scholarly journals SAT0075 Does early remission lead to better 5-year outcomes than low disease activity? results from the real life nor-dmard study

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Norvang ◽  
IC Olsen ◽  
E Lie ◽  
EK Kristianslund ◽  
TK Kvien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
The Real

Is Treat-to-target in Lupus Nephritis Realistic in Clinical Practice?

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Chiu Mok
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Activity State ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Comparative Trials

The Treat-to-Target (T2T) principle has been advocated in a number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory medical illnesses. Tight control of disease activity has been shown to improve the outcome of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis as compared to the conventional approach. However, whether T2T can be applied to patients with lupus nephritis is still under emerging discussion. Treatment of lupus nephritis should target at inducing and maintaining remission of the kidney inflammation so as to preserve renal function and improve survival in the longterm. However, there is no universal agreement on the definition of remission or low disease activity state of nephritis, as well as the time points for switching of therapies. Moreover, despite the availability of objective parameters for monitoring such as proteinuria and urinary sediments, differentiation between ongoing activity and damage in some patients with persistent urinary abnormalities remains difficult without a renal biopsy. A large number of serum and urinary biomarkers have been tested in lupus nephritis but none of them have been validated for routine clinical use. In real life practice, therapeutic options for lupus nephritis are limited. As patients with lupus nephritis are more prone to infective complications, tight disease control with aggressive immunosuppressive therapies may have safety concern. Not until the feasibility, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of T2T in lupus nephritis is confirmed by comparative trials, this approach should not be routinely recommended with the current treatment armamentarium and monitoring regimes.

scholarly journals SAT0204 LUPUS LOW-DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE VS SLE RESPONDER INDEX IN A “REAL-LIFE” SETTING

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez ◽  
Valentina Canti ◽  
Lucia Moiola ◽  
Marco Magnoni ◽  
Patrizia Rovere-Querini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Activity State

scholarly journals Ideal target for psoriatic arthritis? Comparison of remission and low disease activity states in a real-life cohort

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonieke J J van Mens ◽  
Marleen G H van de Sande ◽  
Arno W R van Kuijk ◽  
Dominique Baeten ◽  
Laura C Coates
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Skin Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Low Disease Activity

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) recommendations state that the target of treatment should be remission or low disease activity (LDA). We used a real-life dataset to compare different potential targets.Methods250 patients with PsA considered in an acceptable disease state according to their rheumatologist were included. Targets for remission were the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission (≤4), very low disease activity (VLDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score ≤1.9. LDA targets analysed were the DAPSA ≤14, cDAPSA ≤13, minimal disease activity (MDA) and adjusted MDA targets: MDAjoints with both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) mandated, MDAskin (psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) mandated) and MDAjoints&skin with TJC, SJC and PASI mandated.ResultsComparison of the several candidate targets demonstrates that VLDA is achieved by the lowest proportion of patients and includes patients with the lowest residual disease activity compared with the other remission targets. The modified MDA measures are the most stringent targets for LDA in terms of residual disease on joints, psoriasis and enthesitis within patients achieving the target. In both remission and LDA, the inclusion of C reactive protein did not show an added value. The exclusion of a skin domain, as in the DAPSA measures, resulted in negligence of skin disease and a negative impact on the quality of life in some patients.ConclusionsThe different remission and LDA targets show us significant overlap between measures, but these measures targeting the same definition do differ in terms of allowance of residual disease. Inclusion of laboratory markers seems unnecessary, although exclusion of a skin domain may result in psoriasis not being assessed resulting in residual impactful skin disease.

Performance of SLE responder index and lupus low disease activity state in real life: A prospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1752-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe A. Ramirez ◽  
Valentina Canti ◽  
Lucia Moiola ◽  
Marco Magnoni ◽  
Patrizia Rovere‐Querini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Activity State

Early clinical response predicts low disease activity at one year in rheumatoid arthritis patients on treatment with certolizumab in real-life settings. An appraisal of the Italian registry GISEA

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florenzo Iannone ◽  
Giorgio Carlino ◽  
Antonio Marchesoni ◽  
Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini ◽  
Roberto Gorla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Glucocorticoid withdrawal in systemic lupus erythematosus: are remission and low disease activity reliable starting points for stopping treatment? A real-life experience

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Tani ◽  
Elena Elefante ◽  
Viola Signorini ◽  
Dina Zucchi ◽  
Valentina Lorenzoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Asian Pacific

ObjectivesTo evaluate the proportion of patients who have successfully withdrawn glucocorticoids (GCs) in a longitudinal cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over a period of 6 years; to evaluate patient characteristics during GC withdrawal in relation to existing definitions of remission and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS); and to evaluate the occurrence of flares after GC withdrawal.MethodsPatients who attempted GC withdrawal were identified for the cohort, and the following information was assessed during withdrawal attempts: date of last disease flare, disease activity and damage and ongoing treatment. Information regarding the occurrence of disease flares after GC withdrawal was also recorded for patients who successfully stopped treatment.Definitions of remission were applied to GC withdrawal in line with European consensus criteria (Definitions of remission in SLE [DORIS]) and LLDAS in line with the Asian Pacific Lupus Consortium definition.Results148 patients were involved in the study; GC withdrawal was attempted in 91 patients (61.5%) with 77 patients (84.6%) successfully stopping GCs. At the beginning of the GC reduction, the majority of patients were in complete or clinical remission (48.9% and 39.6%, respectively). Disease activity was significantly lower in patients who successfully stopped GCs, and the proportion of patients in complete remission was higher (54.2%) with respect to patients who failed in their attempt. Among patients who stopped GCs, 18 flares were recorded after a median of 1 year. The time period since the last flare was shorter in patients who experienced flares with respect to patients who did not flare (mean 0.93 years vs 6.0, p<0.001).ConclusionsGC withdrawal is an achievable goal in SLE and may be attempted after a long-term remission or LLDAS to protect the patient from disease flares.

scholarly journals Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data from the St. Gallen and Aarau Cohorts

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mueller ◽  
Hasler ◽  
Popp ◽  
Mattow ◽  
Durmisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Liver Enzymes ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Low Disease Activity

: Introduction: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib have been shown in several randomized clinical trials. The study presented here aimed to assess the clinical tolerability and effectiveness of tofacitinib among RA patients in real life. Methods: Consecutive patients between January 2015 and April 2017 with RA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria were included in a prospectively designed analysis of retrospective data. Patients were initiated on tofacitinib 5 mg bid. The primary objective was to analyze the safety of tofacitinib in a real-life cohort. Safety was assessed by the reasons to stop tofacitinib during follow up and changes of liver enzymes, hemoglobin, and creatinine. The secondary outcome was to analyze the frequency of and time to achieve low disease activity (LDA) and remission as defined by 28 joint count disease activity score (DAS28). Results: A total of 144 patients were treated with tofacitinib. A total of 84.9% of patients were pre-exposed to at least one biological agent. The average DAS28 at the initiation of tofacitinib was 4.43. A total of 50.0% of patients were positive for rheumatoid factor and 49.0% for ACPA. The mean follow up was 1.22 years (range 10d–3.7a) after initiation of tofacitinib treatment. A total of 94 (64.4%) patients remained on tofacitinib during follow-up. The average time to stop tofacitinib was 190.0 days. Reasons to stop tofacitinib were: insufficient response (n = 23), gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 18), infection (n = 5), myalgia (n = 2), remission (n = 2), headache (n = 2), cough, blue finger syndrome, intolerance, heartburn, psoriasis, and increased liver enzymes (all n = 1). Increased alanine amino transferase (ALAT) or aspartate amino transferase (ASAT) > 2× upper limit of normal (ULN) were detected in 3.3% and 4.4% of patients, respectively. Hemoglobin decrease of >10% was detected in 15.1% of the patients and decreased lymphocytes <500/μL in 3.4%. An increase of creatinine >20% was detected in 9.4% of patients. A total of 62.9% and 50.0% of the patients achieved low disease activity (LDA) or remission after a median of 319 and 645 days, respectively. These rates were significantly higher in patients naïve to biologic agents as compared to patients pre-exposed to biologics (LDA: naïve 100% 92 d, pre-exposed 57.0% 434 d, p ≤ 0.001; remission: naïve 86.7% 132 d, pre-exposed 44.1%, 692 d, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Tofacitinib is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with RA. Tofacitinib may induce high rates of LDA and remission in patients with active disease, even after the use of one or more biologics, though the rate appeared higher in patients naïve to biologics. Tofacitinib may be a valuable option in a treat-to-target approach. Our data demonstrate that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are safe and efficacious in real life patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document