scholarly journals Glycoprotein C of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Shields Glycoprotein B from Antibody Neutralization

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Komala Sari ◽  
Katrina A. Gianopulos ◽  
Anthony V. Nicola
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Protein Composition ◽  
Viral Envelope ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Antibody Neutralization ◽  
Glycoprotein C ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Viruses have evolved strategies to avoid neutralization by the host antibody response. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein C (gC) functions in viral entry and binds to complement component C3b, inhibiting complement-mediated immunity. We investigated whether gC protects HSV from antibody neutralization. HSV-1 that lacks gC was more sensitive to complement-independent neutralization by a panel of gB monoclonal antibodies than a wild-type gC rescuant virus. The presence of gC decreased neutralization by 2- to 16-fold. The gB in the native envelope of HSV-1 had reduced reactivity with antibodies in comparison to gB from the gC-null virus, suggesting that gC hampers the recognition of gB epitopes in the viral particle. The protein composition of the gC-null virus, including the surface glycoproteins essential for entry, was equivalent to that of the wild type, suggesting that gC is directly responsible for the reduced antibody recognition and neutralization. The neutralizing activity of antibodies to gD and gH antibodies was also increased in HSV lacking gC. Together, the data suggest that HSV-1 gC protects the viral envelope glycoproteins essential for entry, including gB, by shielding them from neutralization as a potential mechanism of immune evasion. IMPORTANCE HSV-1 causes lifelong infection in the human population and can be fatal in neonatal and immunocompromised individuals. There is no vaccine or cure, in part due to the ability of HSV to escape the host immune response by various mechanisms. The HSV particle contains at least 15 envelope proteins, four of which are required for entry and replication. This work suggests a novel role for gC in shielding the HSV entry glycoproteins. gC may function to help HSV escape neutralization by antibodies.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 Differ in Their Interaction with Heparan Sulfate

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (19) ◽  
pp. 9106-9114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Trybala ◽  
Jan-Åke Liljeqvist ◽  
Bo Svennerholm ◽  
Tomas Bergström
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Ionic Strength ◽  
Heparan Sulfate ◽  
Viral Envelope ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Electrostatic Forces ◽  
Homologous Proteins ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) serves as an initial receptor for many different viruses, including herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and 2, respectively). Glycoproteins C and B (gC and gB) are the major components of the viral envelope that mediate binding to HS. In this study, purified gB and gC homologous proteins as well as purified HSV-1 and HSV-2 virions were compared for the ability to bind isolated HS receptor molecules. HSV-1 gC and HSV-2 gC bound comparable amounts of HS. Similarly, HSV-1 gB and its HSV-2 counterpart showed no difference in the HS-binding capabilities. Despite the similar HS-binding potentials of gB and gC homologs, HSV-1 virions bound more HS than HSV-2 particles. Purified gC and gB proteins differed with respect to sensitivity of their interaction with HS to increased concentrations of sodium chloride in the order gB-2 > gB-1 > gC-1 > gC-2. The corresponding pattern for binding of whole HSV virions to cells in the presence of increased ionic strength of the medium was HSV-2 gC-neg1 > HSV-1 gC−39 > HSV-1 KOS 321 > HSV-2 333. These results relate the HS-binding activities of individual glycoproteins with the cell-binding abilities of whole virus particles. In addition, these data suggest a greater contribution of electrostatic forces for binding of gB proteins and gC-negative mutants compared with binding of gC homologs and wild-type HSV strains. Binding of wild-type HSV-2 virions was the least sensitive to increased ionic strength of the medium, suggesting that the less extensive binding of HS molecules by HSV-2 than by HSV-1 can be compensated for by a relatively weak contribution of electrostatic forces to the binding. Furthermore, gB and gC homologs exhibited different patterns of sensitivity of binding to cells to inhibition with selectively N-, 2-O-, and 6-O-desulfated heparin compounds. The O-sulfate groups of heparin were found to be more important for interaction with gB-1 than gB-2. These results indicate that HSV-1 and HSV-2 differ in their interaction with HS.

scholarly journals Entry of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and Other Alphaherpesviruses via the Paired Immunoglobulin-Like Type 2 Receptor α

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 4520-4527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Arii ◽  
Masashi Uema ◽  
Tomomi Morimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Sagara ◽  
Hiroomi Akashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Cho Cells ◽  
Viral Envelope ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Entry Pathway ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) enters cells either via fusion of the virion envelope and host cell plasma membrane or via endocytosis, depending on the cell type. In the study reported here, we investigated a viral entry pathway dependent on the paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α (PILRα), a recently identified entry coreceptor for HSV-1 that associates with viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB). Experiments using inhibitors of endocytic pathways and ultrastructural analyses of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transduced with PILRα showed that HSV-1 entry into these cells was via virus-cell fusion at the cell surface. Together with earlier observations that HSV-1 uptake into normal CHO cells and those transduced with a receptor for HSV-1 envelope gD is mediated by endocytosis, these results indicated that expression of PILRα produced an alternative HSV-1 entry pathway in CHO cells. We also showed that human and murine PILRα were able to mediate entry of pseudorabies virus, a porcine alphaherpesvirus, but not of HSV-2. These results indicated that viral entry via PILRα appears to be conserved but that there is a PILRα preference among alphaherpesviruses.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus 1 UL34 Protein Regulates the Global Architecture of the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Infected Cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumio Maeda ◽  
Jun Arii ◽  
Yoshitaka Hirohata ◽  
Yuhei Maruzuru ◽  
Naoto Koyanagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Null Mutation ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Nuclear Egress ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Upon herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection, the CD98 heavy chain (CD98hc) is redistributed around the nuclear membrane (NM), where it promotes viral de-envelopment during the nuclear egress of nucleocapsids. In this study, we attempted to identify the factor(s) involved in CD98hc accumulation and demonstrated the following: (i) the null mutation of HSV-1 UL34 caused specific dispersion throughout the cytoplasm of CD98hc and the HSV-1 de-envelopment regulators, glycoproteins B and H (gB and gH); (ii) as observed with CD98hc, gB, and gH, wild-type HSV-1 infection caused redistribution of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers calnexin and ERp57 around the NM, whereas the UL34-null mutation caused cytoplasmic dispersion of these markers; (iii) the ER markers colocalized efficiently with CD98hc, gB, and gH in the presence and absence of UL34 in HSV-1-infected cells; (iv) at the ultrastructural level, wild-type HSV-1 infection caused ER compression around the NM, whereas the UL34-null mutation caused cytoplasmic dispersion of the ER; and (v) the UL34-null mutation significantly decreased the colocalization efficiency of lamin protein markers of the NM with CD98hc and gB. Collectively, these results indicate that HSV-1 infection causes redistribution of the ER around the NM, with resulting accumulation of ER-associated CD98hc, gB, and gH around the NM and that UL34 is required for ER redistribution, as well as for efficient recruitment to the NM of the ER-associated de-envelopment factors. Our study suggests that HSV-1 induces remodeling of the global ER architecture for recruitment of regulators mediating viral nuclear egress to the NM. IMPORTANCE The ER is an important cellular organelle that exists as a complex network extending throughout the cytoplasm. Although viruses often remodel the ER to facilitate viral replication, information on the effects of herpesvirus infections on ER morphological integrity is limited. Here, we showed that HSV-1 infection led to compression of the global ER architecture around the NM, resulting in accumulation of ER-associated regulators associated with nuclear egress of HSV-1 nucleocapsids. We also identified HSV-1 UL34 as a viral factor that mediated ER remodeling. Furthermore, we demonstrated that UL34 was required for efficient targeting of these regulators to the NM. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that a herpesvirus remodels ER global architecture. Our study also provides insight into the mechanism by which the regulators for HSV-1 nuclear egress are recruited to the NM, where this viral event occurs.

scholarly journals A Functional Interaction between Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein gH/gL Domains I and II and gD Is Defined by Using Alphaherpesvirus gH and gL Chimeras

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (14) ◽  
pp. 7159-7169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Fan ◽  
Richard Longnecker ◽  
Sarah A. Connolly
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Viral Envelope ◽  
Functional Interaction ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Homotypic Interaction ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACTWhereas most viruses require only a single protein to bind to and fuse with cells, herpesviruses use multiple glycoproteins to mediate virus entry, and thus communication among these proteins is required. For most alphaherpesviruses, the minimal set of viral proteins required for fusion with the host cell includes glycoproteins gD, gB, and a gH/gL heterodimer. In the current model of entry, gD binds to a cellular receptor and transmits a signal to gH/gL. This signal then triggers gB, the conserved fusion protein, to insert into the target membrane and refold to merge the viral and cellular membranes. We previously demonstrated that gB homologs from two alphaherpesviruses, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and saimiriine herpesvirus 1 (SaHV-1), were interchangeable. In contrast, neither gD nor gH/gL functioned with heterotypic entry glycoproteins, indicating that gD and gH/gL exhibit an essential type-specific functional interaction. To map this homotypic interaction site on gH/gL, we generated HSV-1/SaHV-1 gH and gL chimeras. The functional interaction with HSV-1 gD mapped to the N-terminal domains I and II of the HSV-1 gH ectodomain. The core of HSV-1 gL that interacts with gH also was required for functional homotypic interaction. The N-terminal gH/gL domains I and II are the least conserved and may have evolved to support species-specific glycoprotein interactions.IMPORTANCEThe first step of the herpesvirus life cycle is entry into a host cell. A coordinated interaction among multiple viral glycoproteins is required to mediate fusion of the viral envelope with the cell membrane. The details of how these glycoproteins interact to trigger fusion are unclear. By swapping the entry glycoproteins of two alphaherpesviruses (HSV-1 and SaHV-1), we previously demonstrated a functional homotypic interaction between gD and gH/gL. To define the gH and gL requirements for homotypic interaction, we evaluated the function of a panel of HSV-1/SaHV-1 gH and gL chimeras. We demonstrate that domains I and II of HSV-1 gH are sufficient to promote a functional, albeit reduced, interaction with HSV-1 gD. These findings contribute to our model of how the entry glycoproteins cooperate to mediate herpesvirus entry into the cell.

Typing of Clinical Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 Isolates with Monoclonal Antibodies

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 2717-2718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Åke Liljeqvist ◽  
Bo Svennerholm ◽  
Tomas Bergström
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Glycoprotein C ◽  
Glycoprotein G ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1-specific anti-glycoprotein C-1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) and a type 2-specific anti-glycoprotein G-2 MAb for typing of 2,400 clinical HSV-1 isolates and 2,400 clinical HSV-2 isolates, respectively, using an enzyme immunoassay. The anti-HSV-1 MAb showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, and the anti-HSV-2 MAb showed a sensitivity of 99.46% and 100% specificity, indicating that these MAbs are suitable for typing of clinical HSV isolates.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus Latency-Associated Transcript Sequence Downstream of the Promoter Influences Type-Specific Reactivation and Viral Neurotropism

2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 6605-6613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Bertke ◽  
Amita Patel ◽  
Philip R. Krause
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Central Nervous System Infection ◽  
Sensory Nerve ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Cord ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus (HSV) establishes latency in sensory nerve ganglia during acute infection and may later periodically reactivate to cause recurrent disease. HSV type 1 (HSV-1) reactivates more efficiently than HSV-2 from trigeminal ganglia while HSV-2 reactivates more efficiently than HSV-1 from lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia (DRG) to cause recurrent orofacial and genital herpes, respectively. In a previous study, a chimeric HSV-2 that expressed the latency-associated transcript (LAT) from HSV-1 reactivated similarly to wild-type HSV-1, suggesting that the LAT influences the type-specific reactivation phenotype of HSV-2. To further define the LAT region essential for type-specific reactivation, we constructed additional chimeric HSV-2 viruses by replacing the HSV-2 LAT promoter (HSV2-LAT-P1) or 2.5 kb of the HSV-2 LAT sequence (HSV2-LAT-S1) with the corresponding regions from HSV-1. HSV2-LAT-S1 was impaired for reactivation in the guinea pig genital model, while its rescuant and HSV2-LAT-P1 reactivated with a wild-type HSV-2 phenotype. Moreover, recurrences of HSV-2-LAT-S1 were frequently fatal, in contrast to the relatively mild recurrences of the other viruses. During recurrences, HSV2-LAT-S1 DNA increased more in the sacral cord compared to its rescuant or HSV-2. Thus, the LAT sequence region, not the LAT promoter region, provides essential elements for type-specific reactivation of HSV-2 and also plays a role in viral neurotropism. HSV-1 DNA, as quantified by real-time PCR, was more abundant in the lumbar spinal cord, while HSV-2 DNA was more abundant in the sacral spinal cord, which may provide insights into the mechanism for type-specific reactivation and different patterns of central nervous system infection of HSV-1 and HSV-2.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Latency and the Kinetics of Reactivation Are Regulated by a Complex Network of Interactions between the Herpesvirus Entry Mediator, Its Ligands (gD, BTLA, LIGHT, and CD160), and the Latency-Associated Transcript

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaohui Wang ◽  
Alexander V. Ljubimov ◽  
Ling Jin ◽  
Klaus Pfeffer ◽  
Mitchell Kronenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglia ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Latently Infected ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Herpesvirus Entry Mediator ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACTRecently, we reported that the herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM; also called TNFRSF14 or CD270) is upregulated by the latency-associated transcript (LAT) of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and that the absence of HVEM affects latency reactivation but not primary infection in ocularly infected mice. gD has been shown to bind to HVEM. LIGHT (TNFSF14), CD160, and BTLA (B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator) also interact with HVEM and can interfere with HSV gD binding. It was not known if LIGHT, CD160, or BTLA affected the level of latency reactivation in the trigeminal ganglia (TG) of latently infected mice. To address this issue, we ocularly infected LIGHT−/−, CD160−/−, and BTLA−/−mice with LAT(+) and LAT(−) viruses, using similarly infected wild-type (WT) and HVEM−/−mice as controls. The amount of latency, as determined by the levels of gB DNA in the TG of the LIGHT−/−, CD160−/−, and BTLA−/−mice infected with either LAT(+) or LAT(−) viruses, was lower than that in WT mice infected with LAT(+) virus and was similar in WT mice infected with LAT(−) virus. The levels of LAT RNA in HVEM−/−, LIGHT−/−, CD160−/−, and BTLA−/−mice infected with LAT(+) virus were similar and were lower than the levels of LAT RNA in WT mice. However, LIGHT−/−, CD160−/−, and BTLA−/−mice, independent of the presence of LAT, had levels of reactivation similar to those of WT mice infected with LAT(+) virus. Faster reactivation correlated with the upregulation of HVEM transcript. The LIGHT−/−, CD160−/−, and BTLA−/−mice had higher levels of HVEM expression, and this, along with the absence of BTLA, LIGHT, or CD160, may contribute to faster reactivation, while the absence of each molecule, independent of LAT, may have contributed to lower latency. This study suggests that, in the absence of competition with gD for binding to HVEM, LAT RNA is important for WT levels of latency but not for WT levels of reactivation.IMPORTANCEThe effects of BTLA, LIGHT, and CD160 on latency reactivation are not known. We show here that in BTLA, LIGHT, or CD160 null mice, latency is reduced; however, HVEM expression is upregulated compared to that of WT mice, and this upregulation is associated with higher reactivation that is independent of LAT but dependent on gD expression. Thus, one of the mechanisms by which BTLA, LIGHT, and CD160 null mice enhance reactivation appears to be the increased expression of HVEM in the presence of gD. Thus, our results suggest that blockade of HVEM-LIGHT-BTLA-CD160 contributes to reduced HSV-1 latency and reactivation.

scholarly journals Effect of Apolipoprotein E on the Cerebral Load of Latent Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 5383-5387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier S. Burgos ◽  
Carlos Ramirez ◽  
Isabel Sastre ◽  
Fernando Valdivieso
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus Type ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is neurotropic and enters a latent state lasting the lifetime of the host. This pathogen has recently been proposed as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in conjunction with apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4). In a murine acute infection model, we showed that viral neuroinvasiveness depends directly on the overall ApoE dosage and especially on the presence of isoform ApoE4. If an interaction between ApoE and HSV-1 is involved in AD, it may occur during latency rather than during acute infection. Certainly, ApoE plays an important role in late-onset AD, i.e., at a time in life when the majority of people harbor HSV-1 in their nervous system. In the present work, wild-type, APOE knockout, APOE3, and APOE4 transgenic mice were used to analyze the influence of the ApoE profile on the levels of latent virus DNA. The knockout mice had significantly lower concentrations of the virus in the nervous system than the wild-type mice, while the APOE4 mice had very high levels in the brain compared to the APOE3 animals. ApoE4 seems to facilitate HSV-1 latency in the brain much more so than ApoE3. The APOE dosage correlated directly with the HSV-1 DNA concentration in the brain, strengthening the hypothesis that HSV-1, together with ApoE, might be involved in AD.

scholarly journals Suppression of Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 5883-5890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trine H. Mogensen ◽  
Jesper Melchjorsen ◽  
Lene Malmgaard ◽  
Antonella Casola ◽  
Søren R. Paludan
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Proinflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus Type ◽  
Cytokine Expression ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Viral immune evasion strategies are important for establishment and maintenance of infections. Many viruses are in possession of mechanisms to counteract the antiviral response raised by the infected host. Here we show that a herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant lacking functional viral protein 16 (VP16)—a tegument protein promoting viral gene expression—induced significantly higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines than wild-type HSV-1. This was observed in several cell lines and primary murine macrophages, as well as in peritoneal cells harvested from mice infected in vivo. The enhanced ability to stimulate cytokine expression in the absence of VP16 was not mediated directly by VP16 but was dependent on the viral immediate-early genes for infected cell protein 4 (ICP4) and ICP27, which are expressed in a VP16-dependent manner during primary HSV infection. The virus appeared to target cellular factors other than interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase R (PKR), since the virus mutants remained stronger inducers of cytokines in cells stably expressing a dominant-negative mutant form of PKR. Finally, mRNA stability assay revealed a significantly longer half-life for interleukin-6 mRNA after infection with the VP16 mutant than after infection with the wild-type virus. Thus, HSV is able to suppress expression of proinflammatory cytokines by decreasing the stability of mRNAs, thereby potentially impeding the antiviral host response to infection.

scholarly journals Soluble V Domain of Nectin-1/HveC Enables Entry of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) into HSV-Resistant Cells by Binding to Viral Glycoprotein D

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heechung Kwon ◽  
Qing Bai ◽  
Hyun-Jung Baek ◽  
Kelly Felmet ◽  
Edward A. Burton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Glycoprotein D ◽  
Viral Glycoprotein ◽  
Virus Attachment ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Interaction of herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein D (gD) with specific cellular receptors is essential for HSV infection of susceptible cells. Virus mutants that lack gD can bind to the cell surface (attachment) but do not enter, implying that interaction of gD with its receptor(s) initiates the postattachment (entry) phase of HSV infection. In this report, we have studied HSV entry in the presence of the gD-binding variable (V) domain of the common gD receptor nectin-1/HveC to determine whether cell association of the gD receptor is required for HSV infection. In the presence of increasing amounts of the soluble nectin-1 V domain (sNec1123), increasing viral entry into HSV-resistant CHO-K1 cells was observed. At a multiplicity of 3 in the presence of optimal amounts of sNec1123, approximately 90% of the cells were infected. The soluble V domain of nectin-2, a strain-specific HSV entry receptor, promoted entry of the HSV type 1 (HSV-1) Rid-1 mutant strain, but not of wild-type HSV-1. Preincubation and immunofluorescence studies indicated that free or gD-bound sNec1123 did not associate with the cell surface. sNec1123-mediated entry was highly impaired by interference with the cell-binding activities of viral glycoproteins B and C. While gD has at least two functions, virus attachment to the cell and initiation of the virus entry process, our results demonstrate that the attachment function of gD is dispensable for entry provided that other means of attachment are available, such as gB and gC binding to cell surface glycosaminoglycans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document