scholarly journals mRNA Processing Factor CstF-50 and Ubiquitin Escort Factor p97 Are BRCA1/BARD1 Cofactors Involved in Chromatin Remodeling during the DNA Damage Response

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danae Fonseca ◽  
Jorge Baquero ◽  
Michael R. Murphy ◽  
Gamage Aruggoda ◽  
Sophia Varriano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Intricate Mechanism ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Cleavage Stimulation Factor

ABSTRACT The cellular response to DNA damage is an intricate mechanism that involves the interplay among several pathways. In this study, we provide evidence of the roles of the polyadenylation factor cleavage stimulation factor 50 (CstF-50) and the ubiquitin (Ub) escort factor p97 as cofactors of BRCA1/BARD1 E3 Ub ligase, facilitating chromatin remodeling during the DNA damage response (DDR). CstF-50 and p97 formed complexes with BRCA1/BARD1, Ub, and some BRCA1/BARD1 substrates, such as RNA polymerase (RNAP) II and histones. Furthermore, CstF-50 and p97 had an additive effect on the activation of the ubiquitination of these BRCA1/BARD1 substrates during DDR. Importantly, as a result of these functional interactions, BRCA1/BARD1/CstF-50/p97 had a specific effect on the chromatin structure of genes that were differentially expressed. This study provides new insights into the roles of RNA processing, BRCA1/BARD1, the Ub pathway, and chromatin structure during DDR.

scholarly journals MORC2 regulates DNA damage response through a PARP1-dependent pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (16) ◽  
pp. 8502-8520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Da-Qiang Li
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract Microrchidia family CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2) is a newly identified chromatin remodeling enzyme with an emerging role in DNA damage response (DDR), but the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we show that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), a key chromatin-associated enzyme responsible for the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymers in mammalian cells, interacts with and PARylates MORC2 at two residues within its conserved CW-type zinc finger domain. Following DNA damage, PARP1 recruits MORC2 to DNA damage sites and catalyzes MORC2 PARylation, which stimulates its ATPase and chromatin remodeling activities. Mutation of PARylation residues in MORC2 results in reduced cell survival after DNA damage. MORC2, in turn, stabilizes PARP1 through enhancing acetyltransferase NAT10-mediated acetylation of PARP1 at lysine 949, which blocks its ubiquitination at the same residue and subsequent degradation by E3 ubiquitin ligase CHFR. Consequently, depletion of MORC2 or expression of an acetylation-defective PARP1 mutant impairs DNA damage-induced PAR production and PAR-dependent recruitment of DNA repair proteins to DNA lesions, leading to enhanced sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Collectively, these findings uncover a previously unrecognized mechanistic link between MORC2 and PARP1 in the regulation of cellular response to DNA damage.

scholarly journals Schizosaccharomyces pombe KAT5 contributes to resection and repair of a DNA double strand break

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Li ◽  
Ruben C Petreaca ◽  
Susan L Forsburg
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract Chromatin remodeling is essential for effective repair of a DNA double strand break. KAT5 (S. pombe Mst1, human TIP60) is a MYST family histone acetyltransferase conserved from yeast to humans that coordinates various DNA damage response activities at a DNA double strand break (DSB), including histone remodeling and activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. In S. pombe, mutations in mst1+ causes sensitivity to DNA damaging drugs. Here we show that Mst1 is recruited to DSBs. Mutation of mst1+ disrupts recruitment of repair proteins and delays resection. These defects are partially rescued by deletion of pku70, which has been previously shown to antagonize repair by homologous recombination. These phenotypes of mst1 are similar to pht1-4KR, a non-acetylatable form of histone variant H2A.Z, which has been proposed to affect resection. Our data suggest that Mst1 functions to direct repair of DSBs towards homologous recombination pathways by modulating resection at the double strand break.

scholarly journals The nucleosome: orchestrating DNA damage signaling and repair within chromatin

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poonam Agarwal ◽  
Kyle M. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Histone Modifications ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Current View ◽  
Target Specificity ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Transcription And Replication

DNA damage occurs within the chromatin environment, which ultimately participates in regulating DNA damage response (DDR) pathways and repair of the lesion. DNA damage activates a cascade of signaling events that extensively modulates chromatin structure and organization to coordinate DDR factor recruitment to the break and repair, whilst also promoting the maintenance of normal chromatin functions within the damaged region. For example, DDR pathways must avoid conflicts between other DNA-based processes that function within the context of chromatin, including transcription and replication. The molecular mechanisms governing the recognition, target specificity, and recruitment of DDR factors and enzymes to the fundamental repeating unit of chromatin, i.e., the nucleosome, are poorly understood. Here we present our current view of how chromatin recognition by DDR factors is achieved at the level of the nucleosome. Emerging evidence suggests that the nucleosome surface, including the nucleosome acidic patch, promotes the binding and activity of several DNA damage factors on chromatin. Thus, in addition to interactions with damaged DNA and histone modifications, nucleosome recognition by DDR factors plays a key role in orchestrating the requisite chromatin response to maintain both genome and epigenome integrity.

scholarly journals DNA-PKcs promotes chromatin decondensation to facilitate initiation of the DNA damage response

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (18) ◽  
pp. 9467-9479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiming Lu ◽  
Janapriya Saha ◽  
Pauline J Beckmann ◽  
Eric A Hendrickson ◽  
Anthony J Davis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromatin Decondensation ◽  
Damage Site ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract The DNA damage response (DDR) encompasses the cellular response to DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs), and includes recognition of the DSB, recruitment of numerous factors to the DNA damage site, initiation of signaling cascades, chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle checkpoint activation, and repair of the DSB. Key drivers of the DDR are multiple members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase family, including ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), and the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). ATM and ATR modulate multiple portions of the DDR, but DNA-PKcs is believed to primarily function in the DSB repair pathway, non-homologous end joining. Utilizing a human cell line in which the kinase domain of DNA-PKcs is inactivated, we show here that DNA-PKcs kinase activity is required for the cellular response to DSBs immediately after their induction. Specifically, DNA-PKcs kinase activity initiates phosphorylation of the chromatin factors H2AX and KAP1 following ionizing radiation exposure and drives local chromatin decondensation near the DSB site. Furthermore, loss of DNA-PKcs kinase activity results in a marked decrease in the recruitment of numerous members of the DDR machinery to DSBs. Collectively, these results provide clear evidence that DNA-PKcs activity is pivotal for the initiation of the DDR.

scholarly journals Ubiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response

Open Biology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 150018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Brown ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Sensing ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

Failure of accurate DNA damage sensing and repair mechanisms manifests as a variety of human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, immunodeficiency, infertility and cancer. The accuracy and efficiency of DNA damage detection and repair, collectively termed the DNA damage response (DDR), requires the recruitment and subsequent post-translational modification (PTM) of a complex network of proteins. Ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) SUMO have established roles in regulating the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A role for other UBLs, such as NEDD8, is also now emerging. This article provides an overview of the DDR, discusses our current understanding of the process and function of PTM by ubiquitin and NEDD8, and reviews the literature surrounding the role of ubiquitylation and neddylation in DNA repair processes, focusing particularly on DNA DSB repair.

scholarly journals Involvement of Global Genome Repair, Transcription Coupled Repair, and Chromatin Remodeling in UV DNA Damage Response Changes during Development

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e1000941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Lans ◽  
Jurgen A. Marteijn ◽  
Björn Schumacher ◽  
Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers ◽  
Gert Jansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Global Genome Repair ◽  
Transcription Coupled Repair ◽  
Genome Repair

scholarly journals MORC2 Signaling Integrates Phosphorylation-Dependent, ATPase-Coupled Chromatin Remodeling during the DNA Damage Response

Cell Reports ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 1657-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da-Qiang Li ◽  
Sujit S. Nair ◽  
Kazufumi Ohshiro ◽  
Anupam Kumar ◽  
Vasudha S. Nair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Dependent Atpase ◽  
Damage Response

Heterochromatin and the DNA damage response: the need to relaxThis paper is one of a selection of papers in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Chromosomal Mutations

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.

scholarly journals Identification of S-phase DNA damage-response targets in fission yeast reveals conservation of damage-response networks

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (26) ◽  
pp. E3676-E3685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Willis ◽  
Chunshui Zhou ◽  
Andrew E. H. Elia ◽  
Johanne M. Murray ◽  
Antony M. Carr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Damage Response

The cellular response to DNA damage during S-phase regulates a complicated network of processes, including cell-cycle progression, gene expression, DNA replication kinetics, and DNA repair. In fission yeast, this S-phase DNA damage response (DDR) is coordinated by two protein kinases: Rad3, the ortholog of mammalian ATR, and Cds1, the ortholog of mammalian Chk2. Although several critical downstream targets of Rad3 and Cds1 have been identified, most of their presumed targets are unknown, including the targets responsible for regulating replication kinetics and coordinating replication and repair. To characterize targets of the S-phase DDR, we identified proteins phosphorylated in response to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-induced S-phase DNA damage in wild-type, rad3∆, and cds1∆ cells by proteome-wide mass spectrometry. We found a broad range of S-phase–specific DDR targets involved in gene expression, stress response, regulation of mitosis and cytokinesis, and DNA replication and repair. These targets are highly enriched for proteins required for viability in response to MMS, indicating their biological significance. Furthermore, the regulation of these proteins is similar in fission and budding yeast, across 300 My of evolution, demonstrating a deep conservation of S-phase DDR targets and suggesting that these targets may be critical for maintaining genome stability in response to S-phase DNA damage across eukaryotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document