scholarly journals Canakinumab treatment for patients with active recurrent or chronic TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS): an open-label, phase II study

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Gattorno ◽  
Laura Obici ◽  
Marco Cattalini ◽  
Vincent Tormey ◽  
Ken Abrams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor ◽  
Periodic Syndrome ◽  
Primary Efficacy Variable ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Long Term Treatment

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of canakinumab, a high-affinity human monoclonal anti-interleukin-1β antibody, in inducing complete or almost complete responses in patients with active tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS).MethodsTwenty patients (aged 7–78 years) with active recurrent or chronic TRAPS were treated with canakinumab 150 mg every 4 weeks for 4 months (2 mg/kg for those ≤40 kg) in this open-label, proof-of-concept, phase II study. Canakinumab was then withdrawn for up to 5 months, with reintroduction on relapse, and 4 weekly administration (subsequently increased to every 8 weeks) for 24 months. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving complete or almost complete response at day 15, defined as clinical remission (Physician's Global Assessment score ≤1) and full or partial serological remission.ResultsNineteen patients (19/20, 95%; 95% CI 75.1% to 99.9%) achieved the primary efficacy variable. Responses to canakinumab occurred rapidly; median time to clinical remission 4 days (95% CI 3 to 8 days). All patients relapsed after canakinumab was withdrawn; median time to relapse 91.5 days (95% CI 65 to 117 days). On reintroduction of canakinumab, clinical and serological responses were similar to those seen during the first phase, and were sustained throughout treatment. Canakinumab was well tolerated and clinical responses were accompanied by rapid and sustained improvement in health-related quality of life. Weight normalised pharmacokinetics of canakinumab, although limited, appeared to be consistent with historical canakinumab data.ConclusionsCanakinumab induces rapid disease control in patients with active TRAPS, and clinical benefits are sustained during long-term treatment.Trial registration numberNCT01242813; Results.

A Phase II Study of Intravenous Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes NCT00384956.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1451-1451
Author(s):  
Richard Walgren ◽  
Crystal Dao ◽  
Frederieke Kreisel ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Camille Abboud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Erythroid Response

Abstract Rationale: 5-Azacytidine (Aza), a DNA hypomethylating agent, has now been shown in 2 clinical trials involving high-risk MDS patients to provide a survival benefit over supportive/conventional care regimens. While one phase II study used a continuous 7-day IV infusion, Aza was administered subcutaneously (SQ) in most pre-approval studies. However, injection site reactions are not uncommon with SQ dosing, especially in thrombocytopenic patients. Aza given as a short intravenous (IV) infusion is anticipated to be efficacious from pharmacokinetic profiling and is FDA approved, but prospective efficacy data for short IV infusion are lacking. Study aim and design: To determine the efficacy of IV Aza when given as a short infusion, we have undertaken an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study of Aza in patients with MDS, either de novo or secondary, defined by FAB classification. Previously treated subjects were ineligible if they had already received Aza or decitabine. Treatment consisted of Aza 75 mg/m2 given as a 20 minute IV infusion once daily on Days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle. Response was evaluated by IWG 2000 criteria. After two cycles at the 75 mg/m2 dose, patients failing to achieve a CR were eligible for an increased dose of 100 mg/m2. After 6 cycles of therapy, patients must have demonstrated at least a hematologic improvement to continue on study. Study endpoints include determination of the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, and secondary endpoints examined the rates of hematological improvement, time to progression, and cytogenetic response. Results: Accrual began 8/17/06 with a target of 21 subjects. As of 7/31/07, 15 subjects have accrued with a median follow-up of 77 days (range 4 to 246). Subjects consisted of 9 males and 6 females with a median age of 69.6 yr (range 53 to 82). The median time from diagnosis is 213 days (range 0 days to 4 yr). By FAB criteria, subjects consist of 4 RA, 9 RAEB, 1 RAEB-t, and 1 CMML, and subjects are categorized by IPSS risk as 1 Low, 4 Int-1, and 10 Int-2. Two patients had therapy related MDS. The data remain preliminary with subjects having completed a mean of 3 cycles (range 1 to 6). None of the 5 subjects who have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy have achieved a CR. However, 2 (40%) of these subjects achieved a PR. Additionally, 1 (20%) patient had a major erythroid response, while another had a minor erythroid response. Median time to response was 2 months. Ten subjects remain on study, 1 patient withdrew due to progressive disease (in first week of therapy), and 4 deaths have occurred on study (2 due to sepsis, 1 each due to pneumonia and acute MI). No deaths were attributed to study drug. Common adverse events include nausea, emesis, and hematologic toxicities. Grade 2–3 nausea and grade 2–3 emesis each occurred in 5 subjects. Observed grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included: anemia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), leukopenia (n=3), neutropenia (n=7), and febrile neutropenia (n=1). Hematologic toxicities have resulted in transient treatment delays (< 4 weeks) and dose reduction, but hematologic toxicities have not prevented subsequent treatment on study. Conclusions: Although follow-up is short for assessment of efficacy, this is the first prospective study to report on efficacy and toxicity of short infusional Aza in the treatment of MDS.

scholarly journals Phase II study of metronomic treatment with daily oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy: VinoMetro—AGO-B-046

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slavomir Krajnak ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Lukas Schollenberger ◽  
Christian Rosé ◽  
Christian Ruckes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is an increasingly used treatment option in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after failure of endocrine-based therapies. Methods VinoMetro was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study of metronomic oral vinorelbine (VRL; 30 mg/day) as a first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC after endocrine failure. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 weeks. Results Between January 2017 and April 2019, nine patients were enrolled. The CBR was 22.2% (90% confidence interval [CI] 4.1–55.0), p = 0.211. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 weeks (95% CI 11.3–12.7). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.2% of patients. One patient died of febrile neutropenia. Conclusion VinoMetro (AGO-B-046) was closed early after nine patients and occurrence of one grade 5 toxicity in agreement with the lead institutional review board (IRB). Metronomic dosing of oral VRL in HR+/HER2− MBC as first-line CT after failure of endocrine therapies showed only limited benefit in this population. Trial registration number and date of registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007992; December 15, 2016.

An open-label single-arm phase II study of regorafenib for the treatment of angiosarcoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
Brian Schulte ◽  
Steven Robinson ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Kevin Kozak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Open Label

scholarly journals Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin as first-line therapy for advanced squamous NSCLC patients: a prospective randomized international phase II study (NAVoTrial 03)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110229
Author(s):  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Piotr Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Marion Ferreira ◽  
Grzegorz Czyżewicz ◽  
Dariusz Kowalski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Objective: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-cisplatin (OV-CDDP) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GEM-CDDP) in patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter, international phase II study that enrolled untreated patients with advanced sq-NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either 60–80 mg/m2 OV days 1 and 8 in combination with 80 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm A) or 1250 mg/m2 GEM days 1 and 8 in combination with 75 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm B). After four cycles, patients without disease progression continued maintenance dose of OV or GEM until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 114 patients with sq-NSCLC were randomized, and 113 were treated (57 in arm A and 56 in arm B). DCR was high in both arms: 73.7% (95%CI: 62.4–100.0) in arm A and 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7–100.0) in arm B. Median PFS and TTF were similar in arm A and B 4.2 and 2.8 months, and 4.3 and 3.1 months, respectively. Even though the difference was not significant, the OS was 10.2 for arm A and 8.4 months for arm B. The safety profiles were consistent with the current knowledge of adverse events. QoL results revealed an improvement in patients under OV treatment. Conclusion: The OV-CDDP combination showed comparable efficacy to GEM-CDDP with acceptable safety profile and enhanced patients’ QoL. Trial registration: The study was registered under EudraCT number 2012-003531-40.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document