scholarly journals Small bowel adenocarcinoma: a case of atypical CT scan appearance

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (jun08 1) ◽  
pp. bcr0220125915-bcr0220125915
Author(s):  
A. M. Eltweri ◽  
D. Bowrey ◽  
M. Taylor
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Erika Yamazawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
Kaishi Satomi ◽  
Hirokazu Taniguchi ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
...  

Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) accounts for <2% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. The most common organs of SBA metastases are the abdominal lymph node, liver, and peritoneum. There have been almost no reports of brain metastases of SBA. Dabaja et al. reported 1 case of brain metastasis out of 217 SBA cases, but details of the clinical course of the case were unclear. Our case might be the first report covering the full clinical course, pathological findings, and genetic data. Here, we report a very rare case of brain metastasis from poorly differentiated SBA. Case Description: A 54-year-old man who suffered from abdominal pain and melena visited a nearby hospital. This patient had no risk factors for SBA. He underwent partial resection of the jejunum with regional lymphadenectomy and combined resection of the transverse colon. Pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, pT4N2M0 Stage IIIB (UICC-TNM: 8th edition). One month after curative surgery, liver metastasis was detected by a computed tomography (CT) scan, and then, palliative chemotherapy was started. During the third-line chemotherapy, a brain tumor on the left cerebellum was detected by the CT scan. Tumor resection was performed, and the histopathological features coincided with the primary jejunum tumor. Based on surgical, radiological, pathological, and genetic findings, this brain tumor was comprehensively diagnosed as a metastasis from poorly differentiated SBA. Conclusion: Here, we experienced a very rare case of brain metastasis from poorly differentiated SBA.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupama Rajanbabu ◽  
Kiran Bagul ◽  

Introduction: In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, there is a survival benefit for patients who achieve optimalcytoreduction. Suboptimallycytoreduced patients are at risk of the increased morbidity of a surgery without associated survival benefit. Predicting which patients can undergo optimal cytoreduction represents a critical decision-making point. Present study analyses the predictors, pre operative (clinical and radiologic) and intraoperative of suboptimal debulking. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences from March 2013 to May 2015. All the patients with clinically (physical examination, laboratory and imaging results) diagnosed Stage IIIc epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) who were planed for primary debulking surgery were included. The demographic data and details of tumor markers, radiological investigations including CT scan, intra operative findings and histopathologic details were collected. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v20.0. Results: 36 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Gross ascites wasthe clinical parameter found to be associated with suboptimal debulking. CT scan had low sensitivity (35-53%) in diagnosing small bowel mesenteric and porta hepatis disease and high sensitivity in diagnosing diffuse peritoneal thickening, omental disease, diaphragmatic and nodal disease. On univariate analysis diffuse peritoneal thickening and small bowel serosa and mesenteric disease were significantly consistent with sub optimal debulking. Conclusion: Finding out disease at the sites which are associated with suboptimal debulking (diffuse peritoneal thickening, smallbowel mesenteric and serosal disease) pre operatively or at the beginning of surgery can predict optimal debulking and can help avoid un necessary surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-329
Author(s):  
Johannes Klose ◽  
Felix Lasitschka ◽  
Cornelia Horsch ◽  
Moritz J. Strowitzki ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junji Mitsushita ◽  
Sachiho Netsu ◽  
Koichi Suzuki ◽  
Mitsuhiro Nokubi ◽  
Akira Tanaka

1985 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Gallup ◽  
R. J. Stock ◽  
J. J. Sammons ◽  
W. E. Paulk

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A218
Author(s):  
Vanessa Palacsak-Juif ◽  
Anne Marie Bouvier ◽  
Jacques Cosnes ◽  
Vincent Dancourt ◽  
Bernard Flourie ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 693-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett L. Ecker ◽  
Matthew T. McMillan ◽  
Jashodeep Datta ◽  
Ronac Mamtani ◽  
Bruce J. Giantonio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document