scholarly journals Acceptability of a mHealth strategy for hypertension management in a low-income and middle-income country setting: a formative qualitative study among patients and healthcare providers

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e052986
Author(s):  
Buna Bhandari ◽  
Aletta E Schutte ◽  
Rohan Jayasuriya ◽  
Abhinav Vaidya ◽  
Madhusudan Subedi ◽  
...  

BackgroundUnderstanding contextual needs and preferences is important for a successful design and effective outcome of a mHealth strategy.ObjectivesThis formative study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and providers on the acceptability of a mHealth (text message) strategy and elicit preferred features of a mHealth strategy for hypertension management.DesignA qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions guided by the technology acceptance model.SettingThe study was conducted at primary healthcare facilities and at a tertiary level referral hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.ParticipantsA total of 61 participants, patients with hypertension (n=41), their family members (n=5), healthcare workers (n=11) and key informants (n=4) were included. We purposively recruited patients with hypertension aged 30–70 who attended the selected healthcare facilities to obtain maximum variation based on their age, sex and literacy.ResultsThe respondents perceived the mHealth strategy to be useful as it would reinforce medication compliance and behaviour change. Participants valued the trustworthiness of information from health authorities that could be delivered privately. Some implementation challenges were identified including a lack of technical manpower, resources for software development, gaps in recording a patient’s essential information and digital illiteracy. Solutions proposed were having system-level preparedness for recording the patient’s details, establishing a separate technical department in the hospital and involving a family member to assist illiterate/elderly patients. In addition, participants preferred text messages in the local language, containing comprehensive contextual content (disease, treatment, cultural foods and misconceptions) delivered at regular intervals (2–3 times/week) preferably in the morning or evening.ConclusionsWe found that a simple text messaging strategy was acceptable for hypertension management in this low/middle-income country setting. However, meticulous planning must address the needs of a diverse range of participants to ensure the mHealth strategy is acceptable to wider groups.

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (22) ◽  
pp. e15681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Guilherme Passaglia ◽  
Luisa Campos Caldeira Brant ◽  
Bruno Ramos Nascimento ◽  
Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. e0184662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rima Hajjar ◽  
Aya Bassatne ◽  
Mohamad Ali Cheaito ◽  
Rabie Naser El Dine ◽  
Sarah Traboulsy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan-Hoang Vuong

Valian rightly made a case for better recognition of women in science during the Nobel week in October 2018 (Valian, 2018). However, it seems most published views about gender inequality in Nature focused on the West. This correspondence shifts the focus to women in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC).


Author(s):  
Bridget Pratt

Health research funded by organizations from HICs and conducted in low- and middle-income countries has grown significantly since 1990. Power imbalances and inequities frequently (but not always) exist at each stage of the international research process. Unsurprisingly then, a variety of ethical concerns commonly arise in the context of international health research, such as inequities in funding, the semi-colonial nature of international research models, the brain drain of low- and middle-income country researchers, and inequities in partnerships between HIC and low- and middle-income country researchers. In this chapter, these (and other) ethical concerns are introduced and the following ethical concepts to address the concerns are then discussed: responsiveness, standard of care, benefit sharing, community engagement, and social value. Existing guidance and remaining debates about how to specify each of the concepts are summarized. The chapter concludes by highlighting the existence of epistemic injustices within the field of international research ethics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document