scholarly journals Hyperprogressive disease during nivolumab or irinotecan treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. e000488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Hiroshi Imazeki ◽  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Tumour Growth ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

BackgroundNivolumab showed a survival benefit for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, an acceleration of tumour growth during immunotherapy, (hyperprogressive disease, HPD) has been reported in various cancers. This study reviewed the HPD in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan.MethodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were patients with AGC with measurable lesions, and their tumour growth rates (TGR) during nivolumab or irinotecan were compared with those during prior therapy. HPD was defined as an increase in TGR more than twofold.Results34 and 66 patients received nivolumab and irinotecan in third or later line between June 2009 and September 2018 at our hospital; 22 patients receiving nivolumab had prior treatment with irinotecan, and one patient received irinotecan after nivolumab. Nivolumab and irinotecan showed no differences in disease control rates (38.2% and 34.8%) and in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6, p=0.802). The incidence of HPD was slightly higher after nivolumab (29.4%) than after irinotecan (13.5%) (p=0.0656), showing no differences in background between the patients with and without HPD. Compared between HPD and PD other than HPD after nivolumab, the HRs for PFS and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7; p=0.756), and 2.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8; p=0.168), but such clear difference in OS was not observed after irinotecan.ConclusionsHPD was observed more frequently after nivolumab compared with irinotecan, which was associated with a poor prognosis after nivolumab but not so clearly after irinotecan.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel alone versus weekly docetaxel plus oxaliplatin as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary response and safety results.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14570-e14570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Keon Uk Park ◽  
Hun-Mo Ryoo ◽  
Sung Hwa Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e14570 Background: Gastric cancer is a frequent malignancy with worldwide estimated incidence of 990,000 cases, representing 7.8% of all cancers in 2008. There are limited data suggesting a benefit for doublet second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: The eligibility criteria were patients 1) with prior exposure to cisplatin based chemotherapy and advanced or recurrent stomach cancer 2) with pathologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, 3) with an ECOG performance status 0 to 2, 4) with measurable lesions. Each treatment cycle was consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 in docetaxel mono therapy group and docetaxel 36 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 in docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy group on days 1, 8. The primary end point of this study was response rate, and secondary end points included toxicity, progression free and overall survival. Results: Fifty two patients were enrolled; median age was 63 years; male (n=42) and female (n=10); docetaxel mono therapy (n=27) and docetaxel/oxalliplatin doublet therapy (n=25). The median number of cycles administered was 2.5 (range,1-9). Fourty eight patients were assessable for efficacy. Four partial responses, 7 stable diseases in mono therapy group (RR; 4/27, 14.8%) and 1 complete remission, 4 partial responses, 13 stable diseases in double therapy group (RR; 5/25, 20.0%) were confirmed (p=0.198). Median progression free survival was 1.97 months in the mono therapy group and 4.93 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.007). Median overall survival was 11.57 months in the mono therapy group and 8.13 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.650). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 11 of 52 patients; G3 pain were in 2 patients and G3 pneumonia was in 1 patient in mono group, G3/4 neutropenia were 5 patients in the combination group, G3 nausea, vomiting, general weakness was 1 patient each group in combination group. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy showed superior progression free survival to monotherapy group as second line therapy in cisplatin pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients.

Salvage gastrectomy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer after combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15113-e15113
Author(s):  
Kei Hosoda ◽  
Keishi Yamashita ◽  
Shinichi Sakuramoto ◽  
Hiroaki Mieno ◽  
Katsuhiko Higuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival

e15113 Background: The prognosis for patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy alone is extremely poor. We have evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage gastrectomy following chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Methods: We evaluated 30 patients with unresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma whose lesions were down-staged by DCS chemotherapy and who underwent salvage gastrectomy with lymph node dissection from 2006 to 2012, when visible lesions were judged resectable. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records to identify factors that would influence overall survival. Results: Of the 30 patients, 17 had extra-regional lymph node metastases, 5 had liver metastases, 9 had peritoneal dissemination and 6 had pancreatic head invasion prior to DCS chemotherapy. Of the 30 patients, 23, 3, and 4 underwent R0, R1, and R2 resection, respectively. No in-hospital deaths or reoperations occurred. Pathological evaluation of primary tumors revealed grades 3, 2, 1b, 1a, and 0 tumor regression in 4, 9, 7, 7, and 2 patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 19 months.Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 45% and 65%, respectively. Of 17 patients with target tumors, 15 had partial responses, making the overall response rate 88%. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (56%); all treatment-related toxicities were resolved, and no patient died of toxicity-related causes. Univariate analysis showed that R1/2 surgery (p<0.001), diffuse type histology (p=0.054), histological grade 0/1a/1b following chemotherapy (p<0.033), ypN3 (p<0.001) and yply2/3 (p=0.003), were significantly prognostic of reduced overall survival. A multivariate proportional hazard model found that ypN3 (p=0.003) was the sole independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: Salvage gastrectomy after DCS chemotherapy was safe and effective in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Lymph node metastasis after chemotherapy was significantly prognostic of poor prognosis, suggesting the need for further treatment.

scholarly journals Identification of MATN3 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Gastric Cancer through Comprehensive TCGA and GEO Data Mining

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Pan Wang ◽  
Wei-sheng Xiao ◽  
Yue-hua Li ◽  
Xiao-ping Wu ◽  
Hong-bo Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The World ◽  
Diagnostic And Prognostic Value

Gastric cancer (GC) is still a vital malignant cancer across the world with unsatisfactory prognostic results. Matrilin-3 (MATN3) is a member of the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein family. The present research intends to explore the expression level of MATN3 in patients with GC and to explore the prognosis significance of MATN3. In this study, we observed that the MATN3 expression was remarkably upregulated in GC samples in contrast to noncancer samples. Clinical analyses unveiled that high MATN3 expression was related to age, tumor status, and clinical stages. Survival analyses unveiled that patients with high MATN3 expression displayed a poorer overall survival and progression-free survival than those with low MATN3 expression. The AUC of the relevant ROC curve for 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years of survival is 0.571, 0.596, and 0.720, separately. Multivariate assays revealed that MATN3 expression and stage were independent predictors of poor prognosis of GC patients. A meta-analysis unveiled that high MATN3 expression was tightly associated with better overall survival. Overall, our data indicated that MATN3 may have a diagnostic and prognostic value for patients with advanced gastric cancer and assist to improve clinical outcomes for GC patients.

Combined analysis of three randomized phase III trials comparing S-1 monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Madoka Takeuchi ◽  
Wataru Ichikawa ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Yu Sunakawa ◽  
Koji Oba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

49 Background: S-1 is the gold standard for first line therapy of advanced gastric cancer in Asia. There have been multiple meta-analyses published researching and comparing the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy versus combination1,2. However there has been no analysis using actual trial data. Methods: Actual data from three randomized Phase III trials were combined to compare the efficacy of S-1 Monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy. The START trial, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with docetaxel, SPIRITS, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with cisplatin and TOP-002, comparing S-1 and S-1 combination with irinotecan, were merged and combined. For this analysis, the three S-1 arms were combined (n = 642) and the different S-1 combination therapy were combined (n = 617) creating two new treatment arms. The primary efficacy outcome of overall survival, progression free survival and subset analysis of overall survival stratified by baseline characteristics were performed. Results: A total of 1248 patients, including 210 Korean patients from the START were used in the analysis. The median overall survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 382 [209, 648] and 321 [177, 597] and median progression free survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 153 [81, 267] and 122 [61, 204]. Both overall survival (p = 0.0088 HR = 0.85 (0.76,0.96)) and progression free survival ( p = < 0.001 HR = 0.75 (0.67,0.85)) was significantly longer in the combination therapy arm compared to the monotherapy arm. Conclusions:Although there are limitations, the analysis re-confirms that S-1 combination therapy shows to be more efficacious compared to S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. It must be noted that heterogeneity of the S-1 arm was not carefully considered when combining the S-1 data for the trials. In addition, the results are limited to the Asian (Japanese and Korean) population.

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in taxane, cisplatin refractory gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4551-4551
Author(s):  
S. Cho ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
W. Bae ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

4551 Background: S-1 is a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed to mimic protracted continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In previous study, S-1 demonstrated promising activity which is comparable to combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 salvage chemotherapy, in patients with taxane and cisplatin refractory gastric cancer. The primary end point was progression free survival and secondary end points were overall survival, safety and clinical benefit. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had histologically documented gastric adenocarcinoma previously treated with taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) and cisplatin; age≥18; Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; adequate organ function; no evidence of gastrointestinal obstruction or passage disturbance. S-1 treatment was performed according to BSA as followed; < BSA 1.25, 80 mg/day, 1.25 ≤ BSA < 1.5, 100 mg/day; BSA ≥ 1.5, 120 mg/day. Every dosage was delivered divided two times and administered for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of resting period. Treatment continued until progression of disease or life-threatening adverse events were occurred. Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this study and of the patients, forty-eight patients were evaluable. A total 194 chemotherapy cycles were administered and median number of cycles was three. Four (8.3%) patients had a partial response and 18 (37.5%) patients had stable disease. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.8 and 10.2 months, respectively. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 6 patients (12.5%) and there was no febrile neutropenia. Most of nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and mucositis, and there was no grade 3 or grade 4 except two patients, who developed grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea, respectively. The clinical benefit response was observed in 16 patients (33.3%). Conclusions: This results showed that S-1 monotherapy was active and safe salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with taxane and cisplatin. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Serum VEGF Per Platelet Count as a Prognosis Predicting Factor in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5467-5467
Author(s):  
Byung Soo Kim ◽  
Chul Won Choi ◽  
Seok Jin Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Control Serum ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: New blood vessel formation is a crucial step in the process of tumor growth and systemic metastasis. Recent studies have shown that VEGF expression not in tissues but in serum sample is correlated with tumor vascularity, and the high serum VEGF levels could predict poor prognosis in cancer patients. However there has been no data regarding the clinical and prognostic significance of serum VEGF levels per platelet count in advanced gastric cancer. In this study, we conducted a study to evaluate the prognostic implication of serum VEGF per platelet count in the patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 111 patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer, 35 patients with early gastric cancer were included and control serum samples were acquired from 25 healthy volunteers. The levels of VEGF were measured using human VEGF quantitative enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival comparisons were made by the log rank test in metastatic gastric cancer. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized for multivariate analyses after univariate analysis defined relevant prognostic variables. Results: The mean serum VEGF level was higher in the patients of AGC compared to those with EGC and controls (AGC 465 ± 315.8pg/ml; EGC 306 ± 97.8 pg/ml controls 230.8 ± 53.2 pg/ml, P&lt; 0.033). A trend toward a significant positive correlation between serum VEGF and platelet counts was observed in patients of AGC (r = 0.477, P = 0.000, Fig 2) and there was a significant correlation between serum VEGF levels and differentiation of tumor (p = 0.014), stage (p = 0.036). The overall survival (log rank, p =0.0432) and the progression free survival (median 4.5 vs. 8.9 months; log rank, p =0.0116) were significantly shorter in patients with high VEGF per platelet count (≥1.626 pg/106). In the multivarivate analysis, performance status (P=0.025), the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (P=0.006), serum VEGF per platelet (P=0.005) were found to be significantly associated with the short progression free survival Conclusions: This study demonstrated that serum VEGF per platelet count is correlated with short overall survival and progression free survival in advanced gastric cancer patients. Therefore, serum VEGF per platelet may be a useful marker for predicting the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document