scholarly journals 30 years' follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 330 (7485) ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Bonadonna ◽  
Angela Moliterni ◽  
Milvia Zambetti ◽  
Maria Grazia Daidone ◽  
Silvana Pilotti ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 586-591
Author(s):  
Yang Guangcheng ◽  
Su Xiao ◽  
Boran Wang ◽  
Wang Ying ◽  
Chang Fei ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 213 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIRAM S. CODY ◽  
EDWARD H. LAUGHLIN ◽  
CARLOS TRILLO ◽  
JEROME A. URBAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 715-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena-Marie Petersson ◽  
Marjan Vaez ◽  
Marie I. Nilsson ◽  
Fredrik Saboonchi ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 953-960
Author(s):  
Tanapat Engkakul ◽  
Nuntakorn Thnogtang ◽  
Akarin Nimmannit ◽  
Suebwong Chuthapisith ◽  
Charuwan Akewanlop

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 656-660
Author(s):  
Anjali Vinocha ◽  

Introduction:Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, with 5- and 10-year relative survival rates are 91% and 84%, respectively for women with invasive breast cancer. This study aimed to detect the role of serum breast cancer marker CA 15-3 for early detection of metastasis, relapse or recurrence for management of breast cancer patients. Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study with a total of 132 breast cancer patients from the year 2010 to march 2020 were taken and followed up. For these patients demographic, biochemical parameters, radiological and clico-pathological data were collected and analysed. Result: The mean age at the time of presentation and mean duration of follow-up was 47 years and 31 months respectively. There was elevation in the serum level of CA 15-3 at the time of diagnosis of metastasis, recurrence or residual disease in 41 patients. This shows that sensitivity of elevated CA 15-3 (> 30 IU/ml) level in Ca Breast patients was 84%, 75 % and 75 % with respect to metastasis, recurrence and relapse. Log Rank test Chi- square value was 7.39 which was statistically significant (p=0.007). Cox proportional hazard model was created for effect of age at presentation, CA 15-3 at the time of diagnosis and MRM on distant metastasis and was statistically significant (p=0.037). Conclusion: We recommend that for the management of breast cancer patients, Cancer antigen (CA 15-3) levels can be used as prognostic marker for early diagnosis of metastasis, recurrence or relapse.


1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Valagussa ◽  
J. D. Tesoro Tess ◽  
A. Rossi ◽  
G. Tancini ◽  
A. Banfi ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Powles ◽  
T F Hickish ◽  
A Makris ◽  
S E Ashley ◽  
M E O'Brien ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate in a randomized clinical trial systemic chemoendocrine therapy used as primary (neo-adjuvant) treatment before surgery in women with primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged less than 70 years with clinically palpable, primary operable breast cancer diagnostically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and suitable for treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant treatment received four cycles of chemo-therapy for 3 months before surgery followed by another four cycles after surgery, and were compared with patients randomized to adjuvant therapy who received eight cycles of chemotherapy over 6 months after surgery. RESULTS Of 212 patients who were randomized to receive either adjuvant (n = 107) or neoadjuvant (n = 105) chemoendocrine therapy, 200 are now assessable for response. The two groups are comparable for age, menopausal status, disease stage, and surgical requirements. The overall clinical response rate was 85%, with a complete histologic response rate of 10%. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for mastectomy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (13%) as compared with those who received adjuvant therapy (28%) (P < .005). Symptomatic and hematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period for patients in this trial is 28 months, during which time four patients have relapsed locally and 20, including one of the local relapses, have developed metastatic disease, 19 of whom have died. The follow-up period is too brief to evaluate relapse rate or survival duration. CONCLUSION This trial confirms previous reports of a high rate of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but is the first to include small primary cancers and to show, in the context of a randomized trial, a reduction in the requirement for mastectomy. Until disease-free and overall survival data are available from the larger National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-18 trial, such neoadjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document