scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of paediatric surgery: an economic evaluation of World Paediatric Project surgical interventions in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2002–2019)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e050286
Author(s):  
Carrie B Dolan ◽  
Samuel A Agyemang ◽  
Brian Clare ◽  
Charles Coleman ◽  
Bill Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Per Capita

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of six types of surgical interventions as part of a sustained paediatric surgical programme in St.Vincent and the Grenadines from 2002 to 2019.DesignIn this economic model, six paediatric surgical interventions (ophthalmic, orthopaedic, plastic, general, urology, neurosurgery) were compared with no surgery in a deterministic cost-effectiveness model. We assessed health benefits as averted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Costs were included from the programme perspective and measured using standard micro-costing methods. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each type of surgical intervention. Interventions with ICERs of <50% of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were considered cost-effective. Costs are reported in 2019 US$. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of uncertainty.ResultsThe average cost per procedure was US$16 685 (range: US$9791.78–US$72 845.76). The cumulative discounted 18-year health impact was 5815 DALYs averted with a cost per DALY averted of US$2622. Most paediatric surgical interventions were cost-effective, yielding cost per DALY estimates less than 50% of GDP per capita of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. When undiscounted, only orthopaedic surgeries had cost per DALY more than 50% GDP per capita. When considering discounting, orthopaedic and urology surgeries exceeded the adopted threshold for cost-effectiveness.ConclusionsWe found that short-term, recurrent surgical interventions could yield substantial economic benefits in this limited resource setting. This research indicates that investment in paediatric surgical interventions is cost-effective for the majority of specialties. These findings are of clinical significance given the large burden of disease attributable to surgically treatable diseases. This work demonstrates that scaling up dedicated surgical programmes for children is a cost-effective and essential component to improve paediatric health.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of ranibizumab for retinal vein occlusion patients in China from the societal perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyi Ni ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
Yawen Jiang ◽  
Jing Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Societal Perspective ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Per Capita

Abstract Background Clinical trials in China have demonstrated that ranibizumab can improve the clinical outcomes of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). However, no economic evaluation of ranibizumab has been conducted among Chinese patient population. Methods To provide insights into the economic profile of ranibizumab among Chinese RVO population, a Markov state-transition model was used to predict the outcomes of ranibizumab comparing to laser photocoagulation and observational-only care from the societal perspective. This model simulated changes in patient visuality, quality-adjusted of life years (QALY), medical costs, and direct non-medical costs of individuals with visual impairment due to BRVO or CRVO in lifetime. The base-case analysis used an annual discount rate of 5% for costs and benefits following the China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing ranibizumab to laser photocoagulation was ¥65,008/QALY among BRVO patients and was ¥65,815/QALY among CRVO patients, respectively. Comparing to the 2019 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of ¥71,000, both two ICERs were far below the cost-effective threshold at three times of GDP per capita (¥213,000). The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated the base-case results were robust in most of the simulation scenarios. Conclusion The current Markov model demonstrated that ranibizumab may be cost-effective compared with laser photocoagulation to treat BRVO and cost-effective compared to observation-only care to treat CRVO in China from the societal perspective.

scholarly journals Is Albumin-based Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Justifiable? An Evidence from a Cost-effectiveness Evaluation

1970 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bereket Tigabu ◽  
Majid Davari ◽  
Abbas Kebriaeezadeh ◽  
Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh ◽  
Kourosh Sadeghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Tree Age ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
The Cost

BACKGROUND: Fluid and antimicrobial therapy are the essential parts of sepsis management. The type of fluid to resuscitate with is an unsettled issue in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of albumin-based resuscitation over crystalloids.METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by extracting data from a database of Sina Hospital, Islamic Republic of Iran. A decision tree was constructed by using Tree Age Pro2011. The patients were grouped based on the types of fluids used for resuscitation into crystalloid alone or crystalloid + albumin groups at the initial decision node. The patients were followed from the onset of severe sepsis and septic shock upto 28 days. The healthcare payers’ perspective was considered in constructing the model. The cost was measured in US dollars and the effectiveness was measured by life years gained.RESULTS: The addition of albumin during resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock has an effectiveness gain of 0.09 life years and cost increment of 495.00 USD. The estimated ICER for this analysis was 5500.00 USD per life year gained. The probability that albumin is cost-effective at one GDP per capita is 49.5%.CONCLUSION: Albumin-based resuscitation is not cost-effective in Iran when a GDP per capita was considered for a life year gain. The cost-effectiveness was insensitive to the cost of standard care. We recomend the caustious use albumin as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline. 

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of FOLFOX Combined Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiyue Li ◽  
Shen Lin ◽  
Leslie Wilson ◽  
Pinfang Huang ◽  
Hang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Portal Vein Invasion ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Per Capita

BackgroundHepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) plus sorafenib has a more desirable effect versus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein invasion. However, considering the high cost of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC), this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HAIC plus sorafenib (SoraHAIC) versus standard care for HCC patients from the Chinese health system perspective.MethodsA Markov multi-state model was constructed to simulate the disease course and source consumption of SoraHAIC. Costs of primary therapeutic drugs were calculated based on the national bid price, and hepatic artery catheterization fee was collected from the Fujian Provincial Price Bureau. Clinical data, other costs, and utility values were extracted from references. Primary outcomes included life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The robustness of model was verified by uncertainty sensitivity analyses.ResultsSoraHAIC gained 1.18 QALYs (1.68 LYs) at a cost of $65,254, while the effectiveness and cost of sorafenib were 0.52 QALYs (0.79 LYs) and $14,280, respectively. The ICER of SoraHAIC vs sorafenib was $77,132/QALY ($57,153/LY). Parameter that most influenced the ICER was utility of PFS state. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed that SoraHAIC was not cost-effective in the WTP threshold of 3*Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of China ($30,492/QALY). But about 38.8% of the simulations were favorable to SoraHAIC at the WTP threshold of 3*GDP per capita of Beijing ($72,000/QALY). When 3*GDP per capita of Fujian ($47,285/QALY) and Gansu Province ($14,595/QALY) were used as WTP threshold, the acceptability of SoraHAIC was 0.3% and 0%, respectively.ConclusionsThe study results indicated that SoraHAIC was not cost-effective in medium-, and low-income regions of China. In developed areas of China (Beijing), there was a 38.8% probability that the SoraHAIC regimen would be cost-effective.

Cost-effectiveness of CHOP in treating DLBCL in Malawi.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6644-6644
Author(s):  
Matthew Painschab ◽  
Racquel Elizabeth Kohler ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Satish Gopal
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Per Capita

6644 Background: DLBCL is common in Africa, and often curable, but treatment costs and cost-effectiveness are key considerations. WHO defines extremely cost-effective interventions as having an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) < GDP per capita. Methods: We used a decision tree model to conduct a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis from a health systems perspective in Malawi (2017 GDP per capita $340). Comparisons were made between CHOP vs. palliative care with diagnosis (PC+D), and palliative care without diagnosis (PC-D). Microcosting and clinical outcomes were derived from published prospective data. Costs reflect treatment and 2 years of follow-up. Outcomes reflect a lifetime time horizon. Life expectancies were derived from UNdata, and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) weights from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Costs were analyzed in 2017 US $, and costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. Annual estimates for new DLBCL cases (n=161) were used as input incidence. Probablistic sensitivity analysis was conducted using Crystal Ball software over 1000 simulations. Results: For the base case, the ICER of CHOP versus PC+D is $150/DALY averted, and versus PC-D is $200/DALY averted (Table). The ICER was stable across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. The ICER varied most across the range of progression-free survival estimates ($117-209), and range of costs for CHOP plus follow-up ($71-308). CHOP was extremely cost-effective by the WHO definition in 99% of simulations versus PC+D, and 94% of simulations versus PC-D. In the base case, total annual cost of DLBCL treatment with CHOP in Malawi was $306,221. Conclusions: This is one of the first rigorous cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses for cancer treatment in a low-income country. CHOP is extremely cost-effective compared to palliative care, with ~$300,000 needed annually to treat all DLBCL cases in Malawi. These findings merit external validation, and support continued regional investments in cancer care. [Table: see text]

Abstract 02: Population Strategies to Decrease Sodium Intake: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Webb ◽  
Saman Fahimi ◽  
Gitanjali M Singh ◽  
Shahab Khatibzadeh ◽  
Renata Micha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Sodium Intake ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Dietary Sodium ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Sodium Reduction ◽  
National Education ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Global Cost ◽  
Per Capita

Background: Excess sodium intake is a major risk factor for CVD globally. Yet, the cost-effectiveness of policy interventions to reduce sodium consumption in every country has not been quantified. Methods: We characterized global sodium intakes, blood pressure (BP) levels, effects of sodium on BP, and CVD rates, each by age and sex in 187 countries based on the 2010 Global Burden of Diseases study. Nation-specific costs of a policy that combined education with targeted industry agreements to reduce sodium were estimated using the WHO NCD Costing Tool. Nation-specific impacts on mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were modeled using comparative risk assessment, based on various scenarios including 10%, 30%, 1 g/d, and 3 g/d achieved sodium reductions over 10 yrs. Cost-effectiveness (CE) was evaluated as PPP-adjusted international $ per DALY saved over 10 yrs. Results: Worldwide, a 10% sodium reduction within each country was projected to avert an average of 5,655,000 CVD-related DALYs/year, at an average cost of 1.11 international dollars per capita over the 10 yr intervention. The average CE ratio was I$207/DALY. Across 21 world regions, sodium reduction would be most CE in South Asia and East/Southeast Asia (each I$120/DALY); across 187 countries, the most CE were Moldova (I$9.89/DALY), Azerbaijan (I$12.82/DALY), and Uzbekistan (I$12.85/DALY). The least CE region was Australia/New Zealand (I$922/DALY), although this CE was still substantially below the usual threshold to define an intervention as CE (3.0 GDP per capita). 99% of the world's population live in countries in which the intervention had a CE ratio < 1.0 GDP per capita, and 95% in countries with a CE ratio < 0.1 GDP per capita - far below standard acceptable CE ratios of 3.0 GDP per capita. Conclusions: National education and industry-agreement strategies to reduce dietary sodium would have substantial impacts on CVD and be extremely cost-effective in nearly every country worldwide. CE of 10% reduction intervention: GDP/capita per DALY

Affording Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Argentinean National Cancer Institute (ANCI) perspective.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19404-e19404
Author(s):  
Carolina Gabay ◽  
Santiago Pesci ◽  
Johana Caldano ◽  
Maria Celeste Diaz
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Per Capita

e19404 Background: ICI agents proved clinical effectiveness in metastatic NSCLC; irrespectively PDL1 expression, but they increase costs considerably. Thus its cost-effectiveness (CE) needs to be established in low and middle-income countries. We aimed to assess CE of Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed (PCP) vs. carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line setting for non-squamous NSCLC, according to PDL1expresion, in Argentinian public healthcare system (APHS). Methods: Clinical outcomes, utilities, and transition probabilities were collected from the available literature (Keynote 189/024) after a systematic review. The certainty of evidence according to GRADE methodology was qualified as high. A Markov model was developed. Model outcomes were measured in quality adjusted-life-years (QALY) and CE was estimated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 20 years time horizon. Only direct costs were considered from a public price database of the drugs accounted in the model. The WHO ICER threshold, defined as 1-3 GDP per capita, was selected to established CE. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. Results: In PDL1≥ 50 % subgroup, PCP increased life expectancy of patients by 1.06 QALY for an incremental cost of USD 71.551 vs. CP with an ICER of 67.352 per QALY. An indirect comparison of PCP vs. Pembolizumab monotherapy found no differences in QALY estimates, however, it was associated with an incremental cost of USD 5.516. QALY estimate for PDL1 1-49% was 0.73 with an ICER of USD 85.984/ QALY gained. PDL1 < 1% obtained a QALY of 0.42 related to the largest ICER (USD 97.095) for the same comparison. The sensitivity analyses using a threshold between 1- 3 Argentinian GDP per capita in 2018 (USD 11.8602) found that PCP has no chance of being considered CE in untreated NSCLC patients. If a 6 GDP threshold is adopted in PDL1≥ 50 %, PCP would have a 50% possibility of being CE. Conclusions: This model was part of the decision-making process in the development of treatment guidelines for metastatic NSCLC in the ANCI. PCP cannot be considered acceptable for the APHS. Strategies to reduce costs are mandatory to improve affordability in our region.

Evaluating the Outcomes of a Hospital-to-Community Model of Integrated Care for Dementia

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ngoc Huong Lien Ha ◽  
Philip Yap Lin Kiat ◽  
Sean Olivia Nicholas ◽  
Ivana Chan ◽  
Shiou Liang Wee
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Behavioural Problems ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
The Cost

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Living with dementia is challenging for persons with dementia (PWDs) and their families. Although multi-component intervention, underscored by the ethos of person-centred care, has been shown to maintain quality of life (QOL) in PWDs and caregivers, a lack of service integration can hinder effectiveness. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> CARITAS, an integrated care initiative provided through a hospital-community care partnership, endeavours to provide person-centred dementia care through ambulatory clinic consults, case management, patient and caregiver engagement, and support. We evaluated CARITAS’ clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness with a naturalistic cross-sectional within-subject design. We assessed patients’ function, QOL, and behavioural problems post-intervention. We estimated CARITAS’ cost-effectiveness from a patient’s perspective, benchmarking it against other dementia treatments and Singapore’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. <b><i>Results:</i></b> CARITAS care significantly improved health utility (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), reduced caregiver burden (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), and improved PWDs’ behavioural problems (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) related to “memory” (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), “disruption” (<i>p</i> = 0.017), and “depression” (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). CARITAS’ benefits (<i>d</i><sub>RMBPC</sub> = 0.357, <i>d</i><sub>EQ5D index</sub> = 0.328, <i>d</i><sub>ZBI</sub> = 0.361) were comparable to those of other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for dementia. CARITAS costs SG$133,056.69 per quality-adjusted life years gain, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1.31 and 1.49 against the cost of donepezil in patients with mild Alz­heimer’s disease and Singapore’s GDP per capita in 2019, respectively, falling within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1.0–3.0. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> CARITAS integrated dementia care is a cost-effective intervention that showed promising outcomes for PWDs and their caregivers.

Ixazomib (IXA), carfilzomib (CAR), elotuzumab (ELO) or daratumumab (DAR) with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (LEN+DEX) versus LEN+DEX only in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM): A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8043-8043
Author(s):  
Mavis Obeng-Kusi ◽  
Daniel Arku ◽  
Neda Alrawashdh ◽  
Briana Choi ◽  
Nimer S. Alkhatib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Comparative Cost ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Life Years

8043 Background: IXA, CAR, ELO and DARin combination with LEN+DEXhave been found superior in efficacy compared to LEN+DEX in the management of R/R MM. Applying indirect treatment comparisons from a network meta-analysis (NMA), this economic evaluation aimed to estimate the comparative cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of these four triplet regimens in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: In the absence of direct treatment comparison from a single clinical trial, NMA was used to indirectly estimate the comparative PFS benefit of each regimen. A 2-state Markov model simulating the health outcomes and costs was used to evaluate PFS life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) with the triplet regimens over LEN+DEX and expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR). Probability sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty on the model. Results: The NMA revealed that DAR+LEN+DEX was superior to the other triplet therapies, which did not differ statistically amongst them. As detailed in the Table, in our cost-effectiveness analysis, all 4 triplet regimens were associated with increased PFSLY and PFSQALY gained (g) over LEN+DEX at an additional cost. DAR+LEN+DEX emerged the most cost-effective with ICER and ICUR of $667,652/PFSLYg and $813,322/PFSQALYg, respectively. The highest probability of cost-effectiveness occurred at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $1,040,000/QALYg. Conclusions: Our economic analysis shows that all the triplet regimens were more expensive than LEN +DEX only but were also more effective with respect to PFSLY and PFSQALY gained. Relative to the other regimens, the daratumumab regimen was the most cost-effective.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cost-utility Analysis of Second-generation Direct-acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdollah Poursamad ◽  
Zahra Goudarzi ◽  
Iman Karimzadeh ◽  
Nahid Jallaly ◽  
Khosro Keshavarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genotype 1 ◽  
Medication Regimen ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Medication Therapy ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Study Results

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to increased mortality, disability, and liver transplantation if left untreated, and it is associated with a possible increase in disease burden in the future, all of which would surely have a significant impact on the health system. New antiviral regimens are effective in the treatment of the disease yet expensive. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of three medication regimens, namely, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), velpatasvir/sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir/sofosbuvir (DCV/SOF) for HCV patients with genotype 1 in Iran. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was developed to predict the costs and outcomes of the three mentioned medication therapy strategies. The final outcome of the study was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which was obtained using the previously published studies. The study was conducted from the perspective of the Health Ministry; therefore, only direct medical costs were estimated. The results were provided as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY. Ultimately, the one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to measure the strength of study results. Results: The results showed that the QALYs for LDV/SOF, DCV/SOF, and VEL/SOF were 13.25, 13.94, and 14.61, and the costs were 4,807, 7,716, and 4,546$, respectively. The VEL/SOF regimen had lower costs and higher effectiveness than the LDV/SOF and DCV/SOF regimens, making it a dominant strategy. The tornado diagram results showed that the study results had the highest sensitivity to chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and compensated cirrhosis (CC) state costs. Moreover, the scatter plots showed that the VEL/SOF was the dominant therapeutic strategy in 73% of the simulations compared to LDV/SOF and 66% of the simulations compared to DCV/SOF; moreover, it was in the acceptable region in 92% of the simulations and below the threshold. Therefore, it was considered the most cost-effective strategy. Moreover, the results showed that DCV/SOF was in the acceptable region below the threshold in 69% of the simulations compared to LDV/SOF. Therefore, the DCV/SOF regimen was more cost-effective than LDV/SOF. Conclusions: According to the present study results, it is suggested that the VEL/SOF regimen be used as the first line of therapy in patients with HCV genotype 1. Moreover, DCV/SOF can be the second-line medication regimen.

scholarly journals Cladribine tablets are a cost-effective strategy in high-disease activity relapsing multiple sclerosis patients in Iran

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayyereh Ayati ◽  
Lora Fleifel ◽  
Mohammad Ali Sahraian ◽  
Shekoufeh Nikfar
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Cladribine tablets are the foremost oral immune-reconstitution therapy for high disease activity relapsing multiple sclerosis (HDA-RMS). We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets compared to natalizumab in patients with HDA-RMS in Iran. Methods: A 5-year cohort-based Markov model was developed with 11 expanded disability status score (EDSS) health states, including patients with HDA-RMS as on and off-treatment. All costs were identified from the literature and expert opinion and were measured in Iranian Rial rates, changed to the 2020 USD rate and were discounted by 7.2%. Quality adjusted life years (QALY), discounted by 3.5%, and life years gained (LYG) were adopted to measure efficacy. The final results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that was compared to a national willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of 1 to 3 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (D/PSA) were employed to evaluate uncertainty. Results: Cladribine tablets dominated natalizumab and yielded 6,607 USD cost-saving and 0.003 additional QALYs per patient. LYG was comparable. The main cost component was drug acquisition cost in both arms. DSA indicated the sensitivity of the results to the cost discount rates and also the patients’ body weight; while they were less sensitive to the main clinical variables. PSA indicated that cladribine tablets were cost-effective in Iran, with a probability of 57.5% and 58.6% at lower and higher limits of threshold, respectively. Conclusion: Cladribine tablets yielded higher QALYs and lower costs compared to natalizumab, in patients with HDA-RMS in Iran.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document