EVOLVING VIEWS OF AVALONIA IN SOUTHEASTERN NEW ENGLAND: PERSPECTIVES FROM EDIACARAN CAMBRIDGE "ARGILLITE", EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.D. Thompson ◽  
◽  
J.L. Crowley
2019 ◽  
pp. 141-181
Author(s):  
James N. Stanford

This is the first of two chapters (Chapters 6 and 7) that analyze fieldwork results in eastern Massachusetts. This chapter analyzes the eastern Massachusetts “Hub” region as a whole, providing a statistical overview of speakers interviewed in the Dartmouth-based fieldwork in this area. It examines the results in terms of major traditional Eastern New England dialect features, including Linear Mixed Effects regression modeling in terms of phonetic environments and social factors like age, gender, social class, and ethnicity. The chapter also plots these dialect features in terms of speakers’ birth year and other factors, showing how these features are changing over time.


1927 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-2

The iron industry in New England was nearly contemporaneous with the settlement of eastern Massachusetts, but for upwards of a hundred years it was confined to the bog ore found in marshes near Lynn and a few other places. By the time of the Revolutionary War, iron foundries were firmly established in the New England States.


2019 ◽  
pp. 182-208
Author(s):  
James N. Stanford

This is the second of two chapters (Chapters 6 and 7) that analyze the Dartmouth-based fieldwork data in eastern Massachusetts. This chapter “zooms in” to focus on particular subgroups within the Hub data set. First, the chapter provides statistical and graphical comparisons of traditional New England dialect features by contrasting two nearby groups: White speakers in the traditional working-class South Boston neighborhood, and Black/African American speakers in nearby Dorchester, Hyde Park, and other neighborhoods. The chapter concludes with a fieldwork project in Cape Cod. In each case, the chapter provides detailed plots of dialect features and statistical analyses with respect to age, gender, social class, ethnicity, and other factors


1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-262
Author(s):  
Clayton W. Ogg ◽  
John W. Green

Growth in residential land use is a relatively visible and permanent change taking place in communities across Massachusetts and in many parts of New England. These changes have generated considerable public concern and have been the subject of professional study by several disciplines.


1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 898-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. Schutts ◽  
A. Brecher ◽  
P. M. Hurley ◽  
C. W. Montgomery ◽  
H. W. Krueger

It appears that a hydrothermal alteration and development of magnetite is largely responsible for a paleomagnetic resetting in a belt of mafic–intermediate rocks in eastern Massachusetts. The age of this thermal and metasomatic event is found to be about 370 m.y. by both geochronological and paleomagnetic evidence. This age does not coincide with the emplacement of plutons within the region (600 and 450 m.y.), nor with the 340 m.y. uplift and cooling shown by K–Ar ages on biotites.The age and tentative pole position obtained favour the hypothesis that an eastern region in New England and Maritime Canada comprised a single block in the Devonian that was separate from North America at that time, and fits the polar wanderpath of North Africa.


1924 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
William W. Porter

Summary An earthquake occurred on the morning of January 7, 1925. It was felt in eastern Massachusetts, and adjacent parts of Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Maine. Distance from Harvard seismograph forty-five kilometers. Epicentral area thought to be near Cape Ann. Not felt at sea. Closely related to an earthquake area in northeast Massachusetts. Radius of periphery of disturbed area from epicentral area,—maximum seventy-five miles, minimum fifty miles. Maximum intensity barely V, Rossi-Forel Scale.


1981 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1248-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Hurley ◽  
C. K. Shearer

A clustering of paleomagnetic poles for rock units of mid-Paleozoic (ca. 400 Ma) age in eastern New England indicates that a variety of lithologic types may be used to obtain virtual geomagnetic poles (VGP's) in an igneous–metamorphic terrain. These rock types include chilled margins of basaltic dikes or narrow dikes, hydrothermal alterations such as epidote veinlets, mafic rocks reset by low-grade metamorphism, and hypabyssal igneous bodies, particularly where there is evidence of hydrothermal activity.The results suggest the approach to be followed to obtain valid VGP's in similar geological belts in the Precambrian. The remanence directions in Devonian and Mississippian rock units in eastern Massachusetts and southern and northern Maine are close to other determinations of similar age within the Maritime block, demonstrating the potential usefulness of the procedures.


2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-538
Author(s):  
Peggy Kasten

Building Regional Capacity (BRC) is an NSF-funded professional development institute for grades 7—12 mathematics teachers, department heads, mathematics coordinators, and other present or future teacher leaders from around New England. Its chief focus is leadership in designing and delivering quality professional development. BRC was developed at the Education Development Center (EDC) and is a collaboration among EDC, the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UMass Lowell), and the Eastern Massachusetts Association of Mathematics Department Heads.


1973 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sprague de Camp

The following transcriptions were made from tape recordings of the speech of two natives of Greater Boston, reading ‘The North Wind and the Sun’ followed by a sentence composed to illustrate the distinctive New England distribution of low vowels. In each transcription, [aː] varies from cardinal to []; [ɑ] is about cardinal; [ɒː] varies from cardinal to ; the [o] in ‘o#x0259;, oɹ] ranges from to . Whereas [ɒː] and [oə] are kept quite distinct, as are [aː] and [ɑ], [ɑ] and [ɒː] are close together, overlap, and are not kept rigorously separate, [a] in [aɩ, aɷ] = [] or ; the first speaker uses a more advanced and the second speaker a more retracted variety. Diphthongization of [eɩ], [oɷ] is only slight, and the first element of [oɷ] is near cardinal and well-rounded. [œ] is a lightly-rounded , about like French [ə].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document