scholarly journals Real-world clinical outcome and toxicity data and economic aspects in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy: the experience of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e000774
Author(s):  
Elena Fountzilas ◽  
Georgia-Angeliki Koliou ◽  
Athanassios Vozikis ◽  
Vassiliki Rapti ◽  
Achilleas Nikolakopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pharmaceutical Therapy ◽  
Therapy Costs ◽  
Third Line

BackgroundWe evaluated real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity data and assessed treatment-related costs in patients with advanced breast cancer who received treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi).Patients and methodsWe conducted a prospective–retrospective analysis of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who received a CDKi, in combination with endocrine therapy, at any line of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY)) perspective, assessing only costs related to direct medical care, including drug therapy costs and adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related costs.ResultsFrom July 2015 to October 2019, 365 women received endocrine therapy combined with CDKi; median age was 61 years, postmenopausal 290 (80.6%) patients. CDKi were administered as first-line treatment in 149 (40.9%) patients, second-line treatment in 96 (26.4%) and third-line treatment and beyond in 119 (32.7%) patients. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 86 (23.6%) patients, whereas 8 (2.2%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The median PFS for patients who received CDKi as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment and beyond was 18.7, 12 and 7.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival since the initiation of CDKi treatment was 29.9 months (95% CI: 23.0–not yet reached (NR)). The mean pharmaceutical therapy cost estimated per cycle was 2 724.12 € for each patient, whereas the main driver of the ADR-related costs was haematological adverse events.ConclusionsTreatment with CDKi was well tolerated, with a low drug discontinuation rate. Patients who received CDKi as first-line treatment had improved PFS and OS compared with second-line treatment and beyond. The main component of direct medical costs assessed in the cost analysis comprises CDKi pharmaceutical therapy costs.Trial registration numberNCT04133207

Chemothery (pacitaxol or irinotecan), plus apatinib and sintilimab as second-/third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16080-e16080
Author(s):  
Ting Deng ◽  
Le Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Duan ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Shaohua Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Third Line Treatment

e16080 Background: Patients with advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer have poor prognosis after progression on first-line chemotherapy. We investigated to combine second-line chemotherpy with third-line drugs, apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody in these patients. Methods: This study is a single center, exploratory study in China. Eligible patients are adults with histologically confirmed advanced gastric or GEJ adenocancinoma, who were failure of first-line or second-line chemotherapy. Subjects receive chemotherapy, pacitaxol or iritecan (investigator choice), apatinib 250mg po qd, sintilimab 200mg ivd q3w. Response was assessed every 6 weeks. (RECIST version1.1) Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: Between May 30, 2019 and November 5, 2020, a total of 26 patients were enrolled in this study, and 4 (15.4%) patients were failure of second-line chemotherapy. There were 21 males and 5 females, and the median age was 61. The total number of treatment cycles was 140 and the median number was 5.5. Among 24 patients who were evaluated, partial response (PR) was obtained in 12 cases, stable disease (SD) in 8 cases and progressive disease (PD) in 4 cases. Objective response rate was 50.0%，and disease control rate was 83.3%. The median PFS was 7.06 months (95% CI 5.52-8.60), and the median overal survival has not yet been reached. The most common adverse events (AE) were leukopenia (61.5%), anemia (57.7%), neutropenia (53.8%), proteinuria (42.3%), alopecia (42.3%), hypothyroidism (38.5%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (34.6%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (34.6%) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (34.6%), but most of them were grade 1 or 2, and the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was neutropenia (11.5%). Conclusions: Chemotherapy, plus apatinib and sintilimab demonstrated promising activity and manageable safety profile as second- even third-line treatment in advanced gastric or GEJ cancer. Demographics and baseline characteristics.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals AB0751 SAFETY AND PERSISTENCE OF USTEKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN BIOBADASER

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1672.2-1672
Author(s):  
N. Busquets-Pérez ◽  
C. Sánchez-Piedra ◽  
P. Vela-Casasempere ◽  
M. Freire-Gonzalez ◽  
C. Bohórquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
First Year ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Minimal Disease ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Third Line

Background:Ustekinumab has been efficacy and safety for psoriatic artritis in clinical trials.Objectives:To assess effectiveness, by means of drug persistence analisys, and safety of ustekinumab in patients with psoriastic arthritis in Biobadaser.Methods:BIOBADASER is the Spanish registry of biological drugs of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology and the Spanish Medicines Agency. We identified patients aged 18 years or more with psoriatic arthritis on Ustekinumab. A descriptive analysis was performed.The persistence of ustekinumab therapy was calculated with a Kaplan-Meier curve and was compared with the persistence of anti-TNF, according to line treatment. Log Rank test was used to establish a comparison. Adverse events occurring with ustekinumab are described according to year treatment.Results:One hundred and twelve patients were on ustekinumab. Most of them were on their second or third line treatment: 53.57% more than one biological therapy (BT), 19.64% second BT, 26.79% were naïve for BT. Most of them were on 45 mg dose: 88.24%. Median duration of disease at Ustekinumab initiation was 10.1 SD 7.2 years; 69.23% had peripheral arthritis; 45.24% had obesity and 39.29% were overweight; 40,6% were on prednisone and 59.82% on DMARD. The cause of discontinuation of treatment was mainly inefficacy (82.61%) and less common an adverse event (6.52%). The probability of persistence of treatment with ustekinumab was 0.83 (95% CI 0.63-0.92) at year 1, 0.79 (0.58-0.90) at year 2 and 0.79 (0.58-0.9) at year 3 when ustekinumab was prescribed as the first line treatment. The persistence decrease when ustekinumab was prescribe as a second and third treatment: being 0.53 (0.27-0.73) the first year, 0.46 (0.22-0.67) the second year and 0.46 (0.22-0.67) as a second line treatment and 0.58 (0.44-0.70) the first year, 0.33 (0.17-0.50) the second year and 0.33 (0.17-0.50) the third year as a third line treatment.The persistence was similar to anti-TNF treatment, according to line treatment. Adverse events were mainly mild (97.83%) and occurred the first year of treatment. Most of the adverse events were classified as “infections and infestations” (36.96%).Conclusion:The persistence of ustekinumab was high, being 83% at the end of the first year on treatment and 79% the second and the third year of treatment. The persistence of ustekinumab was higher when if it was the first line treatment compared as if it was used as the second o third BT option. The persistence of Ustekinumab is similar to the persistence of anti-TNF treatments in all the analyzed treatment lines (no statistically differences were found). Adverse events occurred mainly during the first year treatment. They were mainly mild adverse events and the frequency decreased within the second and third year of treatment.References:[1]Treatment with ustekinumab in a Spanish cohort of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in daily clinical practice.Almirall M, Rodriguez J, Mateo L, Carrascosa JM, Notario J, Gallardo F. Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;36(2):439-443;[2]Minimal disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with ustekinumab: results from a 24-week real-world study.Napolitano M, Costa L, Caso F, Megna M, Scarpa R, Balato N, Ayala F, Balato A. J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Oct;24(7):381-384;[3]Minimal Disease Activity and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-World Evidence Study With Ustekinumab.Queiro R, Brandy A, Rosado MC, Lorenzo A, Coto P, Carriles C, Alperi M, Ballina J. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018 Jun 28;[4]An analysis of Drug Survival, Effectiveness, and Safety in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treated With Ustekinumab: An Observational Study of 69 Patients in Routine Clinical Practice.Salgüero Fernández I, Gil MH, Sanz MS, Gullón GR;Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Eribulin Mesylate as a Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Spain: Management in the Later Line of Therapy

10.36469/9834 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-193
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tremblay ◽  
Unnati Majethia ◽  
Ilias Kontoudis ◽  
Jesús De Rosendo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Background: Two thirds (62%) of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in Western Europe have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease, for which anthracyclines and taxanes are recommended as first-line treatments, followed by microtubule-targeting agents such as capecitabine, vinorelbine and/or eribulin. The study objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of eribulin in Spain as a second-line treatment for HER2-negative MBC with its current status as a third-line treatment for patients who have received capecitabine. Methods: A Markov model was developed from the perspective of the Spanish healthcare system. The model had three health states: Stable; Progression and Death. In Stable, patients received eribulin or: capecitabine and vinorelbine for HER2-negative patients; primary treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) for post-capecitabine patients. In Progression, all patients received secondary TPC. Model inputs were overall survival, progression-free survival and costs relating to chemotherapies, grade 3/4 adverse events and healthcare utilization. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify uncertainty. Results: As second-line treatment, Eribulin was associated with a greater incremental benefit in life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than capecitabine and vinorelbine. Erubilin as third-line treatment was associated with greater benefit in life years (LYs) and QALYs than TPC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for eribulin were higher in the second-line than the third-line setting in terms of LYs (€35,149 versus €24,884) and QALYs (€37,152 versus €35,484). In both settings, deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER is most sensitive to the eribulin price. Conclusion: Eribulin is cost-effective as second-line treatment for HER2-negative MBC patients in Spain; albeit, slightly less so than as third-line treatment for MBC patients who have received capecitabine (an ICER per QALY difference of €1,668). This difference may fall within the margin of error for the model and could potentially be addressed by a minor reduction in the eribulin price.

Stent-over-sponge (SOS): a novel technique complementing endosponge therapy for foregut leaks and perforations

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Valli ◽  
Joachim Mertens ◽  
Arne Kröger ◽  
Christoph Gubler ◽  
Christian Gutschow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Vacuum Therapy ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
First Line ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background and study aims Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) has evolved as a promising option for endoscopic treatment of foregut wall injuries in addition to the classic closure techniques using clips or stents. To improve vacuum force and maintain esophageal passage, we combined endosponge treatment with a partially covered self-expandable metal stent (stent-over-sponge; SOS). Patients and methods Twelve patients with infected upper gastrointestinal wall defects were treated with the SOS technique. Results Indications for SOS were anastomotic leakage after surgery (n = 11) and chronic foregut fistula (n = 1). SOS treatment was used as a first-line treatment in seven patients with a success rate of 71.4 % (5/7) and as a second-line treatment after failed previous EVT treatment in five patients (success rate 80 %; 4/5). Overall, SOS treatment was successful in 75 % of patients (9/12). No severe adverse events occurred. Conclusion SOS is an effective method to treat severely infected foregut wall defects in patients where EVT has failed, and also as a first-line treatment. Comparative prospective studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

Aromatase Inhibitors in the Treatment and Prevention of Breast Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 881-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Goss ◽  
Kathrin Strasser
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Third

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current clinical status and possible future applications of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer. METHODS: A review of the literature on the third-generation aromatase inhibitors was conducted. Some data that have been presented but not published are included. In addition, the designs of ongoing trials with aromatase inhibitors are outlined and the implications of possible results discussed. RESULTS: All of the third-generation oral aromatase inhibitors—letrozole, anastrozole, and vorozole (nonsteroidal, type II) and exemestane (steroidal, type I)—have now been tested in phase III trials as second-line treatment of postmenopausal hormone-dependent breast cancer. They have shown clear superiority compared with the conventional therapies and are therefore considered established second-line hormonal agents. Currently, they are being tested as first-line therapy in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. Preliminary results suggest that the inhibitors might displace tamoxifen as first-line treatment, but further studies are needed to determine this. CONCLUSION: The role of aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal breast cancer and in combination with chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments are areas of future exploration. The ongoing adjuvant trials will provide important data on the long-term safety of aromatase inhibitors, which will help to determine their suitability for use as chemopreventives in healthy women at risk of developing breast cancer.

Economic evaluation of crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and brigatininb in anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line treatment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21104-e21104
Author(s):  
Nimer S. Alkhatib ◽  
Briana Choi ◽  
Hala Halawah ◽  
Matthias Calamia ◽  
Dexter Gulick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Reference Drug ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Life Years

e21104 Background: Crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and brigatinib are approved as second line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC. Crizotinib was the first ALK inhibitor for first line therapy approved by Food and Drug Administration (2011) then ceritinib (2014), alectinib (2015), and brigatinib (2017) were approved as second line drugs. Following more data, these agents were approved as the first line therapy (2017 for ceritinib and alectinib; 2020 for brigatinib). These remain as a treatment option in patients who fail the first line therapy. Cost-effectiveness/utility analyses were conducted to assess clinical efficacy with varying costs of the agents. Methods: A three state Markov model were assumed (progression free, progression and death). Progression free survival (PFS) curves were digitized and fitted with exponential function. US payer perspective, a lifetime horizon, and discount rate of 3% were applied. Drug costs were Redbook wholesale acquisition cost. Other costs included were monitoring, adverse events and disease progression from published data (US$ 2020). Adverse events reported >5% in patients were included. Measured outcomes were PFS life years (PFSLY) and quality adjusted life years (PFSQALY). Crizotinib was the reference drug. Incremental cost-effectiveness and utility ratios (ICER/ICUR) of PFSLY and PFSQALY gained (PFSLYG, PFSQALYG) and lost were estimated. Base case (BCA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: Crizotinib was the reference drug for the following outcomes. For alectinib, with the decremental cost of -$14,653 (-$14,712), the incremental PFSLY of 0.16 (0.16) and PFSQALY of 0.05 (0.05) resulted in an ICER / PFSLYG of -$89,337 (-$88,604) and an ICUR / PFSQALYG of -$269,835 (-$266,510). For brigatinib, with the decremental cost of -$14,975 (-$14,954), the incremental PFSLY of 0.01 (0.01) and PFSQALY of ̃0.01 (0.02) yielded an ICER / PFSLYG of -$1,982,962 (-$1,431,631) and an ICUR / PFSQALYG of -$2,140,534 (-$570,538). For ceritinib, with the incremental cost of $7,590 ($7,514), there were decremental PFSLY of -0.01 (-0.01) and PFSQALY of -0.03 (-0.03). Conclusions: As second line treatment, crizotinib, ceritinib, and brigatinib had comparable PFSLYs and PFSQALYs while alectinib had the most PFSLY and PFSQALY and the lowest cost. Therefore, alectinib is the most cost-effective treatment for treating ALK+ NSCLC as the second line therapy.[Table: see text]

Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
B L Weber ◽  
C Vogel ◽  
S Jones ◽  
H Harvey ◽  
L Hutchins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE We evaluated single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as first- and second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in patients who were not resistant to anthracyclines. Objective tumor response (TR) and toxicity were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 107 women were enrolled onto this multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase II study. Patients were stratified into first- and second-line treatment groups, based on prior treatment history. Vinorelbine was initially given at 30 mg/m2/wk, with dose modification for toxicity as indicated. Therapy was continued until disease progression or severe toxicity mandated withdrawal or until the patient asked to be removed from the study. RESULTS The objective response rate for all patients was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 44%): 35% (95% CI, 23% to 48%) for first-line patients and 32% (95% CI, 20% to 47%) for second-line patients. Nine first-line and three second-line patients obtained a complete response (CR). The median duration of objective response was 34 weeks in both groups. The overall survival durations of first- and second-line patients were 67 weeks and 62 weeks, respectively. Granulocytopenia was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients died on study as a result of granulocytopenic sepsis. CONCLUSION Single-agent vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated agent for first- and second-line therapy of ABC. The results of this study confirm the findings of similar international trials and suggest vinorelbine should be considered a valid treatment option for patients with ABC and a potential component in future combination regimens for this disease.

Duration of second-line T-DM1 therapy: Is it associated with duration of first-line anti-Her2 therapy in metastatic HER2 + breast cancer?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12512-e12512
Author(s):  
Daniela Katz ◽  
Ilan Feldhamer ◽  
Sari Greenberg-Dotan ◽  
Ariel Hammerman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Adjuvant Trastuzumab ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Line Standard

e12512 Background: Tumors with HER2 overexpression usually respond to HER2-targeted therapies. Since the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA trials, a taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TTP) are the first-line standard for the management of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) is the second-line standard. Intrinsic subtypes existing within HER2+ tumors may impact the degree of a patient’s response to anti HER2 therapy; however HER2 subtyping for predicting response is still experimental and not in routine clinical use. In this retrospective population-based study, we aimed to assess whether duration of treatment (DOT) of second-line TDM1 is associated with the DOT of first-line TTP, and might serve as a hint for a HER2 subtype. Methods: Clalit Health Services (CHS) manages health care of 52% of the Israeli population. We identified 113 HER2+ CHS MBC patients, treated with TTP as first-line treatment that initiated TDM1 as second-line, until Dec. 31, 2016. Patient's (pts) demography, HER2 and HR status were recorded. A Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by HR status, adjusted for age and prior adjuvant trastuzumab, was used to explore the association between second-line and first-line DOT in HR positive and negative pts. Results: Pts baseline characteristics and DOT in first- and second-line treatment are presented in the table. A statistically significant association between DOT of both treatment lines was found in HR positive pts with a trend also in HR negative pts. Conclusions: The observed association between first- and second-line DOT, unrelated to hormonal status, may result from a primary characteristic of the intrinsic tumor subtype, that impacts acquired resistance. Longer observations in larger patient cohorts are required to confirm this observation. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document