Combination therapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pfisterer ◽  
I. Vergote ◽  
A. Du Bois ◽  
E. Eisenhauer
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Abdominal Symptoms ◽  
Global Quality Of Life

Many patients with advanced ovarian cancer will develop recurrent disease. For those patients who have recurrence of disease at least 6 months after initial therapy, the paclitaxel–platinum combination has been shown to be a superior treatment to platinum monotherapy. However, many patients develop clinically relevant neurotoxicity, frequently resulting in treatment discontinuation. The efficacy and safety of an alternative regimen that does not show significant neurotoxicity were evaluated by comparing gemcitabine–carboplatin with carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients in a Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group. Participants with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine–carboplatin or carboplatin every 21 days. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. From September 1999 to April 2002, 356 patients (178 participants received gemcitabine–carboplatin, 178 received carboplatin only) were randomized to treatment. Patients received six cycles of either gemcitabine–carboplatin or carboplatin. With a median follow-up of 17 months, median PFS was 8.6 months for gemcitabine–carboplatin (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9–9.7 months) and 5.8 months for carboplatin (95% CI 5.2–7.1 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI 0.58–0.90; P = 0.0032]). The response rate for the gemcitabine–carboplatin group was 47.2% (95% CI 39.9–54.5%) and 30.9% for carboplatin group (95% CI 24.1–37.7%; P = 0.0016). The HR for overall survival was 0.96 (95% CI 0.75–1.23; P = 0.7349). Patients treated with gemcitabine–carboplatin reported significantly faster palliation of abdominal symptoms and a significantly improved global quality of life. Gemcitabine–carboplatin treatment significantly improves the PFS of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Compared With Carboplatin in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Intergroup Trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (29) ◽  
pp. 4699-4707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobus Pfisterer ◽  
Marie Plante ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Hal Hirte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

Purpose Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrent disease. For those patients who recur at least 6 months after initial therapy, paclitaxel platinum has shown a modest survival advantage over platinum without paclitaxel; however, many patients develop clinically relevant neurotoxicity, frequently resulting in treatment discontinuation. Thus, an alternative regimen without significant neurotoxicity was evaluated by comparing gemcitabine plus carboplatin with single-agent carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Methods Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone, every 21 days. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS). Results Three hundred fifty-six patients (178 gemcitabine plus carboplatin; 178 carboplatin) were randomly assigned. Patients received a median of six cycles in both arms. With a median follow-up of 17 months, median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.9 to 9.7 months) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.1 months) for carboplatin. The hazard ration (HR) for PFS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; P = .0031). Response rate was 47.2% (95% CI, 39.9% to 54.5%) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 30.9% (95% CI, 24.1% to 37.7%) for carboplatin (P = .0016). The HR for overall survival was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75 to1.23; P = .7349). While myelosuppression was significantly more common in the combination, sequelae such as febrile neutropenia or infections were uncommon. No statistically significant differences in quality of life scores between arms were noted. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus carboplatin significantly improves PFS and response rate without worsening quality of life for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals Real-World Experience of Olaparib Maintenance in High-Grade Serous Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation: A Korean Multicenter Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paik ◽  
Lee ◽  
Lee ◽  
Shin ◽  
Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Brca1 Mutation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

Background: Olaparib maintenance therapy has shown efficacy and tolerability in patients with platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous recurrent ovarian cancer (HSROC) with BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm). Our aim was to present real-world experience with olaparib in Korea. Method: We included HSROC patients with BRCAm treated with olaparib maintenance at four institutions in Korea between 2016 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for clinico-pathologic characteristics, objective response, survival outcomes, and safety. Results: One hundred HSROC patients with BRCAm were included. BRCA1 mutation was present in 71 patients (71.0%), and BRCA2 mutation was present in 23 patients (23.0%). In terms of the best objective response with olaparib maintenance in 53 patients with partial remission from most recent chemotherapy, complete remission occurred in 12 (22.6%) and partial remission in four (7.5%), while 33 patients (62.3%) had stable disease. The 24 month progression-free survival was 42.4%, and 24 month overall survival was 82.1%. Grade 3 or more adverse events were as follows: anemia in 14 patients (14.0%), neutropenia in seven patients (7.0%), thrombocytopenia in two patients (2.0%), oral mucositis in one patient (1.0%), and soft tissue infection in one patient (1.0%). Conclusions: The safety and effectiveness of olaparib maintenance treatment in a real-world study were consistent with those reported in previous clinical trials.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 585-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezzeldin M Ibrahim ◽  
Ahmed A Refae ◽  
Ali M Bayer ◽  
Emad R Sagr
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Polymerase Inhibitors

Aim: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) improved progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of PARPIs as maintenance strategy for newly diagnosed patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer with or without mutations. Materials & methods: Using defined selection criteria, a literature search identified four eligible randomized clinical trials involving 2386 patients. Results: Compared with placebo maintenance, PARPIs achieved a 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death as compared with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39–0.73; p < 0.0001). That benefit was shown in all clinical subgroups: among those with BRCA mutation, with negative/unknown BRCA mutation, and in those with homologous recombination deficient tumors. Data about the effect on overall survival are still premature. Conclusion: In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, PARPIs maintenance after standard therapy achieved a significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared with placebo, overall and in all subgroups.

Trabectedin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (19) ◽  
pp. 3107-3114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Monk ◽  
Thomas J. Herzog ◽  
Stanley B. Kaye ◽  
Carolyn N. Krasner ◽  
Jan B. Vermorken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

PurposeThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with that of PLD alone in women with recurrent ovarian cancer after failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsWomen ≥ 18 years, stratified by performance status (0 to 1 v 2) and platinum sensitivity, were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of PLD 30 mg/m2followed by a 3-hour infusion of trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2every 3 weeks or PLD 50 mg/m2every 4 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology assessment.ResultsPatients (N = 672) were randomly assigned to trabectedin/PLD (n = 337) or PLD (n = 335). Median PFS was 7.3 months with trabectedin/PLD v 5.8 months with PLD (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.96; P = .0190). For platinum-sensitive patients, median PFS was 9.2 months v 7.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95; P = .0170). Overall response rate (ORR) was 27.6% for trabectedin/PLD v 18.8% for PLD (P = .0080); for platinum-sensitive patients, it was 35.3% v 22.6% (P = .0042), respectively. ORR, PFS, and overall survival among platinum-resistant patients were not statistically different. Neutropenia was more common with trabectedin/PLD. Grade 3 to 4 transaminase elevations were also more common with the combination but were transient and noncumulative. Hand-foot syndrome and mucositis were less frequent with trabectedin/PLD than with PLD alone.ConclusionWhen combined with PLD, trabectedin improves PFS and ORR over PLD alone with acceptable tolerance in the second-line treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Topotecan (T) and carboplatin (C) in the treatment of platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC): Results of a multicenter phase I/II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5089-5089
Author(s):  
D. Koensgen ◽  
A. Belau ◽  
P. Klare ◽  
T. Steck ◽  
O. Camara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Primary Standard ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Grade 3

5089 Background: Despite of the effectiveness of radical surgery and first-line chemotherapy, most patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse. Paclitaxel (P) in combination with C as second-line treatment improves the outcome of pts with platinum-sensitive ROC in comparison to C monotherapy. Due to polyneuropathy and alopecia this regimen can not be offered to all pts. Therefore, other platinum-combinations are required. We conducted a phase I/II study to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and the tolerability of combination therapy with T and C. Methods: Pts with platinum-sensitive ROC and primary standard therapy were stratified according to treatment-free interval (TFI): 6–12 months (A) and ≥12 months (B). Following dose regimens were analysed: T 1mg/m2/d1–3 + C AUC5/d3 and T 0.75 mg/m2/d1–3 + C AUC5/d3, q21d. DLT was based on the first 4 courses and defined as: CTC grade 3/4 hematological and grade 2 non-hematological toxicity (excepted alopecia, vomiting), treatment delay >7d. Primary endpoints were DLT and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were remission rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From 06/04 to 08/05, 28 pts were enrolled, 26 pts (A:13 pts, B:13 pts) were eligible. Median age was 61.5 years. A total of 141 cycles were analysed, median number of cycles was 6 (range A:2–8, B:1–10). DLTs were: leucopenia (n = 5) and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). MTD was reached at dose: T: 0.75mg/m2 and C: AUC5. Overall, grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (in% of all cycles), for (A) and (B) respectively, were: anemia 4% vs. 4%, leucopenia 34% vs. 13%, neutropenia 30% vs. 31%, thrombocytopenia 7% vs. 6%. Febrile neutropenia 4.3% vs. 0%. Darbepoetin alfa was given in 13.5% of all cycles. Overall, grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were infrequent (< 5%). Overall RR (95% CI) was 50% (29.7–70.1) [A: 30.8% (0.1–61.1), B: 69.3% (38.7–90.9)]. Median follow-up was 5.8 mo, median PFS (95% CI) was 7.7 mo (1.3–9.4) [A: 6.2 (1.3–7.2), B: 8.0 (7.3–9.4)]. Median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: TC is a feasible and effective chemotherapy regimen for platinum sensitive ROC. Tolerability is not associated to TFI. The recommended dose for subsequent studies is T:0.75 and C:AUC5. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

New biomarkers to predict platinum resistance in ovarian cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17085-e17085
Author(s):  
Oana Trifanescu ◽  
Laurentia Minea Gales ◽  
Maria Iuliana Gruia ◽  
Bianca Andreea Gusoiu ◽  
Florina Torliceanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Salts ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

e17085 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and is characterized by the highest mortality of all gynecological cancers. Despite of initial response, platinum resistance develops and contributes to the poor outcome of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients. The aim of the study was to identify biomarkers helpful in predicting treatment response to platinum salts. Methods: Forty eight patients with advanced ovarian (stage II, III and IV) cancer were prospectively enrolled between 2014 and 2017. All patients underwent surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Serum reactive oxygen species parameters such as malondialdehyde, ceruloplasmine, and serum VEGF were measured before each cycle of chemotherapy. Results: Mean age at diagnostic was 51.3 +/- 8.1 years, (range 42 - 78). Median follow up was 39 months (range 12-56). Twenty tree percent were platinum resistance. Median progression free survival was 22 months and estimated median overall survival was 84 months, 77% of patients being alive at 3 years. VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients with platinum resistance disease (1210 pg/ml) compare to platinum sensitive (mean VEGF levels 945pg/ml, p = 0.0003). We used a ROC curve to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of VEGF as a predictor to platinum response and find out that the aria under the curve (AUC) was 0.874, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.734-1 and cut-off value (80% sensibility, 80% specificity) was 1085pg/ml. Malondialdehyde levels were statistically significant higher in patients with platinum resistance disease (mean value 11.1 μmol/100 ml vs. 7.4 μmol/100 ml in platinum sensitive, p = 0.02. The ROC curve for malondialdehyde identify an aria under the curve of 0.818, p = 0.0001 and CI 95% (0.744-0.893) and a cut-off value of 7.74 μmol/100 ml to estimate with 81.3% sensitivity and 64% specificity platinum response validating this bio markers as predicting platinum response. For Ceruloplasmine AUC was 0.706, p = 0.0001, 95% CI (0.617,-0.796). Conclusions: Malondialdehyde, ceruloplasmine and VEGF can estimate with precision the resistance to platinum salts in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3176-3182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Dirk Stengel ◽  
Guelten Oskay-Oezcelik ◽  
Alain G. Zeimet ◽  
Harald Sommer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Refractory

PurposeThe management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine.Patients and MethodsWomen with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m2/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m2plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2on day 1 and 600 mg/m2on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire).ResultsThe trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (± 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank P = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank P = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 v 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia.ConclusionNonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document