scholarly journals SAT0096 DISCORDANCE BETWEEN SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE INDEX OF THE DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE MAY REDUCE THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 981.2-982
Author(s):  
A. Xie ◽  
L. Ji ◽  
Z. Zhang

Background:There was discordance between subjective and objective index of the disease activity score, or between clinical parameters and ultrasound findings in some RA patients. Therefore, we set out to determine whether the discordance between subjective and objective index of the composite score could reduce the correlation between clinical and ultrasound parameters in RA.Objectives:To investigate whether the discordance between tender and swollen joint count (TJC and SJC) as well as patient’s and evaluator’s global assessment (PGA and EGA) influences the correlation between clinical and US parameters in RA.Methods:RA patients with available ultrasonography of 28 joints from Jan 2014 to Jan 2018 were enrolled in the study. Gray-scale (GS) synovial hypertrophy and Power Doppler (PD) synovitis were measured and semi-quantitatively graded. The total GS/PD score was the sum score of 28 joints. SJC and TJC based on 28 joints, PGA and EGA of all the patients were evaluated by one rheumatologist. The numeric difference between TJC and SJC (ΔTSJ) and that between PGA and EGA (ΔPEG) were calculated. The correlation between clinical and ultrasound parameters in different ΔTSJ and ΔPEG subgroups was explored.Results:Totally 163 patients were enrolled in the study. Clinical composite disease activity scores and all the components were significantly correlated with the total GS and PD scores (p<0.01 for all). But the relevance between the clinical disease parameters and total PD score became weak, with the increase of ΔTSJ. For the patients with ΔTSJ > 5, the total PD score was only correlated with CRP, EGA and PGA, while the total GS score was only correlated with CRP. Similarly, no correlation between total PD score and clinical parameters, except for SJC, was observed in patients with ΔPEG < 0 (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Total PD/GS score was correlated well with the clinical parameters of disease activity, including both the subjective and objective indexes. But for patients with ΔTSJ > 5,there was no correlation between total GS/PD scores and clinical composite disease activity scores, except that only the objective index (CRP, SJC and EGA) were more likely to correlate with total GS/PD scores.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Naranje ◽  
Mahesh Prakash ◽  
Aman Sharma ◽  
Sunil Dogra ◽  
Niranjan Khandelwal

Objective. To determine the frequency of the various ultrasound findings in hand joints in patients with psoriatic arthritis and correlate grayscale and Power Doppler ultrasonography findings with Disease Activity Score 28.Methods. This prospective study was performed in 30 patients. Ultrasound evaluation of 28 joints of both hands was undertaken and various findings were recorded including synovial hypertrophy, Power Doppler abnormality, soft tissue thickening, tendonitis, joint effusion, periosteal reaction, and erosions. Composite ultrasound scores and Disease Activity Score 28 were calculated and compared. Spearman correlation was used to see relationship between the ultrasound and DAS28 scores.Results. Ultrasound detected more abnormalities in the hand joints than did clinical examination. The frequency of various ultrasound abnormalities was as follows: Synovial hypertrophy was seen in 100%, Power Doppler abnormality suggesting hypervascularity was seen in 36.7%, soft tissue thickening was seen in 66.7%, periosteal reaction was seen in 33.3%, erosions were seen in 30% (mostly in DIP and PIP joints), and flexor tendonitis was seen in 6.7% of patients. Significant correlation was found between Disease Activity Score 28 and grayscale joint score (GSJS) (Spearman’sρ: 0.499;P: 0.005), grayscale joint count (GSJC) (ρ: 0.398;P: 0.029), and Power Doppler joint score (PDJS) (ρ: 0.367;P: 0.046). There was a statistically significant difference between remission and low disease activity group and moderate disease activity group in terms of GSJC, GSJS, PDJC, and PDJS (P<0.05). These ultrasound measures were higher in moderate disease activity zone patients.Conclusion. Ultrasound is a useful modality for the objective assessment of psoriatic arthritis. Ultrasound including Power Doppler can be used as a modality for assessment of severity of psoriatic arthritis as it correlates with the clinical scoring.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
A. Ortolan ◽  
S. Ramiro ◽  
F. A. Van Gaalen ◽  
T. K. Kvien ◽  
R. B. M. Landewé ◽  
...  

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index measuring disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). It includes questions from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and inflammation biomarkers. However, ASDAS calculation is not always possible because PGA is sometimes not collected.Objectives:To develop an alternative ASDAS to be used in research settings when PGA is unavailable.Methods:Longitudinal data from 4 axSpA cohorts and 2 RCTs were combined. Observations were randomly split in a development (N=1026) and a validation cohort (N=1059). Substitutes of PGA by BASDAI total score, single or combined individual BASDAI questions, and a constant value, were considered. In the development cohort, conversion factors for each substitute were defined by Generalized Estimating Equations. Validation was performed in the validation cohort according to the OMERACT filter, taking into consideration: 1) Truth (agreement with original-ASDAS in the continuous score, by intraclass correlation coefficient -ICC- and in disease activity states, by weighted kappa) 2) Discrimination (standardized mean difference –SMD- of ASDAS scores between high/low disease activity states defined by external anchors e.g Patient Acceptable Symptom State –PASS-; agreement -kappa- in the % of patients reaching ASDAS improvement criteria according to alternative vs. original formulae) 3) Feasibility.Results:Taking all psychometric properties into account and comparing the different formulae (Table), alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total as PGA replacement proved to be: 1) truthful (agreement with original-ASDAS: ICC=0.98, kappa=0.90); 2) discriminative: it could discriminate between high/low disease activity states (e.g. scores between PASS no/yes: SMD=1.37 versus original-ASDAS SMD=1.43) and was sensitive to change (agreement with original-ASDAS in major improvement/clinically important improvement criteria: kappa=0.93/0.88; 3) feasible (BASDAI total often available; conversion coefficient≈1).Table.Psychometric properties of alternative ASDAS formulaeConclusion:Alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total score as PGA replacement is the most truthful, discriminative and feasible instrument. This index enables ASDAS calculation in existing cohorts without PGA.Disclosure of Interests:Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Sofia Ramiro: None declared, Floris A. van Gaalen: None declared, Tore K. Kvien Grant/research support from: Received grants from Abbvie, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD and Roche (not relevant for this abstract)., Consultant of: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Paid instructor for: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Speakers bureau: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB Pharma, Pedro M Machado Consultant of: PMM: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Speakers bureau: PMM: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Astrid van Tubergen Consultant of: Novartis, Caroline Bastiaenen: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2326-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXIME DOUGADOS ◽  
MAHAUT RIPERT ◽  
PASCAL HILLIQUIN ◽  
PATRICE FARDELLONE ◽  
OLIVIER BROCQ ◽  
...  

Objective.Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the 4 items included in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for evaluation of activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the influence of the use of 3 different techniques of PGA on the assessment of disease activity.Methods.We evaluated 3 different DAS28 according to the technique of PGA in 108 patients with active RA before and after 12 weeks of etanercept therapy.Results.The reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation) between screening and baseline was very high and similar for the 3 DAS28. The percentage of patients in the different states of disease (from remission to higher disease activity) and the sensitivity to change across the 3 DAS28 scales were very similar.Conclusion.The different techniques of collection of PGA to be included in the DAS calculation yield similar results. However, an accepted, unequivocal technique should be encouraged in order to reduce heterogeneity in scoring DAS among patients with RA.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2081-2087 ◽  
Author(s):  
LONNIE PYNE ◽  
VIVIAN P. BYKERK ◽  
GILLES BOIRE ◽  
BOULOS HARAOUI ◽  
CAROL HITCHON ◽  
...  

Objective.To determine the factors most strongly associated with an increase in therapy of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).Methods.Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) were included if the patient had ≥ 2 visits and baseline and 6 months data. A regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with treatment intensification.Results.Of 1145 patients with ERA, 790 met inclusion criteria; mean age was 53.4 years (SD 14.7), mean disease duration 6.1 months (SD 2.8), 75% were female, baseline Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 4.7 (SD 1.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.8) at 6 months for included patients. Univariate factors for intensifying treatment were physician global assessment (MDGA; OR 7.8 and OR 7.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, p < 0.0005), swollen joint count (SJC; OR 4.7 and OR 7.3 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005), and DAS28 (OR 3.0 and OR 4.6 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005). In the regression model only MDGA was strongly associated with treatment intensification (OR 1.5 and OR 1.2 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005); DAS28 was not consistently predictive (OR 1.0, p = 0.987, and OR 1.2, p = 0.023, at 3 and 6 months). DAS28 was the reason for treatment intensification 2.3% of the time, compared to 51.7% for SJC, 49.9% for tender joint count, and 23.8% for MDGA. For the same SJC, larger joint involvement was more likely to influence treatment than small joints at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.027).Conclusion.MDGA was strongly associated with an increase in treatment at 3 and 6 months in ERA, whereas DAS28 was not. Physicians rarely stated that DAS28 was the reason for increasing treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
VS Schäfer ◽  
WA Schmidt ◽  
M Backhaus ◽  
W Hartung

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly involves the knee joint in up to 30% of patients. Musculoskeletal ultrasound enables the skilled clinician to easily assess disease activity. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of the sonography score of large joints in Rheumatology (SOLAR) for different treatments of knee arthritis in RA. Method: Joints were assessed by ultrasound at 4 visits. Laboratory, immunological and clinical parameters were recorded. Results: 225 RA patients were analyzed. The DAS 28 in the subgroup receiving systemic steroids was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in patients treated with intraarticular glucocorticosteroids (GCs) at T0, comparing the values from T0 to T3 the same appeared (p=0.003). Concerning the acute GC treatment regimens, the gray scale ultrasound (GSUS) sum score was found to be significantly higher in patients receiving intraarticular GCs versus no GCs (p=0,035), as well as in patients receiving systemic versus intraarticular GCs (p=0.001). Regarding the differences from T0 and T3, similar to the baseline analysis, a high GSUS sum score was significantly associated with intraarticular GCs, a low to no GC administration (p=0.035), while a high GSUS sum score was significantly linked to intraarticular GCs, rather than systemic GCs (p=0.008). Conclusion: SOLAR score is sensitive to change in knee arthritis. Intraarticular GC administration is performed in patients with high GSUS scores. Systemic administration of GC is linked to high disease activity (DAS28) rather than GSUS or power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 823.1-823
Author(s):  
J. Roszkiewicz ◽  
D. Michałek ◽  
A. Ryk ◽  
B. Szmyd ◽  
E. Smolewska

Background:Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most frequent rheumatic disease in children, with an estimated prevalence between 16 and 150 per 100 000 [1]. Methotrexate (MTX) administered at the dose 10-15mg/m2is currently recommended as the first-line treatment in most of JIA subtypes [2]. Despite its widespread use in rheumatology, the mechanism of MTX immunomodulatory action remains incompletely understood [3]. Free adenosine is one of the particles possibly associated with the action of MTX, acting via three types of adenosine receptor: ADORA2A, ADORA2B, and ADORA3 [4].Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms inADORA2A(rs2236624, rs2298383) andADORA3(rs3393) receptors genes on the disease activity and presence of MTX therapy side effects in patients with JIA.Methods:One hundred children with JIA of all subtypes treated with MTX were recruited to the study. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected at the baseline of MTX therapy and on a control visit 4-6 months (median 5.09 months) after starting MTX. The clinical parameters included inflammatory markers values, number of joints with active arthritis, number of joints with restricted range of movement, physician’s global assessment of disease activity, parent/patient global assessment of overall well-being, functional ability (measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire – CHAQ) and the value of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Disease Activity Score 71 (JADAS 71). Presence of MTX side effects was evaluated on the control visit. SNP genotyping was performed using genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood samples.Results:Both polymorphic variants ofADORA2A(rs2236624, rs2298383 - CC/CT) were significantly associated with 3.5 times higher odds of gastrointestinal side effects occurrence (OR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.12-11.03, p=0.03 and OR: 3.49, 95%CI: 0.89-13.66 p=0.07) after adjustment to age, sex, dose and route of MTX administration. In addition, children with theADORA3rs3393 polymorphic variant (CT/CC) after six months of MTX treatment had significantly lower number of joints with active arthritis (0.0 vs 1.0, p=0.04), lower JADAS 71 score (3.0 vs 5.1, p=0.16) and lower value of CRP (0.6 vs 2.4, p=0.02).Conclusion:Although future studies are needed to verify our findings, polymorphisms inADORA2AandADORA3genes may become the determinants of MTX treatment efficacy and gastrointestinal toxicity in children with JIA.References:[1]Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001.J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390-392.[2]Ferrara G, Mastrangelo G, Barone P, et al. Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting.PediatrRheumatol Online J. 2018;16(1):46. Published 2018 Jul 11. doi:10.1186/s12969-018-0255-8.[3]Brown, P. M., Pratt, A. G., & Isaacs, J. D. (2016). Mechanism of action of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis and the search for biomarkers. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 12(12), 731–742. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.175.[4]Varani, K. et al. A2A and A3 adenosine receptor expression in rheumatoid arthritis: upregulation, inverse correlation with disease activity score and suppression of inflammatory cytokine and metalloproteinase release. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, R197 (2011).Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document