THU0208 Effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritispatients after failure to antitnf or naÏve patients in real world setting. one year follow-up experience

Abstract Introduction Ibrutinib is the only once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor with significant survival benefit vs chemo- and /or immunotherapy in multiple phase 3 studies of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It has profoundly changed the treatment landscape of CLL with the longest follow-up. However, seven years (yrs) after ibrutinib was approved in Italy by regulatory agencies for CLL treatment, available data on the patterns of care of such pts in the setting of clinical practice is limited. Herein we present the first interim analysis (IA) of EVIdeNCE (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03720561), a multicenter, observational clinical study designed to describe the current management of pts receiving ibrutinib in real-world setting in Italy in terms of retention rate: the study's primary end point. Methods EVIDENCE 312 treatment-naïve (TN) 38% and relapsed/refractory (R/R) 62% pts with CLL according to the iwCLL diagnosis criteria observed at 39 Italian hematological institutions in the period between November 2018 and October 2019. Inclusion criteria were treatment with ibrutinib according to the European Summary of Product Characteristics as per routine clinical practice started within the previous 3 months. The purpose of this IA is to provide demographics and disease characteristics at baseline and a preliminary evaluation of ibrutinib retention rate after one year of follow-up, along with its safety profile. Results The median age of pts at the time of ibrutinib initiation was 71.0 yrs (range 41.0-89.0), with 60% ≥70 yrs, 63.2% male, and 90% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance 0-1. Baseline Rai stage 0-I, II, and III-IV accounted for 18.3%, 29.7% and 52.1% pts, respectively. Patients in stage IV were observed in 40% of the R/R and 27% in TN subgroup. Considering 120 pts with known mutational status, del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation were present in 50.0% of pts (TN=52.1%, R/R=48.6%), while IGHV was unmutated in 35.0% (TN=33.3% and R/R=36.15) and mutated in 15.0% (TN=14.6%, R/R=15.3%). At baseline, 62.9% of pts had comorbidities and 30.6% presented with a history of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). A CIRS score ≥6 was observed in 28.5% of pts. The median time from CLL diagnosis to the start of ibrutinib was 5.1 yrs (TN 1.75 yrs vs R/R 7.27 yrs). At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade was experienced by 70.7% of pts. Frequencies were as follows: infections (30.8%; COVID-19 infections 3.2%), arthralgia (10.8%), neutropenia (9.3%), fatigue (8.4%), diarrhea (7.7%), atrial fibrillation (7.4%; grade 3-4, 4.2%), fever (7.1%), rash (6.4%), anemia (6.1%) and hypertension (4.2%). Mild bleeding TEAEs were reported in 16.1% of pts with no major bleeding event. TEAEs were more frequent in the elderly (≥65 yrs) while no significant differences in the rate of TEAEs were recorded in TN and R/R pts (69.7% vs 71.4%, respectively). Serious TEAEs were reported in 21.9% of pts. Overall in intention to treat (ITT), 32 deaths (10%) were observed (TN=8, R/R=24). The most common causes of death were infections (3.5%) and progressive disease (PD) (1.9%). Permanent discontinuation was observed in 56 (18%) of the pts (TN=17.2%, R/R=18.7%) and it mostly occurred within the first 6 months. Main causes of discontinuation were toxicity (6.1%), PD (3.8%) or death (3.5%). Temporary interruptions (≤ 3 months without therapy and/or dose modifications) during the whole observation period occurred in 30.3% (TN=35.3%, R/R=27.2%) and 37.7% (TN=37.5%, R/R=37.8%) of pts, respectively, mainly determined by toxicity and clinical judgment. Finally, in this first IA after 17.3 months (range 1.1 - 27.0) median follow-up, the ibrutinib retention rate (calculated as the ratio between the number of patients who retained ibrutinib treatment over the total number of patients at risk) at 1-year was 81.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77.2% - 86.1%] with no difference between TN 83.2% (95% CI, 75.2% - 89.4%) and R/R 81.2% pts (95% CI, 74.9% - 86.4%). Conclusions EVIDENCE is the first real-world study of ibrutinib use in CLL clinical practice in Italy. Ibrutinib retention rate at one-year suggests a better knowledge and expertise of hematologists in the management of ibrutinib-related toxicities that may result in an improved long-term outcome of pts with CLL. Disclosures Molica: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Honoraria. Scarfo: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants. Murru: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel and accommodation; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sportoletti: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Frigeri: Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Sanna: Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Coscia: Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Reda: Abbvie: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Tafuri: Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Grugnetti: Janssen: Current Employment. Magarotto: Janssen: Current Employment. Mauro: Tskeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Real-World Clinical Outcomes Associated with Canagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: The Real-Wecan Study

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9072275 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. 2275

Author(s):

Juan J. Gorgojo-Martínez ◽

Manuel A. Gargallo-Fernández ◽

Alba Galdón Sanz-Pastor ◽

Teresa Antón-Bravo ◽

Miguel Brito-Sanfiel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Real World ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Baseline Hba1c ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Antihyperglycemic Therapy ◽

The Mean ◽

Hba1c Levels

The aims of this multicentric retrospective study were to assess in a real-world setting the effectiveness and safety of canagliflozin 100 mg/d (CANA100) as an add-on to the background antihyperglycemic therapy, and to evaluate the intensification of prior sodium–glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) therapy by switching to canagliflozin 300 mg/d (CANA300) in patients with T2DM. One cohort of SGLT2i-naïve patients with T2DM who were initiated on CANA100 and a second cohort of patients with prior background SGLT-2i therapy who switched to CANA300 were included in the study. The primary outcome of the study was the mean change in HbA1c over the follow-up time. In total, 583 patients were included—279 in the cohort of CANA100 (HbA1c 8.05%, weight 94.9 kg) and 304 in the cohort of CANA300 (HbA1c 7.51%, weight 92.0 kg). Median follow-up periods in both cohorts were 9.1 and 15.4 months respectively. CANA100 was associated to significant reductions in HbA1c (−0.90%) and weight (−4.1 kg) at the end of the follow-up. In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 9.25%), CANA100 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.51%. In the second cohort, patients switching to CANA300 experienced a significant decrease in HbA1c (−0.35%) and weight (−2.1 kg). In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 8.94%), CANA300 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.12%. There were significant improvements in blood pressure in both cohorts. No unexpected adverse events were reported. In summary, CANA100 (as an add-on therapy) and CANA300 (switching from prior SGLT-2i therapy) significantly improved several cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM.

Download Full-text

Prognostic implications of DPP-4 inhibitor vs. sulfonylurea use on top of metformin in a real world setting - results of the 1 year follow-up of the prospective DiaRegis registry

International Journal of Clinical Practice ◽

10.1111/ijcp.12179 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 67 (10) ◽

pp. 1005-1014 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

A. K. Gitt ◽

P. Bramlage ◽

C. Binz ◽

M. Krekler ◽

E. Deeg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Prognostic Implications

Download Full-text

Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant stroke: Quality of life and caregiver’s burden in a real-world setting

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery ◽

10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106168 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 197 ◽

pp. 106168

Author(s):

Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho ◽

Lucas Braz Gonçalves ◽

Nicholas Falcomer Koetz ◽

Aline Maria Lara Silvestrin ◽

Aderaldo Costa Alves Júnior ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Real World ◽

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Long Term Follow Up

Download Full-text

TCT-350 Safety and Performance of the Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold, Magmaris in a Real World Setting - First 400 Subjects at 12-month Follow-up of the BIOSOLVE-IV Registry

Journal of the American College of Cardiology ◽

10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1499 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 72 (13) ◽

pp. B142-B143

Author(s):

Michael Lee ◽

Adrian Wlodarczak ◽

Johan Bennett ◽

Jan Torzewski ◽

Michael Haude ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Real World Setting ◽

And Performance

Download Full-text

087 Endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) in the elderly. For better or worse in the real world?

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry ◽

10.1136/jnnp-2019-anzan.75 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 90 (e7) ◽

pp. A28.1-A28

Author(s):

Stacey K Jankelowitz ◽

Kylie Tastula ◽

Nicola Mitchell ◽

Patrick Tang ◽

Tim Ang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Stroke Risk ◽

The Elderly ◽

Early Improvement ◽

Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Multicentre Trials ◽

Valve Implantation ◽

Lost To Follow Up

IntroductionAcross multicentre trials ECR is safe and effective in octogenarians. Despite RCT evidence elderly patients may be denied ECR due to perceived poor risk-benefit. We examine impact of age on ECR outcomes and outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cases (where stroke risk is high), in a real world setting.MethodsWe analysed 311 consecutive ECR cases between 2016 and 2019 in 10 year age bands for ECR outcomes including 90 day mRS and mortality. Impact of premorbid function (mRS), NIHSS, recorded co-morbidities, and aetiology was assessed. TAVI case outcomes were examined.ResultsThirty one percent of ECR outcome cases were over 79 years of age; 90 day mortality was 34%; 25% had a 90 day mRS 0–2. Early NIHSS improvement was 5. Ninety-day mortality and mRS 0–2 for 10–19 (n=3), 20–29 (n=2), 30–39 (n=4), 40–49 (n=23), 50–59 (n=27), 60–69 (n=69), 70–79 (n=84),80–89 (n=62) and 90–99 (n=11) years were 0 and 100%, 0 and 100%, 33 and 67%, 4 and 78%, 15 and 52%, 13 and 49%, 17 and 33%, 24 and 2% and 55 and 18%, respectively. There was 9% lost to follow-up.Six TAVI cases had a NIHSS of 8–20 and pre-morbid mRS<3, four with mRS 0. Mean 24 hour NIHSS improvement was 8.ConclusionWithout age exclusions older patients had worse unadjusted outcomes. However, patients over 79 years had clinically important early improvement in NIHSS score and ninety day outcomes were comparable to favourable RCT data and TAVI patients also had early improvement.

Download Full-text

Real World Data In Myeloma: Experiences From The Swedish Population-Based Registry On 2494 Myeloma Patients Diagnosed 2008-2011

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1972.1972 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1972-1972 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Cecilie Blimark ◽

Erik Holmberg ◽

Gunnar Juliusson ◽

Hareth Nahi ◽

Forsberg Karin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Plasma Cell ◽

Real World ◽

Clinical Intervention ◽

Population Based ◽

Plasma Cell Leukemia ◽

Cell Leukemia ◽

First Report ◽

One Year ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction The Swedish Myeloma Registry (SMR) is a prospective observational registry designed to document real-world management and outcomes in newly diagnosed myeloma, with the purpose to improve the quality of the management of patients in Sweden. Population-based registries may provide complementary information on the management of patients to that of clinical intervention trials. With high representation and excellent data quality we can present valuable information in a whole population and reduce the impact of selection on outcome and reduce the subsequent problem with extrapolating data from clinical intervention studies on non-study populations. Methods The registry comprises web-reported data on all patients diagnosed with myeloma, plasmocytoma, and plasma cell leukemia from 2008 in Sweden, at time of diagnosis and after one year of follow-up. Coverage is analyzed through the compulsory Swedish Cancer Registry. Survival is achieved from the Swedish Tax Agency. Missing data are actively requested. This first report contains data on patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2011 with follow-up after one year on patients with symptomatic disease 2008-2010, with a follow-up through the end of 2012. Analyses of incidence, patient characteristics at baseline, proportion of patients given intensive treatment, obtaining very good partial remission (VGPR) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results Clinical data at baseline was available for 2494 patients (96% coverage)and 1- year follow-up data on 1427 patients (90% of all symptomatic cases initially reported), from 70 different centers in Sweden. The age adjusted incidence was 6.5 myeloma cases per 100 000 inhabitants and year. The median age was 70 years for men, and 73 years for women (34% younger than 66 years). At diagnosis, 76% were reported as symptomatic myeloma, 18% as smouldering myeloma, 5% plasmocytoma and 1% plasma cell leukemia. IgG-myeloma was most common (59%), followed by IgA (21%), Bence-Jones (13%), non-secretory (4%), IgD and IgM both less than 1%. Among symptomatic myeloma (n=1910), 76% had osteolytic lesions or compression fractures at diagnosis. Anemia (defined as hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dl) was seen in 33%, impaired kidney function (s-creatinin levels above 173 mmol/l) in 18%, and hypercalcemia in 21% at the time of diagnosis. In patients were ISS was available, 23%, 45% and 32% were in stage I, II, and III, respectively. Previous MGUS was known in 13 % of patients. Overall, 81 % of patients 65 years or younger received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 4% of the elderly population. In the patients aged 65 years and younger, 63% of patients received one of the newer drugs in the first year of treatment, for the patients 66 to 80 years the number was 56%, and 25% of patients above 80 years. Throughout the study period, an increase in VGPR-rate on initial treatment was observed, more pronounced in younger patients (<66 years), from 35% in 2008 to 46% in 2010. For patients >65 years, the VGPR-rate increased from 17 to 27%. After a median of follow-up time of three years, OS was 63%. There was a significant difference in absolute and relative survival between younger and older patients. In symptomatic myeloma, patients 65 years or younger had an expected 3-year survival of 76% and in patients 66 years and above it was 50% (Figure). The relative 3-year survival for patients with asymptomatic patients was 81%. Discussion SMR is an instrument for increased quality in the management of plasma cell neoplasms in Sweden. This first report from the registry shows very high coverage and good adherence to guidelines in all regions of Sweden, both in diagnostics and treatment. A great effort is made to make the SMR complete and to present population-based data on management and outcome in Sweden. Longer follow-up is needed to address the question of the impact of new treatment options on the survival. The registry gives a great opportunity to perform population-based research of high quality based on the acceptance of the registry among treating physicians. Disclosures: Turesson: Celgene Corp: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Impact of Treatment on Overall Survival (OS) in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Report from the Erasme Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5240.5240 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5240-5240

Author(s):

Montserrat Arnan ◽

Rosa Coll ◽

Mar Tormo ◽

José María Bastida ◽

María Calbacho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Who Classification ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Very High

Abstract Introduction: Treatment of MDS has undergone a dramatic change in recent years with the emergence of demethylating agents; however, there are limited data on the impact of these agents on OS in the "real-world" setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use and outcomes of different therapies in patients (pts) with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)-defined Intermediate-2- and High-risk (higher-risk) MDS. Methods: The ERASME study (CEL-SMD-2012-01) is an observational, prospective study of pts with either MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML); pts were defined using the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Initial pt management strategy was classified into 3 groups: active therapy (AT), such as chemotherapy or treatment with azacitidine (AZA), lenalidomide (LEN), etc.; allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which included those pts receiving other therapies before transplantation; and observation and support (OB&SP), which included red blood cell and platelet transfusions, and growth factors. OS rates of higher-risk pts are presented using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 160 pts with higher-risk MDS were recruited between Jan 2013 and Feb 2015. Median follow-up was 8.6 months (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-11.8). Pt characteristics are described in the Table. AT was the first therapeutic decision in 83 (52%) pts, HCT in 43 (27%), and OB&SP in 34 (21%). Within the AT group, 75 (90%) pts received AZA alone, 5 (6%) AZA plus chemotherapy, and 3 (4%) received other options; most pts (n = 78; 94%) were treated with a 7-day regimen. Among the 43 potential HCT candidates, 40 (93%) had received prior therapy: 25 (58%) with AZA alone, 8 (19%) with chemotherapy, 6 (14%) with AZA plus chemotherapy, and 1 (2%) with LEN; 3 (7%) had not received prior therapy. Of the potential HCT candidates, 20 had undergone transplantation within a median of 8 months (IQR 4.1-13.3); 7 (16%) pts died before transplantation and 16 (37%) are still awaiting transplantation. The main reasons for OB&SP being the initial pt strategy were disease risk (100%), age (95%), comorbidities (60%), and symptomatology (44%). At last follow-up, 70 of 160 pts (44%) had died after a median of 6 months (IQR 2.9-11.8): 34 (41%), 14 (32%), and 22 (65%) pts undergoing AT, HCT, and OB&SP, respectively (log-rank 6.9; P = 0.032). Median OS in pts who received AT, HCT, and OB&SP was 18.60 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.1-21.8), 14.92 months (95% CI 11.6-not reached), and 8.44 months (95% CI 4.3-13.4), respectively. Median OS was significantly longer in the AT group compared with the OB&SP group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3; P = 0.0197). No statistically significant difference was observed in OS between pts treated with AT and those considered potential HCT candidates (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5-17.7; P = 0.8). Conclusions: The preliminary data from this observational, prospective study indicate that AT significantly prolongs OS compared with OB&SP when treating pts with higher-risk MDS in a real-world setting. AZA was the most common treatment in the AT group. Abstract presented on behalf of the ERASME Study Investigators Group. Table. Baseline characteristics of the MDS population (N = 160) Characteristic Age, median (IQR), years 73 (64.5-79.0) Male, n (%) 86 (53.8) Bone marrow blast count, median (IQR), % 12 (7.5-16.3) Hemoglobin level, median (IQR), g/dL 9.55 (8.0-10.6) Platelet count, median (IQR), × 109/L 64.75 (41.0-121.0) ANC, median (IQR), × 109/L 1 (0.47-2.20) Cytogenetic risk (by IPSS-R), n (%) Low 64 (40.0) Intermediate 9 (5.6) High 27 (16.9) Very High 39 (24.4) Missing data 21 (13.1) WHO classification, n (%) RCMD 17 (10.6) RAEB type 1 28 (17.5) RAEB type 2 94 (58.8) Unclassified 2 (1.3) Missing 1 (0.6) AML 20-30% blasts 18 (11.3) IPSS risk classification, n (%) Intermediate-2 86 (53.8) High 71 (44.4) Missing 3 (1.9) IPSS-R risk classification, n (%) Very Low 4 (2.5) Low 28 (17.5) Intermediate 20 (12.5) High 40 (25.0) Very High 46 (28.8) Missing 22 (13.8) AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; FAB, French-American-British; IPSS-R, Revised-IPSS; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RCMD, refractory anemia with multilineage dysplasia. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine was used to treat patients who are potential hematopoietic stem cell transplant candidates. Ramos:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rafel:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Valcárcel:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Single-Agent Ibrutinib Vs Standard of Care for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) and Treatment-Naive (TN) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): An Adjusted Comparison of RESONATETM and RESONATE-2TM with the French Lyon-Sud Database

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2039.2039 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2039-2039

Author(s):

Gilles A. Salles ◽

Lucile Baseggio ◽

Emmanuel Bachy ◽

Clementine Sarkozy ◽

Herve Ghesquieres ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Level Data ◽

Advanced Disease Stage ◽

Independent Risk Factors ◽

Male Sex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The benefits of ibrutinib (ibr) have been demonstrated by the phase 3 RESONATE and RESONATE-2 trials for patients (pts) with R/R and TN (≥ 65 years) CLL, respectively. In these studies, ibr showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs approved comparators (ofatumumab [ofa] in RESONATE and chlorambucil [clb] in RESONATE-2). However, a number of other treatment regimens are widely used in clinical practice for CLL based on individual patient and disease characteristics; it is currently unknown if ibr results in better survival outcomes when compared directly with each of these other treatments. AIM: In the absence of a head-to-head comparison, we investigated the relative efficacy of ibr vs physician's choice (PC) in pts with R/R or TN CLL by comparing pt-level data from RESONATE and RESONATE-2 with data from pts in a real-world setting (the Lyon-Sud database). This database holds electronic medical records for 390 pts with CLL from the academic Lyon-Sud Hospital in France; nearly all patients were diagnosed between 1990 and 2014. This is the first analysis of ibr vs PC in a real-world setting for pts with TN CLL. METHODS: Pt-level data from RESONATE (ibr, n = 195; ofa, n = 196) were compared with data on pts with CLL from Lyon-Sud who received 2nd(n = 107) or later-line treatment (3rd [n = 62], 4th [n = 43], and subsequent [n = 51] lines). Similarly, RESONATE-2 (ibr, n = 136; clb, n = 133) pt-level data were compared with those of pts aged ≥ 65 years who received 1st-line treatment (n = 131). In order to account for non-comparability due to lack of randomization, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare PFS and OS between treatments, including line of therapy, age, sex, disease stage (based on Binet/Rai), and deletion 17p or 11q mutations as covariates. For the definition of PFS, missing data for date of disease progression for pts in Lyon-Sud who initiated subsequent therapy were replaced by the conservative proxy of date of initiation of next treatment. Predicted PFS and OS curves for the Lyon-Sud cohort were derived from the multivariate model. RESULTS: For R/R pts in Lyon-Sud, across all treatment lines the most frequent regimens used were rituximab (R) + chemotherapy (n = 46), bendamustine + R (BR; n = 28), fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + R (FCR) (n = 27), clb + R (n = 19), R monotherapy (n = 21), and R-CHOP-based (n = 19); the remaining percentages comprised various other therapies, each used in < 5% of pts. Median age at treatment initiation for Lyon-Sud and RESONATE was 69 and 67 years, respectively; median number of prior therapies was 2 and 3, and median follow-up was 30.0 and 21.9 months. More lines of prior therapy, older age, male sex, advanced disease stage (Binet C/Rai III/IV), and presence of deletion 17p/11q were independent risk factors for worse PFS and OS outcome. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, PFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) for ibr vs PC were 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.26) and 0.28 (0.17-0.46), respectively. Adjusted HRs for ibr vs the most frequent treatments ranged from 0.09 (R monotherapy) to 0.38 (FCR) for PFS and 0.21 (R monotherapy) to 0.33 (FCR) for OS; all were statistically significant. For TN pts in Lyon-Sud, the most frequent treatment regimens used were FCR (n = 40), clb + R (n = 21), clb monotherapy (n = 17), R-(mini)CHOP (n = 11), and BR (n = 11). Median age at treatment initiation was 73 years for both Lyon-Sud and RESONATE-2; median follow-up was 36.9 and 28.1 months, respectively. Older age, male sex, and advanced disease stage were independent risk factors for worse PFS and OS outcome. After adjustment for baseline differences, the PFS and OS HRs for ibr vs PC were 0.25 (0.14-0.47) and 0.41 (0.17-0.99). Predicted PFS and OS curves for both R/R and TN patients are presented in Figure 1. CONCLUSIONS: Investigation of survival outcomes suggests that ibr administered to pts in RESONATE and RESONATE-2 was more effective than PC used in a real-world cohort of French pts with R/R or TN CLL, suggesting a 4.8-fold improvement in PFS and a 3.4-fold improvement in OS in R/R pts and 4-fold and 2.4-fold improvements in TN pts, respectively. These results further support the growing evidence that ibr significantly improves both PFS and OS vs commonly used regimens in the R/R and TN settings, and could have important implications for improving treatment of CLL in clinical practice. Disclosures Salles: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sarkozy:Sandoz: Research Funding; Janssen Research & Development: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Ghesquieres:Mundipharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche France: Research Funding. Diels:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Besson:Janssen: Employment. MacDougall:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; IMS Health: Employment. Hermans:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; IMS Health: Employment. Healy:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Garside:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Iraqi:Janssen Research & Development: Employment.

Download Full-text