scholarly journals Evaluation of rational prescribing in paediatrics

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e001045
Author(s):  
Imti Choonara
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelle Tichelaar ◽  
Theo PGM de Vries ◽  
Milan Richir

Author(s):  
Asma Al-Turkait ◽  
Lisa Szatkowski ◽  
Imti Choonara ◽  
Shalini Ojha

Rational prescribing is challenging in neonatology. Drug utilization studies help identify and define the problem. We performed a review of the literature on drug use in neonatal units and describe global variations. We searched databases (EMBASE, CINAHL and Medline) from inception to July 2020, screened studies and extracted relevant data (two reviewers). The search revealed 573 studies of which 84 were included. India (n = 14) and the USA (n = 13) reported the most. Data collection was prospective (n = 56) and retrospective (n = 26), mostly (n = 52) from one center only. Sixty studies described general drug use in 34 to 450,386 infants (median (IQR) 190 (91–767)) over a median (IQR) of 6 (3–18) months. Of the participants, 20–87% were preterm. The mean number of drugs per infant (range 11.1 to 1.7, pooled mean (SD) 4 (2.4)) was high with some reporting very high burden (≥30 drugs per infant in 8 studies). This was not associated with the proportion of preterm infants included. Antibiotics were the most frequently used drug. Drug use patterns were generally uniform with some variation in antibiotic use and more use of phenobarbitone in Asia. This study provides a global perspective on drug utilization in neonates and highlights the need for better quality information to assess rational prescribing.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. e89-e90
Author(s):  
J.L. Boer ◽  
E. Beers ◽  
T.C. Egberts ◽  
H.G. Leufkens ◽  
P.A. Jansen

2017 ◽  
pp. 231-244
Author(s):  
Mikhail Zhukalin ◽  
Christopher J. Williams ◽  
Michael Reed ◽  
Dale C. Strasser
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Iram Shaifali ◽  
Rajib Karmakar ◽  
Shalini Chandra ◽  
Santosh Kumar

Background: Utilization pattern of antipsychotics has undergone a major shift as the newly introduced atypical antipsychotics have heralded the market. Hence continuous studies on current prescribing trends are needed to provide most updated, effective and rational treatment of psychoses.Methods: This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India. OPD tickets of the department of psychiatry for the year 2016-2017 were evaluated for a total of 310 cases. These prescriptions were used to determine the drug utilization of antipsychotics and for their appropriateness against the WHO recommended core prescribing indicators.Results: A total of 310 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and a male predominance was seen (male:female= 1.3:1). The most common psychotic disorder diagnosed was schizophrenia (44%). Majority of the patients (76%) received monotherapy and the prescribing trend showed a higher use of atypical antipsychotics (89%) over typical ones (11%). The most commonly prescribed anti-psychotic drugs were olanzapine (31%), followed by risperidone (26%). On analysing prescriptions according to the WHO core prescribing indicators it was observed that average number of antipsychotics prescribed per prescription was 1.32. 24% of drugs were prescribed by generic name and 5.2% were administered via injectable route. Drugs prescribed from National list of Essential Medicine, 2015 constituted 46%.Conclusions: The high inclination towards the use of atypical antipsychotics observed in our study correlates with the global changing trends in the treatment of schizophrenia. WHO prescribing indicators should be adhered to, to impart rational prescribing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (172) ◽  
Author(s):  
GP Rauniyar ◽  
RK Roy ◽  
BP Das ◽  
G Bhandari ◽  
SK Bhattacharya

Objective of this prospective study was to assess the acquisition of prescribing skill of preclinicalmedical and dental undergraduate students. Prescription writing skills of 258 students of both firstand second year of MBBS and BDS students were analyzed through an objective structured practicalexamination. MBBS student of second year scored 85.01% and 92.82% respectively in physician anddrug related component whereas first year MBBS students scored 89.9% and 83.4%. BDS studentof first year scored 91.96% and 86.33% in physician and drug related components which is betterthan second year that scored 83.33% and 77.94% respectively. This study revealed that the studentsof both courses acquire prescribing skills to a limited extent during preclinical phase. Prescribingerrors were found both in physician and drug related components. To minimize the different form ofprescribing errors vigorous training in the internship period will help to minimize prescribing errorsand improve rational prescribing too.Key words: dental, examination, medical, objective, prescription, student


1978 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 21-22

Temazepam, 3-hydroxydiazepam, is one of the active metabolites of diazepam. It has recently been marketed under the names of Normison (Wyeth) and Euhypnos (Montedison). We regret the introduction of a drug under two trade names: this is a commercial practice which makes rational prescribing more difficult. Nevertheless, this drug merits careful consideration as an hypnotic.


BMJ ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 312 (7023) ◽  
pp. 76-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Mudur
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Isabel Boaventura ◽  
João Costa ◽  
Ricardo Miguel Fernandes ◽  
Joaquim Ferreira

Introduction: Clinical pharmacology educational strategies for medicine students seek to foster skills that range from technical knowledge to the development of behaviors that ensure rational prescribing decisions. The authors present the results of a study to evaluate the perceptions, attitudes and behaviors linked with rational prescribing throughout training.Material and Methods: Four focus groups were held with first, third and fifth year medical students and residents from the first years of various specialties, with a total of 29 participants. A semi-structured questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to facilitate interaction between the participants, alongside case-studies to explore the behaviors associated with therapeutic decisions.Results: The analysis of the references showcased an evolution of concepts throughout academic training. References regarding guidelines and effectiveness emerge during the third year; safety and treatment personalization emerge during the fifth year and specialist training. Efficacy studies, systematic reviews, regulatory documents and online platforms were considered the most relevant sources of information.Discussion: The literature review showcases the need to implement strategies dedicated to the development of adequate skills for rational prescribing. The use of focus groups may be a useful methodology to engage students in self-evaluation of their skills and inform faculty of the perceptions and behaviors of students.Conclusion: This analysis illustrates the awareness of students and young physicians to the need to adapt therapeutic approaches to the characteristics of the patient. These concepts should be reinforced so that young doctors feel more prepared for rational prescription in complex clinical situations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document