scholarly journals Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction secondary to vaccine-induced immune thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia (VITT)

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e245218
Author(s):  
Luke Flower ◽  
Zdenek Bares ◽  
Georgina Santiapillai ◽  
Stephen Harris
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Regional Wall Motion ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities ◽  
Electrocardiographic Changes ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Wall Motion Abnormalities ◽  
D Dimer

A 40-year-old man with no cardiac history presented with central chest pain 8 days after receiving the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine against COVID-19. Initial blood tests demonstrated a thrombocytopaenia (24×109 μg/L) and a raised d-dimer (>110 000 μg/L), and he was urgently transferred to our tertiary referral central for suspected vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopaenia and thrombosis (VITT). He developed dynamic ischaemic electrocardiographic changes with ST elevation, a troponin of 3185 ng/L, and regional wall motion abnormalities. An occlusion of his left anterior descending coronary artery was seen on CT coronary angiography. His platelet factor-4 (PF-4) antibody returned strongly positive. He was urgently treated for presumed VITT with intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone and plasma exchange, but remained thrombocytopaenic and was initiated on rituximab. Argatroban was used for anticoagulation for his myocardial infarction while he remained thrombocytopaenic. After 6 days, his platelet count improved, and his PF-4 antibody level, troponin and d-dimer fell. He was successfully discharged after 14 days.

scholarly journals Microfistulas Causing Diverse Regional Ischemia: Consecutive Inferior and Lateral ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 704-706
Author(s):  
Tufan Çınar ◽  
Yavuz Karabağ ◽  
İbrahim Rencuzogullari ◽  
Metin Cağdaş
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Type I ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Coronary Artery Fistulas ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Electrocardiographic Changes ◽  
St Elevation

Coronary artery fistulas (CAFs) are described as abnormal communications between a coronary artery and cardiac chambers, or other vascular structures. The two types of CAFs are defined as type I (singular fistula) and type II (microfistulas). Even though various electrocardiographic changes have been previously described in CAF patients, coronary-artery microfistulas causing ST-segment elevation in diverse locations have not been reported. We describe a case report of an adult patient who presented with acute inferior myocardial infarction due to coronary-artery microfistulas. During the hospital stay, the patient re-experienced chest pain, and control electrocardiography revealed ST-segment elevation in the I and AVL leads along with reciprocal ST-segment depression in the inferior precordial leads. Although CAFs are clinically rare, they can have important clinical consequences. Microfistulas should be kept in mind as a cause of ST elevation myocardial infarction in some patients.

scholarly journals Asymptomatic pulmonary embolus masquerading as acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction

CJEM ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 62-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Noble ◽  
Amandeep Singh
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Acute Coronary Occlusion ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Anteroseptal Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Wall Motion Abnormalities ◽  
Cardiac Catherization

ABSTRACT Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an uncommon and often overlooked cause of ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram (ECG). Emergent echocardiography has been cited as a means to rapidly distinguish acute myocardial infarction from PE. However, both of these conditions can present with focal wall motion abnormalities. We report a case of a 51-year-old asymptomatic male who presented to our emergency department with anterior ST-segment elevation and right-heart strain on an ECG. The clinical diagnosis of ST elevation myocardial infarction was in doubt, and an echocardiogram was obtained while the patient was in the emergency department. Although a focal area of hypokinesia was observed on echocardiography, cardiac catherization did not demonstrate any evidence of acute coronary occlusion. A computed tomographic angiogram of the chest was subsequently obtained, which demonstrated evidence of submassive pulmonary emboli. Our case highlights the limited utility of emergent echocardiography in cases of ST-segment elevation.

Spontaneous changes in regional wall motion abnormalities in acute myocardial infarction

1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 406-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagara Tamaki ◽  
Tsunehiro Yasuda ◽  
Robert C. Leinbach ◽  
Herman K. Gold ◽  
Kenneth A. McKusick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Wall Motion ◽  
Regional Wall Motion ◽  
Regional Wall ◽  
Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities ◽  
Wall Motion Abnormalities

scholarly journals Management of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in Different Settings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod Partow-Navid ◽  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Ashish Mukherjee ◽  
Padmini Varadarajan ◽  
Ramdas G. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Management Process ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
St Elevation

AbstractST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening condition that requires emergent, complex, well-coordinated treatment. Although the primary goal of treatment is simple to describe—reperfusion as quickly as possible—the management process is complicated and is affected by multiple factors including location, patient, and practitioner characteristics. Hence, this narrative review will discuss the recommended management and treatment strategies of STEMI in the circumstances.

Abstract 12762: Clinical Characteristics and Determinants of Non-Eligibility for Reperfusion in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the NCDR®

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun W Dasari ◽  
Steve Hamilton ◽  
Anita Y Chen ◽  
Tracy Y Wang ◽  
James A de Lemos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Vessel Disease ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation

Background: There is little recent data describing the characteristics and outcomes of STEMI patients who do not undergo urgent reperfusion. Methods: Using the ACTION Registry®-GWTG™ database, we examined 232,208 STEMI patients presenting January 2007 through December 2013 at 793 U.S. centers. The cohort was divided into those who underwent reperfusion (n=194,916; 84%), had documented contraindication to reperfusion (n=31,518; 13.5%) and were eligible but not reperfused (n=5,774; 2.5%). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between these groups. Results: Compared with those reperfused, patients not reperfused were older, more often female and had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, MI, stroke and atrial fibrillation. LBBB and CHF were more common in the non-reperfused groups upon presentation. The major documented contraindications to reperfusion were unsuitable anatomy for primary PCI (31%), symptoms onset > 12 hours (9%), patient/family refusal/DNR status (6%), resolved chest pain (6%) and ST elevation (5%) presentation to non-PCI centers (4%). Three-vessel disease and in-hospital CABG were more common in non-reperfused patients with and without contraindication compared with those receiving reperfusion (39 & 37% vs. 26%, p<0.001) and (17 & 17% vs. 3%, p<0.001 respectively). In-hospital outcomes are summarized in the table. Conclusion: Most STEMI patients who were not reperfused had a documented contraindication. Unsuitable anatomy for PCI was the major contributor to ineligibility. In hospital mortality, death/MI and cardiogenic shock were higher in the non-reperfused groups.

scholarly journals Electrocardiographic Effects of Propofol versus Etomidate in Patients with Brugada Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Flamée ◽  
Varnavas Varnavas ◽  
Wendy Dewals ◽  
Hugo Carvalho ◽  
Wilfried Cools ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brugada Syndrome ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Depression ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Qrs Prolongation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Electrocardiographic Changes ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Double Blinded

Abstract Background Brugada Syndrome is an inherited arrhythmogenic disease, characterized by the typical coved type ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads from V1 through V3. The BrugadaDrugs.org Advisory Board recommends avoiding administration of propofol in patients with Brugada Syndrome. Since prospective studies are lacking, it was the purpose of this study to assess the electrocardiographic effects of propofol and etomidate on the ST- and QRS-segments. In this trial, it was hypothesized that administration of propofol or etomidate in bolus for induction of anesthesia, in patients with Brugada Syndrome, do not clinically affect the ST- and QRS-segments and do not induce arrhythmias. Methods In this prospective, double-blinded trial, 98 patients with established Brugada syndrome were randomized to receive propofol (2 to 3 mg/kg-1) or etomidate (0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg-1) for induction of anesthesia. The primary endpoints were the changes of the ST- and QRS-segment, and the occurrence of new arrhythmias upon induction of anesthesia. Results The analysis included 80 patients: 43 were administered propofol and 37 etomidate. None of the patients had a ST elevation greater than or equal to 0.2 mV, one in each group had a ST elevation of 0.15 mV. An ST depression up to −0.15mV was observed eleven times with propofol and five with etomidate. A QRS-prolongation of 25% upon induction was seen in one patient with propofol and three with etomidate. This trial failed to establish any evidence to suggest that changes in either group differed, with most percentiles being zero (median [25th, 75th], 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 0]). Finally, no new arrhythmias occurred perioperatively in both groups. Conclusions In this trial, there does not appear to be a significant difference in electrocardiographic changes in patients with Brugada syndrome when propofol versus etomidate were administered for induction of anesthesia. This study did not investigate electrocardiographic changes related to propofol used as an infusion for maintenance of anesthesia, so future studies would be warranted before conclusions about safety of propofol infusions in patients with Brugada syndrome can be determined. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

scholarly journals High risk electrocardiographic patterns in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Diego Echeverri- Marín ◽  
Cristhian Felipe Ramirez Ramos ◽  
Andrés Miranda-Arboleda ◽  
Gustavo Castilla-Agudelo ◽  
Clara Saldarriaga-Giraldo
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Early Reperfusion ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Acute Coronary Occlusion ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Electrocardiographic Findings

Acute myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death in the world and the electrocardiogram remains the diagnostic tool for determining an acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. In spite of this, only half of the patients present classic electrocardiogram findings compatible with the ST-elevation infarction criteria. There is a spectrum of electrocardiographic findings that may reflect a phenomenon of acute coronary occlusion, which should be promptly recognized by the clinician to offer early reperfusion therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document