scholarly journals The Biological Impact of the Human Master Regulator p53 Can Be Altered by Mutations That Change the Spectrum and Expression of Its Target Genes

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2297-2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Menendez ◽  
Alberto Inga ◽  
Michael A. Resnick

ABSTRACT Human tumor suppressor p53 is a sequence-specific master regulatory transcription factor that targets response elements (REs) in many genes. p53 missense mutations in the DNA-binding domain are often cancer associated. As shown with systems based on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p53 mutants can alter the spectra and intensities of transactivation from individual REs. We address directly in human cells the relationship between changes in the p53 master regulatory network and biological outcomes. Expression of integrated, tightly regulated DNA-binding domain p53 mutants resulted in many patterns of apoptosis and survival following UV or ionizing radiation, or spontaneously. These patterns reflected changes in the spectra and activities of target genes, as demonstrated for P21, MDM2, BAX, and MSH2. Thus, as originally proposed for “master genes of diversity,” p53 mutations in human cells can differentially influence target gene transactivation, resulting in a variety of biological consequences which, in turn, might be expected to influence tumor development and therapeutic efficacy.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e55103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédérique Végran ◽  
Magali Rebucci ◽  
Sandy Chevrier ◽  
Muriel Cadouot ◽  
Romain Boidot ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungeui Hong ◽  
Nathan Brandt ◽  
Ally Yang ◽  
Tim Hughes ◽  
David Gresham

Understanding the molecular basis of gene expression evolution is a central problem in evolutionary biology. However, connecting changes in gene expression to increased fitness, and identifying the functional basis of those changes, remains challenging. To study adaptive evolution of gene expression in real time, we performed long term experimental evolution (LTEE) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) in ammonium-limited chemostats. Following several hundred generations of continuous selection we found significant divergence of nitrogen-responsive gene expression in lineages with increased fitness. In multiple independent lineages we found repeated selection for non-synonymous mutations in the zinc finger DNA binding domain of the activating transcription factor (TF), GAT1, that operates within incoherent feedforward loops to control expression of the nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) regulon. Missense mutations in the DNA binding domain of GAT1 reduce its binding affinity for the GATAA consensus sequence in a promoter-specific manner, resulting in increased expression of ammonium permease genes via both direct and indirect effects, thereby conferring increased fitness. We find that altered transcriptional output of the NCR regulon results in antagonistic pleiotropy in alternate environments and that the DNA binding domain of GAT1 is subject to purifying selection in natural populations. Our study shows that adaptive evolution of gene expression can entail tuning expression output by quantitative changes in TF binding affinities while maintaining the overall topology of a gene regulatory network.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1484-1484
Author(s):  
Ilaria Iacobucci ◽  
Anna Ferrari ◽  
Stefania Trino ◽  
Annalisa Lonetti ◽  
Cristina Papayannidis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1484 MDM2, a p53-inducible phosphoprotein, binds to the N-terminus of the p53 and negatively regulates its transcriptional activity. New MDM2 antagonists, such as RO5045337 (Roche) and NSC-66811 (Merck), are now available for Phase I/II clinical development, but their activity is dependent on TP53 mutation status. Therefore, in order to efficiently treat B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with an MDM2 antagonist, we set up a sensitive assay to identify TP53 lesions. Deletions and uniparental disomy (UPD) involving TP53 were assessed on 146 DNA samples from Philadelphia-positive (Ph+)(n = 126) and Ph-negative (n = 20) ALL patients by Genome-Wide Human SNP 6.0 array (Affymetrix). No 17p UPD events were detected whereas losses were identified in 2% of cases. Mutations of TP53 were thereafter investigated in 67 samples including 60 Ph+ and 7 Ph-negative cases. Since the majority of the studies in leukemia were focused on genomic alterations and resulted in low rate of TP53 mutations, we aimed to identify RNA mutations and aberrant isoforms due to other mechanisms, such as RNA editing. To this purpose three overlapping shorter amplicons covering the entire coding cDNA sequence (GenBank accession number NM_000546.4) and the untranslated exon 1 [amplicon 1 (491 bp): exons 1–5; amplicon 2 (482 bp): exons 5–8; amplicon 3 (498 bp): exons 8–11)] and a longer amplicon (1,317 bp) starting from exon 1 and ending to exon 11 were sequenced by Sanger method. TP53 mutations were detected in only 6 cases (8.9%), suggesting that these alterations are apparently rare events in B-ALL. They included 4 missense point mutations in the DNA binding domain and in the carboxyl-terminal tetramerization and regulatory domain: C135Y (ex 5), A234T (ex 7), R290C (ex 8) and A347T (ex 10). Interestingly, in two cases we identified aberrant transcripts: 1) a TP53 isoform characterized by retention of introns 5–6–7 and predicted to encode for a truncated protein due a premature stop codon; 2) a TP53 isoform in which the DNA binding domain is lost due to an exon conjunction between the exon 4 and the 3' untraslated region (UTR)(ex4-3'UTR: 7579533–7572842, according to GRCh37/hg19). Next, in order to investigate if low rate of mutations were detectable, we also analyzed our whole transcriptome data obtained using next generation sequencing technology (Illumina/Solexa Genome Analyzer) on 3 Ph+ ALL patients. Curiously, all patients harbored clones ranging from 45% to 94% with TP53 mutations in the DNA binding and tetramerization domains: C182W (ex 5), T231A (ex 7), L330R (ex 9) in the first patient and Stop394S, D393V/H and G389Y/V (ex 11) in the second one. Moreover, in the first and third patient we detected 10 and 13 base exchanges, respectively, located in intron 6 within 7578166–7578142 region, suggesting a retention of this intron in the primary transcript and the dysfunction of the DNA-binding domain. The mechanism of intron retention (with or without mutations) was particularly intrigued since it could be a new mechanism of functional inactivation of TP53. To address this hypothesis we performed amplification of TP53 cDNA followed by single cell cloning and subsequent direct sequencing in 4 patients previously resulted wild-type by Sanger sequencing for TP53. By this approach, all patients showed cDNA alterations. In one case we identified the missense mutation S90P (ex 4) and an aberrant isoform lacking the DNA binding domain and caused by an exon-junction between exons 2 and 7 (ex2-7: 7579866–7577510). In a second patient the P190S (ex 6) and N235S (ex 7) missense mutations were detected. Moreover, an aberrant isoform lacking the DNA binding domain and characterized by an exon-junction between the first part of exon 4 and the last part of exon 7 (ex4-7: 7579581–7577532) was also identified. In the third patient the E285G (ex 8) was found associated with a 3'-UTR base exchange, which was also detected in the remaining fourth patient. In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that TP53 alterations at the RNA level, including missense mutations, aberrant exon junctions and internal intron retentions are highly frequent in B-ALL patients and that testing for TP53 mutations with sensitive assay based on RNA analysis is absolutely required. Supported by European LeukemiaNet, AIL, AIRC, Fondazione Del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna, FIRB 2006, PRIN 2009, Ateneo RFO grants, PIO program, Programma di Ricerca Regione – Università 2007 – 2009. Disclosures: Soverini: Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Baccarani:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujue Chen ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Zhen Teng ◽  
Hong Liu

Centromeric transcription has been shown to play an important role in centromere functions. However, lack of approaches to specifically manipulate centromeric transcription calls into question that the proposed functions are a direct consequence of centromeric transcription. By monitoring nascent RNAs, we found that several transcriptional inhibitors exhibited distinct, even opposing, efficacies on the suppression of ongoing gene and centromeric transcription in human cells, whereas under the same conditions, total centromeric RNAs were changed to a lesser extent. The inhibitor suppressing ongoing centromeric transcription weakened centromeric cohesion, whereas the inhibitor increasing ongoing centromeric transcription strengthened centromeric cohesion. Furthermore, expression of CENP-B DNA-binding domain or CENP-B knockdown moderately increased centromeric transcription without altering gene transcription; as a result, centromeric cohesion was accordingly strengthened. Targeting of the Kox1-KRAB domain with CENP-B DB to centromeres specifically decreased centromeric transcription and weakened centromeric cohesion. Thus, based on these findings, we propose that a major function of centromeric transcription is to maintain centromeric cohesion in human cells.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1768-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojiao Fan ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Yuwei Zhu ◽  
Liwen Niu ◽  
Maikun Teng ◽  
...  

The SaeR/S two-component regulatory system is essential for controlling the expression of many virulence factors inStaphylococcus aureus. SaeR, a member of the OmpR/PhoB family, is a response regulator with an N-terminal regulatory domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain. In order to elucidate how SaeR binds to the promoter regions of target genes, the crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of SaeR (SaeRDBD) was solved at 2.5 Å resolution. The structure reveals that SaeRDBDexists as a monomer and has the canonical winged helix–turn–helix module. EMSA experiments suggested that full-length SaeR can bind to the P1 promoter and that the binding affinity is higher than that of its C-terminal DNA-binding domain. Five key residues on the winged helix–turn–helix module were verified to be important for binding to the P1 promoterin vitroand for the physiological function of SaeRin vivo.


2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 5019-5031 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Fredericks ◽  
Kasirajan Ayyanathan ◽  
Meenhard Herlyn ◽  
Josh R. Friedman ◽  
Frank J. Rauscher

ABSTRACT The t(2;13) chromosomal translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma tumors (ARMS) creates an oncogenic transcriptional activator by fusion of PAX3 DNA binding motifs to a COOH-terminal activation domain derived from the FKHR gene. The dominant oncogenic potential of the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein is dependent on the FKHR activation domain. We have fused the KRAB repression module to the PAX3 DNA binding domain as a strategy to suppress the activity of the PAX3-FKHR oncogene. The PAX3-KRAB protein bound PAX3 target DNA sequences and repressed PAX3-dependent reporter plasmids. Stable expression of the PAX3-KRAB protein in ARMS cell lines resulted in loss of the ability of the cells to grow in low-serum or soft agar and to form tumors in SCID mice. Stable expression of a PAX3-KRAB mutant, which lacks repression function, or a KRAB protein alone, lacking a PAX3 DNA binding domain, failed to suppress the ARMS malignant phenotype. These data suggest that the PAX3-KRAB repressor functions as a DNA-binding-dependent suppressor of the transformed phenotype of ARMS cells, probably via competition with the endogenous PAX3-FKHR oncogene and repression of target genes required for ARMS tumorigenesis. The engineered repressor approach that directs a transcriptional repression domain to target genes deregulated by the PAX3-FKHR oncogene may be a useful strategy to identify the target genes critical for ARMS tumorigenesis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 452 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Yamazaki ◽  
Jun-ichi Suehiro ◽  
Hideki Miyazaki ◽  
Takashi Minami ◽  
Tatsuhiki Kodama ◽  
...  

The COUP-TFII (chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II) nuclear receptor, which is composed of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain, exerts pleiotropic effects on development and cell differentiation by regulating the transcription of its target genes, including Cyp7a1 (cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily a, polypeptide 1), which plays important roles in catabolism of cholesterol in the liver. Although multiple variants of COUP-TFII exist, their roles in the regulation of Cyp7a1 expression have not been elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the roles of COUP-TFII-V2 (variant 2), which lacks a DNA-binding domain, in the regulation of the transcriptional control of the Cyp7a1 gene by COUP-TFII in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. We found that COUP-TFII-V2 was significantly expressed in Huh7 cells, in which Cyp7a1 was not expressed. Furthermore, knockdown of COUP-TFII-V2 enhanced endogenous Cyp7a1 expression in Huh7 cells. Although COUP-TFII activates the Cyp7a1 promoter through direct binding to DNA, this activation was affected by COUP-TFII-V2, which physically interacted with COUP-TFII and inhibited its DNA-binding ability. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that COUP-TFII-V2 inhibited the binding of endogenous COUP-TFII to the intact Cyp7a1 promoter. The results of the present study suggest that COUP-TFII-V2 negatively regulates the function of COUP-TFII by inhibiting its binding to DNA to decrease Cyp7a1 expression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document