AB0306 The influence of the definition of patient global assessment in assessment of ACR/eular remission and minimal disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: A 3-month cohort study in patients starting etanercept

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 655.2-655
Author(s):  
M. Boers ◽  
Y. Brault ◽  
I. Logeart ◽  
M. Dougados
2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2326-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXIME DOUGADOS ◽  
MAHAUT RIPERT ◽  
PASCAL HILLIQUIN ◽  
PATRICE FARDELLONE ◽  
OLIVIER BROCQ ◽  
...  

Objective.Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the 4 items included in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for evaluation of activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the influence of the use of 3 different techniques of PGA on the assessment of disease activity.Methods.We evaluated 3 different DAS28 according to the technique of PGA in 108 patients with active RA before and after 12 weeks of etanercept therapy.Results.The reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation) between screening and baseline was very high and similar for the 3 DAS28. The percentage of patients in the different states of disease (from remission to higher disease activity) and the sensitivity to change across the 3 DAS28 scales were very similar.Conclusion.The different techniques of collection of PGA to be included in the DAS calculation yield similar results. However, an accepted, unequivocal technique should be encouraged in order to reduce heterogeneity in scoring DAS among patients with RA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE A. WELLS ◽  
MAARTEN BOERS ◽  
TRACY LI ◽  
PETER S. TUGWELL

Objective.To validate the definitions of minimal disease activity (MDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare abatacept to control with respect to patients attaining a state of MDA.Methods.Two randomized controlled trials comparing abatacept to control in patients with RA were considered: ATTAIN and AIM. Core set measures, Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28), and, for AIM, radiographic scores were available. The core set and DAS-based definitions for MDA were calculated and the number of patients in the treatment groups meeting the definitions was compared to determine sensitivity of the criteria to treatment differences and patient severity. The number of times achieving MDA was compared to the change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and for the AIM study compared to change in radiographic scores.Results.For both definitions of MDA, the change in radiographic scores showed a continual decrease in progression the more often a patient was in MDA. The change in HAQ, for both studies, showed a similar consistent improvement — the longer a patient was in MDA, then the better the HAQ score. Significantly more patients in the abatacept group met the core set and DAS-based definition of MDA than in the control group.Conclusion.The presence and persistence of MDA was associated with slowing of radiographic progression and improvement in the HAQ, providing support for discriminative and predictive validity of the measure. The MDA results were consistent with other efficacy analyses indicating a treatment advantage for abatacept.


Author(s):  
G. Carretero ◽  
J.M. Carrascosa ◽  
L. Puig ◽  
J.L. Sánchez‐Carazo ◽  
A. López‐Ferrer ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mie Fusama ◽  
Yasushi Miura ◽  
Kumiko Yukioka ◽  
Takanori Kuroiwa ◽  
Chikako Yukioka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Strand ◽  
Jeffrey Kaine ◽  
Rieke Alten ◽  
Gene Wallenstein ◽  
Annette Diehl ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson’s Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients. Results Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients. Conclusions This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients’ perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document