THE AGE OF MONAZITE AT THE GARNET ISOGRAD IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN PIEDMONT OF PENNSYLVANIA: FURTHER EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF AN INVERTED METAMORPHIC GRADIENT BELOW THE EMBREEVILLE THRUST

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howell Bosbyshell ◽  
◽  
Andrew C. Ford
1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 686-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Alcock ◽  
Mary Emma Wagner

Interpretation of the early Paleozoic tectonic history of the Appalachian Piedmont is commonly complicated by post-Taconian deformation that has disrupted and obscured early Paleozoic structure. Blocks that lie between zones where later deformation has been concentrated, however, may preserve evidence of Taconian high-grade metamorphism. In these cases, analysis of metamorphism allows an interpretation of the early Paleozoic tectonic history of the block and its surrounding region. A block of this type in the Pennsylvania–Delaware Piedmont includes three tectonic units: (1) the basement-cored massifs of southeastern Pennsylvania with Grenvillian gneiss unconformably overlain by the Setters Formation and Cockeysville Marble; (2) the Wilmington Complex arc terrane; and (3) the Wissahickon Group and associated metaigneous rocks. A metamorphic gradient and inferred temperature inversion within the Wissahickon Group and a metamorphic discontinuity at the Wissahickon Group–Cockeysville Marble contact are used to establish that the Wilmington Complex was first joined with the Wissahickon Group and that the two units were then emplaced together onto the rocks now exposed in the massifs. An observed correlation of amphibolite-facies mineral assemblages in the Cockeysville Marble with their distance from the Wissahickon Group indicates that peak metamorphism of the marble occurred after the metapelites were emplaced. As amphibolite-facies metamorphism of the basement-cored massifs has been previously dated as Taconian, it follows that the assembly of these tectonic units occurred in the early Paleozoic.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Bailey ◽  
◽  
Hope J. Duke ◽  
Zachary Foster-Baril ◽  
Daniel F. Stockli

SEG Discovery ◽  
2007 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Michel Gauthier ◽  
Sylvain Trépanier ◽  
Stephen Gardoll

ABSTRACT One hundred years after the first gold discoveries in the Abitibi subprovince, the Archean James Bay region to the north is experiencing a major exploration boom. Poor geologic coverage in this part of the northeastern Superior province has hindered the application of traditional Abitibi exploration criteria such as crustal-scale faults and “Timiskaming-type” sedimentary rocks. New area selection criteria are needed for successful greenfield exploration in this frontier region, and the use of steep metamorphic gradients is presented as a possible alternative. The statistical robustness of the metamorphic gradient area selection criterion was confirmed by using the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to estimate the correlation between metamorphic fronts and the distribution of known Abitibi orogenic gold producers. The criterion was then applied to the James Bay region during a first-pass craton-scale exploration program. This was part of the strategy that led to the discovery of the Eleonore multimillion-ounce gold deposit in 2004.


SEG Discovery ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Jim Saunders ◽  
Mark Steltenpohl ◽  
Robert B. Cook

ABSTRACT: The discovery and production of gold from epithermal and volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in the Carolina slate belt of the southern Appalachians perhaps have overshadowed the gold potential of orogenic gold deposits in relatively higher grade metamorphic terranes of the southern Appalachian Piedmont. There has been a limited amount of exploration in the non-Carolina slate belt southern Appalachians since the early 1980s. Here we describe some of the recent exploration activity and geology of gold occurrences in the most productive part of the Alabama Piedmont, including the Goldville and Devil’s Backbone districts. In this area, there is a strong geochemical association of gold and arsenic in bedrock, saprolite, and soils, which reflects the mineralogical association of gold with arsenian pyrite and arsenopyrite in mineralized zones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document