scholarly journals 057 Neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis: impact of spinal cord stimulation, an under-utilised modality?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Corbett ◽  
Peter Courtney ◽  
Mike Boggild
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation

scholarly journals Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rapisarda ◽  
Eleonora Ioannoni ◽  
Alessandro Izzo ◽  
Manuela D’Ercole ◽  
Nicola Montano
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Urinary Dysfunction ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Motor Disorder ◽  
Motor Disorders ◽  
Failed Back Surgery

Objective. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients. Methods. A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: “multiple sclerosis,” “spinal cord stimulation,” and “dorsal column stimulation,” according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Results. A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction ( p  = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain ( p  = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders. Conclusions. Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.

scholarly journals 1-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation alleviates chronic refractory pain after spinal cord injury: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiaki Yamada ◽  
Aiko Maeda ◽  
Katsuyuki Matsushita ◽  
Shoko Nakayama ◽  
Kazuhiro Shirozu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Cervical Vertebrae ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Cord Injury

Abstract Background Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently complain of intractable pain that is resistant to conservative treatments. Here, we report the successful application of 1-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a patient with refractory neuropathic pain secondary to SCI. Case presentation A 69-year-old male diagnosed with SCI (C4 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A) presented with severe at-level bilateral upper extremity neuropathic pain. Temporary improvement in his symptoms with a nerve block implied peripheral component involvement. The patient received SCS, and though the tip of the leads could not reach the cervical vertebrae, a 1-kHz frequency stimulus relieved the intractable pain. Conclusions SCI-related symptoms may include peripheral components; SCS may have a considerable effect on intractable pain. Even when the SCS electrode lead cannot be positioned in the target area, 1-kHz high-frequency SCS may still produce positive effects.

Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 986-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk De Ridder ◽  
Sven Vanneste ◽  
Mark Plazier ◽  
Elsa van der Loo ◽  
Tomas Menovsky
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Burst Stimulation ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Tonic Stimulation ◽  
Better Than

Abstract INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation is commonly used for neuropathic pain modulation. The major side effect is the onset of paresthesia. The authors describe a new stimulation design that suppresses pain as well as, or even better than, the currently used stimulation, but without creating paresthesia. METHODS A spinal cord electrode (Lamitrode) for neuropathic pain was implanted in 12 patients via laminectomy: 4 at the C2 level and 7 at the T8–T9 level for cervicobrachialgia and lumboischialgia, respectively (1 at T11 at another center). During external stimulation, the patients received the classic tonic stimulation (40 or 50 Hz) and the new burst stimulation (40-Hz burst with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per burst). RESULTS Pain scores were measured using a visual analog scale and the McGill Short Form preoperatively and during tonic and burst stimulation. Paresthesia was scored as present or not present. Burst stimulation was significantly better for pain suppression, by both the visual analog scale score and the McGill Short Form score. Paresthesia was present in 92% of patients during tonic stimulation, and in only 17% during burst stimulation. Average follow-up was 20.5 months. CONCLUSION The authors present a new method of spinal cord stimulation using bursts that suppress neuropathic pain without the mandatory paresthesia. Pain suppression seems as good as or potentially better than that achieved with the currently used stimulation. Average follow-up after nearly 2 years (20.5 months) suggests that this stimulation design is stable.

First experience with chronic epidural spinal cord stimulation in Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug — clinical observations

2021 ◽  
Vol LIII (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Olga A. Bondarenko ◽  
Gaspar V. Gavrilov ◽  
Vadim A. Padurets ◽  
Roman V. Kasich
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Chronic Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome ◽  
Epidural Stimulation ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
And Migration

Purpose of the work. The article is devoted to the first experience of epidural stimulation in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug at the budgetary institution Surgut Clinical Trauma Hospital. Clinical examples are presented for two main indications for the application of this technique (disease of the operated spine, a consequence of spinal cord injury in combination with chronic neuropathic pain syndrome). Research methods. An assessment of the intensity of pain syndrome was given according to a visual analogue scale, the Pain Detect questionnaire; indicators of anxiety, depression on the HADS scale; quality of life according to the Oswestry questionnaire for a follow-up period of 6-12 months in patients with chronic epidural stimulation. Results. A positive assessment of the action during test neurostimulation was 63.3% (38 patients). Of the established permanent systems, a good result was achieved and persisted for 12 months or more in 96% (24 patients). It was necessary to change the stimulation parameters in 13% (3 patients). Revision of permanent systems was performed in 20% (5 patients), due to the progression of the degenerative-dystrophic process of the spine, damage and migration of system elements. Conclusions. Chronic epidural spinal cord stimulation has established itself as a personalized, highly effective, minimally invasive and safe method of treating chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. Multicomponent corrective action is of scientific interest and requires further study.

scholarly journals Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain: Current perspectives of indications, cost-effectiveness, complications and results

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Camporeze ◽  
Renata Faria Simm ◽  
Iracema Araújo Estevão ◽  
Luis Roberto Mathias Junior ◽  
Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Reduction Of Pain ◽  
Bibliographic Search

Introduction: The spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been described as a valuable neuromodulating procedure in the management of chronic and medically untreated neuropathic pain. Although, many studies have discussed the use of this technique, a question still remains regarding its efficacy in different medical conditions with different etiology in the long term. The aim of this paper is to discuss the risks, complications, cost-effectiveness and results of SCS in patients affected by chronic neuropathic pain based on the comprehensive literature review. Methods: Bibliographic search of references from 1950 to 2016 using the databases MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO, PubMed, and applied language as selection criteria, choosing preferably recent articles written in Portuguese, Spanish or English. Results: Based on literature review, SCS is a safe, reversible, adjustable and nondestructive surgical procedure demonstrating a significant effect in the reduction of pain intensity and improvement in quality of life in these patients. Furthermore, in spite of the initial high cost to its application, SCS has been associated with lower rates of complications and high rates of cost-effectiveness when compared to standard therapies. Conclusion: Although used in medical conditions with different etiology, the procedure is still an effective and a cost-effective approach to neuropathic pain, mainly in patients affected by failed back pain syndrome (FBSS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Modulation of neuronal activity after spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain; H215O PET study

NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 2564-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Kishima ◽  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
Koichi Hosomi ◽  
Mohamed Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
H215o Pet
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document