scholarly journals SPT20/ADA5 encodes a novel protein functionally related to the TATA-binding protein and important for transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 3206-3213 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Roberts ◽  
F Winston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Poor Growth ◽  
New Gene ◽  
Novel Protein

Mutations selected as suppressors of Ty and solo delta insertion mutations is Saccharomyces cerevisiae have identified a number of genes important for transcription initiation. One of these gens, SPT15, encodes the TATA-binding protein, and three others, SPT3, SPT7, and SPT8, encode proteins functionally related to the TATA-binding protein. To identify additional related functions, we have selected for new spt mutations. This work has identified one new gene, SPT20. Null mutations in SPT20 cause poor growth and a set of severe transcriptional defects very similar to those caused by null mutations in SPT3, SPT7, and SPT8 and also very similar to those caused by certain missense mutations in SPT15. Consistent with its having an important function in transcription in vivo, SPT20 was also recently identified as ADA5 and has been shown to be important for transcriptional activation (G.A. Marcus, J. Horiuchi, N. Silverman, and L. Guarente, Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3197-3205, 1996.

scholarly journals A novel 66-kilodalton protein complexes with Rrn6, Rrn7, and TATA-binding protein to promote polymerase I transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 6436-6443 ◽  
Author(s):  
C W Lin ◽  
B Moorefield ◽  
J Payne ◽  
P Aprikian ◽  
K Mitomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Polymerase I

We report the cloning of RRN11, a gene coding for a 66-kDa protein essential for transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rrn11 specifically complexes with two previously identified transcription factors, Rrn6 and Rrn7 (D. A. Keys, J. S. Steffan, J. A. Dodd, R. T. Yamamoto, Y. Nogi, and M. Nomura, Genes Dev. 8:2349-2362, 1994). The Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7 complex also binds the TATA-binding protein and is required for transcription by the core domain of the Pol I promoter. Therefore, we have designated the Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7-TATA-binding protein complex the yeast Pol I core factor. A two-hybrid assay was used to demonstrate involvement of short leucine heptad repeats on both Rrn11 and Rrn6 in the in vivo association of these two proteins. This assay also verified the previously described strong association between Rrn6 and Rrn7, independent of the Rrn6 leucine repeat.

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2832-2839
Author(s):  
A S Ponticelli ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

The promoter region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that direct transcription initiation to two sites designated +1 and +13. On the basis of differences between their nucleotide sequences and their responsiveness to upstream promoter elements, it has previously been proposed that TC and TR promote transcription by different molecular mechanisms. To begin a study of his3 transcription in vitro, we used S. cerevisiae nuclear extracts together with various DNA templates and transcriptional activator proteins that have been characterized in vivo. We demonstrated accurate transcription initiation in vitro at the sites used in vivo, transcriptional activation by GCN4, and activation by a GAL4 derivative on various gal-his3 hybrid promoters. In all cases, transcription stimulation was dependent on the presence of an acidic activation region in the activator protein. In addition, analysis of promoters containing a variety of TR derivatives indicated that the level of transcription in vitro was directly related to the level achieved in vivo. The results demonstrated that the in vitro system accurately reproduced all known aspects of in vivo his3 transcription that depend on the TR element. However, in striking contrast to his3 transcription in vivo, transcription in vitro yielded approximately 20 times more of the +13 transcript than the +1 transcript. This result was not due to inability of the +1 initiation site to be efficiently utilized in vitro, but rather it reflects the lack of TC function in vitro. The results support the idea that TC and TR mediate transcription from the wild-type promoter by distinct mechanisms.

Mechanism of initiator-mediated transcription: evidence for a functional interaction between the TATA-binding protein and DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3841-3849
Author(s):  
B Zenzie-Gregory ◽  
A Khachi ◽  
I P Garraway ◽  
S T Smale
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Recognition Sequence ◽  
Specific Recognition ◽  
Rate Limiting

Promoters containing Sp1 binding sites and an initiator element but lacking a TATA box direct high levels of accurate transcription initiation by using a mechanism that requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). We have begun to address the role of TBP during transcription from Sp1-initiator promoters by varying the nucleotide sequence between -14 and -33 relative to the start site. With each of several promoters containing different upstream sequences, we detected accurate transcription both in vitro and in vivo, but the promoter strengths varied widely, particularly with the in vitro assay. The variable promoter activities correlated with, but were not proportional to, the abilities of the upstream sequences to function as TATA boxes, as assessed by multiple criteria. These results confirm that accurate transcription can proceed in the presence of an initiator, regardless of the sequence present in the -30 region. However, the results reveal a role for this upstream region, most consistent with a model in which initiator-mediated transcription requires binding of TBP to the upstream DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence. Moreover, in vivo it appears that the promoter strength is modulated less severely by altering the -30 sequence, consistent with a previous suggestion that TBP is not rate limiting in vivo for TATA-less promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that variations in the structure of a core promoter might alter the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation and thereby alter the potential modes of transcriptional regulation, without severely changing the pathway used to assemble a functional preinitiation complex.

Transcriptional activation requires protection of the TATA-binding protein Tbp1 by the ubiquitin-specific protease Ubp3

2010 ◽  
Vol 431 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boon Shang Chew ◽  
Wee Leng Siew ◽  
Benjamin Xiao ◽  
Norbert Lehming
Keyword(s):  
Mutant Strain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Glutathione Transferase ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Mutant Protein ◽  
Specific Protease ◽  
Ubiquitin Specific Protease

Tbp1, the TATA-binding protein, is essential for transcriptional activation, and Gal4 and Gcn4 are unable to fully activate transcription in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae TBP1E86D mutant strain. In the present study we have shown that the Tbp1E186D mutant protein is proteolytically instable, and we have isolated intragenic and extragenic suppressors of the transcription defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. The TBP1R6S mutation stabilizes the Tbp1E186D mutant protein and suppresses the defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. Furthermore, we found that the overexpression of the de-ubiquitinating enzyme Ubp3 (ubiquitin-specific protease 3) also stabilizes the Tbp1E186D mutant protein and suppresses of the defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. Importantly, the deletion of UBP3 and its cofactor BRE5 lead to increased degradation of wild-type Tbp1 protein and to defects in transcriptional activation by Gal4 and Gcn4. Purified GST (glutathione transferase)–Ubp3 reversed Tbp1 ubiquitination, and the deletion of UBP3 lead to the accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated species of Tbp1 in a proteaseome-deficient genetic background, demonstrating that Ubp3 reverses ubiquitination of Tbp1 in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that Ubp3 was recruited to the GAL1 and HIS3 promoters upon the induction of the respective gene, indicating that protection of promoter-bound Tbp1 by Ubp3 is required for transcriptional activation.

scholarly journals NC2α Interacts with BTAF1 and Stimulates Its ATP-Dependent Association with TATA-Binding Protein

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 10072-10082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin P. Klejman ◽  
Lloyd A. Pereira ◽  
Hester J. T. van Zeeburg ◽  
Siv Gilfillan ◽  
Michael Meisterernst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Present Evidence ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Human Ortholog ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activity of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is controlled by a variety of proteins. The BTAF1 protein (formerly known as TAFII170/TAF-172 and the human ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mot1p) and the NC2 complex composed of NC2α (DRAP1) and NC2β (Dr1) are able to bind to TBP directly and regulate RNA polymerase II transcription both positively and negatively. Here, we present evidence that the NC2α subunit interacts with BTAF1. In contrast, the NC2β subunit is not able to associate with BTAF1 and seems to interfere with the BTAF1-TBP interaction. Addition of NC2α or the NC2 complex can stimulate the ability of BTAF1 to interact with TBP. This function is dependent on the presence of ATP in cell extracts but does not involve the ATPase activity of BTAF1 nor phosphorylation of NC2α. Together, our results constitute the first evidence of the physical cooperation between BTAF1 and NC2α in TBP regulation and provide a framework to understand transcription functions of NC2α and NC2β in vivo.

scholarly journals The TATA-binding protein is not an essential target of the transcriptional activators Gal4p and Gcn4p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2003 ◽  
Vol 370 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine BONGARDS ◽  
Boon Shang CHEW ◽  
Norbert LEHMING
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Clear Correlation ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Transcriptional Activators ◽  
Transcription Process

According to the recruitment model, transcriptional activators work by increasing the local concentration of one or several limiting factors for the transcription process at the target promoter. The TATA-binding protein Tbp1 has been considered as a likely candidate for such a limiting factor. We have used a series of Gal4p and Tbp1 mutants to correlate the in vivo interaction between the two proteins with the strength of activation. We find a clear correlation between activation strength and in vivo interaction for the series of Gal4p mutants. Consistently, the weaker activator Gcn4p does not interact with Tbp1. However, a corresponding analysis of the series of Tbp1 mutants revealed that Tbp1 is not an essential target of the acidic activators Gal4p and Gcn4p. Furthermore, detailed analysis of a Tbp1 mutant deficient for transcriptional activation by Gal4p revealed that the mutant is defective in interactions with five other proteins involved in the process of transcription.

scholarly journals A Human TATA Binding Protein-Related Protein with Altered DNA Binding Specificity Inhibits Transcription from Multiple Promoters and Activators

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 7610-7620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Moore ◽  
Josef Ozer ◽  
Moreh Salunek ◽  
Gwenael Jan ◽  
Dennis Zerby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Related Protein ◽  
Multiple Promoters ◽  
Binding Surface

ABSTRACT The TATA binding protein (TBP) plays a central role in eukaryotic and archael transcription initiation. We describe the isolation of a novel 23-kDa human protein that displays 41% identity to TBP and is expressed in most human tissue. Recombinant TBP-related protein (TRP) displayed barely detectable binding to consensus TATA box sequences but bound with slightly higher affinities to nonconsensus TATA sequences. TRP did not substitute for TBP in transcription reactions in vitro. However, addition of TRP potently inhibited basal and activated transcription from multiple promoters in vitro and in vivo. General transcription factors TFIIA and TFIIB bound glutathioneS-transferase–TRP in solution but failed to stimulate TRP binding to DNA. Preincubation of TRP with TFIIA inhibited TBP-TFIIA-DNA complex formation and addition of TFIIA overcame TRP-mediated transcription repression. TRP transcriptional repression activity was specifically reduced by mutations in TRP that disrupt the TFIIA binding surface but not by mutations that disrupt the TFIIB or DNA binding surface of TRP. These results suggest that TFIIA is a primary target of TRP transcription inhibition and that TRP may modulate transcription by a novel mechanism involving the partial mimicry of TBP functions.

scholarly journals Mechanism of initiator-mediated transcription: evidence for a functional interaction between the TATA-binding protein and DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3841-3849 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Zenzie-Gregory ◽  
A Khachi ◽  
I P Garraway ◽  
S T Smale
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Recognition Sequence ◽  
Specific Recognition ◽  
Rate Limiting

Promoters containing Sp1 binding sites and an initiator element but lacking a TATA box direct high levels of accurate transcription initiation by using a mechanism that requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). We have begun to address the role of TBP during transcription from Sp1-initiator promoters by varying the nucleotide sequence between -14 and -33 relative to the start site. With each of several promoters containing different upstream sequences, we detected accurate transcription both in vitro and in vivo, but the promoter strengths varied widely, particularly with the in vitro assay. The variable promoter activities correlated with, but were not proportional to, the abilities of the upstream sequences to function as TATA boxes, as assessed by multiple criteria. These results confirm that accurate transcription can proceed in the presence of an initiator, regardless of the sequence present in the -30 region. However, the results reveal a role for this upstream region, most consistent with a model in which initiator-mediated transcription requires binding of TBP to the upstream DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence. Moreover, in vivo it appears that the promoter strength is modulated less severely by altering the -30 sequence, consistent with a previous suggestion that TBP is not rate limiting in vivo for TATA-less promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that variations in the structure of a core promoter might alter the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation and thereby alter the potential modes of transcriptional regulation, without severely changing the pathway used to assemble a functional preinitiation complex.

scholarly journals Yeast Coactivator MBF1 Mediates GCN4-Dependent Transcriptional Activation

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4971-4976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Takemaru ◽  
Satoshi Harashima ◽  
Hitoshi Ueda ◽  
Susumu Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Region

ABSTRACT Transcriptional coactivators play a crucial role in gene expression by communicating between regulatory factors and the basal transcription machinery. The coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) was originally identified as a bridging molecule that connects theDrosophila nuclear receptor FTZ-F1 and TATA-binding protein (TBP). The MBF1 sequence is highly conserved across species fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae to human. Here we provide evidence acquired in vitro and in vivo that yeast MBF1 mediates GCN4-dependent transcriptional activation by bridging the DNA-binding region of GCN4 and TBP. These findings indicate that the coactivator MBF1 functions by recruiting TBP to promoters where DNA-binding regulators are bound.

scholarly journals Recruitment of CBP/p300, TATA-Binding Protein, and S8 to Distinct Regions at the N Terminus of Adenovirus E1A

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 5594-5605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mozhgan Rasti ◽  
Roger J. A. Grand ◽  
Joe S. Mymryk ◽  
Phillip H. Gallimore ◽  
Andrew S. Turnell
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Cellular Transformation ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Transformation Process ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis

ABSTRACT The N-terminal region of the adenovirus (Ad) 12S E1A gene product targets several cellular proteins that are essential for the induction of S phase, cellular immortalization, cellular transformation, transcriptional repression, and transcriptional activation. The precise binding sites for these proteins, however, remain to be resolved. We therefore undertook an extensive site-directed mutagenesis approach to generate specific point mutants and to precisely map the binding sites for CBP, p300, TATA-binding protein (TBP), S4, S8, hGcn5, P/CAF, and Ran within the first 30 amino acids of the Ad5 12S E1A protein. We determined that although common residues within the N-terminal region can form partial binding sites for these proteins, point mutants were also generated that could discriminate between binding sites. These data indicate that AdE1A can target each of these proteins individually through distinct binding sites. It was evident, however, that the mutation of specific hydrophobic residues typically had the greatest effect upon AdE1A's ability to bind individual partners. Indeed, the mutation of L at positions 19 and 20 eliminated the ability of AdE1A to interact with any of the N-terminal binding proteins studied here. Interestingly, although TBP and S8 or CBP/p300 can exist as functional complexes, RNA interference revealed that the recruitment of either TBP, S8, or CBP/p300 to AdE1A was not dependent upon the expression of the other proteins. These data further indicate that AdE1A can target individual partner proteins in vivo and that it does not necessarily recruit these proteins indirectly as components of larger macromolecular complexes. Finally, we took advantage of the fine-mapping data to ascertain which proteins were targeted during the transformation process. Consistent with previous studies, CBP/p300 was found to be targeted by AdE1A during this process, although our data suggest that binding to other N-terminal proteins is also important for transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document