scholarly journals Prospective cohort study of water immersion for labour and birth compared with standard care in an Irish maternity setting

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038080
Author(s):  
Paula L Barry ◽  
Lean E McMahon ◽  
Ruth AM Banks ◽  
Ann M Fergus ◽  
Deirdre J Murphy

ObjectiveTo examine the birth outcomes for women and babies following water immersion for labour only, or for labour and birth.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingMaternity hospital, Ireland, 2016–2019.ParticipantsA cohort of 190 low-risk women who used water immersion; 100 gave birth in water and 90 laboured only in water. A control group of 190 low-risk women who received standard care.MethodsLogistic regression analyses examined associations between water immersion and birth outcomes adjusting for confounders. A validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire was completed.Main outcome measuresPerineal tears, obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), neonatal unit admissions (NNU), breastfeeding and birth experiences.ResultsCompared with standard care, women who chose water immersion had no significant difference in perineal tears (71.4% vs 71.4%, adj OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.39) or in OASI (3.3% vs 3.8%, adj OR 0.91; 0.26–2.97). Women who chose water immersion were more likely to have a PPH ≥500 mL (10.5% vs 3.7%, adj OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.03 to 6.57), and to exclusively breastfeed at discharge (71.1% vs 45.8%, adj OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.66 to 4.05). There was no significant difference in NNU admissions (3.7% vs 3.2%, adj OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.33 to 3.42). Women who gave birth in water were no more likely than women who used water for labour only to require perineal suturing (64% vs 80.5%, adj OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.33), to experience OASI (3.0% vs 3.7%, adj OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 8.79) or PPH (8.0% vs 13.3%, adj OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.26 to 2.09). Women using water immersion reported more positive memories than women receiving standard care (p<0.01).ConclusionsWomen choosing water immersion for labour or birth were no more likely to experience adverse birth outcomes than women receiving standard care and rated their birth experiences more highly.

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther I. Feijen-de Jong ◽  
Danielle E.M.C. Jansen ◽  
Frank Baarveld ◽  
Agatha W. Boerleider ◽  
Evelien Spelten ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emma Seed ◽  
Lauren Kearney ◽  
Edward Weaver ◽  
Rachael Nugent

Objective: This study investigated maternal and fetal outcomes following warm water immersion (WWI) and/or waterbirth compared with land birth for women with moderate obstetric risk factors. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Maternity hospital, Australia, 2019-2020 Population: 1665 participants, some with ‘risk factors’ for adverse perinatal outcomes requiring continuous electronic fetal monitoring (CEFM) during labour. Method: Multivariate logistical regressions were used to determine the odds of neonatal and maternal outcome measures between three groups: waterbirth, WWI and land birth Main outcome measures: Neonatal morbidity and mortality, including neonatal unit admission (NNU). Maternal clinical outcome measures, including mode of birth, perineal injury, postpartum haemorrhage, length of labour and morbidity. Results: NNU admissions for a suspected infectious condition were significantly higher in the land birth group (p=0.035). After accounting for labour duration, epidural use, previous birth mode, and labour onset, no significant difference was detected between land births and WWI/water births in the odds of NNU admission (p=0.200). No babies were admitted to NNU with signs of water inhalation or drowning. Women birthing on land had a higher mean blood loss (p=0.036) and were more likely to be febrile (2% v 0%; p=0.007); Obstetric anal sphincter injury was similar between groups. Pharmacological analgesia use was lower in the WB/WWI group (p<0.001). There was 1 cord avulsion in the waterbirth group (0.41%). Mode of birth was similar between groups (p=0.697). Conclusion: Despite moderate obstetric risk factors such as oxytocin administration and induction of labour; maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups.


Author(s):  
Lauren A. Wise ◽  
Tanran R. Wang ◽  
Amelia K. Wesselink ◽  
Sydney K. Willis ◽  
Alina Chaiyasarikul ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinglong Yang ◽  
Xueying Yang ◽  
Linghua Li ◽  
Huifang Xu ◽  
Lirui Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We estimated the predictive effects of ART-related perceptions on the actual ART uptake behavior among ART naïve PLWH stratified by different time of HIV diagnosis under the new strategy. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted among ART naïve PLWH in Guangzhou, China from June 2016 to June 2017. Cox regression model was used to evaluate the predictive effects of ART-related perceptions on ART initiation among PLWH stratified by different timepoint of HIV diagnosis (i.e., before or after the update of the new treatment policy). Results Among 411 participants, 150 and 261 were diagnosed before (pre-scaleup group) and after (post-scaleup group) the implementation of the new strategy, respectively. The ART initiation rate in the post-scaleup group (88.9%) was higher than that in the pre-scaleup group (73.3%) (p < 0.001). A significant difference of mean score was detected in each HBM construct between pre- and post-scaleup groups (p < 0.05). After adjusting for significant background variables, among all participants, only the self-efficacy [adjusted HR (HRa) = 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.43, p = 0.006], has a predictive effect on ART initiation; in pre-scaleup group, all constructs of HBM-related ART perceptions were predictors of ART initiation (HRa = 0.71 to 1.83, p < 0.05), while in post-scaleup group, no significant difference was found in each construct (p > 0.05). Conclusions The ART initiation rate was high particularly among participants who diagnosed after the new treatment strategy. The important role of the time of HIV diagnosis on ART initiation identified in this study suggested that future implementation interventions may consider to modify the ART-related perceptions for HIV patients who diagnosed before the implementation of the new ART strategy, while expand the accessibility of ART service for those who diagnosed after the implementation of the new strategy.


CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Yan ◽  
Shelley L. McLeod ◽  
Marcia L. Edmonds ◽  
Robert J. Sedran ◽  
Karl D. Theakston

AbstractIntroductionDetermining which patients with ureterolithiasis are likely to require urologic intervention is a common challenge in the emergency department (ED). The objective was to determine if normal renal sonogram could identify low-risk renal colic patients, who were defined as not requiring urologic intervention within 90 days of their initial ED visit and can be managed conservatively.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study involving adult patients presenting to the EDs of a tertiary care centre with suspected renal colic over a 20-month period. Renal ultrasonography (US) was performed in the diagnostic imaging department by trained ultrasonographers, and the results were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups: normal, suggestive of ureterolithiasis, visualized ureteric stone, or findings unrelated to urolithiasis. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine if patients received urologic intervention within 90 days of their ED visit.ResultsOf 610 patients enrolled, 341 (55.9%) had US for suspected renal colic. Of those, 105 (30.8%) were classified as normal; none of these patients underwent urologic intervention within 90 days of their ED visit. Ninety (26.4%) US results were classified as suggestive, and nine (10%) patients received urologic intervention. A total of 139 (40.8%) US results were classified as visualized ureteric stone, and 34 (24.5%) patients had urologic intervention. Seven (2.1%) US results were classified as findings unrelated to urolithiasis, and none of these patients required urologic intervention. The rate of urologic intervention was significantly lower in those with normal US results (p<0.001) than in those with abnormal findings.ConclusionA normal renal sonogram predicts a low likelihood for urologic intervention within 90 days for adult ED patients with suspected renal colic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document