. 5148-5157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Beatty ◽  
Douglas F. Browning ◽  
Stephen J. W. Busby ◽  
Alan J. Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Class I ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Cyclic Amp Receptor Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription of the Escherichia coli acs gene, which encodes an acetate-scavenging enzyme required for fitness during periods of carbon starvation. Two promoters direct transcription of acs, the distal acsP1 and the proximal acsP2. In this study, we demonstrated that acsP2 can function as the major promoter and showed by in vitro studies that CRP facilitates transcription by “focusing” RNA polymerase to acsP2. We proposed that CRP activates transcription from acsP2 by a synergistic class III mechanism. Consistent with this proposal, we showed that CRP binds two sites, CRP I and CRP II. Induction of acs expression absolutely required CRP I, while optimal expression required both CRP I and CRP II. The locations of these DNA sites for CRP (centered at positions −69.5 and −122.5, respectively) suggest that CRP interacts with RNA polymerase through class I interactions. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrated that acs transcription requires the surfaces of CRP and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (α-CTD), which is known to participate in class I interactions: activating region 1 of CRP and the 287, 265, and 261 determinants of the α-CTD. Other surface-exposed residues in the α-CTD contributed to acs transcription, suggesting that the α-CTD may interact with at least one protein other than CRP.

scholarly journals Cra-Dependent Transcriptional Activation of theicd Gene of Escherichia coli

1999 ◽  
Vol 181 (3) ◽  
pp. 893-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Prost ◽  
Didier Nègre ◽  
Christelle Oudot ◽  
Katsuhiko Murakami ◽  
Akira Ishihama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
P2 Promoter ◽  
Catabolite Repressor ◽  
A Site ◽  
Extension Analysis

ABSTRACT The icd gene of Escherichia coli, encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase, was shown to be expressed from two different promoters: the previously identified icd P1 and a newly detected second promoter, icd P2, whose expression is positively regulated by the catabolite repressor-activator protein Cra, formerly called FruR. In each case, we determined the mRNA start site by primer extension analysis of in vivo transcripts and examined the interaction of the icd control region with either RNA polymerase or Cra. We observed that (i) the Cra factor binds to and activates transcription from a site centered at position −76.5 within the icd P2 promoter region and (ii) three particular mutations in the C-terminal end of the α subunit of RNA polymerase (L262A, R265A, and N268A) considerably diminish transcription initiating from the icd P2 promoter, as shown by in vitro experiments performed in the presence of mutant RNA polymerases carrying Ala substitutions.

scholarly journals RNA polymerases in strict endosymbiont bacteria with extreme genome reduction show distinct erosions that might result in limited and differential promoter recognition

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0239350
Author(s):  
Cynthia Paola Rangel-Chávez ◽  
Edgardo Galán-Vásquez ◽  
Azucena Pescador-Tapia ◽  
Luis Delaye ◽  
Agustino Martínez-Antonio
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Genome Reduction ◽  
Promoter Element ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Terminal Domain

Strict endosymbiont bacteria present high degree genome reduction, retain smaller proteins, and in some instances, lack complete functional domains compared to free-living counterparts. Until now, the mechanisms underlying these genetic reductions are not well understood. In this study, the conservation of RNA polymerases, the essential machinery for gene expression, is analyzed in endosymbiont bacteria with extreme genome reductions. We analyzed the RNA polymerase subunits to identify and define domains, subdomains, and specific amino acids involved in precise biological functions known in Escherichia coli. We also perform phylogenetic analysis and three-dimensional models over four lineages of endosymbiotic proteobacteria with the smallest genomes known to date: Candidatus Hodgkinia cicadicola, Candidatus Tremblaya phenacola, Candidatus Tremblaya Princeps, Candidatus Nasuia deltocephalinicola, and Candidatus Carsonella ruddii. We found that some Hodgkinia strains do not encode for the RNA polymerase α subunit. The rest encode genes for α, β, β’, and σ subunits to form the RNA polymerase. However, 16% shorter, on average, respect their orthologous in E. coli. In the α subunit, the amino-terminal domain is the most conserved. Regarding the β and β’ subunits, both the catalytic core and the assembly domains are the most conserved. However, they showed compensatory amino acid substitutions to adapt to changes in the σ subunit. Precisely, the most erosive diversity occurs within the σ subunit. We identified broad amino acid substitution even in those recognizing and binding to the -10-box promoter element. In an overall conceptual image, the RNA polymerase from Candidatus Nasuia conserved the highest similarity with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and their σ70. It might be recognizing the two main promoter elements (-10 and -35) and the two promoter accessory elements (-10 extended and UP-element). In Candidatus Carsonella, the RNA polymerase could recognize all the promoter elements except the -10-box extended. In Candidatus Tremblaya and Hodgkinia, due to the α carboxyl-terminal domain absence, they might not recognize the UP-promoter element. We also identified the lack of the β flap-tip helix domain in most Hodgkinia’s that suggests the inability to bind the -35-box promoter element.

Regulation of ndh expression in Escherichia coli by Fis

Microbiology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Jackson ◽  
Timo Blake ◽  
Jeffrey Green
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Exponential Growth ◽  
Nadh Dehydrogenase ◽  
Class I ◽  
Nitrate Respiration ◽  
Anaerobic Conditions ◽  
Expression In Escherichia Coli

The Escherichia coli ndh gene encodes NADH dehydrogenase II, a primary dehydrogenase used during aerobic and nitrate respiration. The anaerobic transcription factor FNR represses ndh expression by binding at two sites centred at −94·5 and −50·5. In vivo transcription studies using promoter fusions with 5′ deletions confirmed that both FNR sites are required for maximum repression under anaerobic conditions. The histone-like protein Fis binds to three sites [centred at −123 (Fis I), −72, (Fis II) and +51 (Fis III)] in the ndh promoter. Using ndh : : lacZ promoter fusions carrying 5′ deletions, or replacement mutations it is shown that Fis III is a repressing site and that Fis I and II are activating sites, with the greatest contribution from Fis II. Deletion of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α-subunit abolished Fis-mediated activation of ndh expression, suggesting that ndh has a Class I Fis-activated promoter. In accordance with the established pattern of Fis synthesis, ndh transcription was greatest during exponential growth. Thus, it is suggested that Fis enhances ndh expression during periods of rapid growth, by acting as a Class I activator, and that the binding of tandem FNR dimers represses ndh expression by preventing interaction of the RNA polymerase α-subunit with DNA and Fis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document