scholarly journals Cancer and suicidal ideation and behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e020463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaella Calati ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
Elizabeth Mostofsky ◽  
Qing Shen ◽  
Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Study Heterogeneity ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

IntroductionPrevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviours are higher among patients with cancer than general population. No systematic review/meta-analysis investigated this topic; therefore, our aim will be to assess the relationship between cancer and SI and behaviours.MethodsWe will search PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases from their inception until 30 June 2018. Case–control and cohort studies focused on the association between cancer (any type) and suicidal outcomes (suicide, suicide attempt and SI) will be included. Two team members will independently: (A) perform the selection of the included studies and data extraction, with the supervision of a third member in case of discrepancies and (B) assess each study with: (1) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS); (2) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement; (3) Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We will conduct a random-effects meta-analysis. Individual and pooled ORs and associated 95% CIs will be calculated as well as between-study heterogeneity. We will examine the potential for publication bias. If possible, we will explore reasons for potential between-study heterogeneity.Ethics and disseminationThis study does not require ethical approval. The study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, will be publicly disseminated and will be the topic of research presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017072482.

scholarly journals Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) on pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e039933
Author(s):  
Kleyton Santos Medeiros ◽  
Ayane Cristine Alves Sarmento ◽  
Erico Silva Martins ◽  
Ana Paula Ferreira Costa ◽  
José Eleutério Jr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been growing at an accelerating rate, and has become a public health emergency. Pregnant women and their fetuses are susceptible to viral infection, and outcomes in this population need to be investigated.Methods and analysisPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHAL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, clinicaltrials.gov, SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Registry will be searched for observational studies (cohort and control cases) published from December 2019 to present. This systematic review and meta-analysis will include studies of pregnant women at any gestational stage diagnosed with COVID-19. The primary outcomes will be maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. Three independent reviewers will select the studies and extract data from the original publications. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. To evaluate the strength of evidence from the included data, we will use Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. Data synthesis will be performed using Review Manager software V.5.2.3. To assess heterogeneity, we will compute the I2 statistics. Additionally, a quantitative synthesis will be performed if the included studies are sufficiently homogenous.Ethics and disseminationThis study will be a review of the published data, and thus it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberPROSPERO 2020: CRD42020181519.

scholarly journals Accuracy of potential diagnostic indicators for coeliac disease: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e038994
Author(s):  
Martha Maria Christine Elwenspoek ◽  
Joni Jackson ◽  
Sarah Dawson ◽  
Hazel Everitt ◽  
Peter Gillett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coeliac Disease ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Endoscopic Biopsy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Registration Number

IntroductionCoeliac disease (CD) is a systemic immune-mediated disorder triggered by gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. CD is diagnosed using a combination of serology tests and endoscopic biopsy of the small intestine. However, because of non-specific symptoms and heterogeneous clinical presentation, diagnosing CD is challenging. Early detection of CD through improved case-finding strategies can improve the response to a gluten-free diet, patients’ quality of life and potentially reduce the risk of complications. However, there is a lack of consensus in which groups may benefit from active case-finding.Methods and analysisWe will perform a systematic review to determine the accuracy of diagnostic indicators (such as symptoms and risk factors) for CD in adults and children, and thus can help identify patients who should be offered CD testing. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched from 1997 until 2020. Screening will be performed in duplicate. Data extraction will be performed by one and checked by a second reviewer. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third reviewer. We will produce a narrative summary of identified prediction models. Studies, where 2×2 data can be extracted or reconstructed, will be treated as diagnostic accuracy studies, that is, the diagnostic indicators are the index tests and CD serology and/or biopsy is the reference standard. For each diagnostic indicator, we will perform a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity.Ethics and disseminationResults will be reported in peer-reviewed journals, academic and public presentations and social media. We will convene an implementation panel to advise on the optimum strategy for enhanced dissemination. We will discuss findings with Coeliac UK to help with dissemination to patients. Ethical approval is not applicable, as this is a systematic review and no research participants will be involved.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020170766.

scholarly journals Efficacy of tuina, cupping and acupuncture therapy on pain, anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with neck pain: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-xin Qin ◽  
An Li ◽  
Mao-Lin Zhan ◽  
Yi-Cheng Wu ◽  
Yong-Hua Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Future Clinical Practice ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Anxiety Depression

Abstract Background: Neck pain is a common disorder and is more frequent in females than in males worldwide. Recently, more attention is being paid to precautions for and treatment of neck pain. Current therapeutic methods for neck pain include pharmaceutical, complementary and alternative therapies. Tuina, acupuncture and cupping are effective in the treatment of neck pain, which enrich patients’ options. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of different interventions using randomised controlled trials to identify a prioritised treatment for neck pain.Methods: We will search five English databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID and Cochrane Library) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang Database and VIP) from database inception to December 2020. Two reviewers will independently perform article screening (title, keywords, abstract and full text); data extraction; risk of bias (RoB) assessment and grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation. We will use RevMan 5.3 software to carry out statistical analysis of the RoB and risk ratio to analyse the dichotomous data. Finally, we will use GeMTC V.0.8.1 package of R-3.3.2 software for network meta-analysis based on a Bayesian framework.Discussion: We will compare these three interventions to determine the most effective therapy for neck pain in terms of improving pain, anxiety, depression and QoL. In this way, we will provide powerful evidence for future clinical practice guidelines for patients with neck pain who want to receive a suitable treatment.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020206853.

scholarly journals Association between climate conditions and osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Wang ◽  
Qinguang Xu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yan Xue ◽  
Ding Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, causing by multiple factors. It has long been a belief that arthritis pain is influenced by the weather. However, scientific studies have documented inconsistent results. To date, neither systematic review nor meta-analysis of existing findings has comprehensively considered their relations. The present study will critically appraise and synthesize the existing evidence from observational studies that examined the relationship between certain climate conditions and OA. Methods and design: This protocol will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. There are no restrictions on the study date or publication status for searches in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and other relative databases. All eligible observational studies will be included, with weather conditions as effect factors and OA symptom or imaging abnormality as outcomes. Two reviewers will be responsible for data extraction and analysis. Risk of bias and quality appraisal will be performed for the included studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis will be conducted using Rev Man V.5.3 with the associations between weather conditions and OA presented by odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results This systematic review and meta-analysis will present the overall association between weather conditions and OA. The association of climate factors influencing OA incidence or progression would be further illustrated in subgroup analysis depending on whether that has been extensively described in the literature. Discussion This study will provide the analysis evidence on the effect of meteorological factors on OA. In an approach of dealing with weather conditions, the results will benefit the daily management of OA.

scholarly journals Prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-ru Yan ◽  
Xun Chen ◽  
Peitong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Ethical Approval

IntroductionPatients with lung cancer often experience heavy psychological distress, especially depression, which results in poorer quality of life, shorter survival time and greater mortality. Our aim is to summarise data on the prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with lung cancer.Methods and analysisWe will search PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) for studies on the prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with lung cancer, which should be published from 1 January 1975 to 25 November 2018 in English/Chinese. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias. We will use RevMan V.5.0 and STATA V.12.0 software for statistical analysis. The I² test will be used to identify the extent of heterogeneity. Publication bias will be assessed by generating a funnel plot and performing the Begg and Egger test. The quality of the systematic review will be evaluated using the AMSTAR (‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews’) criteria and ‘The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation’.Ethics and disseminationSince this is a review involving analysis of publicly available data, ethical approval is not required. The final results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018118167.

scholarly journals Association Between Asthma and Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Lin Kang ◽  
Pei-En Chen ◽  
Tao-Hsin Tung ◽  
Ching-Wen Chien
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
The Relationship

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between asthma and migraine and assess the risk for migraine in patients with asthma.Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) databases from inception to September 26, 2021, for indexed observational studies that examined either the odds or risk of migraine in subjects with asthma. The qualities of the included studies were evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio for case-control and cross-sectional studies and the risk ratio for cohort studies.Results: Seven observational studies (four cross-sectional and three cohort studies) with a total of 549,534 study subjects were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis and selected for data extraction. Four articles were considered to be of moderate quality; other studies were considered to be of high quality. Asthma was associated with increased odds (OR, 1.85; 95%CI, 1.39–2.45) and risk of migraine (RR, 1.70; 95%CI, 1.52–1.90).Conclusions: The available evidence that supports the existence of an association between asthma and migraine is limited. Clinicians should be aware that patients with asthma show both increased prevalence and incidence of migraine. Further studies are warranted to further clarify the relationship between asthma and migraine.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=185881, identifier: CRD42020185881.

scholarly journals Association between cytokine levels, sepsis severity and clinical outcomes in sepsis: a quantitative systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e048476
Author(s):  
Amal Gharamti ◽  
Omar Samara ◽  
Anthony Monzon ◽  
Sias Scherger ◽  
Kristen DeSanto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Proinflammatory Cytokines ◽  
English Language ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interferon Γ ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Ethical Approval

IntroductionIt is widely assumed that sepsis is a life-threatening systemic inflammation caused by a dysregulated host response to infection mediated by an increase in multiple proinflammatory cytokines. The levels of key proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor, interleukin-1β and interferon γ are poorly characterised during sepsis. We believe this project will produce a ‘gold-standard’ document to which other reports on cytokine levels will be compared. The objective of this systematic review will be to identify key cytokine circulating levels in patients with sepsis and assess the association between these levels and morbidity and mortality outcomes related to sepsis.Methods and analysisWe would include reports of any design except for case reports. Sepsis patients will comprise those with a diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. The primary exposure is levels of three proinflammatory cytokines. The primary outcome is mortality at 28 or 30 days. Study subjects can be of any age, sex or ethnicity. Studies will be restricted to the English language. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection will be searched for eligible studies. A database search will include studies from 1985 to May 2020. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, assess methodological quality and extract data. A meta-analysis will be performed, if possible, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation Summary of Findings presented.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as data will be extracted from existing literature. This systematic review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and at conference meetings.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020179800.

scholarly journals Prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e040997
Author(s):  
Varo Kirthi ◽  
Paul Nderitu ◽  
Uazman Alam ◽  
Jennifer Evans ◽  
Sarah Nevitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
International Diabetes Federation ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Fundus Photography ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Cochrane Library

IntroductionThere is growing evidence of a higher than expected prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes. This paper presents the protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of retinopathy in prediabetes. The aim of the review is to estimate the prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes and to summarise the current data.Methods and analysisThis protocol is developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive electronic bibliographic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report prevalence data for retinopathy on fundus photography in adults with prediabetes. No time restrictions will be placed on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. Disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved by discussion, and if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate.The primary outcome is the prevalence of any standard features of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on fundus photography, as per International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ICDRSS) classification. Secondary outcomes are the prevalence of (1) any retinal microvascular abnormalities on fundus photography that are not standard features of DR as per ICDRSS classification and (2) any macular microvascular abnormalities on fundus photography, including but not limited to the presence of macular exudates, microaneurysms and haemorrhages. Risk of bias for included studies will be assessed using a validated risk of bias tool for prevalence studies. Pooled estimates for the prespecified outcomes of interest will be calculated using random effects meta-analytic techniques. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review and no primary data are to be collected. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international meetings including Diabetes UK, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, American Diabetes Association and International Diabetes Federation conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020184820.

scholarly journals Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Oswald D. Kothgassner ◽  
Andreas Goreis ◽  
Kealagh Robinson ◽  
Mercedes M. Huscsava ◽  
Christian Schmahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Dialectical Behavior Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adolescent Psychopathology ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Self Harm

Abstract Background Given the widespread nature and clinical consequences of self-harm and suicidal ideation among adolescents, establishing the efficacy of developmentally appropriate treatments that reduce both self-harm and suicidal ideation in the context of broader adolescent psychopathology is critical. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) literature on treating self-injury in adolescents (12–19 years). We searched for eligible trials and treatment evaluations published prior to July 2020 in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for clinical trials. Twenty-one studies were identified [five randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), three controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 13 pre-post evaluations]. We extracted data for predefined primary (self-harm, suicidal ideation) and secondary outcomes (borderline personality symptoms; BPD) and calculated treatment effects for RCTs/CCTs and pre-post evaluations. This meta-analysis was pre-registered with OSF: osf.io/v83e7. Results Overall, the studies comprised 1673 adolescents. Compared to control groups, DBT-A showed small to moderate effects for reducing self-harm (g = −0.44; 95% CI −0.81 to −0.07) and suicidal ideation (g = −0.31, 95% CI −0.52 to −0.09). Pre-post evaluations suggested large effects for all outcomes (self-harm: g = −0.98, 95% CI −1.15 to −0.81; suicidal ideation: g = −1.16, 95% CI −1.51 to −0.80; BPD symptoms: g = −0.97, 95% CI −1.31 to −0.63). Conclusions DBT-A appears to be a valuable treatment in reducing both adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation. However, evidence that DBT-A reduces BPD symptoms was only found in pre-post evaluations.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Antalgic Therapies in Patients with Vertebral Bone Metastasis: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 3991
Author(s):  
Antonio Jose Martin-Perez ◽  
María Fernández-González ◽  
Paula Postigo-Martin ◽  
Marc Sampedro Pilegaard ◽  
Carolina Fernández-Lao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Vertebral Metastasis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

There is no systematic review that has identified existing studies evaluating the pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention for pain management in patients with bone metastasis. To fill this gap in the literature, this systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different antalgic therapies (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) in the improvement of pain of these patients. To this end, this protocol has been written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020135762). A systematic search will be carried out in four international databases: Medline (Via PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS, to select the randomized controlled clinical trials. The Risk of Bias Tool developed by Cochrane will be used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the identified studies. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe and compare the studies, and after the data extraction, random effects model and a subgroup analyses will be performed according to the type of intervention, if possible. This protocol aims to generate a systematic review that compiles and synthesizes the best and most recent evidence on the treatment of pain derived from vertebral metastasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document