scholarly journals Developmental Control of Histone mRNA and dSLBP Synthesis during Drosophila Embryogenesis and the Role of dSLBP in Histone mRNA 3′ End Processing In Vivo

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2267-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Lanzotti ◽  
Handan Kaygun ◽  
Xiao Yang ◽  
Robert J. Duronio ◽  
William F. Marzluff
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Histone Gene ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Hypomorphic Mutation ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Polyadenylation Signals

ABSTRACT In metazoans, the 3′ end of histone mRNA is not polyadenylated but instead ends with a stem-loop structure that is required for cell cycle-regulated expression. The sequence of the stem-loop in the Drosophila melanogaster histone H2b, H3, and H4 genes is identical to the consensus sequence of other metazoan histone mRNAs, but the sequence of the stem-loop in the D. melanogaster histone H2a and H1 genes is novel. dSLBP binds to these novel stem-loop sequences as well as the canonical stem-loop with similar affinity. Eggs derived from females containing a viable, hypomorphic mutation in dSLBP store greatly reduced amounts of all five histone mRNAs in the egg, indicating that dSLBP is required in the maternal germ line for production of each histone mRNA. Embryos deficient in zygotic dSLBP function accumulate poly(A)+ versions of all five histone mRNAs as a result of usage of polyadenylation signals located 3′ of the stem-loop in each histone gene. Since the 3′ ends of adjacent histone genes are close together, these polyadenylation signals may ensure the termination of transcription in order to prevent read-through into the next gene, which could possibly disrupt transcription or produce antisense histone mRNA that might trigger RNA interference. During early wild-type embryogenesis, ubiquitous zygotic histone gene transcription is activated at the end of the syncytial nuclear cycles during S phase of cycle 14, silenced during the subsequent G2 phase, and then reactivated near the end of that G2 phase in the well-described mitotic domain pattern. There is little or no dSLBP protein provided maternally in wild-type embryos, and zygotic expression of dSLBP is immediately required to process newly made histone pre-mRNA.

scholarly journals Two Xenopus Proteins That Bind the 3′ End of Histone mRNA: Implications for Translational Control of Histone Synthesis during Oogenesis

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 835-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeng-Feng Wang ◽  
Thomas C. Ingledue ◽  
Zbigniew Dominski ◽  
Ricardo Sanchez ◽  
William F. Marzluff
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Loop Structure ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Stem Loop Structure ◽  
Histone Synthesis

ABSTRACT Translationally inactive histone mRNA is stored in frog oocytes, and translation is activated at oocyte maturation. The replication-dependent histone mRNAs are not polyadenylated and end in a conserved stem-loop structure. There are two proteins (SLBPs) which bind the 3′ end of histone mRNA in frog oocytes. SLBP1 participates in pre-mRNA processing in the nucleus. SLBP2 is oocyte specific, is present in the cytoplasm, and does not support pre-mRNA processing in vivo or in vitro. The stored histone mRNA is bound to SLBP2. As oocytes mature, SLBP2 is degraded and a larger fraction of the histone mRNA is bound to SLBP1. The mechanism of activation of translation of histone mRNAs may involve exchange of SLBPs associated with the 3′ end of histone mRNA.

scholarly journals Point mutations in the stem-loop at the 3' end of mouse histone mRNA reduce expression by reducing the efficiency of 3' end formation.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1709-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
N B Pandey ◽  
A S Williams ◽  
J H Sun ◽  
V D Brown ◽  
U Bond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Base Pair ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Loop Sequence ◽  
Processing Signal

Mammalian histone mRNAs end in a highly conserved stem-loop structure, with a six-base stem and a four-base loop. We have examined the effect of mutating the stem-loop on the expression of the histone mRNA in vivo by introducing the mutated histone genes into CHO cells by stable transfection. Point mutations have been introduced into the loop sequence and into the UA base pair at the top of the stem. Changing either the first or the third base of the conserved UYUN sequence in the loop to a purine greatly reduced expression, while changing both U's to purines abolished expression. A number of alterations in the stem sequence, including reversing the stem sequence, reversing the two base pairs at the base of the stem, or destroying the UA base pair at the top of the stem, also abolished expression. Changing the UA base pair to a CG or a UG base pair also reduced expression. The loss of expression is due to inefficient processing of the pre-mRNA, as judged by the efficiency of processing in vitro. Addition of a polyadenylation site or the wild-type histone processing signal downstream of a mutant stem-loop resulted in rescuing the processing of the mutant pre-histone mRNA. These results suggest that if the histone pre-mRNA is not rapidly processed, then it is degraded.

scholarly journals The Stem-Loop Binding Protein Is Required for Efficient Translation of Histone mRNA In Vivo and In Vitro

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 7093-7104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sànchez ◽  
William F. Marzluff
Keyword(s):  
Small Region ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Single Class ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Reticulocyte Lysate ◽  
Luciferase Mrna ◽  
Reporter Mrna

ABSTRACT Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs end in a conserved stem-loop rather than in the poly(A) tail found on all other mRNAs. The 3′ end of histone mRNA binds a single class of proteins, the stem-loop binding proteins (SLBP). In Xenopus, there are two SLBPs: xSLBP1, the homologue of the mammalian SLBP, which is required for processing of histone pre-mRNA, and xSLBP2, which is expressed only during oogenesis and is bound to the stored histone mRNA in Xenopus oocytes. The stem-loop is required for efficient translation of histone mRNAs and substitutes for the poly(A) tail, which is required for efficient translation of other eucaryotic mRNAs. When a rabbit reticulocyte lysate is programmed with uncapped luciferase mRNA ending in the histone stem-loop, there is a three- to sixfold increase in translation in the presence of xSLBP1 while xSLBP2 has no effect on translation. Neither SLBP affected the translation of a luciferase mRNA ending in a mutant stem-loop that does not bind SLBP. Capped luciferase mRNAs ending in the stem-loop were injected into Xenopus oocytes after overexpression of either xSLBP1 or xSLBP2. Overexpression of xSLBP1 in the oocytes stimulated translation, while overexpression of xSLBP2 reduced translation of the luciferase mRNA ending in the histone stem-loop. A small region in the N-terminal portion of xSLBP1 is required to stimulate translation both in vivo and in vitro. An MS2-human SLBP1 fusion protein can activate translation of a reporter mRNA ending in an MS2 binding site, indicating that xSLBP1 only needs to be recruited to the 3′ end of the mRNA but does not need to be directly bound to the histone stem-loop to activate translation.

scholarly journals Point mutations in the stem-loop at the 3' end of mouse histone mRNA reduce expression by reducing the efficiency of 3' end formation

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1709-1720
Author(s):  
N B Pandey ◽  
A S Williams ◽  
J H Sun ◽  
V D Brown ◽  
U Bond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Base Pair ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Loop Sequence ◽  
Processing Signal

Mammalian histone mRNAs end in a highly conserved stem-loop structure, with a six-base stem and a four-base loop. We have examined the effect of mutating the stem-loop on the expression of the histone mRNA in vivo by introducing the mutated histone genes into CHO cells by stable transfection. Point mutations have been introduced into the loop sequence and into the UA base pair at the top of the stem. Changing either the first or the third base of the conserved UYUN sequence in the loop to a purine greatly reduced expression, while changing both U's to purines abolished expression. A number of alterations in the stem sequence, including reversing the stem sequence, reversing the two base pairs at the base of the stem, or destroying the UA base pair at the top of the stem, also abolished expression. Changing the UA base pair to a CG or a UG base pair also reduced expression. The loss of expression is due to inefficient processing of the pre-mRNA, as judged by the efficiency of processing in vitro. Addition of a polyadenylation site or the wild-type histone processing signal downstream of a mutant stem-loop resulted in rescuing the processing of the mutant pre-histone mRNA. These results suggest that if the histone pre-mRNA is not rapidly processed, then it is degraded.

scholarly journals Nuclear Import of the Stem–Loop Binding Protein and Localization during the Cell Cycle

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2960-2971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Erkmann ◽  
Eric J. Wagner ◽  
Jian Dong ◽  
Yanping Zhang ◽  
Ulrike Kutay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Import Receptors ◽  
Mrna Binding

A key factor involved in the processing of histone pre-mRNAs in the nucleus and translation of mature histone mRNAs in the cytoplasm is the stem–loop binding protein (SLBP). In this work, we have investigated SLBP nuclear transport and subcellular localization during the cell cycle. SLBP is predominantly nuclear under steady-state conditions and localizes to the cytoplasm during S phase when histone mRNAs accumulate. Consistently, SLBP mutants that are defective in histone mRNA binding remain nuclear. As assayed in heterokaryons, export of SLBP from the nucleus is dependent on histone mRNA binding, demonstrating that SLBP on its own does not possess any nuclear export signals. We find that SLBP interacts with the import receptors Impα/Impβ and Transportin-SR2. Moreover, complexes formed between SLBP and the two import receptors are disrupted by RanGTP. We have further shown that SLBP is imported by both receptors in vitro. Three sequences in SLBP required for Impα/Impβ binding were identified. Simultaneous mutation of all three sequences was necessary to abolish SLBP nuclear localization in vivo. In contrast, we were unable to identify an in vivo role for Transportin-SR2 in SLBP nuclear localization. Thus, only the Impα/Impβ pathway contributes to SLBP nuclear import in HeLa cells.

scholarly journals Concentrating pre-mRNA processing factors in the histone locus body facilitates efficient histone mRNA biogenesis

2016 ◽  
Vol 213 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre C. Tatomer ◽  
Esteban Terzo ◽  
Kaitlin P. Curry ◽  
Harmony Salzler ◽  
Ivan Sabath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Assembly Factor ◽  
U7 Snrnp ◽  
Histone Locus Body ◽  
Histone Locus ◽  
Processing Factors

The histone locus body (HLB) assembles at replication-dependent histone genes and concentrates factors required for histone messenger RNA (mRNA) biosynthesis. FLASH (Flice-associated huge protein) and U7 small nuclear RNP (snRNP) are HLB components that participate in 3′ processing of the nonpolyadenylated histone mRNAs by recruiting the endonuclease CPSF-73 to histone pre-mRNA. Using transgenes to complement a FLASH mutant, we show that distinct domains of FLASH involved in U7 snRNP binding, histone pre-mRNA cleavage, and HLB localization are all required for proper FLASH function in vivo. By genetically manipulating HLB composition using mutations in FLASH, mutations in the HLB assembly factor Mxc, or depletion of the variant histone H2aV, we find that failure to concentrate FLASH and/or U7 snRNP in the HLB impairs histone pre-mRNA processing. This failure results in accumulation of small amounts of polyadenylated histone mRNA and nascent read-through transcripts at the histone locus. Thus, the HLB concentrates FLASH and U7 snRNP, promoting efficient histone mRNA biosynthesis and coupling 3′ end processing with transcription termination.

scholarly journals Randomization and In Vivo Selection Reveal a GGRG Motif Essential for Packaging Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 RNA

2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 802-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayyba T. Baig ◽  
Jean-Marc Lanchy ◽  
J. Stephen Lodmell
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Rna Packaging ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus

ABSTRACT The packaging signal (ψ) of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) is present in the 5′ noncoding region of RNA and contains a 10-nucleotide palindrome (pal; 5′-392-GGAGUGCUCC) located upstream of the dimerization signal stem-loop 1 (SL1). pal has been shown to be functionally important in vitro and in vivo. We previously showed that the 3′ side of pal (GCUCC-3′) is involved in base-pairing interactions with a sequence downstream of SL1 to make an extended SL1, which is important for replication in vivo and the regulation of dimerization in vitro. However, the role of the 5′ side of pal (5′-GGAGU) was less clear. Here, we characterized this role using an in vivo SELEX approach. We produced a population of HIV-2 DNA genomes with random sequences within the 5′ side of pal and transfected these into COS-7 cells. Viruses from COS-7 cells were used to infect C8166 permissive cells. After several weeks of serial passage in C8166 cells, surviving viruses were sequenced. On the 5′ side of pal there was a striking convergence toward a GGRGN consensus sequence. Individual clones with consensus and nonconsensus sequences were tested in infectivity and packaging assays. Analysis of individuals that diverged from the consensus sequence showed normal viral RNA and protein synthesis but had replication defects and impaired RNA packaging. These findings clearly indicate that the GGRG motif is essential for viral replication and genomic RNA packaging.

scholarly journals Translational Regulation by an Intramolecular Stem-Loop Is Required for Intermolecular RNA Regulation of the par Addiction Module

2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (18) ◽  
pp. 6076-6083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Shokeen ◽  
Smita Patel ◽  
Tony J. Greenfield ◽  
Cassandra Brinkman ◽  
Keith E. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Antisense Rna ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Rna Regulation ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Stability Determinant ◽  
Rna I

ABSTRACT The par stability determinant of Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1 is the only antisense RNA-regulated addiction module identified to date in gram-positive bacteria. par encodes two small, convergently transcribed RNAs, designated RNA I and RNA II, that function as the toxin (Fst)-encoding and antitoxin components, respectively. Previous work showed that structures at the 5′ end of RNA I are important in regulating its translation. The work presented here reveals that a stem-loop sequestering the Fst ribosome binding site is required for translational repression but a helix sequestering the 5′ end of RNA I is not. Furthermore, disruption of the stem-loop prevented RNA II-mediated repression of Fst translation in vivo. Finally, although Fst-encoding wild-type RNA I is not toxic in Escherichia coli, mutations affecting stem-loop stability resulted in toxicity in this host, presumably due to increased translation.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of Stem-Loop Binding Protein (SLBP) on Two Threonines Triggers Degradation of SLBP, the Sole Cell Cycle-Regulated Factor Required for Regulation of Histone mRNA Processing, at the End of S Phase

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1590-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxing Zheng ◽  
Zbigniew Dominski ◽  
Xiao-Cui Yang ◽  
Phillip Elms ◽  
Christy S. Raska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

ABSTRACT The replication-dependent histone mRNAs, the only eukaryotic mRNAs that do not have poly(A) tails, are present only in S-phase cells. Coordinate posttranscriptional regulation of histone mRNAs is mediated by the stem-loop at the 3′ end of histone mRNAs. The protein that binds the 3′ end of histone mRNA, stem-loop binding protein (SLBP), is required for histone pre-mRNA processing and is involved in multiple aspects of histone mRNA metabolism. SLBP is also regulated during the cell cycle, accumulating as cells enter S phase and being rapidly degraded as cells exit S phase. Mutation of any residues in a TTP sequence (amino acids 60 to 62) or mutation of a consensus cyclin binding site (amino acids 99 to 104) stabilizes SLBP in G2 and mitosis. These two threonines are phosphorylated in late S phase, as determined by mass spectrometry (MS) of purified SLBP from late S-phase cells, triggering SLBP degradation. Cells that express a stable SLBP still degrade histone mRNA at the end of S phase, demonstrating that degradation of SLBP is not required for histone mRNA degradation. Nuclear extracts from G1 and G2 cells are deficient in histone pre-mRNA processing, which is restored by addition of recombinant SLBP, indicating that SLBP is the only cell cycle-regulated factor required for histone pre-mRNA processing.

Functions of the cytoplasmic domain of the beta PS integrin subunit during Drosophila development

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Grinblat ◽  
S. Zusman ◽  
G. Yee ◽  
R.O. Hynes ◽  
F.C. Kafatos
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Cytoplasmic Tail ◽  
Cytoplasmic Domain ◽  
P Element ◽  
Integrin Subunit ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mutant Proteins ◽  
Adhesive Interactions

Integrins constitute a family of membrane-spanning, heterodimeric proteins that mediate adhesive interactions between cells and surrounding extracellular matrices (or other cells) and participate in signal transduction. We are interested in assessing integrin functions in the context of developing Drosophila melanogaster. This report, using mutants of the beta PS subunit encoded by the myospheroid (mys) locus, analyzes the relationships between integrin protein structure and developmental functions in an intact organism. As a first step in this analysis, we demonstrated the ability of a fragment of wild-type mys genomic DNA, introduced into the germ line in a P-element vector P[mys+], to rescue phenotypes attributed to lack of (or defects in) the endogenous beta PS during several discrete morphogenetic events. We then produced in vitro a series of modifications of the wild-type P[mys+] transposon, which encode beta PS derivatives with mutations within the small and highly conserved cytoplasmic domain. In vivo analysis of these mutant transposons led to the following conclusions. (1) The cytoplasmic tail of beta PS is essential for all developmental functions of the protein that were assayed. (2) An intron at a conserved position in the DNA sequence encoding the cytoplasmic tail is thought to participate in important alternative splicing events in vertebrate beta integrin subunit genes, but is not required for the developmental functions of the mys gene assayed here. (3) Phosphorylation on two conserved tyrosines found in the C terminus of the beta PS cytoplasmic tail is not necessary for the tested developmental functions. (4) Four highly conserved amino acid residues found in the N-terminal portion of the cytoplasmic tail are important but not critical for the developmental functions of beta PS; furthermore, the efficiencies with which these mutant proteins function during different morphogenetic processes vary greatly, strongly suggesting that the cytoplasmic interactions involving PS integrins are developmentally modulated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document