scholarly journals Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Both Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1 bind the DNA motif ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the products of multiple murine Hox genes, some of which are themselves oncogenes.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3786-3795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q Lu ◽  
P S Knoepfler ◽  
J Scheele ◽  
D D Wright ◽  
M P Kamps
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Structural Development ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins

E2A-PBX1 is the oncogene produced at the t(1;19) chromosomal breakpoint of pediatric pre-B-cell leukemia. Expression of E2A-Pbx1 induces fibroblast transformation and myeloid and T-cell leukemia in mice and arrests differentiation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-dependent myeloblasts in cultured marrow. Recently, the Drosophila melanogaster protein Exd, which is highly related to Pbx1, was shown to bind DNA cooperatively with the Drosophila homeodomain proteins Ubx and Abd-A. Here, we demonstrate that the normal Pbx1 homeodomain protein, as well as its oncogenic derivative, E2A-Pbx1, binds the DNA sequence ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the murine Hox-A5, Hox-B7, Hox-B8, and Hox-C8 homeodomain proteins, which are themselves known oncoproteins, as well as with the Hox-D4 homeodomain protein. Cooperative binding to ATCAATCAA required the homeodomain-dependent DNA-binding activities of both Pbx1 and the Hox partner. In cotransfection assays, Hox-B8 suppressed transactivation by E2A-Pbx1. These results suggest that (i) Pbx1 may participate in the normal regulation of Hox target gene transcription in vivo and therein contribute to aspects of anterior-posterior patterning and structural development in vertebrates, (ii) that E2A-Pbx1 could abrogate normal differentiation by altering the transcriptional regulation of Hox target genes in conjunction with Hox proteins, and (iii) that the oncogenic mechanism of certain Hox proteins may require their physical interaction with Pbx1 as a cooperating, DNA-binding partner.

scholarly journals Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1734-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Chang ◽  
L Brocchieri ◽  
W F Shen ◽  
C Largman ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Cellular Assays ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
Dna Binding Properties ◽  
Half Site

Pbx cofactors are implicated to play important roles in modulating the DNA-binding properties of heterologous homeodomain proteins, including class I Hox proteins. To assess how Pbx proteins influence Hox DNA-binding specificity, we used a binding-site selection approach to determine high-affinity target sites recognized by various Pbx-Hox homeoprotein complexes. Pbx-Hox heterodimers preferred to bind a bipartite sequence 5'-ATGATTNATNN-3' consisting of two adjacent half sites in which the Pbx component of the heterodimer contacted the 5' half (ATGAT) and the Hox component contacted the more variable 3' half (TNATNN). Binding sites matching the consensus were also obtained for Pbx1 complexed with HoxA10, which lacks a hexapeptide but requires a conserved tryptophan-containing motif for cooperativity with Pbx. Interactions with Pbx were found to play an essential role in modulating Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arm contact with DNA in the core of the Hox half site such that heterodimers of different compositions could distinguish single nucleotide alterations in the Hox half site both in vitro and in cellular assays measuring transactivation. When complexed with Pbx, Hox proteins B1 through B9 and A10 showed stepwise differences in their preferences for nucleotides in the Hox half site core (TTAT to TGAT, 5' to 3') that correlated with the locations of their respective genes in the Hox cluster. These observations demonstrate previously undetected DNA-binding specificity for the amino-terminal arm of the Hox homeodomain and suggest that different binding activities of Pbx-Hox complexes are at least part of the position-specific activities of the Hox genes.

scholarly journals The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arya Zandvakili ◽  
Juli Uhl ◽  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Yuntao Charlie Song ◽  
Brian Gebelein
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Protease Gene ◽  
Precise Integration

AbstractHox genes encode a family of transcription factors that, despite having similar in vitro DNA binding preferences, regulate distinct genetic programs along the metazoan anterior-posterior axis. To better define mechanisms of Hox specificity, we compared and contrasted the ability of abdominal Hox factors to regulate two cis-regulatory elements within the Drosophila embryo. Both the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Abdominal-A (Abd-A) Hox factors form cooperative complexes with the Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) transcription factors to repress the distal-less leg selector gene via the DCRE, whereas only Abd-A interacts with Exd and Hth on the RhoA element to activate a rhomboid serine protease gene that stimulates Epidermal Growth Factor secretion. By swapping binding sites between these elements, we found that the RhoA Exd/Hth/Hox site configuration that mediates Abd-A specific activation can also convey transcriptional repression by both Ubx and Abd-A when placed into the DCRE, but only in one orientation. We further show that the orientation and spacing of Hox sites relative to additional transcription factor binding sites within the RhoA and DCRE elements is critical to mediate appropriate cell- and segment-specific output. These results indicate that the interaction between Hox, Exd, and Hth neither determines activation vs repression specificity nor defines Ubx vs Abd-A specificity. Instead the precise integration of Hox sites with additional TF inputs is required for accurate transcriptional output. Taken together, these studies provide new insight into the mechanisms of Hox target and regulatory specificity as well as the constraints placed on regulatory elements to convey appropriate outputs.Author SummaryThe Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that give cells within each region along the developing body plan a unique identity in animals from worms to mammals. Surprisingly, however, most of the Hox factors bind the same or highly similar DNA sequences. These findings raise a paradox: How can proteins that have highly similar DNA binding properties perform different functions in the animal by regulating different sets of target genes? In this study, we address this question by studying how two Hox factors regulate the expression of target genes that specify leg development and the making of liver-like cells in the developing fly. By comparing and contrasting how Hox target genes are activated and/or repressed, we found that the same Hox binding sites can mediate either activation or repression in a manner that depends upon context. In addition, we found that a Hox binding site that is normally regulated by only one Hox factor, can also be used by more than one Hox factor swapped into another target gene. These findings indicate that the specificity of a Hox factor to regulate target genes does not rely solely upon DNA binding specificity but also requires regulatory specificity.

scholarly journals Helix-loop-helix proteins LYL1 and E2a form heterodimeric complexes with distinctive DNA-binding properties in hematolymphoid cells.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2394-2401 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Miyamoto ◽  
X Cui ◽  
L Naumovski ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

LYL1 is a basic helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein that was originally discovered because of its translocation into the beta T-cell receptor locus in an acute lymphoblastic leukemia. LYL1 is expressed in many hematolymphoid cells, with the notable exceptions of thymocytes and T cells. Using the yeast two-hybrid system to screen a cDNA library constructed from B cells, we identified the E-box-binding proteins E12 and E47 as potential lymphoid dimerization partners for LYL1. The interaction of LYL1 with E2a proteins was further characterized in vitro and shown to require the HLH motifs of both proteins. Immunoprecipitation analyses showed that in T-ALL and other cell lines, endogenous LYL1 exists in a complex with E2a proteins. A preferred DNA-binding sequence, 5'-AACAGATG(T/g)T-3', for the LYL1-E2a heterodimer was determined by PCR-assisted site selection. Endogenous protein complexes containing both LYL1 and E2a bound this sequence in various LYL1-expressing cell lines and could distinguish between the LYL1 consensus and muE2 sites. These data demonstrate that E2a proteins serve as dimerization partners for the basic HLH protein LYL1 to form complexes with distinctive DNA-binding properties and support the hypothesis that the leukemic properties of the LYL1 and TAL subfamily of HLH proteins could be mediated by recognition of a common set of target genes as heterodimeric complexes with class I HLH proteins.

scholarly journals Definition of the Transcriptional Activation Domains of Three Human HOX Proteins Depends on the DNA-Binding Context

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6201-6212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alessandra Viganò ◽  
Giuliana Di Rocco ◽  
Vincenzo Zappavigna ◽  
Fulvio Mavilio
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Downstream Target ◽  
Transcriptional Machinery ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domains

ABSTRACT Hox proteins control developmental patterns and cell differentiation in vertebrates by acting as positive or negative regulators of still unidentified downstream target genes. The homeodomain and other small accessory sequences encode the DNA-protein and protein-protein interaction functions which ultimately dictate target recognition and functional specificity in vivo. The effector domains responsible for either positive or negative interactions with the cell transcriptional machinery are unknown for most Hox proteins, largely due to a lack of physiological targets on which to carry out functional analysis. We report the identification of the transcriptional activation domains of three human Hox proteins, HOXB1, HOXB3, and HOXD9, which interact in vivo with the autoregulatory and cross-regulatory enhancers of the murine Hoxb-1 and human HOXD9 genes. Activation domains have been defined both in a homologous context, i.e., within a HOX protein binding as a monomer or as a HOX-PBX heterodimer to the specific target, and in a heterologous context, after translocation to the yeast Gal4 DNA-binding domain. Transfection analysis indicates that activation domains can be identified in different regions of the three HOX proteins depending on the context in which they interact with the DNA target. These results suggest that Hox proteins may be multifunctional transcriptional regulators, interacting with different cofactors and/or components of the transcriptional machinery depending on the structure of their target regulatory elements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document