scholarly journals Ubiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response

Open Biology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 150018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Brown ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Sensing ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

Failure of accurate DNA damage sensing and repair mechanisms manifests as a variety of human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, immunodeficiency, infertility and cancer. The accuracy and efficiency of DNA damage detection and repair, collectively termed the DNA damage response (DDR), requires the recruitment and subsequent post-translational modification (PTM) of a complex network of proteins. Ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) SUMO have established roles in regulating the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A role for other UBLs, such as NEDD8, is also now emerging. This article provides an overview of the DDR, discusses our current understanding of the process and function of PTM by ubiquitin and NEDD8, and reviews the literature surrounding the role of ubiquitylation and neddylation in DNA repair processes, focusing particularly on DNA DSB repair.

scholarly journals Distinct versus overlapping functions of MDC1 and 53BP1 in DNA damage response and tumorigenesis

2008 ◽  
Vol 181 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Minter-Dykhouse ◽  
Irene Ward ◽  
Michael S.Y. Huen ◽  
Junjie Chen ◽  
Zhenkun Lou
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Tumor Suppression ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Upstream Regulator ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Atm Signaling

The importance of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in development, genomic stability, and tumor suppression is well recognized. Although 53BP1 and MDC1 have been recently identified as critical upstream mediators in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks, their relative hierarchy in the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling cascade remains controversial. To investigate the divergent and potentially overlapping functions of MDC1 and 53BP1 in the ATM response pathway, we generated mice deficient for both genes. Unexpectedly, the loss of both MDC1 and 53BP1 neither significantly increases the severity of defects in DDR nor increases tumor incidence compared with the loss of MDC1 alone. We additionally show that MDC1 regulates 53BP1 foci formation and phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. These results suggest that MDC1 functions as an upstream regulator of 53BP1 in the DDR pathway and in tumor suppression.

scholarly journals Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E11961-E11969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Michael T. Kimble ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2NBS1 complex plays important roles in the DNA damage response by activating the Tel1ATM kinase and catalyzing 5′–3′ resection at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To initiate resection, Mre11 endonuclease nicks the 5′ strands at DSB ends in a reaction stimulated by Sae2CtIP. Accordingly, Mre11-nuclease deficient (mre11-nd) and sae2Δ mutants are expected to exhibit similar phenotypes; however, we found several notable differences. First, sae2Δ cells exhibit greater sensitivity to genotoxins than mre11-nd cells. Second, sae2Δ is synthetic lethal with sgs1Δ, whereas the mre11-nd sgs1Δ mutant is viable. Third, Sae2 attenuates the Tel1-Rad53CHK2 checkpoint and antagonizes Rad953BP1 accumulation at DSBs independent of Mre11 nuclease. We show that Sae2 competes with other Tel1 substrates, thus reducing Rad9 binding to chromatin and to Rad53. We suggest that persistent Sae2 binding at DSBs in the mre11-nd mutant counteracts the inhibitory effects of Rad9 and Rad53 on Exo1 and Dna2-Sgs1–mediated resection, accounting for the different phenotypes conferred by mre11-nd and sae2Δ mutations. Collectively, these data show a resection initiation independent role for Sae2 at DSBs by modulating the DNA damage checkpoint.

scholarly journals DNA-PKcs: A Multi-Faceted Player in DNA Damage Response

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiao Yue ◽  
Chenjun Bai ◽  
Dafei Xie ◽  
Teng Ma ◽  
Ping-Kun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Functional Complex ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Cellular Dna

DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinase family, which can phosphorylate more than 700 substrates. As the core enzyme, DNA-PKcs forms the active DNA-PK holoenzyme with the Ku80/Ku70 heterodimer to play crucial roles in cellular DNA damage response (DDR). Once DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) occur in the cells, DNA-PKcs is promptly recruited into damage sites and activated. DNA-PKcs is auto-phosphorylated and phosphorylated by Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated at multiple sites, and phosphorylates other targets, participating in a series of DDR and repair processes, which determine the cells’ fates: DSBs NHEJ repair and pathway choice, replication stress response, cell cycle checkpoints, telomeres length maintenance, senescence, autophagy, etc. Due to the special and multi-faceted roles of DNA-PKcs in the cellular responses to DNA damage, it is important to precisely regulate the formation and dynamic of its functional complex and activities for guarding genomic stability. On the other hand, targeting DNA-PKcs has been considered as a promising strategy of exploring novel radiosensitizers and killing agents of cancer cells. Combining DNA-PKcs inhibitors with radiotherapy can effectively enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy, offering more possibilities for cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

Heterochromatin and the DNA damage response: the need to relaxThis paper is one of a selection of papers in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Chromosomal Mutations

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.

scholarly journals Nuclear phosphorylated Dicer processes double-stranded RNA in response to DNA damage

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (8) ◽  
pp. 2373-2389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaspar Burger ◽  
Margarita Schlackow ◽  
Martin Potts ◽  
Svenja Hester ◽  
Shabaz Mohammed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Small Noncoding Rna ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

The endoribonuclease Dicer is a key component of the human RNA interference pathway and is known for its role in cytoplasmic microRNA production. Recent findings suggest that noncanonical Dicer generates small noncoding RNA to mediate the DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we show that human Dicer is phosphorylated in the platform–Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille–connector helix cassette (S1016) upon induction of DNA damage. Phosphorylated Dicer (p-Dicer) accumulates in the nucleus and is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks. We further demonstrate that turnover of damage-induced nuclear, double-stranded (ds) RNA requires additional phosphorylation of carboxy-terminal Dicer residues (S1728 and S1852). DNA damage-induced nuclear Dicer accumulation is conserved in mammals. Dicer depletion causes endogenous DNA damage and delays the DDR by impaired recruitment of repair factors MDC1 and 53BP1. Collectively, we place Dicer within the context of the DDR by demonstrating a DNA damage-inducible phosphoswitch that causes localized processing of nuclear dsRNA by p-Dicer to promote DNA repair.

scholarly journals PARP activation regulates the RNA-binding protein NONO in the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (20) ◽  
pp. 10287-10301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Krietsch ◽  
Marie-Christine Caron ◽  
Jean-Philippe Gagné ◽  
Chantal Ethier ◽  
Julien Vignard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Parp Activation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

scholarly journals 53BP1 deficiency combined with telomere dysfunction activates ATR-dependent DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 197 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Martínez ◽  
Juana M. Flores ◽  
Maria A. Blasco
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Damage Response

TRF1 protects mammalian telomeres from fusion and fragility. Depletion of TRF1 leads to telomere fusions as well as accumulation of γ-H2AX foci and activation of both the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)– and the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR)–mediated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage response (DDR) pathways. 53BP1, which is also present at dysfunctional telomeres, is a target of ATM that accumulates at DNA double-strand breaks and favors nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair over ATM-dependent resection and homology-directed repair (homologous recombination [HR]). To address the role of 53BP1 at dysfunctional telomeres, we generated mice lacking TRF1 and 53BP1. 53BP1 deficiency significantly rescued telomere fusions in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking TRF1, but they showed evidence of a switch from the NHEJ- to HR-mediated repair of uncapped telomeres. Concomitantly, double-mutant MEFs showed evidence of hyperactivation of the ATR-dependent DDR. In intact mice, combined 53BP1/TRF1 deficiency in stratified epithelia resulted in earlier onset of DNA damage and increased CHK1 phosphorylation during embryonic development, leading to aggravation of skin phenotypes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document