scholarly journals ‘Saying it without words’: a qualitative study of oncology staff's experiences with speaking up about safety concerns

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e004740 ◽  
Author(s):  
D L B Schwappach ◽  
K Gehring
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. e33-e33 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Entwistle ◽  
D. McCaughan ◽  
I. S. Watt ◽  
Y. Birks ◽  
J. Hall ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham P Martin ◽  
Emma-Louise Aveling ◽  
Anne Campbell ◽  
Carolyn Tarrant ◽  
Peter J Pronovost ◽  
...  

BackgroundHealthcare organisations often fail to harvest and make use of the ‘soft intelligence’ about safety and quality concerns held by their own personnel. We aimed to examine the role of formal channels in encouraging or inhibiting employee voice about concerns.MethodsQualitative study involving personnel from three academic hospitals in two countries. Interviews were conducted with 165 participants from a wide range of occupational and professional backgrounds, including senior leaders and those from the sharp end of care. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method.ResultsLeaders reported that they valued employee voice; they identified formal organisational channels as a key route for the expression of concerns by employees. Formal channels and processes were designed to ensure fairness, account for all available evidence and achieve appropriate resolution. When processed through these formal systems, concerns were destined to become evidenced, formal and tractable to organisational intervention. But the way these systems operated meant that some concerns were never voiced. Participants were anxious about having to process their suspicions and concerns into hard evidentiary facts, and they feared being drawn into official procedures designed to allocate consequence. Anxiety about evidence and process was particularly relevant when the intelligence was especially ‘soft’—feelings or intuitions that were difficult to resolve into a coherent, compelling reconstruction of an incident or concern. Efforts to make soft intelligence hard thus risked creating ‘forbidden knowledge’: dangerous to know or share.ConclusionsThe legal and bureaucratic considerations that govern formal channels for the voicing of concerns may, perversely, inhibit staff from speaking up. Leaders responsible for quality and safety should consider complementing formal mechanisms with alternative, informal opportunities for listening to concerns.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Rainey ◽  
Kathryn Ehrich ◽  
Nicola Mackintosh ◽  
Jane Sandall

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carien W Alingh ◽  
Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden ◽  
Karina van de Voorde ◽  
Jaap Paauwe ◽  
Robbert Huijsman

BackgroundSpeaking up is important for patient safety, but healthcare professionals often hesitate to voice their concerns. Direct supervisors have an important role in influencing speaking up. However, good insight into the relationship between managers’ behaviour and employees’ perceptions about whether speaking up is safe and worthwhile is still lacking.AimTo explore the relationships between control-based and commitment-based safety management, climate for safety, psychological safety and nurses’ willingness to speak up.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey study, resulting in a sample of 980 nurses and 93 nurse managers working in Dutch clinical hospital wards. To test our hypotheses, hierarchical regression analyses (at ward level) and multilevel regression analyses were conducted.ResultsSignificantly positive associations were found between nurses’ perceptions of control-based safety management and climate for safety (β=0.74; p<0.001), and between the perceived levels of commitment-based management and team psychological safety (β=0.36; p<0.01). Furthermore, team psychological safety is found to be positively related to nurses’ speaking up attitudes (B=0.24; t=2.04; p<0.05). The relationship between nurse-rated commitment-based safety management and nurses’ willingness to speak up is fully mediated by team psychological safety.ConclusionResults provide initial support that nurses who perceive higher levels of commitment-based safety management feel safer to take interpersonal risks and are more willing to speak up about patient safety concerns. Furthermore, nurses’ perceptions of control-based safety management are found to be positively related to a climate for safety, although no association was found with speaking up. Both control-based and commitment-based management approaches seem to be relevant for managing patient safety, but when it comes to encouraging speaking up, a commitment-based safety management approach seems to be most valuable.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e230-e234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Etchegaray ◽  
Madelene J. Ottosen ◽  
Theresa Dancsak ◽  
Eric J. Thomas

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1251-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa F. Platt ◽  
Kayla S. Bolland

Relationship partners of transgender-identified individuals have distinctive couple-related experiences that are important to understand. The current qualitative study explored the unique elements of the experiences of those who partner with transgender-identified individuals. A sample of 21 participants who were partnered with a transgender person completed a 1-hr, semi-structured interview. The data yielded five important themes: (1) considerations with physical, sexual, and emotional intimacy; (2) changing sexual orientation labels; (3) safety concerns; (4) marginalization and feelings of isolation; and (5) new appreciation for the gender spectrum. The results show that partners experience considerable change in their lives and relationships as a transgender partner transitions. Implications for future research and how to provide support for this often-overlooked population are provided.


2022 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 105487
Author(s):  
Gro Ellen Mathisen ◽  
Tore Tjora ◽  
Linn Iren Vestly Bergh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document