Three new small nucleolar RNAs that are psoralen cross-linked in vivo to unique regions of pre-rRNA

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 4382-4390
Author(s):  
O J Rimoldi ◽  
B Raghu ◽  
M K Nag ◽  
G L Eliceiri

We have recently described three novel human small nucleolar RNA species with unique nucleotide sequences, which were named E1, E2, and E3. The present article describes specific psoralen photocross-linking in whole HeLa cells of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to nucleolar pre-rRNA. These small RNAs were cross-linked to different sections of pre-rRNA. E1 RNA was cross-linked to two segments of nucleolar pre-rRNA; one was within residues 697 to 1163 of the 5' external transcribed spacer, and the other one was between nucleotides 664 and 1021 of the 18S rRNA sequence. E2 RNA was cross-linked to a region within residues 3282 to 3667 of the 28S rRNA sequence. E3 RNA was cross-linked to a sequence between positions 1021 and 1639 of the 18S rRNA sequence. Primer extension analysis located psoralen adducts in E1, E2, and E3 RNAs that were enriched in high-molecular-weight fractions of nucleolar RNA. Some of these psoralen adducts might be cross-links of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to large nucleolar RNA. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-targeted RNase H digestion of nucleolar extracts revealed accessible segments in these three small RNAs. The accessible regions were within nucleotide positions 106 to 130 of E1 RNA, positions 24 to 48 and 42 to 66 of E2 RNA, and positions 7 to 16 and about 116 to 122 of E3 RNA. Some of the molecules of these small nucleolar RNAs sedimented as if associated with larger structures when both nondenatured RNA and a nucleolar extract were analyzed.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 4382-4390 ◽  
Author(s):  
O J Rimoldi ◽  
B Raghu ◽  
M K Nag ◽  
G L Eliceiri

We have recently described three novel human small nucleolar RNA species with unique nucleotide sequences, which were named E1, E2, and E3. The present article describes specific psoralen photocross-linking in whole HeLa cells of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to nucleolar pre-rRNA. These small RNAs were cross-linked to different sections of pre-rRNA. E1 RNA was cross-linked to two segments of nucleolar pre-rRNA; one was within residues 697 to 1163 of the 5' external transcribed spacer, and the other one was between nucleotides 664 and 1021 of the 18S rRNA sequence. E2 RNA was cross-linked to a region within residues 3282 to 3667 of the 28S rRNA sequence. E3 RNA was cross-linked to a sequence between positions 1021 and 1639 of the 18S rRNA sequence. Primer extension analysis located psoralen adducts in E1, E2, and E3 RNAs that were enriched in high-molecular-weight fractions of nucleolar RNA. Some of these psoralen adducts might be cross-links of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to large nucleolar RNA. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-targeted RNase H digestion of nucleolar extracts revealed accessible segments in these three small RNAs. The accessible regions were within nucleotide positions 106 to 130 of E1 RNA, positions 24 to 48 and 42 to 66 of E2 RNA, and positions 7 to 16 and about 116 to 122 of E3 RNA. Some of the molecules of these small nucleolar RNAs sedimented as if associated with larger structures when both nondenatured RNA and a nucleolar extract were analyzed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 845-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Gerbi

A growing list of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) has been characterized in eukaryotes. They are transcribed by RNA polymerase II or III; some snoRNAs are encoded in the introns of other genes. The nonintronic polymerase II transcribed snoRNAs receive a trimethylguanosine cap, probably in the nucleus, and move to the nucleolus. snoRNAs are complexed with proteins, sometimes including fibrillarin. Localization and maintenance in the nucleolus of some snoRNAs requires the presence of initial precursor rRNA (pre-rRNA). Many snoRNAs have conserved sequence boxes C and D and a 3′ terminal stem; the roles of these features are discussed. Functional assays done for a few snoRNAs indicate their roles in rRNA processing for cleavage of the external and internal transcribed spacers (ETS and ITS). U3 is the most abundant snoRNA and is needed for cleavage of ETS1 and ITS1; experimental results on U3 binding sites in pre-rRNA are reviewed. 18S rRNA production also needs U14, U22, and snR30 snoRNAs, whereas U8 snoRNA is needed for 5.8S and 28S rRNA production. Other snoRNAs that are complementary to 18S or 28S rRNA might act as chaperones to mediate RNA folding. Whether snoRNAs join together in a large rRNA processing complex (the "processome") is not yet clear. It has been hypothesized that such complexes could anchor the ends of loops in pre-rRNA containing 18S or 28S rRNA, thereby replacing base-paired stems found in pre-rRNA of prokaryotes.Key words: RNA processing, small nucleolar RNAs, nucleolus, ribosome biogenesis, rRNA processing complex.


2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2650-2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis L. J. Lafontaine ◽  
David Tollervey

ABSTRACT Two core small nucleolar RNP (snoRNP) proteins, Nop1p (fibrillarin in vertebrates) and Nop58p (also known as Nop5p) have previously been reported to be specifically associated with the box C+D class of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). Here we report that Nop56p, a protein related in sequence to Nop58p, is a bona fide box C+D snoRNP component; all tested box C+D snoRNAs were coprecipitated with protein A-tagged Nop56p. Analysis of in vivo snoRNP assembly indicated that Nop56p was stably associated with the snoRNAs only in the presence of Nop1p. In contrast, Nop58p and Nop1p associate independently with the snoRNAs. Genetic depletion of Nop56p resulted in inhibition of early pre-rRNA processing events at sites A0, A1, and A2 and mild depletion of 18S rRNA. However, Nop56p depletion did not lead to codepletion of the box C+D snoRNAs. This is in contrast to Nop58p, which was required for the accumulation of all tested box C+D snoRNAs. Unexpectedly, we found that Nop1p was specifically required for the synthesis and accumulation of box C+D snoRNAs processed from pre-mRNA introns and polycistronic transcripts.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1023-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Caffarelli ◽  
Massimo Losito ◽  
Corinna Giorgi ◽  
Alessandro Fatica ◽  
Irene Bozzoni

ABSTRACT The U16 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) is encoded by the third intron of the L1 (L4, according to the novel nomenclature) ribosomal protein gene of Xenopus laevis and originates from processing of the pre-mRNA in which it resides. The U16 snoRNA belongs to the box C/D snoRNA family, whose members are known to assemble in ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs) containing the protein fibrillarin. We have utilized U16 snoRNA in order to characterize the factors that interact with the conserved elements common to the other members of the box C/D class. In this study, we have analyzed the in vivo assembly of U16 snoRNP particles in X. laevis oocytes and identified the proteins which interact with the RNA by label transfer after UV cross-linking. This analysis revealed two proteins, of 40- and 68-kDa apparent molecular size, which require intact boxes C and D together with the conserved 5′,3′-terminal stem for binding. Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the p40 protein corresponds to fibrillarin, indicating that this protein is intimately associated with the RNA. We propose that fibrillarin and p68 represent the RNA-binding factors common to box C/D snoRNPs and that both proteins are essential for the assembly of snoRNP particles and the stabilization of the snoRNA.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 672-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Rodor ◽  
Ingrid Letelier ◽  
Loreto Holuigue ◽  
Manuel Echeverria

The snoRNAs (small nucleolar RNAs) and related scaRNAs (small RNAs in the Cajal bodies) represent a major class of nuclear RNAs that guide 2′-O-ribose methylation and pseudouridylation of rRNAs, snRNAs (small nuclear RNAs) and other RNA targets. In vivo, all snoRNAs associate with a set of four highly conserved nucleolar proteins, forming the functional snoRNPs (small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins). The core structure of these mature snoRNPs has now been well described in eukaryotes, but less is known of their biogenesis. Recent data in animals and yeast reveal that assembly of the snoRNPs is a complex process that implicates several auxiliary proteins and transient protein–protein interactions. This new level of snoRNP regulation is now beginning to be unravelled in animals and yeast, but remains unexplored in plants. In the present paper, we review recent data from genomic and functional analysis allowing the identification and study of factors controlling the biogenesis of plant snoRNPs and their impact on plant development.


1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3868-3872 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Shumard ◽  
C Torres ◽  
D C Eichler

In an investigation of the possible involvement of a highly purified nucleolar endoribonuclease in processing of pre-rRNA at the 3' end of the 18S rRNA sequence, an in vitro synthesized pre-18S rRNA transcript containing the 3' end region of 18S rRNA and the 5' region of the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) was used as a substrate for the enzyme. Cleavages generated by the nucleolar RNase were localized by S1 nuclease protection analysis and by the direct release of labeled rRNA products. Precise determination of the specificity of cleavage was achieved by RNA sequence analysis with end-labeled rRNA transcripts. These data demonstrated that the purified nucleolar RNase cleaved the pre-18S rRNA transcript at three specific sites relative to the 3' region of 18S rRNA. The first two sites included the mature 3'-end 18S rRNA sequence and a site approximately 55 nucleotides downstream of the 3'-end 18S rRNA sequence, both of which corresponded directly to recent results (Raziuddin, R. D. Little, T. Labella, and D. Schlessinger, Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:1667-1671, 1989) obtained with transfected mouse rDNA in hamster cells. The other cleavage occurred approximately 35 nucleotides upstream from the mature 3' end in the 18S rRNA sequence. The results from this study mimic the results obtained from in vivo studies for processing in the 3' region of pre-18S rRNA, supporting the proposed involvement of this nucleolar endoribonuclease in rRNA maturation.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisheng Zhang ◽  
Jiaohui Wu ◽  
Andrew J Vista ◽  
Leigh Brian ◽  
Yushi Bai ◽  
...  

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to atherogenesis. An unusual mechanism that increases cellular ROS levels and oxidative stress involves 4 ubiquitously expressed noncoding small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) from introns of the ribosomal protein L13a ( Rpl13a ) locus: U32a , U33 , U34 , and U35a . We tested the hypothesis that these snoRNAs promote aortic smooth muscle cell (SMC) activation and vascular inflammation, by using “snoKO” mice with targeted deletion of the 4 snoRNAs (but not Rpl13a ). Compared with congenic WT SMCs, snoKO SMCs showed 40±20% lower ROS levels, assessed by DCF fluorescence ( p <0.02). Congruently, ROS levels were 35±5% lower in snoKO than WT aorta and carotid frozen sections ( p <0.01), assessed by CellROX Orange fluorescence. Proliferation and migration evoked by FBS and PDGF-BB, respectively, were each 30±10% less in snoKO than WT SMCs ( p <0.01 for each). To assess SMC migration and proliferation in vivo, we performed carotid artery endothelial denudation. Before injury, snoKO and WT carotid arteries were morphologically equivalent. Four wk after injury, carotid neointimal hyperplasia was 57±9% less and luminal area was 40±20 % more in snoKO than in WT mice ( p <0.01). WT and snoKO mice had equivalent heart rates and systolic blood pressures by tail-cuff plethysmography: 480±20 vs 420±80 beats/min; 133±5, 132±7 mm Hg, respectively (n=5/group). To test whether snoRNAs affect atherosclerosis, we orthotopically transplanted carotid arteries from WT and snoKO mice into congenic Apoe -/- mice. Six wk post-op, atherosclerotic neointima was 70±10% smaller in snoKO than in WT carotids ( p <0.01). To assess SMC-to-foam-cell transdifferentiation, which is ROS-dependent, carotid cross-sections were stained for apoE to identify graft-derived cells and for cholesteryl ester with BODIPY. BODIPY + foam cells comprised 21±3% and 11±7% of neointimal area in WT and snoKO carotids, respectively ( p <0.05). Confocal co-localization of apoE and BODIPY (optical slice thickness 1 μm) showed that graft-derived foam cells were 2.0±0.6-fold more prevalent in WT than in snoKO carotids ( p <0.01). We conclude that Rpl13a snoRNAs promote SMC ROS levels, proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo, and that these snoRNAs augment atherosclerosis.


Methods ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Liu ◽  
Jingwei Ni ◽  
Maurille J. Fournier

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Mleczko ◽  
Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are molecules placed in the cell nucleolus and in Cajal bodies. Many scientific reports clearly show that snoRNAs are not only responsible for modifications of other RNAs but also possess multiple other functions such as metabolic stress regulation or modulation of alternative splicing. Full-length snoRNAs as well as small RNAs derived from snoRNAs have been implied in human diseases such as cancer or Prader – Willi Syndrome.  In this review we would like to describe these non – canonical roles of snoRNAs and their derivatives  with the emphasis on their role in human diseases. 


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1181-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Petfalski ◽  
Thomas Dandekar ◽  
Yves Henry ◽  
David Tollervey

ABSTRACT The genes encoding the small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) species snR190 and U14 are located close together in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we report that these two snoRNAs are synthesized by processing of a larger common transcript. In strains mutant for two 5′→3′ exonucleases, Xrn1p and Rat1p, families of 5′-extended forms of snR190 and U14 accumulate; these have 5′ extensions of up to 42 and 55 nucleotides, respectively. We conclude that the 5′ ends of both snR190 and U14 are generated by exonuclease digestion from upstream processing sites. In contrast to snR190 and U14, the snoRNAs U18 and U24 are excised from the introns of pre-mRNAs which encode proteins in their exonic sequences. Analysis of RNA extracted from a dbr1-Δ strain, which lacks intron lariat-debranching activity, shows that U24 can be synthesized only from the debranched lariat. In contrast, a substantial level of U18 can be synthesized in the absence of debranching activity. The 5′ ends of these snoRNAs are also generated by Xrn1p and Rat1p. The same exonucleases are responsible for the degradation of several excised fragments of the pre-rRNA spacer regions, in addition to generating the 5′ end of the 5.8S rRNA. Processing of the pre-rRNA and both intronic and polycistronic snoRNAs therefore involves common components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document