scholarly journals Chronic kidney disease care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e000728 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W Stanifer ◽  
Megan Von Isenburg ◽  
Glenn M Chertow ◽  
Shuchi Anand
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Care Models ◽  
Kidney Function Decline

IntroductionThe number of persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is increasing rapidly; yet systems built to care for them have received little attention. In order to inform the development of scalable CKD care models, we conducted a systematic review to characterise existing CKD care models in LMICs.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and WHO Global Health Library databases for published reports of CKD care models from LMICs between January 2000 and 31 October 2017. We used a combination of database-specific medical subject headings and keywords for care models, CKD and LMICs as defined by the World Bank.ResultsOf 3367 retrieved articles, we reviewed the full text of 104 and identified 17 articles describing 16 programmes from 10 countries for inclusion. National efforts (n=4) focused on the prevention of end-stage renal disease through enhanced screening, public awareness campaigns and education for primary care providers. Of the 12 clinical care models, nine focused on persons with CKD and the remaining on persons at risk for CKD; a majority in the first category implemented a multidisciplinary clinic with allied health professionals or primary care providers (rather than nephrologists) in lead roles. Four clinical care models used a randomised control design allowing for assessment of programme effectiveness, but only one was assessed as having low risk for bias; all four showed significant attenuation of kidney function decline in the intervention arms.ConclusionsOverall, very few rigorous CKD care models have been reported from LMICs. While preliminary data indicate that national efforts or clinical CKD care models bolstering primary care are successful in slowing kidney function decline, limited data on regional causes of CKD to inform national campaigns, and on effectiveness and affordability of local programmes represent important challenges to scalability.

Systematic review of barriers and enablers to the delivery of palliative care by primary care practitioners

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko L Carey ◽  
Alison C Zucca ◽  
Megan AG Freund ◽  
Jamie Bryant ◽  
Anne Herrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Barriers And Enablers ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

Background: There is increasing demand for primary care practitioners to play a key role in palliative care delivery. Given this, it is important to understand their perceptions of the barriers and enablers to optimal palliative care, and how commonly these are experienced. Aim: To explore the type and prevalence of barriers and enablers to palliative care provision reported by primary care practitioners. Design: A systematic review of quantitative data-based articles was conducted. Data sources: Medline, Embase and PsychINFO databases were searched for articles published between January 2007 and March 2019. Data synthesis: Abstracts were assessed against the eligibility criteria by one reviewer and a random sample of 80 articles were blind coded by a second author. Data were extracted from eligible full-texts by one author and checked by a second. Given the heterogeneity in the included studies’ methods and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common barriers related to bureaucratic procedures, communication between healthcare professionals, primary care practitioners’ personal commitments, and their skills or confidence. The most common enablers related to education, nurses and trained respite staff to assist with care delivery, better communication between professionals, and templates to facilitate referral to out-of-hours services. Conclusion: A holistic approach addressing the range of barriers reported in this review is needed to support primary care providers to deliver palliative care. This includes better training and addressing barriers related to the interface between healthcare services.

Medications Used Routinely in Primary Care to be Dose-Adjusted or Avoided in People With Chronic Kidney Disease: Results of a Modified Delphi Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Taji ◽  
Marisa Battistella ◽  
Allan K. Grill ◽  
Jessie Cunningham ◽  
Brenda L. Hemmelgarn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitor ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Delphi Panel ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Modified Delphi

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects up to 18% of those over the age of 65 years. Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in people with CKD is common. Objectives: Develop a pragmatic list of medications used in primary care that required dose adjustment or avoidance in people with CKD, using a modified Delphi panel approach, followed by a consensus workshop. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify potential medications. A group of 17 experts participated in a 3-round modified Delphi panel to identify medications for inclusion. A subsequent consensus workshop of 8 experts reviewed this list to prioritize medications for the development of point-of-care knowledge translation materials for primary care. Results: After a comprehensive literature review, 59 medications were included for consideration by the Delphi panel, with a further 10 medications added after the initial round. On completion of the 3 Delphi rounds, 66 unique medications remained, 63 requiring dose adjustment and 16 medications requiring avoidance in one or more estimated glomerular filtration rate categories. The consensus workshop prioritized this list further to 24 medications that must be dose-adjusted or avoided, including baclofen, metformin, and digoxin, as well as the newer SGLT2 inhibitor agents. Conclusion and Relevance: We have developed a concise list of 24 medications commonly used in primary care that should be dose-adjusted or avoided in people with CKD to reduce harm. This list incorporates new and frequently prescribed medications and will inform an updated, easy to access source for primary care providers.

scholarly journals Antibiotic prescription practices in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. e1003139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgia Sulis ◽  
Pierrick Adam ◽  
Vaidehi Nafade ◽  
Genevieve Gore ◽  
Benjamin Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Prescription Practices ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Protocol for a Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Provider-targeted Interventions to Improve Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallavi Prathivadi ◽  
Natalie Connell ◽  
Louisa Picco ◽  
Karleen F Giannitrapani ◽  
Hong-nei Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background: Improving primary care opioid prescribing is a public health priority in many western nations. Governments, policymakers and key stakeholders are intervening on multiple levels to address patient, prescriber and systems factors contributing to opioid over-prescription in primary care. Many opioid prescribing interventions specifically target primary care providers (PCPs); however, the overall effectiveness of these interventions is not known. Identifying effective components of PCP-targeted behaviour change interventions may help inform scalability and translation of prescribing interventions across countries and varying primary healthcare settings. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of provider-targeted interventions to improve opioid prescribing in primary care. This protocol reports the methods of the proposed narrative synthesis review that will be guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Methods: The study will follow Cochrane methods for conducting a narrative synthesis. Reporting is compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. The review will conduct searches in PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies published in the English language from 2010 onwards. Reference lists of accepted articles will be also screened for additional studies meeting inclusion. Any opioid prescribing behaviour will be measured as an outcome. Intervention components will be mapped to domains of the TDF. No geographic limits will be applied. All stages of screening and data extraction will involve a dual review with gold standard adjudication. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used to evaluate quality and risk. Discussion: This review is being conducted in strict adherence to Cochrane principles. The protocol was submitted for registration to Prospero prior to publication for transparency and to avoid duplication of research. Formal ethics approval is not required for this research. The findings of this review will inform the delivery and implementation of PCP targeted opioid prescribing interventions. Findings will be disseminated to a wide range of stakeholders involved in quality improvement, prescribing interventions, education and training; professional groups, policymakers, researchers and PCPs.Systematic review registration: Submitted to Prospero 22 December 2020; pending registration

scholarly journals Primary Care 2030: Creating an Enabling Ecosystem for Disruptive Primary Care Models to Achieve Universal Health Coverage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Schwarz ◽  
David Duong ◽  
Chase Adam ◽  
J. K. Awoonor-Williams ◽  
Darren Back ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Care Models ◽  
Universal Health ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Telemental Health in Postdisaster Settings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene F. Augusterfer ◽  
Richard F. Mollica ◽  
James Lavelle
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Response ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Telemental Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Time Zone ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Great Satisfaction ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Acute Injuries

Low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately impacted by disasters, and the majority of medical providers in these countries are primary care providers (PCPs). PCPs do a tremendous job saving lives and addressing acute injuries and illnesses, but often are not trained to recognize and treat mental health problems. Telemental health (TMH) should be an important component in supporting those on the front lines of disaster response. Telemedicine and TMH have been deployed in postdisaster settings, but remain underused. A number of challenges must be overcome in the implementation of a comprehensive TMH postdisaster response program: educating providers to work in varied cultures, working through translators, time zone differences, and more. This chapter emphasizes the importance and great satisfaction of disaster response work and the important role of TMH in ensuring the delivery of evidence-based best practices to those in critical need.

scholarly journals MP05: Injuries in refugee children presenting to a paediatric emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S41-S42
Author(s):  
E. Zhang ◽  
F. Razik ◽  
S. Ratnapalan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Refugee Children ◽  
Medical Attention ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ed Visits

Introduction: The number of refugees accepted to Canada grew from 24,600 in 2014 to 46,700 in 2016. Many of these refugees have young families and the number of child refugees has increased accordingly. Although child refugee health care has been in the forefront of media and medical attention recently, there is limited data on injury patterns in this population. Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) collects data on injuries in children presenting to the emergency department (ED). Our objective is to examine the clinical presentations and outcomes of refugee children with injuries presenting to a tertiary care paediatric ED. Methods: Our paediatric hospital has approximately 70,000 ED visits per year of which 13,000 are due to injuries and/or poisonings. The CHIRPP database was accessed to identify children with injuries presenting to our ED from April 2014 to March 2017 with Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) registration status. All patient charts were reviewed to extract demographic and clinical care information. Results: There were 74 children with 81 ED visits during the study period of whom 19% were transferred from other facilities. Most of them (72%) were males with a mean age of 8.7 years (standard deviation 4.29). There were significant medical histories in 32% of children. The presentation to our ED (greater than 24 hours post-injury) was seen in 25% of visits. Twenty five percent of injured children were seen in our ED. The distribution of Canadian Triage Acuity Score (CTAS) scores 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 0%, 16%, 37%, 46% and 1% respectively. However, subspecialty consultations were required in 69%, 60% and 27% of CTAS 2, 3 and 4 children respectively. Overall, 46% of all patients required subspecialty consults. The top three categories of injuries include fractures (23%), soft tissue injuries (20%) and lacerations (17%). More than half (56%) required diagnostic imaging. Most (89%) were treated in ED and discharged (average length-of-stay 3 hours 55 minutes) and 11% required admissions. 47% of children lacked primary care physicians. Conclusion: Almost half of refugee children with IFHP status require DI testing, sub-specialty consultations and primary care referrals when presenting to our ED with injuries. Follow up arrangements are needed as many do not have access to primary care providers. This demonstrates a need for securing primary care providers early for this vulnerable population.

Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of effectiveness

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trang Nguyen ◽  
Sara Holton ◽  
Thach Tran ◽  
Jane Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Informal Community ◽  
The Impact

Background: The effectiveness of interventions for people with severe mental illness delivered by informal community care providers in low and lower middle-income countries is not known. The aim was to conduct a systematic review of the impact of community-based interventions implemented by the informal sector for people with severe mental illness in these settings. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for English-language publications using both keywords and MeSH terms. All study designs were included. Results: Five papers, reporting data from five studies conducted in four low and lower middle-income countries in 2017, met the inclusion criteria for the review. Of the five included studies, three had a before and after design, one was a randomized controlled trial, and one a qualitative investigation. Most interventions with a low-moderate quality of evidence used informal community care providers to deliver either self-help groups, traditional healing treatments, and/or a rehabilitation program. The investigators reported data about improvements in the outcomes of intervention participants (psychosocial functioning, psychotic symptoms, and social inclusion) and positive impacts on their families (family’s knowledge and skills of mental illness management, caregiving burden, social exclusion/stigma against people with severe mental illness, and financial burden). Cost-effectiveness of the intervention (in one study) found that it had a higher financial cost but greater effectiveness than the usual standard of care. Conclusion: Although only a small number of studies were identified, the review provides promising evidence of the professionally developed interventions for people with severe mental illness, delivered by the informal community workforce in low and lower middle-income settings. Training and supportive supervision for informal community care providers are crucial components of effective interventions.

scholarly journals Results of Cancer Control Education for Primary Care Providers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18s-18s
Author(s):  
Vanessa J. Eaton ◽  
Megan K. Kremzier ◽  
Doug Pyle
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Care Course ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract 28 Background: The global burden of cancer is growing in low- and middle-income countries where availability of specialists to treat cancer is acutely low. To detect cancer earlier, patients must be educated about their risk for cancer and be screened when appropriate. In response to a growing need for cancer education in primary health care, ASCO International created the Cancer Control in Primary Care course, which was piloted in 2015. The purpose of the program is to increase the knowledge of primary health workers so as to recognize signs and symptoms of cancer, increase their ability to talk with patients about their risk, and to know how and when to refer patients for additional screening or diagnostic testing. Methods: ASCO collects data from participants in two stages: an on-site evaluation and a follow-up survey 12 months after the workshop. The survey instruments include questions about practice changes, learning objectives, and demographic information. Results: Follow-up surveys have been conducted for four courses. Ninety-three percent of respondents have reported that they made practice changes after the course. In addition, 90% reported that communication with patients about their risk for cancer had increased, 76% reported that they are screening patients for cancer more than before, and 74% reported that they have worked with specialists to plan treatment for their patients with cancer. Conclusion: Results of the Cancer Control in Primary Care course are positive, and ASCO will continue to collaborate with society and institutional partners to train primary health workers around the world to raise awareness of cancer. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No COIs from the authors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document